3,153 research outputs found

    FIGURES 17A–R. Chilicola aenigma Packer, n in Fifteen new species of Chilicola (Hymenoptera: Apoidea; Colletidae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 17A–R. Chilicola aenigma Packer, n. sp. Head of male: A. frontal view, B. lateral view. Head of female: C. lateral view, D. frontal view. E. male pronotum. F. Male hind femur and tibia. G. Female hind femur and tibia. H. Male T6, T7 and apex of S6. I. Lateral view of male metasomal venter. J–M. Male terminalia. J. S7. K. S8. L. genital capsule, dorsal views are at the left. M. Genital capsule, lateral view. N–R. Sting apparatus of female: N. hemitergite 7, O. hemitergite 8, P–Q. Furcula, dorsal and lateral views respectively. R. First and second valvifer with sting shaft. Stippling in A and B indicates pale colouration, in R a membranous region.Published as part of Packer, Laurence & Genaro, Julio A., 2007, Fifteen new species of Chilicola (Hymenoptera: Apoidea; Colletidae), pp. 1-55 in Zootaxa 1468 on page 53, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17662

    An on-line algorithm for semantic forgetting

    No full text
    Ontologies that evolve through use to support new domain tasks can grow extremely large. Moreover, large ontologies require more resources to use and have slower response times than small ones. To help address this problem, we present an on-line semantic forgetting algorithm that removes ontology fragments containing infrequently used or cheap to relearn concepts. We situate our algorithm in an extension of the widely used RoboCup Rescue platform, which provides simulated tasks to agents. We show that our agents send fewer messages and complete more tasks, and thus achieve a greater degree of success, than other state-of-the-art approaches

    Cotton Packer.

    No full text
    Patent for an automatic cotton packer that provides a new method to packing cotton. This mechanism can be controlled automatically or by hand. As the cotton leaves the gin, it is packed automatically

    Forgetting Fragments from Evolving Ontologies

    No full text
    Ontologies underpin the semantic web; they define the concepts and their relationships contained in a data source. An increasing number of ontologies are available on-line, but an ontology that combines information from many different sources can grow extremely large. As an ontology grows larger, more resources are required to use it, and its response time becomes slower. Thus, we present and evaluate an on-line approach that forgets fragments from an OWL ontology that are infrequently or no longer used, or are cheap to relearn, in terms of time and resources. In order to evaluate our approach, we situate it in a controlled simulation environment, RoboCup OWLRescue, which is an extension of the widely used RoboCup Rescue platform, which enables agents to build ontologies automatically based on the tasks they are required to perform. We benchmark our approach against other comparable techniques and show that agents using our approach spend less time forgetting concepts from their ontology, allowing them to spend more time deliberating their actions, to achieve a higher average score in the simulation environment

    Documents: Greenough, Packer, Thomas, et al., 1868-1871

    No full text
    1868 March 2 Note: Judgement in Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland Cty. Re: William J. Greenough & Jno. B. Packer and Robert G. Rieman, Henry Thomas & J. W. Hall for payment of 30,0001868October28toJohnB.Packer(Sunbury)fromHenryThomas(Philadelphia)WesternUnionTelegraphtelegramcopyre:amountofProthonotarycosts1868October28toHenryThomas(Philadelphia)fromJ.B.Packer(Sunbury)WesternUnionTelegraphtelegramre:30,000 1868 October 28 to John B. Packer (Sunbury) from Henry Thomas (Philadelphia) Western Union Telegraph telegram copy re: amount of Prothonotary costs 1868 October 28 to Henry Thomas (Philadelphia) from J.B. Packer (Sunbury) Western Union Telegraph telegram re: 30,720 1868 October 28 to Henry Thomas from C. P. Wolverton (Sunbury) Western Union Telegraph re: ""brief will leave tomorrow am doing my best"" 1868 October 28 to J.B. Packer (Sunbury) from Henry Thomas (Philadelphia) Western Union Telegraph re: ""Are you going to be here this week answer immediately"" 1868 October 28 to Henry Thomas from J. B. Packer (Sunbury) Western Union Telegram r: ""No sir I do not expect to go down"" 1868 December 16 to Charles S. Longstreth (Treasurer Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.) from C. P. Wolverton (Sunbury) letter: Trevorton Coal Co., Henry Thomas, J. P. Boyer, Jacob R. Eby, R. G. Reimer, erection of breaker 1868 August 1 to December 31 Trevorton Mines (account) 1871 September 29 from W. J. Greenough (handwritten note) re: receipt from Israel W. Morris the deeds of Valentine Fegely, Isaac May, David Bohn to Isaac May, Thomas Baumgarden 1871 October 12 from W. J. Greenough (Sunbury) to Israel W. Morris (hand- written letter) re: Hartshorne to John B. Douty deed, mortgages to Boyd and Russell executed by Patterson, Boyd to Carey mortgage, Carey title to B. H. Howell and ultimately to Douty 1872 September 27 from Thomas Baumgardner (Lancaster) to Jno. B. Douty (handwritten letter) re: Judgment against the Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. and get satisfaction from Mr. Greenoug

    MARKET POWER IN BEEF PACKING: FEEDLOT "CAPTURE" AND ITS CAUSES

    No full text
    Concentration in the beef packing industry has been rising for the past 25 years. Many studies of market power in beef packing are based on the conjectural variations framework, which depends on accurate estimates of packer input and processing costs. We propose an alternative measure of packer behavior which does not rely on estimates of packer costs. We also suggest how this measure could be used to draw tentative conclusions regarding packer behavior.Agribusiness, Marketing,

    Packer for Silos.

    No full text
    Patent for a new packer for silos, "...which may be assembled with any silo of standard construction, to carry out the packing operation" (lines 13-15) including illustrations

    Deed Greenough & Packer to Reimer, Hall, Thomas, 1868

    No full text
    1868 June 6 from William J. Greenough & Mary C., John B. Packer & Mary M. (Sunbury) to Robert G. Reimer (Baltimore), John W. Hall and Henry Thomas (Harrisburg) Deed for land in Zerbe (Coal) Township and Trevorton DEED W. J. Greenough & wife et al to R. G. Reimer et al

    THE EFFECTS OF INDUSTRY STRUCTURE ON PRICE: A CASE IN THE BEEF INDUSTRY

    No full text
    This study estimates the influence of concentration and other structural variables on the price of slaughter cattle. Cross-sectional data were used to estimate a single equation model which included, in addition to traditional factor demand variables, packer concentration and a measure of market power exerted by feedlots. Results suggest that packer concentration has had a significant and increasing negative impact on fed cattle prices during the years of analysis, 1972 and 1977.Industrial Organization, Livestock Production/Industries,
    corecore