123,163 research outputs found
Aphis pineti Hartig G. L. & Hartig, T. 1834
No full text<i>Aphis pineti</i> Hartig G.L. & Hartig, T., 1834 <p> <i>Aphis pineti</i> Hartig, G.L. & Hartig, T., 1834: 29. <b>SYNTYPES</b>: 4 (field no. missing [6.04-6.07]).</p> <p> <i>Lachnus pineti</i> (Hartig G.L. & Hartig, T., 1834) (change of combination— Hartig 1839: 645, “ <i>Lachnus pineti n.</i> ”).</p> <p> <i>Cinara</i> (<i>Schizolachnus</i>) <i>pineti</i> (Fabricius, 1781) (senior primary homonym and synonym— Hartig, 1841: 368, “ <i>L. pineti</i> Fabr. ”).</p> <p> <i>Cinara pini</i> (Linnaeus, 1758) (senior synonym— Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers, 1976: 238). <b>Valid</b></p> <p> <b>Specimens.</b> Four pinned apterae lacking specimen identifiers.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Hartig used the name <i>Lachnus pineti</i> in both Hartig (1839) and Hartig (1841), and in each included a reference to an earlier work, in which this species was given the name <i>Aphis pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig, 1834 and described only as having hairy tarsi. In Hartig (1839), he transferred the species to the genus <i>Lachnus</i> and used the notation “ <i>n.</i> [<i>nobis</i>]” acknowledging the authority of both himself and his father. At this time, Hartig recognized the species as synonymous with <i>Lachnus fasciatus</i> Burmeister, 1835 [= <i>Lachnus roboris</i> (Linnaeus, 1758)]. Later in Hartig (1841), he recognized these as <i>Lachnus pineti</i> [= <i>Cinara pineti</i>] (Fabricius, 1781), and in his collection the specimens are labelled as “ <i>Pineti</i> Fabr. ”. Interestingly, neither the earlier name <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig or the homonymy with Fabricius’ name appear to have been acknowledged in more recent aphid taxonomic work. Börner (1952) did not treat Hartig’s name, but transferred <i>Aphis pineti</i> [= <i>Cinara pineti</i>] Fabricius, 1781 to the genus <i>Schizolachnus</i> Mordwilko, 1909. Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers (1976) recognized the synonymy of <i>Lachnus pineti</i> Hartig, 1839 with <i>Cinara pini</i> (Linnaeus, 1758). However, Hartig (1841) clearly distinguished between <i>Lachnus pini</i> [= <i>Cinara pini</i>] (Linnaeus, 1758) and <i>L. pineti</i> on the basis of setal characteristics of the tarsi, describing the latter as the rough-footed pine aphid in contrast to the former’s smooth feet. Thus, on the basis of Hartig’s work, the synonymy of <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig with <i>C. pini</i> (Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers 1976) is likely to be incorrect.</p> <p> With respect to the synonymy of <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig and <i>L. fasciatus</i> in Hartig (1839), the latter is currently recognized as a junior synonym of <i>L. roboris</i> despite different host associations for these taxa. <i>Lachnus fasciatus</i> like <i>A. pineti</i> was described from <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> (Hartig, 1841) whereas <i>L. roboris</i> occurs on <i>Quercus</i> and <i>Castanea</i> (Blackman & Eastop 2023). Interestingly, the synonymy of <i>L. fasciatus</i> with that of <i>L. roboris</i> was recognized by Burmeister (1839) himself on the basis of comparisons with illustrations of the latter in Curtis (1835). Burmeister (1835) described the wings of <i>L. fasciatus</i> as hyaline with a transverse band in the middle and tips broadly brown with a hyaline marginal point in agreement with the wing colour of <i>L. roboris</i>. In contrast, Kaltenbach (1843), while acknowledging its prior synonymy with <i>L. roboris,</i> continued to treat <i>L. fasciatus</i> as a distinct species, and noted morphological differences between the two species. He also treated <i>A. pineti</i> Fabricius as distinct, but unfortunately did not acknowledge Hartig’s (1841) synonymy of <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig with this species. Later, Walker (1848) recognized <i>L. fasciatus</i> as a synonym of <i>C. costata</i> describing its wings as colourless, clouded with brown, and longer than its body. He also described <i>L. roboris</i> as having wings that are short and narrow, and dark brown in colour with three colourless bands (Walker 1848). These later treatments seems to suggest knowledge of differences in wing colour and morphology between <i>L. fasciatus</i> and <i>L. roboris</i> around the time of Hartig’s descriptions. Hartig’s <i>L. pineti</i> specimens, however, are distinct from his <i>C. costata</i> and <i>L. roboris</i> specimens, and might signal his justification for the synonymy of <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig with <i>A. pineti</i> Fabricius. Still, without seeing Burmeister’s type specimens for <i>L. fasciatus</i> it is difficult to determine whether the conflict here stems from Hartig’s (1839) synonymy of <i>A. pineti</i> Hartig & Hartig with <i>L. fasciatus</i> or Burmeister’s (1839) synonymy of the latter with <i>L. roboris</i>. The discrepant host-association between <i>L. fasciatus</i> and <i>L. roboris</i> does seem to suggest that this synonymy may be incorrect.</p> <p> One plausible explanation could be that the synonymy of <i>L. fasciatus</i> and <i>L. roboris</i> in Burmeister (1839) was based on contradictory information in Curtis’ description of <i>L. roboris</i> which was accompanied by a description and illustrations clearly depicting the genus <i>Cinara</i> Curtis, 1835 (see Hottes, 1930b for discussion). However, Hartig also appears to have confused the identity of several of these species. For instance, his collection contains specimens labelled <i>L. pineti</i> (Fabricius) and <i>L. roboris</i> (Linnaeus), but neither of these is consistent with current usage. Hartig’s <i>L. pineti</i> specimens are too large for this species, and his <i>L. roboris</i> specimens lack this species’ distinctive forewing pigmentation. Instead, the forewings are dusky, brown throughout with dark pterostigma, as described in Hartig (1841). The identity of Hartig’s <i>A. pineti</i> specimens will need to be determined to confirm its synonymy with <i>C. pini</i> as is currently accepted or with <i>A. pineti</i> Fabricius as proposed by Hartig (1841). If neither synonymy is supported and there are no other available and potentially valid synonyms, a replacement name may be necessary to remove it from homonymy with <i>A. pineti</i> Fabricius (Article 60.2).</p>Published as part of <i>Brunet, Bryan M. T., Raupach, Michael J., Rehage, Heinz-Otto, Havill, Nathan P. & Foottit, Robert G., 2023, Discovery of the primary aphid (Hemiptera: Aphidomorpha) and scale insect (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) type specimens from the collection of Theodor Hartig (1805 - 1880), pp. 89-116 in Zootaxa 5369 (1)</i> on pages 99-100, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5369.1.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10144745">http://zenodo.org/record/10144745</a>
Aglaïa I. Hartig (1941-1999)
No full textGauthier Florence. Aglaïa I. Hartig (1941-1999) . In: Annales historiques de la Révolution française, n°323, 2001. p. 157
Exenterus adspersus HARTIG 1838
No full textExenterus adspersus HARTIG 1838 Exenterus adspersus HARTIG 1838. Jahresb. Fortschr. Forstwiss. Forstl. Naturk. 1: 271. Cteniscus (Exenterus) lepidus: STROBL 1902: 81. D i s t r i b u t i o n: Palearctic region, introduced into Canada.Published as part of Kolarov, J., 2008, A Catalogue of the [former] Yugoslavian Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera, Insecta), pp. 1585-1739 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 40 (2) on page 1708, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.543164
Aglaïa I. Hartig (1941-1999)
No full textGauthier Florence. Aglaïa I. Hartig (1941-1999) . In: Annales historiques de la Révolution française, n°323, 2001. p. 157
FIGURE 1. Ptilophora variabilis Hartig, 1968 in Ptilophora variabilis Hartig, 1968, bona species, and description of Ptilophora nebrodensis sp. n. from Sicily (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae)
No full textFIGURE 1. Ptilophora variabilis Hartig, 1968, male, 01.xii.2014, Sila—Vivaio Sbanditi, Longobucco, Calabria, Italy (Coll. CREA-FL).Published as part of Infusino, Marco, Hausmann, Axel & Scalercio, Stefano, 2018, Ptilophora variabilis Hartig, 1968, bona species, and description of Ptilophora nebrodensis sp. n. from Sicily (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae), pp. 237-252 in Zootaxa 4369 (2) on page 242, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4369.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/113570
H. Hartig, Vergleichende Warentests i/n Recht Deutschlands, Frankreichs, der Niederlande und Grossbritanien
No full textH. Hartig, Vergleichende Warentests i/n Recht Deutschlands, Frankreichs, der Niederlande und Grossbritanien. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 26 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1974. p. 692
H. Hartig, Vergleichende Warentests i/n Recht Deutschlands, Frankreichs, der Niederlande und Grossbritanien
No full textH. Hartig, Vergleichende Warentests i/n Recht Deutschlands, Frankreichs, der Niederlande und Grossbritanien. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 26 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1974. p. 692
Irmgard Hartig et Albert Soboul : Pour une histoire de l'utopie en France au 18e siècle . Suivi de I. Hartig : Essai de bibliographie, 1977
No full textTrousson Raymond. Irmgard Hartig et Albert Soboul : Pour une histoire de l'utopie en France au 18e siècle . Suivi de I. Hartig : Essai de bibliographie, 1977. In: Dix-huitième Siècle, n°11, 1979. L'année 1778. p. 484
Apocharips trapezoidea Hartig 1841
No full text<i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig, 1841) <p>(Fig. 5)</p> <p> <i>Xystus trapezoideus</i> Hartig, 1841: 352: <i>Allotria trapezoideus</i> (Hartig) Taschenberg, 1866: 130; <i>Allotria trapezoidea</i> (Hartig) Cameron, 1884: 267; <i>Dilyta trapezoidea</i> (Hartig) Kieffer, 1900: 114; <i>Dilyta trapezoidea</i> (Hartig) Evenhuis, 1982: 26; <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig) Menke & Evenhuis, 1991: 152.</p> <p> <i>Alloxista</i> <i>eleaphila</i> Silvestri, 1915: 274 <b>n.</b> syn.: <i>Alloxysta eleaphila</i> Silvestri: Weld, 1952: 253; <i>Apocharips eleaphila</i> (Silvestri) Menke & Evenhuis, 1991: 148.</p> <p> <i>Alloxista</i> <i>peraperta</i> Silvestri, 1915: 272 <b>n.</b> syn.: <i>Alloxysta peraptera</i> Silvestri: Weld, 1952: 253 (misspelling); <i>Apocharips peraptera</i> (Silvestri) Menke & Evenhuis, 1991: 149.</p> <p> <b> Type material of <i>Xystus trapezoideus</i></b> Hartig, LECTOTYPE 3 (ZSM) designated by Evenhuis (1982) with the following labels: “3”, “ lectotype H. H. Evenhuis” (orange label), “ <i>Xystus trapezoideus</i> Hartig det. H.H. Evenhuis 1980”, “ <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> 3 (Hartig, 1840) det. JP-V 2007”.</p> <p> <b> Type material of <i>Alloxista eleaphila</i></b> Silvestri, LECTOTYPE Ƥ (IENU) here designated with the following labels: “Alloxista eleaphila Silv., Ƥ, Vittoria, Siracusa (Sicily) ” (handwritten), “ Lectotype <i>Alloxista</i> <i>eleaphila</i> Silvestri, 1915 Ƥ desig. M. Ferrer-Suay 2011” (red label), “ <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig, 1841) Ƥ M. Ferrer- Suay det. 2012”. PARALECTOTYPE 3 (IENU) here established with the following labels: “Alloxista eleaphila Silv., 3, Vittoria, Siracusa (Sicily)” (handwritten) “ Paralectotype <i>Alloxista</i> <i>eleaphila</i> Silvestri, 1915 3” (red label), “ <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig, 1841) 3 M. Ferrer-Suay det. 2012”.</p> <p> <b> Type material of <i>Alloxista peraperta</i></b> Silvestri, LECTOTYPE Ƥ (IENU) here designated with the following labels: “Alloxista peraperta Silv., Ƥ, Nefasit (ex Euphyllura)” (handwritten), “ Lectotype <i>Alloxista</i> <i>peraperta</i> Silvestri, 1915 Ƥ desig. M. Ferrer-Suay 2011” (red label), “ <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig, 1841) Ƥ M. Ferrer- Suay det. 2012”. PARALECTOTYPE 3 (IENU) here established with the following labels: “Alloxista peraperta Silv., 3, Nefasit (ex Euphyllura)” (handwritten) “ Paralectotype <i>Alloxista</i> <i>peraperta</i> Silvestri, 1915 3” (red label), “ <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> (Hartig, 1841) 3 M. Ferrer-Suay det. 2012”.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Apocharips trapezoidea</i> is differentiated from all other <i>Apocharips</i> species having radial cell with R1 and Rs parallel (Fig. 5 A).</p> <p> <b>Redescription. Coloration</b>. Head yellowish brown, mesosoma and metasoma brown. Antennae yellow, darkening towards apical part. Legs and veins yellowish brown.</p> <p> <b>Head</b>. Triangular, higher than wide, smooth, shiny. Setae below and between toruli, few setae above toruli. Scattered setae on vertex, many setae on frons. Transfacial line 0.8 times height of compound eye. Malar space 0.5 times height of compound eye.</p> <p> <b>Antenna</b>. Female: 13-segmented, filiform. All antennomeres with sparse setae. F1–F4 smooth, thinner than remaining flagellomeres; F5–F11 with rhinaria, club-shaped. Antennal formula: 4.0 (2.4); 3.5 (2.1); 4.5 (1.3); 3.1 (1.3); 3.1 (1.3); 3.5 (1.3) (Fig. 5 C). Male: 14-segmented, filiform. All antennomeres with sparse setae. F1–F12 with rhinaria, club-shaped. Antennal formula: 3.3 (1.9); 2.5 (1.9); 5.0 (1.9); 3.8 (1.8); 3.8 (1.8); 3.8 (1.9); 4.2 (1.9) (Fig. 5 B).</p> <p> <b>Mesosoma</b>. Pronotum with abundant setae; with two long, thick carinae (Fig. 5 E). Mesoscutum smooth, shiny, round in dorsal view with scattered setae. Scutellum smooth, shiny, with scattered setae not being more abundant on apex; apex with M-shaped carinae (Fig. 5 F). Propodeum with abundant setae; two propodeal carinae thick, straight, widening at base (Fig. 5 F).</p> <p> <b>Forewing</b>. Longer than body, 1.2 times as long as mesosoma+metasoma. With dense pubescence and marginal setae (Fig. 5 A). Radial cell 1.0 times as long as wide. R1 and Rs parallel, both reaching costal margin.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Andorra (Pujade-Villar 2005: 545); Austria (Andrews 1978: 91); Bulgaria and Balkan peninsula (Vasileva-Sumnalieva 1976: 23); England (Andrews 1978: 91); Finland (Hellén 1963: 5); Germany (Hartig 1841: 352); Scotland (Andrews 1978: 91); Spain: Canary Islands (Pujade-Villar 2005: 545); Spain: peninsular (Nieves- Aldrey <i>et al</i>. 2003: 39); Sweden (Thomson 1862: 409). Ethiopia (Silvestri 1915: 273) of <i>A. peraperta</i> and Italy (Silvestri 1915: 274) of <i>A. eleaphila</i>.</p> <p> <b>Comments.</b> Silvestri spelled the name of the species as “ <i>peraperta</i> ”. Later, Weld (1952: 253) misspelled the specific name as “ <i>peraptera</i> ”, a mistake followed by Menke & Evenhuis (1991: 149). We maintain Silvestri’s original name “ <i>peraperta</i> ”, which is also present on the slide of the type material. Type material of <i>A. eleaphila</i> and <i>A. peraperta</i> is mounted in four slides corresponding to male and female of each species. These two species are here synonymyzed with <i>A. trapezoidea</i> after examination of the radial cell shape, proportions of flagellomeres, and shape of propodeal carinae, the main diagnostic characters of the genus <i>Apocharips</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Ferrer-Suay, Mar, Paretas-Martínez, Jordi & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2013, Revision of Apocharips Fergusson (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Charipinae) with description of three new species from Colombia, pp. 487-500 in Zootaxa 3646 (4)</i> on pages 494-497, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3646.4.8, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/220644">http://zenodo.org/record/220644</a>
FIG. 3 in Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp.
No full textFIG. 3. — Amphithectus areolatus Hartig, 1840 (= A. dahlbomi Hartig). A, head, anterior view; B, mesosoma, dorsal view; C, F1-F3 ♂, dorsal view; D, ♂, dorsal view of scutellum+metasoma; E, forewing and radial cell; F, T2-T3 ♀, lateral view. Scale bar: 1 mm.Published as part of Paretas-Martínez, Jordi & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2013, Review of Amphithectus Hartig, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae: Figitinae), with description of Amphithectus coriaceus n. sp., pp. 183-194 in Zoosystema 35 (2) on page 191, DOI: 10.5252/z2013n2a4, http://zenodo.org/record/516020
- …
