1,721,075 research outputs found
Challenges of meta-analyses pooling non-randomized controlled studies
No full text[No abstract available
Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty
No full textPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery is now considered the gold standard for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, a sizable portion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have concomitant multivessel disease, which raises important therapeutic and prognostic issues. Indeed, it is still unclear whether percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit vessel alone is superior, equivalent, or inferior in terms of risk-benefit balance in comparison to a strategy of complete revascularization, with percutaneous coronary intervention of nonculprit vessels as well. The present systematic review provides an updated prospective on the rationale, background, and outcomes of culprit-only versus multivessel percutaneous revascularization in subjects undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Our findings clearly demonstrate that multivessel coronary disease significantly and adversely impacts on patient prognosis, yet a culprit-only revascularization strategy should be sought after in most cases, unless patient instability or symptoms/signs of residual myocardial ischemia support nonculprit vessel intervention. © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved
Percutaneous coronary intervention on left main coronary artery trifurcation
No full textTrifurcating coronary artery disease is a complex atherosclerotic process involving the origin of one or more of three side branches arising from a left main coronary artery. With the emergence of drug-eluting stents, interventional cardiologists have become more aggressive in treating this kind of complex diseases, also in patients with an unprotected left main disease. Few series of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on significant lesions of the left main trifurcations have been described, approached with dissimilar techniques in the best attempt of avoiding life-threatening complications. We therefore describe a case of successful PCI on a left main trifurcation supported by pre-and post-intravascular ultrasound iconography
Percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease
No full textSymptomatic coronary artery disease may be commonly due to significant atherosclerotic disease involving coronary vessels of relatively small caliber (i.e., with reference vessel diameter <2.75 mm). Whenever medical therapy fails and in other selected cases, revascularization by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or bypass surgery is indicated even for small vessel coronary disease. However, despite the numerous developments and improvements in devices and techniques, PCI of small coronary vessels is still fraught with a significant risk of midterm restenosis after both balloon-only PCI and bare-metal stent implantation. Drug-eluting stents, especially those associated with very low angiographic late lumen loss (<0.20 mm), appear to significantly improve angiographic and clinical outcomes after PCI of small coronary vessels. The present article provides a concise and updated review on percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with symptomatic small vessel coronary artery disease. © 2010 Elsevier Inc
Long-term effect of chronic oral anticoagulation: Focus on coronary artery disease
No full textCoronary artery disease remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a disease burden that does not seem to have decreased significantly over time. Since their developments, oral drugs that are able to reduce the coagulation properties of blood (i.e., oral anticoagulants such as warfarin or dicoumarol) have been tested in thousands of patients with, or suspected with, coronary artery disease, however they have yielded disparate and conflicting results. The advent of oral antiplatelet agents has further put into a niche the apparent role of oral anticoagulant therapy in subjects with established coronary artery disease (i.e., in the setting of secondary prevention). However, the current and future role of oral anticoagulants in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease remains very important, as testified to by the ongoing research by several major companies and investigators focusing on the development of novel oral anticoagulants. This review provides a succinct and updated appraisal of the long-term effects of chronic oral anticoagulation in the setting of coronary artery disease. © 2009 Future Medicine Ltd
Very very late thrombosis of a sirolimus-eluting stent: does suboptimal stent expansion take its toll even after three years?
No full textWe report the case of a 55-year-old man who underwent coronary angiography in 2004 for early angina following anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Angiography disclosed a critical stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery and significant stenoses in the right coronary artery and first obtuse marginal branch, treated with two paclitaxel-eluting stents and a sirolimus-eluting stent, respectively. After completion of a six-month thienopyridine course and while still being on lifelong aspirin, in 2007 he was readmitted for lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction: angiography revealed stent thrombosis beginning at the proximal edge of the sirolimuseluting stent implanted in the first obtuse marginal branch. Intravascular ultrasound was performed after thrombectomy but before balloon dilation showing suboptimal stent expansion and a thrombus partially adhering to the sirolimus-eluting stent. The procedure was then successfully completed with the implantation of another sirolimus-eluting stent. This clinical vignette suggests that suboptimal drug-eluting stent deployment may be associated with stent thrombosis well after the traditional time frame of subacute thrombosis
Update on Dedicated Bifurcation Stents
No full textCoronary bifurcation lesions represent an area of ongoing challenge in interventional cardiology. Contemporary studies using drug-eluting stents report a reduction in main vessel (MV) restenosis; however, residual stenosis and restenosis at side-branch ostium remain an issue. Multiple two-stent bifurcation strategies exist, including T-stenting, V-stenting, simultaneous kissing stenting, culotte stenting, and crush stenting technique. Each strategy has its own advantages and disadvantages, but on the basis of results of numerous randomized trials, the provisional approach of implanting one stent on the main branch has became the default approach to most bifurcation lesions. Dedicated bifurcation stents have been designed to specifically address some of the shortcomings of the conventional percutaneous approach to bifurcation intervention. The majority of the devices are aimed at facilitating the provisional approach. Dedicated bifurcation stents should enable all operators to treat the side-branch ostium simultaneously with the main branch, preserving a safe, permanent access to side branch during the procedure. In the future, the use of these new devices will probably enhance the interaction between adequate mechanical scaffolding and accurate delivery of the appropriate dosage of any new antirestenosis drugs. There are currently 11 devices available that either have completed or are undergoing first-in-man trials. The development of further drug-eluting platforms and larger controlled studies should demonstrate their clinical applicability, efficacy, and safety before they are widely incorporated into daily practice. (J Interven Cardiol 2009;22:150-155)
Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main disease: The Turin Registry
No full textBackground: Most cardiologists performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for unprotected left main disease (ULM) mandate mid-term angiographic follow-up, yet there are few data supporting this approach. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcome of patients with ULM treated with DES according to their follow-up management strategy. Methods: Patients with ULM stenosis undergoing PCI with DES and surviving up to 6 months were retrospectively identified from our ongoing database. We distinguished those undergoing clinical follow-up only, those with clinically driven angiographic follow-up, and those with routine angiographic follow-up. The primary end-point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e., death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or repeat ULM PCI). Results: A total of 198 patients were included: 55 (28%) in the clinical follow-up group, 64 (32%) in the clinically driven angiographic follow-up group, and 79 (40%) in the routine angiographic follow-up group. After 37.0 ± 15.7 months, mortality was similar in the 3 groups (respectively 7.3, 4.7, and 5.9%, p = 0.27). However, MACE were significantly more common in the clinically driven angiographic follow-up group (42.2 vs. 7.3 and 26.1%, p = 0.02), mainly due to the expected increase in repeat revascularization in those undergoing angiographic follow-up (23.4 vs. 1.8 and 13.14%). Notably, there were no differences in the rate of stent thrombosis across the three groups, with rates of 3.1 vs. 1.8 and 2.5% (p = 0.35). Conclusions: An expectant management can be safely adopted in most patients with ULM treated percutaneously, as long as a low threshold for control coronary angiography is maintained. © 2010 Springer-Verlag
Impact of impedance threshold devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
No full textOBJECTIVES: Vital organ hypoperfusion significantly contributes to the dismal survival rates observed with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest. The impedance threshold device is a valve which reduces air entry into lungs during chest recoil between chest compressions, producing a potentially beneficial decrease in intrathoracic pressure and thus increasing venous return to the heart. This review provides an update on the impedance threshold device and underlines its effect on short-term survival. DATA SOURCE: MedCentral, CENTRAL, PubMed, and conference proceedings were searched (updated March 27, 2007). Authors and external experts were contacted. STUDY SELECTIONS: Three unblinded reviewers selected randomized trials using an impedance threshold device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Four reviewers independently abstracted patient, treatment and outcome data. DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 833 patients from five high quality randomized studies were included in the analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pooled estimates showed that the impedance threshold device consistently and significantly improved return to spontaneous circulation (202/438 [46%] for impedance threshold device group vs. 159/445 [36%] for control, relative risk [RR] = 1.29 [1.10-1.51], p = .002), early survival (139/428 [32%] vs. 97/433 [22%], RR = 1.45 [1.16-1.80], p = .0009) and favorable neurologic outcome (39/307 [13%] vs. 18/293 [6%], RR = 2.35 [1.30-4.24], p = .004) with no effect on favorable neurologic outcome in survivors (39/60 [65%] vs. 18/44 [41%]) nor an improved survival at the longest available follow up (35/428 [8.2%] vs. 24/433 [5.5%]). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies suggests that the impedance threshold device improves early outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc
Early and Long-Term Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Trifurcation Disease
No full textObjectives: We aimed to conduct a retrospective cohort study focusing on our 5-year experience in the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main (ULM) trifurcation disease. Background: Percutaneous treatment of ULM trifurcation remains a challenging and rare procedure for most interventional cardiologists. Moreover, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. Methods: We retrieved all patients with ULM trifurcation disease treated percutaneously at our Institution since 2002, and adjudicated baseline, procedural, and outcome data. The primary end point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, i.e., cardiac death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or target vessel revascularization). Results: A total of 27 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for ULM trifurcation disease, with 14 (52%) cases of true trifurcations, i.e., with concomitant significant stenoses of the distal ULM/ostial left anterior descending plus ostial ramus intermedius and ostial circumflex. Bare-metal stents were implanted in 8 (29%) patients and drug-eluting stents (DES) in 26 (96%), with a main branch stent only strategy in 11 (40%), T stenting in 9 (33%), and V stenting in 6 (27%). Procedural and clinical success occurred in 26 (96%), with one postprocedural death. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 22 patients (81%), and clinical follow-up was completed in all subjects after a median of 28 +/- 17 months, showing overall MACE in 9 (33%), with cardiac death in 4 (15%), myocardial infarction in 1 (4%), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 4 (15%), and percutaneous target vessel revascularization in 5 (19%). Definite stent thrombosis was adjudicated in 1 (3%) patient. Treatment of a true trifurcation lesion and recurrence of angina during follow-up were significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE (P = 0.029 and P = 0.050, respectively). Conclusions: Percutaneous treatment of ULM trifurcation disease is feasible, associated with favorable mid-term results, and may be considered given its low invasiveness in patients at high surgical risk or with multiple comorbidities. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc
- …
