1,720,966 research outputs found

    Psoriasis and biological drugs at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a mini review outlining risk of infection, seroprevalence, and safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine

    No full text
    Objective The aim of this study is to review the life of patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the relevance of frailty within this context, reviewing studies that describe the course and severity of infection in patients with psoriasis on biologics, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2, and the safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine in these patients.Materials and methods The keywords "Psoriasis," "Biologics," "SARS-CoV-2," "COVID-19," and "BNT162b2 Vaccine" were used in various combinations on database engines to find relevant articles on this topic.Results A total of 36 articles were found, with 20 concerning the course, severity, and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy and 16 concerning safety and efficacy of BNT162b2 in these patients.Discussion Patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy did not have increased seroprevalence compared with the general population, indicating that they were not at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population. Furthermore, the immunosuppressive action of biologics may be protective, as patients on biologic therapy had better outcomes and less risk of severe infection. The seroconversion rate against SARS-CoV-2 from the BNT162b2 vaccine was similar in both patients with psoriasis on biologics and the general population, indicating that efficacy is not hindered by the biologic therapy. However, the cellular response in population with psoriasis was significantly less intense, and the humoral immune response was weaker than that in the general population, demonstrating that the possibility of tighter vaccination schedules and additional doses may be advantageous in these patients

    15 Years of Intermittent Therapy With Hydroxychloroquine Without Any Loss of Efficacy in Reticular Erythematous Mucinosis

    No full text
    Reticular erythematous mucinosis (REM) is a rare dermatological condition characterized by erythematous, reticulated patches and plaques with a slightly infiltrated appearance. REM is classified among cutaneous mucinoses, which are characterized by the accumulation of mucin in the subcutaneous tissues, leading to the formation of characteristic reticulated patches on the skin. The pathogenesis is still debated, but the association with sun exposure seems to play an important role. We present the case of a 54-year-old individual with a history of recurrent erythema on the chest and back. The patient came to our attention in 2007 due to a worsening of symptoms after sun exposure. On clinical examination, the patient presented with pruritic, erythematous patches with a reticulated appearance. A biopsy was performed, which showed the presence of a moderate lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis, with a perivascular and periappendageal distribution, consisting mainly of T lymphocytes, and deposits of mucin in the superficial dermis, dissecting the collagen bundles. A diagnosis of REM was made, and the patient began treatment with hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day, with rapid improvement of symptoms. Considering the resolution of symptoms, the therapy was discontinued after 3 months. The patient remained in remission until the following summer when the condition recurred, requiring a new cycle of hydroxychloroquine therapy. The patient has experienced recurrences over the past 15 years during the summer, which responded to hydroxychloroquine therapy, consistently achieving rapid symptom resolution without ever experiencing loss of efficacy or side effects

    Emergency accesses in Dermatology Department during the Covid-19 pandemic in a referral third level center in the north of Italy

    No full text
    : During the lockdown period, most planned visits have been postponed and the number of accesses to emergency department (ED) has dramatically reduced. The aim of our study is to analyze the impact of the lockdown on the number, type, and severity of Dermatological ED diagnosis. We performed a retrospective review of all dermatological consultations in the ED of IRCSS San Matteo during the lockdown period in Italy (February 22-May 3 2020) and compared them with those from the same period in 2019. We noticed a sharply reduction in the number of dermatological consultations requested in the ED: from 164 patients in 2019 to 33 in 2020. Some diagnostic categories showed a significant difference with a higher incidence of vasculopathic lesions (0.6% vs 12.1%, P < .0001), urticarial rashes (8.5% vs 21.2%, P = .03), and scabies (3% vs 12.1%, P = .023). We observed an increase in the proportion of patients starting medications, before coming to the ED 26.2% in 2019 vs 66.7% in 2020 (P < .001). Furthermore, we noticed a significant increase in the average complexity of cases presenting to the ED in 2020, as proven by the increased need for biopsies and systemic therapy
    corecore