42,782 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The David W. Fentress Family Letters, 1856-1969
No full textTranscript of a letter by an unidentified author to David Fentress regarding sharing federal newspapers and the banning of federal newspapers in some areas. The author passes on the news of the war including the destruction of the Federal merchantmen by the Confederate fleet. He passes along world news: Russia preparing to go to War with Europe and how that could negatively affect the Confederacy. There is also speculation on the future of the war
The David W. Fentress Family Letters, 1856-1969
No full textTranscript of a letter by an unidentified author to David Fentress regarding sharing federal newspapers and the banning of federal newspapers in some areas. The author passes on the news of the war including the destruction of the Federal merchantmen by the Confederate fleet. He passes along world news: Russia preparing to go to War with Europe and how that could negatively affect the Confederacy. There is also speculation on the future of the war
‘Is It Real Food?’: Who Benefits from Globalization in Tanzania and India?
No full text‘But is it real food? Responses to globalisation in Tanzania and India’ Sociological Research Online, Volume 11, Issue 4 (http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/4/caplan.html) (also in David Inglis and Debra Gimlin (eds.) The Globalization of Food. Oxford and New York: Berg Publishers. 273-290 ‘Is It Real Food?’: Who Benefits from Globalization in Tanzania and India
From Scots to Australians : the Carment and Inglis Families 1672-1976
No full textMade available by the Northern Territory Library via the Publications (Legal Deposit) Act 2004 (NT).Part A: The Carment family -- Carment beginnings -- David Carment and Margaret Stormonth -- James Carment and Elizabeth Charlotte Maxwell -- David Carment and Elizabeth Shallard -- David Shallard Carment and Ida Marion Arbuckle Mackie. Part B: The Inglis family -- William Inglis and Mary Ann Ferguson -- Violet Louise Inglis -- Conclusion -- Scottish-Australian lives.Reprinted with corrections in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Unless otherwise indicated, all images reproduced in this book belong to members of the Carment, George, Inglis, McAlpine, Sulman and Wood families
Kane, David (2018) Book Review: The Beatles. Inglis, Ian (2017).
No full textBook review of: Inglis, I (2017) The Beatles. Sheffield, Equinox
Leading arts organizations: traditional styles or different realities?
No full textLoretta Inglis, David Cray and Susan Freema
Fabricating the Truth About Bruno Latour(s)
No full textIn his lifetime, Bruno Latour (1947-2022) made many provocative and controversial arguments, such as about the nature of the practices of the natural sciences, and against standard social scientific forms of critique. Running through many of Latour’s interventions, aimed at what he took to be stultifying forms of academic and intellectual orthodoxy, was a concern with the nature of truth. Whether emphasising how science fabricates its ‘facts’, or in having to deal with uncomfortable similarities between that sort of analysis and the attacks on the allegedly fraudulent nature of climate science by climate sceptics, or in presenting the societal bases of standard forms of social critique as fictitious, Latour was constantly engaged in battles about and polemics concerning what counts as truths and truthfulness. In this paper, we consider the nature of some of the main contours of Latour’s battles about and with truths. We present an account of his practice in a critical light. Sometimes that involves stepping outside of the ‘anti-critical’ frame of reference he sought to construct and impose on how philosophy, sociology and other ways of thinking are done, but it also sometimes involves using that apparatus, while turning it against the intentions of the author. The purpose of this paper is not to try out-do Latour in the dismissal of intellectual positions other than one’s own. Instead, we focus on other types and levels of failure in the career-long endeavours and engagements with matters of truth of this curious but undoubtedly unavoidable figure, ‘Bruno Latour’. We end by speculating if more ‘Bruno Latours’ will be fabricated in the service of new modes of truth-creation in the future
- …
