1,721,108 research outputs found

    X chromosome loss and ageing

    No full text
    The detection of a low level 45,X cell line during routine cytogenetic analysis in an adult female can be difficult to interpret. In the absence of recent information regarding loss of the X chromosome and ageing, we undertook a prospective study. A total of 19,650 cells from 655 females aged from birth to 80 years were screened cytogenetically. The frequency of X chromosome loss ranged from 0.07% at age 65 years of age and showed a highly significant quadratic relationship between X chromosome loss and ageing (P < or = 0.00001). We have produced a graphic representation that provides a minimum baseline age-related rate of X chromosome loss. This should assist diagnostic cytogenetics laboratories to determine the significance of 45,X cell lines detected in women of all ages. We also compared the frequency of 45,X cells in women referred with at least one spontaneous abortion with those referred for other reasons and found no significant difference. Thus, in our population, an excess of 45,X cells is not associated with pregnancy loss

    A clinical and molecular study of 26 females with Xp deletions with special emphasis on inherited deletions

    No full text
    We have undertaken a clinical study of 26 females with deletions of Xp including five mother–daughter pairs. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses have mapped the breakpoints of the deletions. We determined the parental origin of each abnormality and studied the X-inactivation patterns. We describe the clinical features and compare them with the amount of Xp material lost. We discuss the putative loci for features of Turner syndrome and describe how our series contributes further to their delineation. We conclude that (1) fertility can be retained even with the loss of two-thirds of Xp, thus, if there are genes on Xp for ovarian development, they must be at Xp11–Xp11.2; (2) in our sample of patients there is no evidence to support the existence of a single lymphogenic gene on Xp; (3) there is no evidence for a second stature locus in proximal Xp; (4) there is no evidence to support the existence of a single gene for naevi; (5) we suggest that the interval in Xp21.1–Xp11.4 between DXS997 and DXS1368 may contain a gene conferring a predisposition to hypothyroidism

    X inactivation in triploidy and trisomy: the search for autosomal transfactors that choose the active X15

    No full text
    Only one X chromosome functions in diploid human cells irrespective of the sex of the individual and the number of X chromosomes. Yet, as we show, more than one X is active in the majority of human triploid cells. Therefore, we suggest that (i) the active X is chosen by repression of its XIST locus, (ii) the repressor is encoded by an autosome and is dosage sensitive, and (iii) the extra dose of this key repressor enables the expression of more than one X in triploid cells. Because autosomal trisomies might help locate the putative dosage sensitive trans-acting factor, we looked for two active X chromosomes in such cells. Previously, we reported that females trisomic for 18 different human autosomes had only one active X and a normal inactive X chromosome. Now we report the effect of triplication of the four autosomes not studied previously; data about these rare trisomies - full or partial - were used to identify autosomal regions relevant to the choice of active X. We find that triplication of the entire chromosomes 5 and 11 and parts of chromosomes 1 and 19 is associated with normal patterns of X inactivation, excluding these as candidate regions. However, females with inherited triplications of 1p21.3-q25.3, 1p31 and 19p13.2-q13.33 were not ascertained. Thus, if a single key dose-sensitive gene induces XIST repression, it could reside in one of these locations. Alternatively, more than one dosage-sensitive autosomal locus is required to form the repressor complex

    Investigation of the origins of human autosomal inversions

    No full text
    A significant proportion of both pericentric and paracentric inversions have recurrent breakpoints and so could either have arisen through multiple independent events or be identical by descent (IBD) with a single common ancestor. Of two common variant inversions previously studied, the inv(2)(p11q13) was genuinely recurrent while the inv(10)(p11.2q21.2) was IBD in all cases tested. Excluding these two variants we have ascertained 257 autosomal inversion probands at the Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory. There were 104 apparently recurrent inversions, representing 35 different breakpoint combinations and we speculated that at least some of these had arisen on more than one occasion. However, haplotype analysis identified no recurrent cases among eight inversions tested, including the variant inv(5)(p13q13). The cases not IBD were shown to have different breakpoints at the molecular cytogenetic level. No crossing over was detected within any of the inversions and the founder haplotypes extended for variable distances beyond the inversion breakpoints. Defining breakpoint intervals by FISH mapping identified no obvious predisposing elements in the DNA sequence. In summary the vast majority of human inversions arise as unique events. Even apparently recurrent inversions, with the exception of the inv(2)(p12q13), are likely to be either derived from a common ancestor or to have subtly different breakpoints. Presumably the lack of selection against most inversions allows them to accumulate and disperse amongst different populations over tim

    Distribution of the D15Z1 copy number polymorphism

    No full text
    Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the probe p15 (D15Z1), we investigated the distribution of the polymorphic 15p signal which has been reported to occur on acrocentric chromosomes in addition to chromosome 15. The short arm of chromosome 15 has a characteristic signal pattern when hybridized with the FISH probe D15Z1. However, the D15Z1 signal can occasionally be seen on the short arm of other acrocentric chromosomes. We studied the distribution of the D15Z1 probe in 1657 patients consisting both of individuals with a normal karyotype and those with a variety of chromosome abnormalities involving the acrocentric chromosomes. Our results show that one in six individuals, regardless of their patient ascertainment category or karyotypic status, had one or more additional D15Z1 signals, and that there were no significant differences in the distribution of extra signals among the patient groups
    corecore