345 research outputs found
Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
No full textEditor's Note: PTJ's Editorial Board has adopted PRISMA to help PTJ better communicate research to physical therapists. For more, read Chris Maher's editorial starting on page 870.
Membership of the PRISMA Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.
This article has been reprinted with permission from the Annals of Internal Medicine from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. Available at: http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/151/4/264. The authors jointly hold copyright of this article. This article has also been published in PLoS Medicine, BMJ, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, and Open Medicine.
Copyright © 2009 Moher et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</jats:p
Active Nursing Research Studies as of 1-2024 (Study summaries),
No full textNursing Clinical Action Team Chair and Co-Chair Education: Back to Basics in Leading the Unit-Based Team.
PI: Vicki Babb, Kelly Ray, BreAnn Taylor, Debbi Bowman
Project ROSC-O
PI: Kaylyn Kistler
Assessment of Nurse Perceptions Related to Shared Governance Culture.
PI: Erin LaCross, Naomi Adamski, Brooke Randol, Stacy Greene, Preston Jennings, Jennifer Sorg, Olivia Figura, Rebecca Howard Kelly Ray, Amber Childers, Kristy Jackson, Christine Fawcet
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Survey Assessing Nursing Knowledge.
PI: Lisa Morgan
Custom Machine Learning Model for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries (HAPI)
PI: Andrea Conley, Brooke Randol
Exploration of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors of Skin Injury in Intensive Care Units.
PI: Andrea Conley, Brooke Randol
Twice Daily Nurse-Driven Spontaneous Awakening Trials Improves Delirium.
PI: Kellie Girardot
DoubleCHEK for Feeding Tube Placement in Premature Infants.
PI: Jennifer Thieman
Outcomes Related to the Use of a Standardized Tiered Skill Acquisition Model.
PI: Stephani Schultz, Holly Platt, Abby Gaff, Chelsea Tetzlaff, Donna Hitzeman, LaToshia Gilbert, Meghan Winebrenner
Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Survey Assessing Nursing Knowledge.
PI: Lisa Morgan MSN, RN, CNRN, AGCNS-BC; Jan Powers PhD, RN, CCNS, CCRN, NE-BC, FCCM, FAAN
A Quantitative Pilot Study to Assess the Effect of a Weighted Blanket Intervention for Agitation Reduction on Patients in Medical Units.
PI: Andrea D. Conley, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, MSCRN; Kristen Emenhiser, BSN, RN, CMSRN; Rebecca Havens, BSN, RN, CMSRN
DrIFT 2 Study: Displacement in Feeding Tubes.
PI: Jan Powers PhD, RN, CCNS, CCRN, CNRN, NE-BC, FCCM
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Medical and Open-Heart Surgical Patients.
PI: Philip Roberts, MSN, MBA, RN, CCRN; Andrea D. Conley, MSN, RN, AGCNS-BC, MSCRN
Effect of Warming IV Fluids During MICU Transport on Patient Comfort and Temperature.
PI: Jennifer Esslinger BSN, RN, CFRN, CTRN
Validation of an evidence-based, nurse-designed fall risk assessment tool: Study 2.
PI: Lindy Bilimek MSN, RN, AGCNS-B
Discovering the South: One Man's Travels Through a Changing America in the 1930s by Jennifer Ritterhouse
No full textÍtems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA
No full textArtículo original: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
The original authors have not revised and verified the Spanish translation, and not necessary endorse it.
Los autores originales no han revisado ni verificado la traducción del manuscrito al español, y no necesariamente están de acuerdo con su contenido.
Publicación del artículo original: 21 Julio 2009
Derechos: © 2009 Moher et al. Este es un artículo de acceso abierto distribuido bajo las condiciones de The Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite el uso ilimitado, su distribución y reproducción en cualquier medio, siempre y cuando se acredite el autor y su fuente original.
Procedencia: No comisionado; revisión científica externa. Para promover la publicación de la Declaración PRISMA, el artículo se ha publicado como acceso abierto y se puede encontrar en la página web de PLoS Medicine (http://medicine.plosjournals.org/) y también se ha publicado en Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, y Open Medicine. Los autores tienen unánimemente los derechos de este artículo. Para más detalles de su uso ver la página web de PRISMA (http://www.prisma-statement.org/).
Traducción y adaptación al español: Mercedes Sotos-Prieto, Johana Prieto, Maria Manera, Eduard Baladia, Rodrigo Martínez-Rodríguez y Julio Basulto.
Autor de correspondencia de la traducción: Mercedes Sotos-Prieto ([email protected]
Developing an evidence-based reporting guideline for randomized controlled trial protocols: The SPIRIT Initiative
No full textProtocols of randomized controlled trials (RCT) are important for many stakeholders including trialists, consumers, ethics boards, funding agencies and journal editors. However, RCT protocols often incompletely describe important trial details or describe inadequate methods. Biased methodological changes are also prevalent. This thesis' objective was to provide the evidence-base for the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items for RandomIzed T rials) Initiative, which aims to increase transparency by developing a reporting guideline for RCT protocols. Guideline content was developed and refined by: 1) a Delphi survey of key stakeholders and 2) a systematic review of empirical evidence. These two components yielded divergent yet complementary perspectives for concepts that RCT protocols should address. Cumulatively, 41 concepts related to trial methodology, administration/organization, ethics and dissemination were recommended for inclusion and 24 concepts for further discussion. These findings inform the SPIRIT guideline content and may ultimately help to improve protocol transparency and the validity of healthcare literature
Developing an evidence-based reporting guideline for randomized controlled trial protocols: The SPIRIT Initiative
No full textProtocols of randomized controlled trials (RCT) are important for many stakeholders including trialists, consumers, ethics boards, funding agencies and journal editors. However, RCT protocols often incompletely describe important trial details or describe inadequate methods. Biased methodological changes are also prevalent. This thesis' objective was to provide the evidence-base for the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items for RandomIzed T rials) Initiative, which aims to increase transparency by developing a reporting guideline for RCT protocols. Guideline content was developed and refined by: 1) a Delphi survey of key stakeholders and 2) a systematic review of empirical evidence. These two components yielded divergent yet complementary perspectives for concepts that RCT protocols should address. Cumulatively, 41 concepts related to trial methodology, administration/organization, ethics and dissemination were recommended for inclusion and 24 concepts for further discussion. These findings inform the SPIRIT guideline content and may ultimately help to improve protocol transparency and the validity of healthcare literature
Ecohydrological modelling with EcH2O-iso to quantify forest and grassland effects on water partitioning and flux ages
No full textACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge research funding from the European Research Council (project GA 335910 VeWa). M. Maneta acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (project GSS 1461576). C. S. is grateful to the Leibniz IGB Berlin for a Senior Research Fellowship. We also thank Umweltbundesamt (UBA) for providing the climate data. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.Peer reviewe
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
No full textSystematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians readthem to keep up to date with their field (1, 2), and they areoften used as a starting point for developing clinical practiceguidelines. Granting agencies may require a systematicreview to ensure there is justification for further research(3), and some health care journals are moving in this direction(4). As with all research, the value of a systematicreview depends on what was done, what was found, andthe clarity of reporting. As with other publications, thereporting quality of systematic reviews varies, limitingreaders’ ability to assess the strengths and weaknesses ofthose reviews
Occurences of author-supplied versus index-supplied keywords.
No full textOccurences of author-supplied versus index-supplied keywords.</p
- …
