76 research outputs found

    <b>Supplemental Material - EDP-514 in healthy subjects and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B</b>

    No full text
    Supplementary Material for EDP-514 in healthy subjects and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B by Jordan J Feld, Eric Lawitz, Tuan Nguyen, Jacob Lalezari, Tarek Hassanein, Paul Martin, Steven-Huy Han, Douglas Dieterich, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Guy De La Rosa, Alaa Ahmad, Ed Luo, Annie L Conery, and Nathalie Adda in Antiviral Therapy.</p

    Restoration of blood total glutathione status and lymphocyte function following α-lipoic acid supplementation in patients with HIV infection

    No full text
    Objectives: To determine whether supplementation with α-lipoic acid (ALA), a glutathione-replenishing disulfide, modulates whole blood total glutathione (GSH+GSSG) levels and improves lymphocyte function in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects with history of unresponsiveness to highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). Design and setting: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at two study sites: an eye clinic at a county hospital in San Jose and a research clinic in San Francisco, California. Subjects: A total of 33 HIV-infected men and women with viral load \u3e 10,000 copies/cm3, despite HAART, aged 4447 years, approximately 36% nonwhite, were enrolled. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ALA (300 mg three times a day) or matching placebo for 6 months. Main outcome measures: The change over 6 months in blood total glutathione status, lymphocyte proliferation response to T-cell mitogens, CD4 cell count, and viral load in patients receiving ALA compared to placebo. Results: The mean blood total glutathione level in ALA-supplemented subjects was significantly elevated after 6 months (1.34 ± 0.79 vs. 0.81 ± 0.18 mmol/L) compared to insignificant change (0.76 ± 0.34 vs. 0.76 ± 0.22 mmol/L) in the placebo group (ALA vs. placebo: p = 0.04). The lymphocyte proliferation response was significantly enhanced or stabilized after 6 months of ALA supplementation compared to progressive decline in the placebo group (ALA vs. placebo: p \u3c 0.001 with phytohemagglutinin; p = 0.02 with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody). A positive correlation was seen between blood total glutathione level and lymphocyte response to anti-CD3 stimulation (R 2 = 0.889). There was no significant change in either HIV RNA level or CD4 count over 6 months in the ALA-supplemented compared to the control group. Conclusion: Supplementation with α-lipoic acid may positively impact patients with HIV and acquired immune deficiency syndrome by restoring blood total glutathione level and improving functional reactivity of lymphocytes to T-cell mitogens. © 2008 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

    Pharmacokinetics of once-daily Etravirine without and with Once-daily Darunavir/ritonavir in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV type-1-Infected Adults

    No full text
    Background A pharmacokinetic trial was conducted to evaluate the potential for once-daily etravirine in anti-retroviral regimens without and with darunavir/ritonavir. Methods During this multicentre, open-label, Phase IIa trial, treatment-naive patients aged ≥18 years with HIV type-1 (HIV-1) received etravirine 400 mg once daily with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine 300/200 mg once daily from days 1–14; on days 15–28, darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily was added. On day 29, etravirine was discontinued and patients continued with the other medications to day 42. Serial blood sampling for etravirine pharmacokinetics was performed over 24 h on day 14 and 28; patients fasted for ≥10 h prior to these visits. Results Of 23 enrolled patients (male 87%, Caucasian 39%), pharmacokinetic profiles for etravirine were available for 21 and 20 patients on day 14 and 28, respectively. The plasma concentration–time profile and pharmacokinetics for etravirine were unchanged with or without darunavir/ritonavir. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was reached 4 h after administration and was 790 and 801 ng/ml on day 14 and 28, respectively; mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from before administration to 24 h after administration was 10,410 ng•h/ml on day 14 and 10,720 ng•h/ml on day 28. In a post-hoc analysis, etravirine Cmax was higher, minimum plasma concentration was lower and AUC was similar when compared with etravirine 200 mg twice daily. Conclusions Addition of darunavir/ritonavir to etravirine, all dosed once daily, did not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of etravirine. Findings support further investigation of etravirine 400 mg once daily in HIV-1-infected patients. (Trial registration number NCT00534352.) </jats:sec

    Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol versus fixed-combination dorzolamide/brimonidine/timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, crossover study

    No full text
    Objectives: The efficacy and hepatic safety of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors rilpivirine (TMC278) and efavirenz were compared in treatment-naive, HIV-infected adults with concurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the pooled week 48 analysis of the Phase III, double-blind, randomized ECHO (NCT00540449) and THRIVE (NCT00543725) trials. Methods: Patients received 25 mg of rilpivirine once daily or 600 mg of efavirenz once daily, plus two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. At screening, patients had alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels 5 the upper limit of normal. HBV and HCV status was determined at baseline by HBV surface antigen, HCV antibody and HCV RNA testing. Results: HBV/HCV coinfection status was known for 670 patients in the rilpivirine group and 665 in the efavirenz group. At baseline, 49 rilpivirine and 63 efavirenz patients [112/1335 (8.4%)] were coinfected with either HBV [55/1357 (4.1%)] or HCV [57/1333 (4.3%)]. The safety analysis included all available data, including beyond week 48. Eight patients seroconverted during the study (rilpivirine: five; efavirenz: three). A higher proportion of patients achieved viral load <50 copies/mL (intent to treat, time to loss of virological response) in the subgroup without HBV/HCV coinfection (rilpivirine: 85.0%; efavirenz: 82.6%) than in the coinfected subgroup (rilpivirine: 73.5%; efavirenz: 79.4%) (rilpivirine, P = 0.04 and efavirenz, P = 0.49, Fisher's exact test). The incidence of hepatic adverse events (AEs) was low in both groups in the overall population (rilpivirine: 5.5% versus efavirenz: 6.6%) and was higher in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients than in those not coinfected (26.7% versus 4.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Hepatic AEs were more common and response rates lower in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with rilpivirine or efavirenz than in those who were not coinfected. " The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.",,,,,,"10.1093/jac/dks130",,,"http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/41161","http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84864505008&partnerID=40&md5=bfab9b8f6f474d2558f7de2c5e9a2277",,,,,,"8",,"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy",,"202
    corecore