10 research outputs found
Towards deposition of copper indium gallium sulphide/selenide materials by chemical vapour deposition
No full textCopper indium gallium sulphide thin films have been fabricated by chemical vapour deposition with metal halide precursors and S2Cl2 and H2 reactive gases. The CVD-grown CIGS thin films have been characterized by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy
The Development Trend of Chinese History Studies in the United States from Philip C. C. Huang's Theory
No full textThe development of Chinese history research in the United States has undergone a transformation from a "Western-centered view" to a "China-centered view". In this new era, scholars of Chinese history call for a new change in research methods. Philip C.C.Huang, a Chinese-American, puts forward the "crisis of normative understanding" and the "four traps" in the study of modern Chinese history. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the breakthrough of Philip C.C.Huang\u27s theory of Chinese history research on the original model and its promotion of Chinese history research in the United States. Starting from Philip C.C.Huang\u27s study of Chinese history, the article analyzes the transcendence of his theory to the previous dichotomy and tries to summarize the development trend of Chinese history research in the United States. It is found that Philip C.C.Huang\u27s theory transcends the dichotomy of Chinese and Western concepts and breaks through the limitations of both theoretical and empirical research, and his Chinese-American identity as a "marginalized person" also provides evidence of the authenticity and objectivity of his theory, which, however, still needs to be further improved. This study identifies the core ideas and shortcomings of Huang\u27s theory and helps to promote a more scientific and convincing study of American Chinese history
Deposition and characterization of copper indium gallium sulphide thin films fabricated by chemical vapour deposition with metal chloride precursors
No full textChemical vapour deposition (CVD) is a widely used method in the optoelectronics and semiconductor industries, producing high purity thin films, in crystalline, amorphous and epitaxial phases. A variety of materials can be produced in this way although for the most part use of the technique has focussed on polysilicon, silicon dioxide, silicon nitride and metallic materials. The advantages of CVD processing, which offers offer superior quality compared to conventional methods such as sputtering or co-evaporation, include conformality, coverage, and stoichiometry control. The process should also be more economical and scalable to large substrates as it can take place at atmospheric pressure rather than under vacuum conditions
Applications of chalcogenide fibers
No full textChalcogenide glass optical fibers have been extensively studied since 1967, when sulphide based fibers and their potential applications were first proposed. While high quality fiber drawn from alloys containing a variety of chalcogen elements have been realized, their delicate nature, complicated fabrication methodology and expense has restricted widespread application and commercial acceptance. In this paper we describe our current work on the fabrication and application of chalcogenide fiber and our vision for their practical implementation in the future
Valid publication of Turpinia pomifera var. minor (Staphyleaceae)
No full textTurpinia Ventenat (1807: 3, non. cons.) is the largest genus of Staphyleaceae (Li et al. 2008). About 13 species are recorded from China, five of which are endemic. Turpinia pomifera var. minor C.C.Huang ex Hsu (1979: 358; see comments in Bartholomew & Zhou 2007) was firstly described in Flora Yunnanica. However, it was not validly published, because no specimen was listed in the protologue, which is contrary to Article 40.1 & 40.2 (McNeill et al. 2012). After consulting the herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), Chinese Academy of Sciences, we found that three gatherings (K.M.Feng 11588, 11748, 13544) were annotated as “Turpinia pomifera (Rox.) Kong [corrected as DC.] var. minor Huang var. n.” [sic] by C.C.Huang in April 1960 on the sheets. Therefore, the three gatherings will potentially have been examined by C.C. Huang and may have been used for the description of T. pomifera var. minor in the preparation of Flora Yunnanica. To validate the name of this variety, a sheet of the gathering K.M.Feng 11588 is designated as the holotype (Fig. 1). Ting-Zhi Hsu published a Latin diagnosis of this variety in 1979, which is referred to below to satisfy Article 39.1. According to Article 46.2, the authorship of the name T. pomifera var. minor remains the same </jats:p
Bergera macrophylla F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full textBergera macrophylla (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314671-1 Fig. 9 Murraya kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) C.C.Huang var. macrophylla C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 16 (2): 85 (Huang 1978). – Murraya macrophylla (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, Guihaia 40 (2): 272 (Mou et al. 2020). – Type: CHINA • Guangxi, Daxin, Xialei, Bitun; Z.J. Li 3198; holotype: IBK[IBK00191042] image! • Longzhou, Kejia, Longshan; X.F. Deng 10571; syntype: IBK[IBK00191043] image! • Longzhou, Jinlong, Banbi; H.Q. Li 40099; syntype: IBK[IBK00191044] image!. Etymology The specific epithet refers to the large leaves. Material examined CHINA • Guangxi Province; P. X. Tan 57677; GXMI! • Napo, Pingmeng; 26 Sep. 2016; F. J. Mou 543, 544; SWFC! • 25 Nov. 2016; F. J. Mou 550; SWFC! • 8 Dec. 2017; F. J. Mou 624, 625; SWFC! • Baidu, Nonghua; 19 Oct. 1977; D. Fang 3-15482; GXMI! • 17 Oct. 1990; D. Fang et al. 0885; GXMI! • Nongbu; 22 Jul. 2013; D.X. Nong et al. 451026130722029 LY; GXMG!, GXMI! • 27 Nov. 2013; X. Y. Huang et al. 51026131127023 LY; GXMG! • Nonglong; 15 Oct. 2014; B. Y. Huang et al. 451026141015067 LY; GXMG! • Jingxi, Tunpan; 14 Oct. 2014; Y. D. Peng et al. 451025141014005 LY; GXMG! • Longzhou, Kejia, Longshan; 30 Oct. 1959; X. F. Deng 10571; IBK! • Jinlong, Banbi; Oct. 1958; H. Q. Li 40099; IBK! • Daxin; 20 Nov. 1956; Z. J. Li 3198; IBK! • Xialei; 7 Dec. 2017; F. J. Mou 618, 619; SWFC!. Description Shrub, high up to 2 m. Compound leaves are 12–46 cm long; rachis rather thin, ca 28 cm long; leaflets 3–9, alternate; chartaceous, leaflets blades 7–18 × 4–10 cm, glabrous, inequilateral, pointed at the base, abruptly acuminate at the tip, very slightly denticulate, with few oil glands; lateral veins, 6–9 pairs, prominent on lower surface; petiolules cylindric, glabrous, 3–4 mm long; petiole cylindric, glabrous. Cymes are terminal, with a few small white flowers, much shorter than the leaves; pedicels longer than flowers, with 2 small bracts at the base or lower third. Flower buds are long, 6 × 2.5 cm, yellow-green, fragrant; calyxes 4-connate, indistinct, very shortly ciliate sepal with a big oil gland; petals 5, lanceolate, 4–6 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, glabrous, a few oil glands. Stamens are 10, 4 mm long; filaments dilated and pubescent upper; anthers attached by the back, oval, with a few hairs. Disks are extremely short. Ovaries are cylindric, warty, glabrous, and distinctly constricted at ca ⅓ from the apex; styles longer than ovaries, with elongated styles, and pubescent lower; stigmas inconspicuous. Berries are oval, diameter 5–10 mm, glabrous, with glands, and red when ripe, containing 1-2 seeds. Phenology Flowering between June and July, while fruiting from August to December. Distribution and habitat China, SW Guangxi (Longzhou, Daxin, Jingxi, and Napo); Vietnam. Growing in forestry of limestone hill or valley forests between alt. 550 and 1400 m. Remarks The species Bergera macrophylla shares few similarities of flowers with B. kwangsiensis, but both are so different in many morphological characteristics (Mou et al. 2020). However, the taxon is more similar to B. glabra from Vietnam in leaf morphological characteristics, and different having fewer oil glands in the mesophyll, smaller cymes, fewer flowers and fruits.Published as part of Mou, Feng-Juan & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860 on pages 165-166, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, http://zenodo.org/record/768937
Bergera kwangsiensis F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full textBergera kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314675-1 Fig. 8 Clausena kwangsiensis C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 8 (1): 90 (Huang 1959). – Murraya kwangsiensis (C.C.Huang) C.C.Huang, Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 16 (2): 85 (Huang 1978). – Type: CHINA • Guangxi, Baise, Baiguoshan; alt. 830 m; R.C. Ching 7667; holotype: PE[00022500] image!; isotype: NAS[NAS00404843] image!. Etymology The specific epithet is derived from the type locality, Guangxi in China. Material examined CHINA • Guangxib Province; 5 Sep. 1928; R. C. Ching 7667; NAS image! • 1958; Nanning Institute of traditional Chinese Medicine 11744; GXMG! • 1960; Nanning Institute of traditional Chinese Medicine 11758; GXMG! • 1964; Y.X. Gan 68238; GXMG! • 8 Jun. 1983; J. Y. Luo & J. X. Ling 76250; GXMI! • 17 Dec. 1985; L. Ou & A. N. Mo 000748; GXMI! • 25 Sep. 1990; D. Fang & L. Zeng 169; GXMI! • Shanglin, Mushan; 9 Jun. 2014; J. B. Teng et al. 450125140609023 LY; GXMG! • Long’an, Chengxiang; 19 Jan. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130119033 LY; IBK! • 9 Nov. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130119033 LY; GXMG! • 25 Jun. 2014; Long’an General Expedition 450123140625098 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Nanwei; 3 Dec. 2012; Long’an General Expedition 450123121203008 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Dujie; 6 Nov. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130116012 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • 27 Jun. 2014; Long’an General Expedition 450123140627072 LY; IBK!, GXMG! • Pinshan, Longhushan; 24 Jul. 2013; Long’an General Expedition 450123130724004 LY; IBK! • Longhushan; 13 Oct. 1981; Expedition 11321; GXMG! • 11 May 2008; Guangxi Expedition of Chinese Plant Combination 0162; IBK! • Xinguang; 12 Nov. 2011; J. C. Yang & Y. B. Liao LH 1316; IBK! • Yali; 22 Nov. 2011; J. C. Yang & Y. B. Liao LH 1765; IBK! • Wuming; 23 Jun. 1955; Guangxi Team 528; PE image! • 16 Dec. 1991; B. S. Huang 22767; GXMI! • Tengxiang; Jun. 1970; S. Q. He s.n.; IBK! • Taiping; 29 Jan. 1975; J. J. Wang 6578; GXMI! • 21 Jul. 1985; Q. Li 166; SYS! • 14 Nov. 1985; Q. Li 173; SYS! • Chengxiang; 12 Decembr 2013; J. B. Teng et al. 450122131212004 LY; GXMG! • Ningwu; 14 Jul. 2010; K. J. Yan 22707; GXMI! • 19 Nov. 2014; J. B. Teng et al. 450122141119007 LY; GXMG! • Yongning; 26 Jul. 1958; S. Q. Zhong A62018; KUN!, IBK! • 16 Sep. 1964; J. Q. Ge & Y. Wang 17638; GXMI! • Dingtun; 20 Jul. 1985; Q. Li 167; SYS! • Chongzuo, Heping; 13 Nov. 1997; D. R. Liang & B. S. Huang 02570; GXMI! • Ningming; 14 Dec. 1977; G.D. Guo 15489; HITBC! • Nongrui; 29 Apr. 1980; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 11881; IBK! • 26 Jul. 2011; Y. S. Huang & Y. B. Liao NM1369; IBK! • 30 May 2013; B. Y. Huang et al. 451422130530024 LY; GXMG! • Tuolong; 8 Dec. 2012; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422121208075 LY; GXMG! • Tingliang; 2 Nov. 2013; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422131102031 LY; GXMG! • Chengzhong; 26 Dec. 2012; B. Y. Huang et al. 451422141226027 LY; GXMG! • 4 Nov. 2013; H. Z. Lü et al. 451422131104016 LY; GXMG! • Longzhou, Jinlong; 3 Jul. 1960; C. J. Liang 21533; GXMI! • Shangjin; 31 Oct. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 20565; GXMI! • 17 Aug. 1989; K. J. Yan & W. Y. Rao 76364; GXMI! • Nonggang, Nonghu; 24 Sep. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 10310; IBK! • Shida; 5 Oct. 1979; Nonggang Comprehensive Expedition 10790; IBK! • Pingxiang, Xiashi; 21 Dec. 1959; X. F. Deng 10670; IBK! • Xiangshui; 8 Jun. 1979; Investigation team of Longzhou Medical Institute 0024; GXMI! • 14 Jun. 1979; Investigation team of Longzhou Medical Institute 0264; GXMI! • 30 Dec. 1986; Y. P. Tao 80172; GXMI! • Daxin, Taiping, Anmin; 21 Jun. 1977; Y. Z. Zhang Da-127; GXMI! • Longlin; 15 Apr. 1979; S. Q. Lin & M. F. Qin 2132; IBK! • Youjiang, Banshui; 18 Jul. 2014; Youjiang General Expedition 451002140718024 LY; GXMG! • Jinxi, Kuiwei, Dezhou; 11 Oct. 2013; X. Y. Huang et al. 451025131011014 LY; GXMG! • Napo Dingye; 20 Jun. 2010; Y. F. Huang & J. Huang HYF0165; GXMG! • Yunnan Province, Funing, Bo’ai; 21 Oct. 1958; H. T. Tsai 8813; KUN! • Guichao; 4 Mar. 2007; F. J. Mou 75, 77; IBSC! • Guichao; 20 Jul. 2007; F. J. Mou 140; IBSC! • 19 Sep. 2016; F. J. Mou 528; SWFC! • Wenshan, Xishan; 14 Oct. 1958; H. T. Tsai 8444; KUN! • Mengla, Menglun, cultivated; 3 Feb. 2007; F. J. Mou 41, 42; IBSC!. Description Shrub, 1–2 m tall. Leaves are 3–11-foliolate, 3–10 × 2.5–6.5 cm; rachises and petiolules covered with soft hairs; leaflet blades alternate, ovate-oblong, coriaceous, dispersively oil-glandular, dark green and shining adaxially and yellowish green abaxially, lower surface covered densely with white soft hairs abaxially, apex obtuse to rounded, margin crenulate; petiolules 2–3 mm. Inflorescences are terminal. Flowers are 5-merous, ellipsoid in bud; sepals broadly ovate, ca 1 mm; petals ca 4 mm, dispersing oil glands. Stamens are 10; filaments flat and widening down; filaments and anthers ciliate. Ovaries are oblong, as long as styles; stigmas not prominent. Fruits are globose, ca 1 cm in diam., and red when ripe. Phenology Flowering between June and July, while fruiting from October to November. Distribution and habitat China: Guangxi (Longzhou, Ningming, Wuming, Yongning, Fushui, and Baise), Yunnan (Wenshan and Funing); Vietnam: Quỳ Chau. Growing in the shrub or forestry of limestone areas, alt. 100–800 (1400) m. Remarks The leaves and fruits of this species have a strong, pleasant scent.Published as part of Mou, Feng-Juan & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860 on pages 163-165, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, http://zenodo.org/record/768937
Turpinia pomifera var. minor C. C. Huang ex T. Z. Hsu 2013, var. nov.
No full text<i>Turpinia pomifera</i> (Roxburgh 1820: 76) Candolle (1825: 3) var. <i>minor</i> C.C.Huang ex T.Z.Hsu, <i>var. nov.</i> <p> <i>Turpinia pomifera</i> var. <i>minor</i> C.C. Huang ex Hsu (1979: 358), not validly published contrary to Article 40.1 & 40.2.</p> <p> Type (designated here):— CHINA. Yunnan: Xichou County, Xiangpingshan, in mixed forests, 1600 m, 2 September 1947, <i>K. M</i> <i>.</i> <i>Feng 11588</i> (holotype KUN!, barcode 0198401, Fig. 1; isotype KUN!, barcode 0198396, Fig. 2); Xichou County, Fadou, in mixed forests, 1450–1550 m, 15 September 1947, <i>K. M</i> <i>.</i> <i>Feng 11748</i> (paratypes KUN!); Malipo County, Tungting, in mixed forests, 1200–1500 m, 22 November 1947, <i>K. M</i> <i>.</i> <i>Feng 13544</i> (paratypes KUN!); Malipo County, Laojunshan, 1700 m, 19 May 1962, <i>K. M</i> <i>.</i> <i>Feng 22639</i> (paratypes KUN!); Malipo County, Laojunshan, 26 May 1962, <i>K. M</i> <i>.</i> <i>Feng 22809</i> (paratypes KUN!).</p>Published as part of <i>Yu, Wen-Bin, 2013, Valid publication of Turpinia pomifera var. minor (Staphyleaceae), pp. 55-58 in Phytotaxa 119 (1)</i> on page 55, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.119.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5079368">http://zenodo.org/record/5079368</a>
Bergera tetramera F. J. Mou 2023, comb. nov.
No full text<i>Bergera tetramera</i> (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou, comb. nov. <p>urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77314674-1</p> <p>Fig. 13</p> <p> <i>Murraya tetramera</i> C.C.Huang, <i>Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica</i> 8 (1): 102, pl. 13 (Huang 1959). – <b>Type</b>: CHINA • Yunnan, Mangshi (Luxi); <i>H. T. Tsai 57277</i>; lectotype: PE [00022518] image!; isolectotypes: PE [00022517] image!, IBSC [0409247]!, NAS [NAS00071351] image!. <b>Designated here</b>.</p> Etymology <p>The specific epithet refers to the 4-merous flowers.</p> Material examined <p> CHINA • Yunnan Province; 1933; <i>H. T. Tsai 57277</i>; NAS image!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57287</i>; KUN!, SWFC!, NAS image!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57525</i>; KUN!, PE image!, A image! • <i>H. T. Tsai 57453</i>; KUN! • 20 Oct. 1933; <i>H. T. Tsai 56249</i>; KUN!, NAS image! • 23 May 1940; <i>C. W. Wang 89515</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, PE image! • Yanshan; 26 Oct. 1932; <i>H. T. Tsai 51453</i>; NAS image!, PE image! • 19 Sep. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83565</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, PE image! • <i>83595</i>; KUN!, IBSC!, WUK image!, PE image! • 24 Oct. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83520</i>; KUN!, WUK image!, PE image! • 30 Oct. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 83555</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Bayao; 6 Nov. 1939; <i>Q. W. Wang 84818</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Xinghua; 5 Nov. 1958; <i>H. T. Tsai 589112</i>; KUN! • 18 Jun. 1964; <i>S. Z. Wang 775</i>; KUN! • 2 Oct. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 547</i>; SWFC! • Malipo; 20 Feb. 1940; <i>C. W. Wang 86992</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Tingting; 23 Sep. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 11965</i>; KUN!; PE image!, A image! • 22 Nov. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 13555</i>; KUN! A image! • Tungting; 18 Nov. 1947; <i>K. M. Feng 13367</i>; KUN! A image! • Xichou, Yaobang; 27 Dec. 1939; <i>C. W. Wang 86068</i>, <i>86094</i>; KUN!, PE image! • Fadou; 16 Nov. 1960; <i>Q. A. Wu 90</i>; KUN! • 3 Jun. 1964; <i>S. Z. Wang 650</i>; KUN! • 14 Dec. 1964; <i>Q. A. Wu 10013</i>, <i>Z. W. Lin 685</i>; KUN! • 8 Oct. 2011; <i>Q. R. Liu & S. Y. Meng 2011-10-122</i>; BNU image! • Nanchang; 10 May 1959; <i>Q. A. Wu 5093</i>; KUN! • Mengla, Yiwu; 9 Sep. 1959; <i>S. J. Pei 10092</i>; KUN! • Mengyuan; 21 Jun. 1973; <i>P. Z. Zhu 8650</i>; HITBC!; IBSC! • 31 May 1982; <i>Expedition 32673</i>; HITBC! • 9 Dec. 1982; <i>Expedition 34392</i>; HITBC! • Jinghong, Jinuo; 1 Jun. 1961; <i>Y. H. Li 3309</i>; HITBC! • 7 Dec. 1961; <i>Y. H. Li 3716</i>; HITBC! • 31 Jul. 1977; <i>G.D. Tao 15722</i>; HITBC!, PE image! • Menghai; 20 Apr. 1959; <i>Z. D. Wang 57991</i>; KUN! • Jianshui; 16 Mar. 1941; <i>S. E. Liu 018293</i>; PE image! • Ning’er, Dehua; 28 Jan. 1991; <i>G. D. Tao 44127</i>; HITBC! • Mengzi; <i>A. Henry 9651 D</i>; L image!, LE image! • <i>A. Henry 9651</i>; LE image! • 27 Nov. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 558</i>; SWFC! • Mile, Xi’er, Nuozu; 29 May 1990; <i>Investigation group of plant resources in Mile County 400</i>; KUN! • Shilin, Naigu; 30 Oct. 2016; <i>F. J. Mou 548</i>; SWFC! • Eshan, Chahe; Jan. 1979; <i>Yüxi Plant Expedition s.n.</i>; KUN! • 17 Dec. 2012; <i>J. Cai et al. 12 CS5744</i>; KUN! • Yimen; 6 Agu. 2018; <i>F. J. Mou 640-2</i>; SWFC! • Lanping; 19 Sep. 1964; <i>S. G. Wu 8980</i>; KUN! • 5 Nov. 2006; <i>T. Zhang et al. SCSB-B-000208</i>; KUN! • Weixi; 6 May 1960; <i>Anonymous 8658</i>; KUN! • Fugong, Pihe; 30 May 1978; <i>Bijiang Expedition 0252</i>; KUN! • Fugong, Pihe; 2 Feb. 2017; <i>F. J. Mou 562</i>; SWFC! • Guizhou Province, Anlong; 20 May 1960; <i>Z. S. Zhang & Y. T. Zhang 3703</i>; IBK! • 20 May 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 3730</i>; IBSC! • 12 Mar. 2009; <i>F. J. Mou 233</i>; IBSC! • Longshan; 9 Jun. 1960; <i>Z. S. Zhang 3183</i>; IBSC!, HGAS image! • 12 Jun. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition</i> 4346; IBSC! • 23 Jun. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition</i> 5758; IBSC! • Pingle; 23 Apr. 2014; <i>C. Y. Deng 522328140423700 LY</i>; GZTM image! • Xishui; 10 Apr. 2003; <i>C. W. Wu 1153</i>; PE image! • 9 May 2003; <i>1192</i>; PE image! • Renhuai; 16 Apr. 2003; <i>X. L. Wang & M. T. An 2130</i>; PE image! • 14 May 2003; <i>X. L. Wang 2166</i>; PE image! • Xingyi; 7 Aug. 1959; <i>Anshun Expedition 867</i>; KUN! <i>•</i> <i>869</i>; HGAS image! • 26 Jul. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 6547</i>; IBK!, IBSC!, NAS image! • Xingren; 4 Dec. 1980; <i>C. Z. Dang 80526</i>; HGAS image! • Libo; 8 May 1981; <i>M. Z. Yang 810258</i>; HGAS image! • Wangmo; 23 Apr. 1960; <i>Guizhou Expedition 1221</i>; IBSC! • 8 Nov. 1986; <i>Longtan Expedition 00751</i>; IBK! • Zhenfeng; 8 Oct. 1982; <i>D. J. Liu 622</i>; HGAS image! • 23 Oct. 1982; <i>D. J. Liu 847</i>, <i>848</i>; HGAS image! • Huishui, Heping; 16 Oct. 2010; <i>F. L. Zou ZouFL0155</i>; KUN!.</p> Description <p>Small trees, 3–7 m high. Branches, leaves pedicel and peduncle covered sparsely with hairs, becoming glabrous later; strongly fragrant. Leaves are 5–11-foliolate; leaflet blades narrowly lanceolate, 2–5 × 0.8–2.0 cm, usually yellow-green, becoming dark brownish-black and oil glands slightly swelling when dry, slightly asymmetrical or symmetrical at the base, and apex acuminate; petiolules 2–4 mm, reddish usually. Inflorescences are terminal cymes. Flowers are white; 4-merous; sepals ovate, less than 1 mm, connate at base; petals white, oblong, 4–5 mm, and revolute when open. Stamens are 8, alternate with long and short, filaments ca 4 mm long and slim. Ovaries are ellipsoid, ca 1 mm; styles ca 2 mm long. Fruits are reddish, globose, 1.0– 1.2 cm in diam., with many oil glands, brown after drying, 1–3-seeded. Seed coats are membranous and smooth.</p> Phenology <p>Flowering between March and April, while fruiting from July to August.</p> Distribution and habitat <p>China: W Guangxi (Baise and Debao), SW Guizhou (Anlong), Yunnan (Yanshan, Funing, Wenshan, Xichou, Malipo, Jinghong, Mengla, Menghai, Ninger, Menglian, Eshan, Yuanyang, Yuanjiang, Mengzi, Jianshui, Mile, Weixi, Lanping, Fugong, and Mangshi). Often growing at the sunny top of limestone hills.</p> Remarks <p> Morphologically, this species is relative to <i>B. euchrestifolia</i>, but the plants are characterized with heavier smell and flowers are 4-merous stably. Two species have different distributions.</p>Published as part of <i>Mou, Feng-Juan, Hu, Xiu, Ha, Bui Thu & Cuong, Nguyen Manh, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Bergera J. Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology, pp. 141-180 in European Journal of Taxonomy 860</i> on pages 171-173, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.860.2057, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7689375">http://zenodo.org/record/7689375</a>
