472 research outputs found
Geoffmonteithia queenslanda Jin, de Keyzer et Slipinski 2020
No full textGeoffmonteithia queenslanda Jin, de Keyzer et Ślipiński, 2020 (Figs. 11 H–J, 14J, 15L, 17E) Geoffmonteithia queenslanda Jin, de Keyzer et Ślipiński, 2020: 21. TL: Townsville, QLD. Holotype in ANIC (examined). Diagnosis. This species is morphologically similar to Pseudoplites and Eurynassa. Male can be separat- ed from P. hamali by its antennomere 3 not thicker than the following segments, the tibiae without lateral spines, and protarsi without long hairs. Female of G. queenslanda can be separated from P. hamali by its dense and coarse punctures on pronotum. Both sexes can be distinguished from Eurynassa species by having elongate antennomere 3 and prominent posteri- or angles on pronotum. Type. Geoffmonteithia queenslanda Jin, de Keyzer et Ślipiński, Holotype male deposited in ANIC, with the following labels “QLD: Townsville, 29 September 1995, Woodger T. | ANIC 25-067089 ”. Material examined (Fig. 17E). Queensland: AM (1 ♂): 5km N Leyburn, Dec. 1987, A. and G. Daniels; ANIC (3 ♂♂): Eidsvold, Dec. 1965, J. Bancraft; Townsville, Sep. 1995, T. Woodger; Yeppoon, Nov. 1965, Le Souef; QDPC (1 ♂): Long Pocket, Indooroopilly, Brisbane, Nov. 1980, J.F. Donaldson; QM (2 ♂♂; 2 ♀♀): 2: Gympie; Boggimoss No. 21 via Taroom, Nov. 1996, G.B. Monteith; Dipperu, Nov. 1971, B. Baldwin; QVMAG (4 ♂♂; 2 ♀♀): 6: The Gap, Brisbane, {from Jan. 1994 to Dec. 1995}, S. Fearn. New South Wales: ANIC (1 ♂; 1 ♀): Stumpys Rd., Braemar S.F., Nov. 2016, R. de Keyz- er, A. Scott and Sundholm, A.; south boundary Fortis Creek NP., north of Grafton, Dec. 1998, Watkins; MV (1 ♂): Canowindra, Jan. 1956, F.E. Wilson. Molecular data. BioSample ID: SAMN11080875 (Holotype), SAMN11080889 (Paratype).Published as part of Jin, Mengjie, Keyzer, Roger De, Hutchinson, Paul, Pang, Hong & Ślipiński, Adam, 2020, A Review Of The Australian Macrotomini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Prioninae), pp. 33-96 in Annales Zoologici 70 (1) on page 61, DOI: 10.3161/00034541ANZ2020.70.1.003, http://zenodo.org/record/377667
Camur McAlpine & Keyzer 1994
No full textCamur McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994 Camur McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994: 316. Type-species: Camur willii McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994 (orig. des.). Gender masculine. Ref. McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 306, 315 (taxon. notes), 310 (key), 316 (desc.). willii McAlpine & Keyzer, 1994: 317. Type locality: Brazil, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutônia, 27°11’S 52°23’W. Distr. Brazil (Paraná [n. occ.*], Santa Catarina). Holotype female (formally in CNC **). Ref. Teratomyza -Gruppe; Hennig 1971: 12 –13 (fig., taxon. notes), 40 (figs.). Camur willii; McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 317 (desc., figs.), 318 (fig.). * Examined material: BRAZIL. Paraná. Palmas, Refúgio de Vida Silvestre dos Campos de Palmas / 21.X.2013, 1100m, Malaise trap / A.C. Pereira col. / 1 female, ZUFMS. **Comments: Although the original description indicated that the holotype is deposited in CNC (McAlpine & Keyzer 1994: 318), through correspondence with the curator of this collection we were informed that the holotype was not found there.Published as part of Rodrigues, J. P. V., Pereira-Colavite, A. & Mello, R. L., 2016, Catalogue of the Teratomyzidae (Diptera, Opomyzoidea) of the World, pp. 275-285 in Zootaxa 4205 (3) on page 280, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/19434
Cryptipus Jin, de Keyzer et Slipinski 2020
No full textCryptipus Jin, de Keyzer et Ślipiński, 2020 (Figs. 5 J–M, 14G, 15J, 17B) Cryptipus Jin, de Keyzer et Ślipiński, 2020: 19. Type species Teispes frenchi Blackburn, 1892, by original designation and monotypy. Diagnostic combination (Male). Large beetles, 25–50 mm long. Dorsum uniformly reddish brown to dark brown. Sexually dimorphic dense fine punctures present near lateral margins of pronotum, ventral side of prothorax and mesoventrite. Head as broad as prothorax; frontoclypeal suture arcuate or broadly angulate; median groove complete. Antennal tubercles almost flat, rounded apically. Eyes transverse, weakly emarginate near antennal insertion, relatively distant dorsally. Mandibles shorter than head, sexually dimorphic longer and thicker in male than in female, weakly arcuate and unidentate apically. Antenna reaching mid elytra in males. Scape about half of head length, posteriorly not extending to posterior margin of eye, gradually expanded apically; antennomere 3 shorter than scape and about as long as 4. Mentum not fused to submentum (Fig. 5M). Terminal palpomere of maxillary and labial palps weakly expanded and apically round- ed. Prothorax transverse with lateral carina weakly dentate; anterior margin without bead, posterior margin with complete bead. Pronotal disc shiny and almost smooth medially surrounded by large and deep, sometimes merged punctures laterally and posteriorly separating disc from irregular lateral densely punctate areas. Prosternal process weakly expanded beyond procoxae, extending to mesoventrite, narrowly pointed apically. Elytra surface almost glabrous and shiny; inner apices with acute sutural angles. Legs strong, rows of tiny spines present on femora while absent on tibia. Protibia smooth externally with two sharp apical projections and pair of subequal spurs; lobes on tarsomere 3 narrow and short, tarsomere 5 much longer than tarsomeres 1 and 2 combined. Description. Male. Length 25–50 mm. Dorsum globrous and shiny, uniformly reddish brown to dark brown. Head oval, slightly narrower than pronotum. Mandibles about as long as head capsule, dorsally bearing sparse hairs, apex curved inwards; each mandible wedge-shaped, very thick and strong on lateral side and near the base, unidentate at apex, with one extra tooth on incisor edge. Labrum transverse, anterior margin pointed medially with relatively dense setae; labrum separated from clypeus by a deep groove; dorsal surface of clypeus with sparse long setae. Frontoclypeal suture almost arcuate or broadly angulate; median groove distinct and complete. Antennal tubercles relatively flat, very distant to each other, apex rounded. Antennae 11-segmented, filiform, extending to mid elytra; scapes short, as long as eye length. Eyes transverse, coarsely facetted, very weakly emarginate near antennal foramen; relatively distant dorsally. Submentum weakly curved at apex, mentum well exposed; gular area triangular and coarsely punctate. Terminal palpomere of maxillary and labial palps weakly expanded and apically rounded. Pronotum transverse with anterior margin emarginate medially; anterior margin without bead, posterior margin with complete bead; lateral carina weakly dentate. Disc surface shiny, glabrous and smooth medially, with deep and fine punctures on lateral area and two small patches of coarsely punctate area posteriorly. Prosternum bearing uniformly deep fine punctures; hypomeron well-defined, broader than prosternal process; prosternal process moderately expand beyond procoxae, with median lobe projecting towards mesoventrite, narrowly rounded apically. Mesoventral process relatively broad, apex emarginate medially. Ventral side of pterothorax and coxae covered with golden hairs. Metanepisternum constricted at base. Scutellum narrowly rounded at apex, surface smooth and shiny. Elytra shiny with very fine and weak irregular coriaceous sculpture, three traces of venation present on apical half of elytra; elytral apices rounded with small but sharp sutural angulation; epipleuron almost complete, very narrowing apically. Legs strong, femur broad and relatively flattened, weakly constricted at both ends, ventral side with rows of tiny spines; each tibia with two distinct apical spines and a pair of strong spurs. Tarsi slender; tarsomere 3 with narrow and short lobes; tarsomere 5 much longer than tarsomere 1 and 2 combined. Abdominal ventrites smooth, only bearing dense long setae along the edges, especially on the apex of ventrite 5. Male genitalia (Fig. 14G). Tegmen longer than sternite VII; parameres short, less than 0.1 times length of entire tegmen, truncate apically with small triangular projections at the base; penis longer than tegmen, dorsal apex broadly rounded while ventral apex narrowly pointed. Female. Mandibles much shorter and narrower than in male; pronotum weakly constricted near anterior margin, with coarsely punctate, irregular lateral area devoid of very sense punctation; prosternum and hypomeron with sparse fine punctures and sparse hairs, relatively shiny. Ovipositor (Fig. 15J) long, apical sclerosed part half of baculus length; distal gonocoxites short and small; stylus inserted laterally and close to gonocoxite apex, relatively long and gradually expanded apically. Remarks. Cryptipus can be distinguished from the remaining genera of the Australian Macrotomini by having the uniformly reddish-brown body, relatively glabrous and smooth elytra, surface only with very fine and shallow punctures usually very hardly seen, the elongate tarsomere 5, which is longer than tarsomeres 1–3 combined, and the tibia without any teeth or spines along external margins. Males are recognised by longer and stronger mandibles. Cryptipus is currently regarded as a monotypic genus to include single Australian species described as Teispes frenchi by Blackburn (1892) and subsequently transferred to Archetypus by Lameere (1903a). Our molecular results (Jin et al. 2020) revealed a relatively isolated placement for this species, hence it was placed in a separate genus.Published as part of Jin, Mengjie, Keyzer, Roger De, Hutchinson, Paul, Pang, Hong & Ślipiński, Adam, 2020, A Review Of The Australian Macrotomini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Prioninae), pp. 33-96 in Annales Zoologici 70 (1) on pages 54-55, DOI: 10.3161/00034541ANZ2020.70.1.003, http://zenodo.org/record/377667
Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of the Fe-Ni-Ti system
No full textA thermodynamic assessment of the ternary Fe-Ni-Ti system together with a partial reassessment of the binary sub-systems Ni-Ti and Fe-Ti was made following the CALPHAD method and using the compound energy formalism (CEF). Two and four sublattices were used to model the bcc and fcc phases respectively. This allows describing the order-disorder transformations occurring not only in the ternary Fe-Ni-Ti system, but also in the quaternary Al-Fe-Ni-Ti system. The description of the C14 Laves phase TiFe₂ was modified to three sublattices in order to be consistent with other Al-Fe-Ni-Ti sub-systems in which a three sublattice model is needed. Thermodynamic parameters were optimized using the available experimental data. On the basis of this optimization the stable phase diagram is calculated. Moreover stable and metastable equilibria between ordered and disordered phases based on fcc and bcc respectively are calculated.status: Publishe
Escalonia surprise Jin & Ślipiński & Keyzer & Pang 2017, sp. nov.
No full textEscalonia surprise sp. nov. (Figures 5 D, 5E) Etymology. The species name refers to Mount Surprise, a town in northern Queensland, the type locality of this species and is a noun in apposition. Description. Length 6.5–8.4mm. Body integument pale yellow with dark brown markings on anterior and apical parts of elytra. Ventral side uniformly yellowish brown, shortly setose. Head darker than pronotum, large and flat, with a fine impressed median line extending from base to clypeal suture. Mandible well-developed, turning dark at teeth apices. Eyes large, convex, with deep groove near frons; eyes strongly emarginate near antenna insertion, and weakly emarginate near mandible articulation. Antenna long, in both sexes extending about 2 antennomeres beyond elytral apices. Antennomeres uniformly yellow, scape subequal to antennomere 3. Pronotum transverse, uniformly yellow, weakly constricted in front, with posteriorly bent projections on lateral side; disc finely punctate, glabrous and feebly shiny. Scutellum darker than pronotum, truncate apically. Elytra with random relatively long bristles, bearing three parallel raised costae on basal two thirds of disc; coarsely and deeply punctate except the apices; elytra basically pale yellow as the pronotum, with two dark brown fasciae on each side, and with light separate spots. Legs slender, unicolor, pro- and mid-coxae oval, metafemur with two rows of weak teeth on the ventral side, tarsomere 1 slightly longer than tarsomere 2. Types. Holotype: Queensland: “ca. 18.10S 144.45E, Gulf Development, 40–49km E of Mount Surprise, Qld. 16 Feb 1995, J. Balderson & P.K. Christensen ” (ANIC). Paratypes (9): Queensland: “ 17.20S 144.57E, Emu Ck., 27km SW of Dimbulah, QLD, 25–26 Nov. 1981, J. Balderson ”(1, ANIC); “QLD, Mareeba Dist., Brumby Gully, on Eucalyptus, 4 Jan 81, S. Barker / SAMA Database No. 25-039335”(1, SAM); “ Australia: N. QLD, 7km NE of Tolga, 23 xii 1986, Storey & De Faveri, light trap ” (1, QM); “ Australia: N. QLD, 7km NE of Tolga, Nov 1988, Storey & De Faveri, light trap ” (1, QM); “ Australia: N. QLD, 7km NE of Tolga, 7–21 xi 1988, Storey & De Faveri, light trap ” (1, QM); “ Australia: N. QLD, 7km NE of Tolga, Dec 1988, Storey & De Faveri, light trap ” (1, QM); “ Cape Tribulation, N. QLD, 24–29 xii 1980, R.I. Storey, N. Gough, rainforest” (1, QM); “ Little Laura R., 15km NE of Laura, N. QLD, 1 i 1983, R. Storey ” (1, QM); “Emerald Ck., Mareeba, 19–20 Dec 1978, N.QLD, I.C. Cunningham, at light” (1, QM). Distribution (Fig. 6B). Known only from northern Queensland. Remarks. This species differs from the E. loxleyae (McKeown) by the elytral costae 1 and 2 separated, pronotum and median portion of elytra uniformly yellow (Fig. 5 D).Published as part of Jin, Mengjie, Ślipiński, Adam, Keyzer, Roger De & Pang, Hong, 2017, Review of Australian genera Tessaromma Newman and Phlyctaenodes Newman with description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Phlyctaenodini), pp. 67-85 in Zootaxa 4277 (1) on pages 81-82, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/80908
Escalonia Jin & Ślipiński & Keyzer & Pang 2017, gen. nov
No full textEscalonia gen. nov (Figures 5A –L) Type species. Tessaromma loxleyae McKeown, 1942. Etymology. This genus is dedicated to our Venezuelan friend and colleague Dr. Hermes E. Escalona García in recognition of his research contributions to the study of Cerambycidae and other beetles. Gender feminine. Description. Length 7–9 mm. Body slender, lightly sclerotized, yellowish brown with variable darker and lighter markings on elytra (Figs 5A, D, F, G); dorsal vestiture comprising single sparse setae or long bristles. Head moderately inclined (Fig. 5C), as long as wide, teardrop-shaped in dorsal view. Mandibles broad-based, short and sharply pointed apically. Maxilla with well-developed and densely setose galea and lacinia; terminal palpomere of labial and maxillary palps ovoid in female, in male expanded apically. Frontoclypeal suture weakly arcuate; clypeus flat, entirely sclerotized. Frons flat with complete median groove, laterally separated from eyes by longitudinal groove extending from antennal insertion forward to mandibular articulation. Eyes large, convex, moderately coarsely facetted, deeply emarginate with very large lower lobe and short and narrow upper lobe. Antennal insertions on raised tubercles, laterally oriented, antennal foramen with thin rim; articulation point clearly visible when antenna is inserted. Antenna 11-segmented, filiform, extending shortly beyond apices of elytra in both sexes; scape gradually expanded apically, slightly stronger than other antennomeres; pedicel small and subquadrate; antennomere 4 shorter than antennomeres 3 or 5. Prothorax transverse with sharp, broad based, posteriorly bent median lateral projections. Disc finely punctured with 3 weak elevations. Prosternal process narrow, blade like, but complete between coxae; procoxal cavities oval, externally open, with lateral extensions; protrochantin exposed. Procoxae transversely oval, without plates. Pterothorax. Mesocoxae circular, without secondary articulation; width of mesoventral process about 0.5 coxal diameter (Fig. 5B); mesocoxal cavity broadly open to mesepimeron; mesotrochantin externally visible. Elytra covering entire abdomen, truncate apically; base of elytra coarsely punctate; elytra with complete or incomplete costae and rows of long bristles. Legs with all femora clavate, each with 1–3 sharp projections on the anterior or posterior edge that are more pronounced in males; setose brushes absent; metafemur not extending beyond apices of elytra. Protibia simple externally with 2 somewhat uneven apical spurs; tarsomere 1 slightly longer than other tarsomeres; pretarsal claws narrowly separated. Abdominal ventrites without patches of dense setae. Ventrite 1 slightly longer than 2 with well-delimited coxal cavities. Intercoxal process triangular and pointed apically; ventrite 5 deeply emarginate in male, truncate in female. Terminalia. Male tergite VIII transverse, emarginate posteriorly with short median strut; sternite IX with long spiculum gastrale forked at base. Aedeagus about 0.3–0.4 times as long as abdomen. Parameres (Fig. 5 K) narrow, free to base, sparsely setose apically. Penis (Fig. 5 J) pointed apically with anterior struts about 0.3 times as long as apicale, endophallus with pair of sclerites at base and several thorn-like sclerites in middle section. Ovipositor moderately long with terminal styli. Remarks. Escalonia can easily be separated from Tessaromma in having emarginate, not divided eyes; antennal scape gradually expanding apically; procoxae strongly projecting and without coxal plates; and femora with tooth like projections. Distribution. So far known only from Australia and New Guinea.Published as part of Jin, Mengjie, Ślipiński, Adam, Keyzer, Roger De & Pang, Hong, 2017, Review of Australian genera Tessaromma Newman and Phlyctaenodes Newman with description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Phlyctaenodini), pp. 67-85 in Zootaxa 4277 (1) on page 80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/80908
FIGURE 3. A–D in Review of Australian genera Tessaromma Newman and Phlyctaenodes Newman with description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Phlyctaenodini)
No full textFIGURE 3. A–D: Tessaromma nanum Blackburn. E–F: Tessaromma undatum Newman. G–H: Tessaromma triste (Hope). I– J: Tessaromma argenteonigra Gressitt (Holotype, BPBM).Published as part of Jin, Mengjie, Ślipiński, Adam, Keyzer, Roger De & Pang, Hong, 2017, Review of Australian genera Tessaromma Newman and Phlyctaenodes Newman with description of a new genus and species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Phlyctaenodini), pp. 67-85 in Zootaxa 4277 (1) on page 75, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/80908
Rhytiphora garnetensis Ashman & Keyzer & ŚLipińsk 2023, sp. nov.
No full textRhytiphora garnetensis sp. nov. (Figs. 6A–C, 7E, 8A, 9A) Diagnosis. Rhytiphora garnetensis sp. nov. is most similar morphologically to R. delicatula and R. pulcherrima Breuning from Western Australia (Fig. 6D–E), but can be distinguished using the following traits: R. delicatula is slightly more elongate (body 3.3 times as long as wide) with smaller eyes (lower lobes 4.3 widths apart, just longer than gena, not fully divided from upper lobe), extended but arcuate clypeus, antennal tubercules slightly further apart (3.8 widths apart), no tubercules and far fewer ochre setae at the elytra base, no ochre on the metaventrite, and slightly different male genitalia (parameres apically blunt; Fig. 9D); R. pulcherrima has smaller eyes (lower lobes 3.9 widths apart) joined by 1 row of ommatidia, bigger male sex patches (covering whole of enlarged ventrite 2) and different colouring: ochre occiput, central brown patch on the pronotum, elytra with lateral silver-white patch in the central third, edged with brown, and ochre patches in the apical third. One paratype from Mt Garnet has been sequenced (ANIC 25-066756, R. ‘nr delicatula’; Ashman et al. 2022a): R. garnetensis sp. nov. is closely related to R. collaris (ANIC 25-066530), R. piperitia (ANIC 25-066534) and R. amicula (ANIC 25-066535, 25-066557) (Figs. 6–8). All three of these species have distinct transverse grooves on the pronotum, no ochre patch on the metaventrite and no tubercules at the elytra base; R. piperitia and R. amicula also have a tubercule at the pronotum lateral margin. Rhytiphora collaris has a short clypeus (in line with mandibular articulation), mottled or banded antennae, striped pronotum, white metanepisternum, heavily mottled elytra with no dorsal dark patches and the lateral white stripe usually extending beyond the basal third. Rhytiphora piperitia has banded antennae, mottled or striped pronotum, heavily mottled elytra with smaller, not ochreous dark patches at the base and diagonal white and brown patches in the apical third. Rhytiphora amicula has smaller sex patches (covering half of male ventrite 2) and no dorsal dark patches or heavy ochre mottling on the elytra. Description. Body small to medium-sized, elongate: body length 13.2–17.0 mm (holotype 15.0 mm), width 4.5–6.0 mm (holotype 5.1 mm). Winged. Dark brown with grey setae, ochre mottling and brown patches on elytra (Figs. 6A–C, 8A). Head with frontoclypeus rectangular (Fig. 7E). Eyes moderately faceted, ringed with white setae (ochre on outer rim), lobes fully divided. Lower lobes separated by 3.3–3.5 times eye width, approximately same length as gena. Upper lobes separated by 2.2 times width of antennal socket, same length as antennal socket. Antennal tubercules fairly prominent, separated by 3.2 times width of antennal socket. Clypeus flat, slightly extended beyond mandibular articulation, sometimes covering membranous anteclypeus; mandibles apically pointed, maxillary and labial palps fusiform (Fig. 7E). Frontoclypeus grey with ochre mottling, gena white below eye, occipital suture with ochre outline. Antennae extending slightly beyond elytral apices in male, with ventral fringe of long, dense setae on antennomeres 2–11. Scape smooth, expanding apically, 2.1 times as long as wide, 4 times longer than pedicel, shorter than antennomere 3, posteriorly extending a little beyond anterior margin of pronotum. Antennomere 3 longer than 4. Antennomeres covered with fine grey setae. Prothorax subquadrate, 0.8 times as long as wide, base distinctly narrower than humeri. Lateral margins with slight anterior ridge; pronotal disc finely punctate with very shallow transverse grooves, setae grey with ochre mottling. Prosternal process narrow, arcuate. Procoxae without spiniform projection in males. Elytra finely punctate, granulate in basal third with two distinct projections (short row of tubercules). Elytral base dark brown and heavily mottled with ochre, except for thin grey line at suture; thin, curved white line on lateral margin, not extending beyond basal third. Rest of elytra grey, lightly mottled with ochre, with brown circular patch at beginning of apical third. Elytral apices distinctly truncate. Legs covered with fine grey setae, hind legs mottled with ochre; male protibial tubercule absent. Mesoventrite arcuate without anterior projection. Metaventrite twice as long as mesoventrite, setae mostly grey with central white and posterior ochre patches. Ventrite 2 slightly longer than 1 in male, with broad yellow sex patches covering almost entire surface; fringe of ventrite 1 slightly thicker in male than other ventrite fringes. Ventrite 5 slightly longer than 4 in female, with sharp apical divot and endocarina. Male genitalia: parameres narrowly separated at base, broadly separated at apices, thick, apically tapered and setose; penis tip rounded (Fig. 9A). Types. Holotype male (Figs. 6A–B, 8A): “QLD: 17.84° S x 144.95°E 25km W of Mt Garnet, 13–14 Feb 2010, J. Hasenpusch, 19663” (ANIC 25-074497). Paratypes (6 specimens): “N. QLD: 38km W. Mt. Garnet, J. Hasenpusch, 3 Feb 2016 ” (1 female, ANIC 25-066756); “ Australia N Qld. 30km W Mt Garnet, 6-11-10, P. Hasenpusch” (1 female in ethanol, ANIC); “ 11.45S 142.35E Heathlands, QLD 15–26 Jan. 1992 T. A. Weir, I. D. Naumann at light” (2 males, ANIC; male genitalia dissection, Fig. 9A); “ 11.57S 142.38E QLD 22km SbyE Heathlands 27 Jan. 1992, A. Ewart, at light Melaleuca swamp” (1 male, ANIC; Figs. 6C, 7E); “ 11.41S 142.28E QLD 15km NWbyW Heathlands 28 Jan. 1992, A. Ewart Eucalyptus tetradonta forest, at light” (1 male, ANIC). Other material examined. Rockhampton, Queensland E. Sutton (1 specimen, ANIC). This specimen is damaged and so has not been made a paratype. Distribution and host plants. Northern to central Queensland coast. Localities include: Heathlands, Mount Garnet, Rockhampton. Specific host plants are unknown, but specimens have been collected from light traps set in predominately Myrtaceae habitats. Etymology. This species is named after its type locality: to the west of Mount Garnet (in the Tablelands Region of Queensland, Australia).Published as part of Ashman, Lauren G., Keyzer, Roger De & S ́ Lipińsk, Adam, 2023, The Australian genus Rhytiphora (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) with a revision of the Rhytiphora collaris group, pp. 1-62 in Zootaxa 5312 (1) on pages 12-15, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5312.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/812968
Kierkegaard et l'exception. Quelle communauté entre le crime et l'innocence?
No full textThe A. attempts, on the basis of a documented investigation, to present an original, or at least an authentic reading of Kierkegaard. Approaching from the periphery of the work, and led in his reverse procedure, by the study of exceptional cases, the A. casts a different light on some Kierkegaardian topics, such as the theory of stages, the forms of the comic, the jump, pseudonymy, the thorn in the flesh, the incognito, primitivity, repetition. By asking himself how Kierkegaard elaborated his thought and general conception of the stages on the path of life, the A. invites us to discover the world of crime in order to confront ourselves with the problem of evil, through the complex figures of the demoniac and the religious. (Transl. by J. Dudley).L'auteur s'efforce à l'issue d'une enquête documentée à nous présenter une lecture originale, du moins authentique de Kierkegaard. À partir d'une approche par la périphérie de l'œuvre et, dans sa marche inverse, menée par l'étude des figures d'exception, l'auteur nous propose un autre éclairage sur quelques thèmes kierkegaardiens comme la théorie des stades, les formes de comique, le saut, la pseudonymie, l'écharde dans la chair, l'incognito, la primitivité, la répétition. En se demandant comment Kierkegaard élabora sa pensée et sa conception générale des stades sur le chemin de la vie, l'auteur nous invite à découvrir le monde du crime pour nous confronter au problème du mal, à travers les figures complexes du démoniaque et du religieux.De Keyzer Stéphane. Kierkegaard et l'exception. Quelle communauté entre le crime et l'innocence?. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 104, n°3, 2006. pp. 467-497
Kierkegaard et l'exception. Quelle communauté entre le crime et l'innocence?
No full textThe A. attempts, on the basis of a documented investigation, to present an original, or at least an authentic reading of Kierkegaard. Approaching from the periphery of the work, and led in his reverse procedure, by the study of exceptional cases, the A. casts a different light on some Kierkegaardian topics, such as the theory of stages, the forms of the comic, the jump, pseudonymy, the thorn in the flesh, the incognito, primitivity, repetition. By asking himself how Kierkegaard elaborated his thought and general conception of the stages on the path of life, the A. invites us to discover the world of crime in order to confront ourselves with the problem of evil, through the complex figures of the demoniac and the religious. (Transl. by J. Dudley).L'auteur s'efforce à l'issue d'une enquête documentée à nous présenter une lecture originale, du moins authentique de Kierkegaard. À partir d'une approche par la périphérie de l'œuvre et, dans sa marche inverse, menée par l'étude des figures d'exception, l'auteur nous propose un autre éclairage sur quelques thèmes kierkegaardiens comme la théorie des stades, les formes de comique, le saut, la pseudonymie, l'écharde dans la chair, l'incognito, la primitivité, la répétition. En se demandant comment Kierkegaard élabora sa pensée et sa conception générale des stades sur le chemin de la vie, l'auteur nous invite à découvrir le monde du crime pour nous confronter au problème du mal, à travers les figures complexes du démoniaque et du religieux.De Keyzer Stéphane. Kierkegaard et l'exception. Quelle communauté entre le crime et l'innocence?. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 104, n°3, 2006. pp. 467-497
- …
