3 research outputs found
Herpes zoster - is there a need for new treatment recommendations?
No full textBackground/Aim. The reactivation of the varicella zoster virus results in herpes zoster. Acyclovir is currently recommended over 7 to 10 days for herpes zoster treatment and should be started within 72 hours of rash eruption. This study analyses whether a therapy delay and/or shorter courses of treatment are associated with adverse outcomes. Methods. We identified 292 patients treated at the Clinic for Infectious and Tropical Diseases in Belgrade for herpes zoster in a five-years period. The data on these patients were analyzed using the descriptive statistics, the ?2 test, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the multiple logistic regression analysis. Results. The average time from rash eruption to the first dose of acyclovir was 4.07 ? 2.64 days. The patients received acyclovir for 6.83 ? 2.45 days. Seventy-one patients had disseminated herpes zoster, 100 had cranial nerve involvement, 86 had complications other than postherpetic neuralgia and one patient died. In cases where therapy was delayed there was no significant association with complications (?2 = 0.031; p = 0.86). Our logistic regression model was not able to predict who was treated less than 7 days. An association between the HZ complications and abbreviated acyclovir regimens was not demonstrated (?2 = 1.109; p = 0.326). We conducted the PubMed search on February 1st, 2017 and found no proof for the need to apply at least 7 days of acyclovir therapy for herpes zoster in the studies that have been published so far. Conclusion. We were unable to prove an association between therapy delay and unfavorable outcomes. The same was true for shorter than recommended acyclovir courses.</jats:p
Early and Late Mortality Predictors in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection Type B
No full textBackground/Aim. Despite technological advances in diagnosis and treatment, in-hospital mortality with acute aortic dissection type B is still about 11%. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for early and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection type B treated medically or with conventional open surgery. Methods. The present study included 104 consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection type B treated in our Center from January 1st, 1998 to January 1st, 2007. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics as well as in-hospital complications were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate testing was performed to identify the predictors of in-hospital (30-day) and late (within 9 years) mortality. Results. 92 (88.5%) patients were treated medically, while 12 (11.5%) patients with complicated acute aortic dissection type B were treated by open surgical repair. In-hospital complications occurred in 35.7% patients, the most often being acute renal failure (28%), hypotension/shock (24%), mesenteric ischemia (12%), and limb ischemia (8%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 15.7% and the 9-year mortality rate was 51.9%. Independent predictors of early mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type B were uncontrolled hypertension (HR-20.69) and a dissecting aorta diameter >4.75 cm (HR-6.30). Independent predictors of late mortality were relapsing pain (HR-7.93), uncontrolled hypertension (HR-7.25), and a pathologic difference in arterial blood pressure (>20 mmHg) (HR-5.33). Conclusion. Knowledge of key risk factors may help with a better choice of treatment and mortality reduction in acute aortic dissection type B patients
