191,014 research outputs found
Random walk over a hypersphere
No full textIn a recent paper the author had shown that a special case of S. M. Joshi
transform (so named after the author's reverent father) of distributions
(Sba f)(x)=〈f(y), lFl(a0;b0;ixy) lFl(a;b;−2ixy)〉
is a characteristic function of a spherical distribution. Using the methods developed in that paper; the problem of distribution of the distance CD, where C and D are points niformly distributed in a hypersphere, has been discussed in the present paper. The form of characteristic function has also been obtained by the method of projected distribution.
A generalization of Hammersley's result has also been developed. The main purpose of the paper is to show that although the use of characteristic functions, using the method of Bochner, is available in problems of random walk yet distributional S. M. Joshi transform can be used as a natural tool has been proved for the first time in the paper
FIGURE 5 in A new species of Cephalaeschna Selys, 1883 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) from Neora Valley National Park, West Bengal, India, with notes on C. acanthifrons Joshi & Kunte, 2017 and C. viridifrons (Fraser, 1922)
No full textFIGURE 5: A. Cephalaeschna acanthifrons holotype from Arunachal Pradesh, thorax [Photo by Subhajit Mazumder]; B. Cephalaeschna viridifrons from Neora Valley National Park, West Bengal, India [Photo by the author]; C. C. acanthifrons, face [Photo by Subhajit Mazumder]; D. C. viridifrons from Neora Valley National Park, face [Photo by the author]; E. C. viridifrons from Neora Valley National Park, abdomen dorsal view [Photo by the author]; F. C. acanthifrons holotype, anal appendages [Photo by Shantanu Joshi, NCBS]; G. C. viridifrons from Assam, anal appendages (reproduced from Asahina 1981a); H. C. viridifrons from Nepal, anal appendages (reproduced from Asahina 1981a); I. C. viridifrons from Neora Valley National Park, anal appendages [Photo by the author].Published as part of Dawn, Prosenjit, 2021, A new species of Cephalaeschna Selys, 1883 (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) from Neora Valley National Park, West Bengal, India, with notes on C. acanthifrons Joshi & Kunte, 2017 and C. viridifrons (Fraser, 1922), pp. 371-380 in Zootaxa 4949 (2) on page 378, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4949.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/463619
Digitipes periyarensis Joshi & Edgecombe, 2013, n. sp.
No full textDigitipes periyarensis n. sp. (Figs 57–67) Digitipes putative species 4. Joshi and Karanth, 2012: figs 2, 3. Type specimens. Holotype CES 091037, female, from Periyar, Kerala, India, 9 ° 58402 N 77 ° 34902 E, leg. J. Joshi, ix. 2009. Paratype CES 091038, female, from type locality, same collection details. Etymology. For the Periyar region. Diagnosis. Cephalic plate slightly longer than wide. Basal three antennal articles glabrous dorsally. Forcipular tooth plates longer than wide. Paramedian sutures nearly complete on most sternites. All legs lacking tarsal, tibial and femoral spurs. Femur of ultimate leg with pair of longitudinal grooves on dorsal surface, the more medial of them contiguous with a longitudinal groove on the prefemur and tibia; tarsus of ultimate legs markedly more slender than short, robust tibia and femur. Coxopleural process short; pores relatively sparse. Description. Length to 58 mm. 17 antennal articles; basal three articles glabrous dorsally, two glabrous ventrally. Anterior longitudinal median furrow at most ca 20 % length of cephalic plate, considerably shorter in holotype (Fig. 57). Cephalic plate and T 1 orange; anterior tergites mixed blue and yellow-brown; tergites in posterior half of trunk mostly light brown with blue margins; antennae and legs 1–20 pale yellow apart from pale blue tarsi on leg 20. Forcipular coxosternal tooth plates longer than wide, markedly so in holotype (Figs 58, 59); four main teeth, not arranged in groups, the outer tooth smaller than the inner three; base of tooth plates defined by relative acute oblique sutures diverging at 105 °– 125 °. Trochanteroprefemoral process with indistinctly defined teeth along inner margin. Second maxillary claw with slender accessory spurs. Article 2 of telopodite bearing a slender spine distally. Tergites with paramedian sutures complete from TT 4 or 5, short suture confined to anterior edge of TT 2–3. Tergites marginate from 5 or 6. Tergites smooth, lacking median ridge or keels (Fig. 66) apart from weak, incomplete median keel on tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment; lateral part of posterior tergites with low, irregularly anastomosing ridges. Sternites with paramedian sutures nearly complete in most segments, especially in anterior part of trunk, those in posterior few segments ca 80 % length of sternite. Tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with lateral margins gently converging posteriorly, posterolateral margins mostly straight, converging to a broad, evenly rounded posteromedial margin (Fig. 61). Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with sides converging posteriorly, posterior margin gently concave (Fig. 62). Coxopleural process short, barely inflected from posterolateral margin of coxopleuron in ventral view (Fig. 62), with two apical spines, lacking lateral spine(s). Pore field terminating strongly beneath dorsal margin of coxopleuron (Fig. 60); pores relative sparse; non-porose area on coxopleural process short. Ultimate leg prefemur with width at distal end nearly 40 % its length, of nearly equal width along its length (Fig. 64). Prefemoral spines robust, with a short, curved apex (Fig. 63): VL 3, VM 2 (3), DM 2. Femur with width at its distal end 40–50 % its length (Fig. 64). Dorsal, medial and lateral surfaces of prefemur and femur rugose, with large, shallow pits; similar pits adjacent to longitudinal groove on dorsomedial side of tibia (Fig. 65). Ultimate leg tarsus 1 2.5 times length of tarsus 2; tarsus 1 2–3.3 times longer than pretarsus; pretarsus with pair of short accessory claws. Discussion. This species is the most morphologically distinct among Indian Digitipes, readily identified by its complete absence of tarsal spurs, the long paramedian sutures on the sternites (nearly complete versus not more than 35 % the length of the sternites in other Indian Digitipes), and by the robust, dorsally-grooved prefemur, femur and tibia of the ultimate legs. Complete paramedian sutures on the sternites are known elsewhere in Digitipes in the type species, D. verdascens Attems. The two known specimens are both females so no data are at hand with respect to the condition of the femoral process in males. Despite its distinctive character states, its membership in Digitipes is indicated by the support at the nodes in the phylogeny that unite it with Group A of Joshi and Karanth (2012) (posterior probability 0.94 for it grouping with D. coonoorensis and D. indicus) and that clade as a whole grouping with Groups B and C (posterior probability 1, bootstrap support 100 %).Published as part of Joshi, Jahnavi & Edgecombe, Gregory D., 2013, Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity, pp. 99-145 in Zootaxa 3626 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/21862
Planaeschna poumai Joshi & Kunte 2017, sp. nov.
No full textPlanaeschna poumai sp. nov. (Figs. 3–4) Holotype. ♂ (NCBS-AV 557), collected on the Senapati-Purul road near TNK village, Senapati District, Manipur, India (25.3756N, 94.2318E), 11.X.2016, Shantanu Joshi leg. Paratype. ♂ (NCBS-AV 585) and allotype ♀ (NCBS-AV 568): upstream from Mayangkhang village, Senapati District, Manipur, India (25.2304N, 94.0066E), 14.X.2016, Shantanu Joshi leg. Etymology. This species is named after the Poumai tribe, one of the larger extant Naga tribes in NE India, which predominantly inhabits the Senapati District of Manipur where the specimens were collected. There are no protected areas in this whole district, which makes community forests critical for biodiversity conservation. Description of the holotype. Head (Fig. 3 e). Labrum, labium, anteclypeus, postclypeus and frons yellow; mandibles brown; postclypeus with two faint brown markings; the crest of the frons and vertex black. Eyes dark green, in live specimens with blue in the center; postgenae marked yellow. Thorax (Fig. 3 d,f). Prothorax black, anterior edge of the mesostigmal plate yellow; propimeron greenish yellow. Synthorax with mesokatepisternum and metakatepisternum marked with yellow; dorsal stripes on mesepisternum green, pointing outwards, faintly yellow at the antealar ridge; mesepimeron marked with a greenish yellow stripe, thinner towards the subalar ridge; a triangular spot below subalar ridge on the mesepimeron and a small spot above the subalar ridge; metepimeron almost entirely yellow; both the mesepimeronic and metepimeronic stripes appear darker green towards the dorsal 1/3rd of its length in live specimens. Legs black; coxae and base of the femur marked with reddish brown; femur of the forelegs marked with yellow on the inside about half its length. Wings. Hyaline; triangle 3-celled (2 in left hw); anal loop 6/7-celled; anal triangle 3-celled; antenodals: 19/ 20 in the fw (a short incomplete nervure present on the left fw between the 2nd and 3rd nervures), 14 in the hw; venation denser towards the apices. Abdomen (Fig. 3 a,d,f). Marked with citron-yellow and green; S1 laterally marked with triangular spot pointing anteriorly, dorsal carina with a yellow stripe; S2 dorsally with a yellow stripe disconnected at the transverse carina; PD edge with a horizontal yellow stripe, laterally with bright yellow AL and PL markings separated by the auricle, the AL marking continuing on the lateral side of the auricle; the auricle posteriorly dark brown; S3–S7 with paired MD spots situated anteriorly about 2/3rd the length of each segment; S3–S7 also with AD and PD yellow stripes on the dorsal carina, reaching the MD spots on S3 and S4; the AD marking reduced on S5–S7, more pronounced and broader on S3; S3–S8 with paired anterio-ventral round yellow spots, these spots continuing dorsally connect to the small ML spots on S3–S7 and the base of the supplementary transverse carina; the ventral spots perfectly rounded on S8; S8 and S10 with paired round black ‘depressions’ dorsally, S9 and S10 black. Anal appendages (Fig. 4 a,b,d). Cerci black; paraprocts black, the central groove and ventral area dark yellow. Cerci twice the length of S10, paraprocts about half the length of cerci. Laterally both cerci and the paraprocts are curved upwards, the cerci are broader and curved slightly more upwards caudal 3/5th of its length, pointed at the apex. The apical 2/5th is spatulate divided in the middle by a lateral ridge. Laterally, the base is thinner and the dorsal half is concave. Paraprocts gently curved upwards, the tip conical, pointing upwards. Dorsally, the anterior cerci are thinner, the outer margin is straight for 1/10th the length of cerci, curved inwards thereafter; the apical spine of the cerci is pointed outwards, sharply pointed. Paraprocts triangular, blunt at the apex. Measurements (mm): abdomen (including anal appendages)=38.6, fw=33.9, hw=34.8. Variation in the paratype (Anal appendages: Fig. 4 d). Paratype male is very similar to the holotype. The PD markings on S2 edge without a thin yellow stripe like on the holotype. Triangle 3 or 4 (right hw) celled, anal triangle 3-celled, anal loop 5-celled. Antenodals: 16/ 17 in the fw, 14/ 16 in the hw. Measurements (mm): abdomen (including anal appendages)=38.5, fw=33.2, hw=33.7. Description of the allotype (Fig. 3 b–c, 4c). The specimen was accidentally decapitated while netting, and the head was lost in the stream beneath, hence the head is not described. Thorax (Fig. 3 c). Prothorax dark brown; the apex of the posterior lobe and the middle lobe black. Synthoracic markings very similar to the male; vibrant yellow-green. The propimeron, mesokatepisternum and metakatepisternum bright yellow; the paired dorsal stripes on the mesepisternum curving slightly outwards at the anterior end; antealar edge marked with faint yellow spots; the mesepimeronic stripe broad and slightly angulated, thinner at the dorsal end with a triangular spot right next to it near the subalar edge; another spot directly above the triangular spot above the subalar ridge; metepimeron marked almost entirely with bright yellowish green, ventral margin thinly brown; the mesepimeronic and metepimeronic markings appear more bright yellow towards the ventral half similar to the male. Legs black; coxae marked yellow posteriorly; basal half of the femur marked yellow posteriorly on the forelegs. Wings. Antenodals: 13–14 in the hw, 19 in the fw. Base of the wings tinted yellow and the area near the node faintly yellow. Median space not traversed by any cross-veins. The triangle is made up of four cells in the hw and three cells in the fw. Pterostigma dark brown, spanning a little more than 2 cells. Abdomen (Fig. 3 b,c). S1 laterally marked with a broad yellow stripe, broader posteriorly; dorsally marked with a thin yellow line; S2 yellow laterally, small, brown, rounded marking on both sides resembling the markings in the area posterior to the auricle of males; a dorsal yellow stripe on S2, S3–S7 with yellow ventro-lateral anterior spots, PL longitudinal spots on S3–S5; S3–S7 with thin yellow AD and PD stripes on the carina disconnected at the center where paired triangular MD spots are present, smaller than the male; S8 marked yellow at the posteriordorsal edge; S8, S9 and S10 black, lower half is dark yellow continuing on to the vulvar scale. Ovipositor (Fig. 4 c). Covered with dry mud suggesting that the female had oviposited or attempted to so in muddy waters. The sternite and ovipositor dark-brown; ovipositor and style extend posteriorly till the base of cerci; cerci about the length of S10, pointed at the apex. Measurements (mm): abdomen (including anal appendages)=47, fw=40, hw=42. Diagnosis. The shape of male anal appendages and the abdominal pattern is similar to P. intersedens (Martin, 1909), the only Indian species of this genus. P. poumai differs with respect to the following diagnostic characters: (a) in both sexes the abdominal pattern differs from P. intersedens in that the paired MD spots on S2 are not present, S9 and S10 unmarked with yellow dorsally, and the PD abdominal spots absent or reduced on S3– S10; (b) the lateral ridge divides the apex of cerci in equal proportions, whereas in P. intersedens the portion below the ridge is more expanded; (c) the posterior half of cerci is not as widely expanded as that in P. intersedens; (d) the apical expansion of cerci laterally angled straight, not curved upwards like P. intersedens; and (e) in both sexes of P. intersedens S2 is laterally yellow; but in P. poumai sp. nov. the lateral yellow markings on S2 of both males is broken posterior to the auricle; this lateral yellow stripe in the female is marked with a round brown spot. The reduced abdominal markings distinguish this species from all other Planaeschna species.Published as part of Joshi, Shantanu & Kunte, Krushnamegh, 2017, Two new dragonfly species (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) from north-eastern India, pp. 259-268 in Zootaxa 4300 (2) on pages 263-266, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4300.2.7, http://zenodo.org/record/83826
Dictamen jurídic del Màster d'Advocacia. Dret penal: delictes contra la propietat. Cas 10 C
No full textTreballs Finals del Màster d'Advocacia, Facultat de Dret, Universitat de Barcelona, Curs: 2019-2020, Tutor: Joshi Jubert, Ujal
Kōdōkan jūdō’s inauspicious ninth kata: the Joshi goshinhō: 'Self-defense methods for women': part 1
No full textBackground and study aim: The purpose of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive and critical review of Joshi goshinhō (“Self-defense methods for Women”), the now reclusive ‘ninth’ kata of Kōdōkan jūdō, once part of the standard women’s jūdō curriculum in Japan.
Material and methods: To achieve this, we offer a careful critical analysis of the available literature and rare source material on this kata.
Results: Recent overviews of Kōdōkan kata frequently omit Joshi goshinhō. This shift seems to have occurred since the 1990s despite no statement of obsoletion or removal from the Kōdōkan teaching curriculum being known. The creation of Joshi goshinhō was ordered by Nangō Jirō, a nephew of Kanō who led the Kōdōkan after Kanō Jigorō’s death in 1938. Joshi goshinhō was completed in 1943 and is usually attributed to a team of eight to ten people..
Conclusions: Joshi goshinhō is still an official kata of Kōdōkan despite it being often omitted from recent kata listings. A variety of factors such as lack of experience and hierarchical position raise doubts about the extent of contribution of some individuals most commonly associated with the creation of Joshi goshinhō. Likely, those who deserve most credit for the intellectual and practical work underlying Joshi goshinhō were: Noritomi Masako, Honda Ariya, Mifune Kyūzō, Sakamoto Fusatarō, and Samura Kaichirō. Joshi goshinhō would meet the increasing demands for self-defense from female jūdōka. Jūdōka have a right to a critical analytical and non-revisionist approach to jūdō’s history in its every aspect as an integral part of the pedagogical aims of jūdō
Planaeschna poumai Joshi & Kunte 2017, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Planaeschna poumai</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 3–4)</p> <p> <b>Holotype.</b> ♂ (NCBS-AV 557), collected on the Senapati-Purul road near TNK village, Senapati District, Manipur, India (25.3756N, 94.2318E), 11.X.2016, Shantanu Joshi leg.</p> <p> <b>Paratype.</b> ♂ (NCBS-AV 585) and <b>allotype</b> ♀ (NCBS-AV 568): upstream from Mayangkhang village, Senapati District, Manipur, India (25.2304N, 94.0066E), 14.X.2016, Shantanu Joshi leg.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> This species is named after the Poumai tribe, one of the larger extant Naga tribes in NE India, which predominantly inhabits the Senapati District of Manipur where the specimens were collected. There are no protected areas in this whole district, which makes community forests critical for biodiversity conservation.</p> <p> <b>Description of the holotype</b>. <i>Head</i> (Fig. 3 e). Labrum, labium, anteclypeus, postclypeus and frons yellow; mandibles brown; postclypeus with two faint brown markings; the crest of the frons and vertex black. Eyes dark green, in live specimens with blue in the center; postgenae marked yellow.</p> <p> <i>Thorax</i> (Fig. 3 d,f). Prothorax black, anterior edge of the mesostigmal plate yellow; propimeron greenish yellow. Synthorax with mesokatepisternum and metakatepisternum marked with yellow; dorsal stripes on mesepisternum green, pointing outwards, faintly yellow at the antealar ridge; mesepimeron marked with a greenish yellow stripe, thinner towards the subalar ridge; a triangular spot below subalar ridge on the mesepimeron and a small spot above the subalar ridge; metepimeron almost entirely yellow; both the mesepimeronic and metepimeronic stripes appear darker green towards the dorsal 1/3rd of its length in live specimens. Legs black; coxae and base of the femur marked with reddish brown; femur of the forelegs marked with yellow on the inside about half its length.</p> <p> <i>Wings.</i> Hyaline; triangle 3-celled (2 in left hw); anal loop 6/7-celled; anal triangle 3-celled; antenodals: 19/ 20 in the fw (a short incomplete nervure present on the left fw between the 2nd and 3rd nervures), 14 in the hw; venation denser towards the apices.</p> <p> <i>Abdomen</i> (Fig. 3 a,d,f). Marked with citron-yellow and green; S1 laterally marked with triangular spot pointing anteriorly, dorsal carina with a yellow stripe; S2 dorsally with a yellow stripe disconnected at the transverse carina; PD edge with a horizontal yellow stripe, laterally with bright yellow AL and PL markings separated by the auricle, the AL marking continuing on the lateral side of the auricle; the auricle posteriorly dark brown; S3–S7 with paired MD spots situated anteriorly about 2/3rd the length of each segment; S3–S7 also with AD and PD yellow stripes on the dorsal carina, reaching the MD spots on S3 and S4; the AD marking reduced on S5–S7, more pronounced and broader on S3; S3–S8 with paired anterio-ventral round yellow spots, these spots continuing dorsally connect to the small ML spots on S3–S7 and the base of the supplementary transverse carina; the ventral spots perfectly rounded on S8; S8 and S10 with paired round black ‘depressions’ dorsally, S9 and S10 black.</p> <p> <i>Anal appendages</i> (Fig. 4 a,b,d). Cerci black; paraprocts black, the central groove and ventral area dark yellow. Cerci twice the length of S10, paraprocts about half the length of cerci. Laterally both cerci and the paraprocts are curved upwards, the cerci are broader and curved slightly more upwards caudal 3/5th of its length, pointed at the apex. The apical 2/5th is spatulate divided in the middle by a lateral ridge. <i>Laterally</i>, the base is thinner and the dorsal half is concave. Paraprocts gently curved upwards, the tip conical, pointing upwards. <i>Dorsally</i>, the anterior cerci are thinner, the outer margin is straight for 1/10th the length of cerci, curved inwards thereafter; the apical spine of the cerci is pointed outwards, sharply pointed. Paraprocts triangular, blunt at the apex.</p> <p> <b>Measurements (mm):</b> abdomen (including anal appendages)=38.6, fw=33.9, hw=34.8.</p> <p> <b>Variation in the paratype (Anal appendages: Fig. 4 d).</b> Paratype male is very similar to the holotype. The PD markings on S2 edge without a thin yellow stripe like on the holotype. Triangle 3 or 4 (right hw) celled, anal triangle 3-celled, anal loop 5-celled. Antenodals: 16/ 17 in the fw, 14/ 16 in the hw.</p> <p> <b>Measurements (mm):</b> abdomen (including anal appendages)=38.5, fw=33.2, hw=33.7.</p> <p> <b>Description of the allotype</b> (Fig. 3 b–c, 4c). The specimen was accidentally decapitated while netting, and the head was lost in the stream beneath, hence the head is not described.</p> <p> <i>Thorax</i> (Fig. 3 c). Prothorax dark brown; the apex of the posterior lobe and the middle lobe black. Synthoracic markings very similar to the male; vibrant yellow-green. The propimeron, mesokatepisternum and metakatepisternum bright yellow; the paired dorsal stripes on the mesepisternum curving slightly outwards at the anterior end; antealar edge marked with faint yellow spots; the mesepimeronic stripe broad and slightly angulated, thinner at the dorsal end with a triangular spot right next to it near the subalar edge; another spot directly above the triangular spot above the subalar ridge; metepimeron marked almost entirely with bright yellowish green, ventral margin thinly brown; the mesepimeronic and metepimeronic markings appear more bright yellow towards the ventral half similar to the male. Legs black; coxae marked yellow posteriorly; basal half of the femur marked yellow posteriorly on the forelegs.</p> <p> <i>Wings.</i> Antenodals: 13–14 in the hw, 19 in the fw. Base of the wings tinted yellow and the area near the node faintly yellow. Median space not traversed by any cross-veins. The triangle is made up of four cells in the hw and three cells in the fw. Pterostigma dark brown, spanning a little more than 2 cells.</p> <p> <i>Abdomen</i> (Fig. 3 b,c). S1 laterally marked with a broad yellow stripe, broader posteriorly; dorsally marked with a thin yellow line; S2 yellow laterally, small, brown, rounded marking on both sides resembling the markings in the area posterior to the auricle of males; a dorsal yellow stripe on S2, S3–S7 with yellow ventro-lateral anterior spots, PL longitudinal spots on S3–S5; S3–S7 with thin yellow AD and PD stripes on the carina disconnected at the center where paired triangular MD spots are present, smaller than the male; S8 marked yellow at the posteriordorsal edge; S8, S9 and S10 black, lower half is dark yellow continuing on to the vulvar scale.</p> <p> <i>Ovipositor</i> (Fig. 4 c). Covered with dry mud suggesting that the female had oviposited or attempted to so in muddy waters. The sternite and ovipositor dark-brown; ovipositor and style extend posteriorly till the base of cerci; cerci about the length of S10, pointed at the apex.</p> <p> <b>Measurements (mm):</b> abdomen (including anal appendages)=47, fw=40, hw=42.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> The shape of male anal appendages and the abdominal pattern is similar to <i>P. intersedens</i> (Martin, 1909), the only Indian species of this genus. <i>P. poumai</i> differs with respect to the following diagnostic characters: (a) in both sexes the abdominal pattern differs from <i>P. intersedens</i> in that the paired MD spots on S2 are not present, S9 and S10 unmarked with yellow dorsally, and the PD abdominal spots absent or reduced on S3– S10; (b) the lateral ridge divides the apex of cerci in equal proportions, whereas in <i>P. intersedens</i> the portion below the ridge is more expanded; (c) the posterior half of cerci is not as widely expanded as that in <i>P. intersedens</i>; (d) the apical expansion of cerci laterally angled straight, not curved upwards like <i>P. intersedens</i>; and (e) in both sexes of <i>P. intersedens</i> S2 is laterally yellow; but in <i>P. poumai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> the lateral yellow markings on S2 of both males is broken posterior to the auricle; this lateral yellow stripe in the female is marked with a round brown spot. The reduced abdominal markings distinguish this species from all other <i>Planaeschna</i> species.</p>Published as part of <i>Joshi, Shantanu & Kunte, Krushnamegh, 2017, Two new dragonfly species (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnidae) from north-eastern India, pp. 259-268 in Zootaxa 4300 (2)</i> on pages 263-266, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4300.2.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/838265">http://zenodo.org/record/838265</a>
V. K. R. V. Rao, A. M. Khusro, C. H. Hanumantha Rao, P. C. Joshi, K. Krishnamurthy, Ajit K. Das, Inflation and India's economic crisis
No full textÉtienne Gilbert. V. K. R. V. Rao, A. M. Khusro, C. H. Hanumantha Rao, P. C. Joshi, K. Krishnamurthy, Ajit K. Das, Inflation and India's economic crisis. In: Tiers-Monde, tome 15, n°58, 1974. pp. 445-446
- …
