1,721,005 research outputs found
Data for: The Fronto-central N2 but not Parietal P3 Reflects Response Inhibition in the Count/No-count Task
No full textThere are three data files in this compressed file.
Data 1 shows the error rates for the count/no-count and the digital accumulation task. Specifically, the Subject column shows the serial number of participants; the Count-miss rate, Nocount-FA, Add 1-miss rate, and Add 0-FA columns separately show the miss rates of Count condition, the false alarm rates of Nocount condition, the miss rates of Add 1 condition, and the false alarm rates of Add 0 conditions for each participant.
Data 2 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to stimuli onset (four stimulus conditions: Count, No-count, Add 1 and Add 0) during the 200–300 ms time window at three recording sites (Fz, FCz, and Cz). Specifically, the Subject column shows the serial number of participants; the Fz-Count, Fz-No-count, Fz-Add 1, and Fz-Add 0 columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited for Count, No-count, Add 1, and Add 0 conditions at Fz electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited for Count, No-count, Add 1, and Add 0 conditions at FCz and Cz electrode sites for each participant.
Data 3 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to stimuli onset (four stimulus conditions: Count, No-count, Add 1 and Add 0) during the 300–500 ms time window at five recording sites (Fz, FCz, Cz, CPz, and Pz). Specifically, the Subject column shows the serial number of participants; the Fz-Count, Fz-No-count, Fz-Add 1, and Fz-Add 0 columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited for Count, No-count, Add 1, and Add 0 conditions at Fz electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited for Count, No-count, Add 1, and Add 0 conditions at FCz, Cz, CPz, and Pz electrode sites for each participant
Data for: The role of forgetting cues in directed forgetting: Ceasing maintenance rehearsal
No full textThere are four data files in this compressed file. Data 1 shows the memory recognition accuracies for four cue-type words (M-R: maintenance-remembering; M-F: maintenance-forgetting; M: maintenance; F: forgetting) and false alarm (FA) for new words from forty participants in Experiment 1. Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the M-R, M-F, M, and F columns separately show the recognition memory performance of M-R, M-F, M, and F words for each participant; the FA column shows the FA of new words for each subject.Data 2 shows the memory recognition accuracies for three cue-type words (M-R, M-F, and F words) and FA for new words from twenty participants in Experiment 2. Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the F, M-R, and M-F columns separately show the recognition memory performance of F, M-R, and M-F words for each participant; the FA column shows the FA of new words for each subject.Data 3 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: M-R, M-F, M, and F cues) during the 200–400 ms time window at nine recording sites (F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4) in Experiment 2. Specifically, the File column shows the serial number of participants; the F3F, F3M, F3M-R, and F3M-F columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at F3 electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at the F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, Fz, Cz, and Pz electrode sites for each participant.Data 4 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: M-R, M-F, M, and F cues) during the 400–600 ms time window at nine recording sites (F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4) in Experiment 2. Specifically, the File column shows the serial number of participants; the F3F, F3M, F3M-R, and F3M-F columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at F3 electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at the F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, Fz, Cz, and Pz electrode sites for each participant.The supplementary material file provides the ERP analysis performed with 54 trials randomly chosen from M and F trials to fit M-R/M-F condition in Experiment 2
Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence
No full textBavioural and ERP dat
Data for: Forgetting Cues are Ineffective in Promoting Forgetting in the Item-Method Directed Forgetting Paradigm
No full textMaterial_word lists_meaning_frequency_stroke.
The mean amplitudes of 150-300, 300-500, and 500-800 ms.
The Procedure of the pilot study.
Behavioral data of the pilot study
Data for: An ERP investigation of the Working Memory Stroop effect
No full textBehavioural and ERP dat
Data for: Forgetting Cues are Ineffective in Promoting Forgetting in the Item-Method Directed Forgetting Paradigm
No full textMaterial_word lists_meaning_frequency_stroke.
The mean amplitudes of 150-300 ms, 300-500 ms, and 500-800 ms.
The Procedure of the pilot study.
Behavioral data of the pilot study
Data for: The Role of Forgetting Cues in Directed Forgetting: Ceasing Maintenance Rehearsal
No full textThere are four data files in this compressed file. Data 1 shows the memory recognition accuracies for four cue-type words (M-R: maintenance-remembering; M-F: maintenance-forgetting; M: maintenance; F: forgetting) and false alarm (FA) for new words from forty participants in Experiment 1. Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the M-R, M-F, M, and F columns separately show the recognition memory performance of M-R, M-F, M, and F words for each participant; the FA column shows the FA of new words for each subject.Data 2 shows the memory recognition accuracies for three cue-type words (M-R, M-F, and F words) and FA for new words from twenty participants in Experiment 2. Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the F, M-R, and M-F columns separately show the recognition memory performance of F, M-R, and M-F words for each participant; the FA column shows the FA of new words for each subject.Data 3 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: M-R, M-F, M, and F cues) during the 200–400 ms time window at nine recording sites (F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4) in Experiment 2. Specifically, the File column shows the serial number of participants; the F3F, F3M, F3M-R, and F3M-F columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at F3 electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at the F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, Fz, Cz, and Pz electrode sites for each participant.Data 4 shows the potentials of ERPs time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: M-R, M-F, M, and F cues) during the 400–600 ms time window at nine recording sites (F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4) in Experiment 2. Specifically, the File column shows the serial number of participants; the F3F, F3M, F3M-R, and F3M-F columns separately show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at F3 electrode site for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the potentials of ERPs elicited by F, M, M-R, and M-F cues at the F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, Fz, Cz, and Pz electrode sites for each participant.The supplementary material file provides the ERP analysis performed with 54 trials randomly chosen from M and F trials to fit M-R/M-F condition in Experiment 2
Data for: A Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy Investigation of Directed Forgetting
No full textBehavioural and fNIRS data.
Data 1 shows the memory recognition accuracies for TBR and TBF words, and the false alarm (FA) for new words from 16 participants. Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the age column shows the ages of participants; the TBF and TBR columns show the recognition memory performance of TBR and TBF words for each participant; the FA column shows the FA of new words for each participant.
Data 2 shows the oxy-Hb levels time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: TBF-f, TBF-r, TBR-f, and TBR-r cues) during the 0–4 s time window in 12 channels (Ch53, Ch54, Ch9, Ch32, Ch2, Ch38, Ch20, Ch44, Ch22, Ch46, Ch25, and Ch48). Specifically, the participant column shows the serial number of participants; the TBF-F-Ch53 column shows the oxy-Hb levels triggered by TBF-F cues in Ch53 for each participant; Similarly, the remaining columns in turn show the oxy-Hb levels triggered by TBF-F cues in the Ch54, Ch9, Ch32, Ch2, Ch38, Ch20, Ch44, Ch22, Ch46, Ch25, and Ch48, and the oxy-Hb levels triggered by TBF-r, TBR-f, and TBR-r cues in the Ch53, Ch54, Ch9, Ch32, Ch2, Ch38, Ch20, Ch44, Ch22, Ch46, Ch25, and Ch48 for each participant.
Data 3 shows the oxy-Hb levels time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: TBF-f, TBF-r, TBR-f, and TBR-r cues) during the 5–9 s time window in 12 channels (Ch53, Ch54, Ch9, Ch32, Ch2, Ch38, Ch20, Ch44, Ch22, Ch46, Ch25, and Ch48). Other columns settings were identical to Data 2.
Data 4 shows the oxy-Hb levels time-locked to cue onset (four types of cues: TBF-f, TBF-r, TBR-f, and TBR-r cues) during the 9–11 s time window in 12 channels (Ch53, Ch54, Ch9, Ch32, Ch2, Ch38, Ch20, Ch44, Ch22, Ch46, Ch25, and Ch48). Other columns settings were identical to Data 2
Data for: Elaborately Rehearsed Information Can be Forgotten: A New Paradigm to Investigate Directed Forgetting
No full textThe material and behavioral and ERP results for this study
Data for: The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory
No full textData for three experiment
- …
