3,249 research outputs found

    Microlinices benthovus Simone 2014

    No full text
    benthovus, Microlinices Simone, 2014 Microlinices benthovus Simone, 2014: 575–578 (figs 6A–J, 7A–H, 11A–C). Gastropoda, Naticidae Paratypes (22 spc): MZSP 105269. Paratypes 1 (15 spc): MZSP 105270. Paratypes 2 (16 spc): MZSP 105271. Paratypes 3 (7 spc): MZSP 105272. Localities: Brazil, Espírito Santo, off Itaúnas, Abrolhos Slope, 18°59' S, 37°50' W, MD55 sta. DC 73, 637 m depth, 27 May 1987; 1) 19°00' S, 37°48' W, MD55 sta. DC72, 950– 1050 m, 27 May 1987; 2) off Regência, 19°40' S, 37°48' W, MD55 sta. CB77, 790– 940 m depth, 27 May 1987; 3) off Itaúnas, Abrolhos Slope, 19°01' S, 37°47' W, MD55 sta. CB79, 1500–1575 m depth, 28 May 1987. Collectors: P. Bouchet, J.H. Leal and B. Métivier. Preservation: Dry. Remarks: Former MNHN, Paris. The catalogue number MZSP 105250 is mentioned twice in Simone’s (2014) paper, among the paratypes of M. ibitingus Simone, 2014 and M. benthovus. This duplicity was a mistake by the author: the latter is an erroneous designation and should be disregarded. The only valid paratype lots for M. benthovus are the ones shown above.Published as part of Cavallari, Daniel C., Dornellas, Ana Paula S. & Simone, Luiz Ricardo L., 2016, Second annotated list of type specimens of molluscs deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1-59 in European Journal of Taxonomy 213 on page 10, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2016.213, http://zenodo.org/record/384012

    Problematiche dell’indotto Fiat di Cassino: proposte per la valorizzazione delle PMI e il rilancio del territorio. Un modello di intervento per rilanciare il sistema

    No full text
    GATTI M., GATTI C., PROIETTI L., SIMONE C., Problematiche dell’indotto Fiat di Cassino: proposte per la valorizzazione delle PMI e il rilancio del territorio. Un modello di intervento per rilanciare il sistema produttivo di Cassino, Bic Notes – Quaderni di Bic Lazio, Numero Speciale, 2006, 9-152 Volume senza attribuzioni ai singoli AutoriM. CATS, CATS C., L. Proietti, SIMONE C. Issues industries Fiat Cassino: proposals for the development of SMEs and the revitalization of the area. A model of intervention to revive the productive system of Cassino, Bic Notes - Papers Bic Lazio, Special Issue, 2006 9-152 Volume without attribution to individual author

    A comparative study of form and theology in the works of Flannery O'Connor and Simone Weil

    No full text
    In this comparative study of the form and theology of Flannery O'Connor and Simone Weil I interrogate how Weil's philosophical writings and her theology illuminate O'Connor's use of both narrative and non-fictional forms, and her Catholicism. The Introduction analyses how Weil's concept of superposed reading provides a new method of approaching both O'Connor, her writings, and O'Connor studies, and focuses on how such apparently different women interconnect. Chapter One explores how both Weil and O'Connor attempt to write their theologies on the souls of their readers yet are each subject to constraints imposed by form. Weil's concept of locating equilibrium between incommensurates is discussed, and her distinctively philosophical approach to fictions and fictionality is used to investigate O'Connor's notion of prophetic fictions and the writer's role. Chapter Two assesses how both writers revivify Christian paradoxes. Weil's monstrous concept of affiiction, and O'Connor's use of the grotesque genre to jolt secular man into an awareness of the sacred are scrutinised. Chapter Three studies how both writers consider an encounter between God and man is possible through the action of grace. My Conclusion interrogates how Weil's work can deepen our understanding of O'Connor's writings, and examines how successful O'Connor is at realising a truly Christian literature. I conclude that despite being a writer of powerful fictions, O'Connor can not be totally successful in her mission as writer-prophet because ultimately fiction escapes orthodoxy

    Author Correction: The geology and evolution of the Near-Earth binary asteroid system (65803) Didymos

    No full text
    Barnouin, Olivier S. et al.-- Full list of authors: Barnouin, Olivier; Ballouz, Ronald-Louis; Marchi, Simone; Vincent, Jean-Baptiste; Agrusa, Harrison; Zhang, Yun; Ernst, Carolyn M.; Pajola, Maurizio; Tusberti, Filippo; Lucchetti, Alice; Daly, R. Terik; Palmer, Eric; Walsh, Kevin J.; Michel, Patrick; Sunshine, Jessica M.; Rizos, Juan L.; Farnham, Tony L.; Richardson, Derek C.; Parro, Laura M.; Murdoch, Naomi; Robin, Colas Q.; Hirabayashi, Masatoshi; Kahout, Tomas; Asphaug, Erik; Raducan, Sabina D.; Jutzi, Martin; Ferrari, Fabio; Hasselmann, Pedro Henrique Aragao; CampoBagatin, Adriano; Chabot, Nancy L.; Li, Jian-Yang; Cheng, Andrew F.; Nolan, Michael C.; Stickle, Angela M.; Karatekin, Ozgur; Dotto, Elisabetta; Della Corte, Vincenzo; Mazzotta Epifani, Elena; Rossi, Alessandro; Gai, Igor; Deshapriya, Jasinghege Don Prasanna; Bertini, Ivano; Zinzi, Angelo; Trigo-Rodriguez, Josep M.; Beccarelli, Joel; Ivanovski, Stavro Lambrov; Brucato, John Robert; Poggiali, Giovanni; Zanotti, Giovanni; Amoroso, Marilena; Capannolo, Andrea; Cremonese, Gabriele; Dall'Ora, Massimo; Ieva, Simone; Impresario, Gabriele; Lavagn, Michèle; Modenini, Dario; Palumbo, Pasquale; Perna, Davide; Pirrotta, Simone; Tortora, Paolo; Zannoni, Marco; Rivkin, Andrew S.In this article the funding from the Spanish project PID2021-128062NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI was omitted. The original article has been corrected.Peer reviewe

    A novel design for an RF MEMS resistive switch on PCB substrate

    No full text
    Copyright @ 2008 Stimulation Action on MEM

    Eugenio d’Ors y Simone Weil: impacto en Aranguren

    No full text
    Eugenio d’Ors is the first author to write about Simone Weil in Spain. He does it in May 1949, recalling Gustave Thibon, one of the speakers of the summer courses held in Santander in August 1948. Thibon, to whom the French philosopher had entrusted part of her writings, published a selection of them in 1948, and Eugenio d’Ors, always attentive to what aroused interest outside of Spain, gives his impressions about the book. A little later, in 1951, it will be José Luis L. Aranguren, surely alerted by his teacher, who is interested in Weil’s work in that same vein to make Spanish readers participate in the thought in vogue in Europe. But Aranguren, who feels challenged by the work of Simone Weil, dwells more on it and frames it in the reality of the present, wondering how the man of his time relates to God.Eugenio d’Ors es el primer autor que en España escribe sobre Simone Weil. Lo hace en una glosa de mayo de 1949, recordando a Gustave Thibon, uno de los profesores de los cursos de verano celebrados en Santander en agosto de 1948. Thibon, a quien la filósofa francesa había confiado parte de sus escritos, publicó una selección de ellos en 1948, y Eugenio d’Ors, siempre atento a lo que despertaba interés fuera de España, da sus impresiones acerca del libro. Poco más tarde, en 1951, será José Luis L. Aranguren, alertado seguramente por su maestro, quien se interese por la obra de Weil en ese mismo empeño por hacer partícipes a los lectores en español del pensamiento que estaba en boga en Europa. Pero Aranguren, que se siente interpelado por la obra de Simone Weil, se detiene más en ella y la enmarca en la realidad del presente preguntándose cómo se relaciona con Dios el hombre de su tiempo

    Eugenio d’Ors y Simone Weil: impacto en Aranguren

    No full text
    Eugenio d’Ors is the first author to write about Simone Weil in Spain. He does it in May 1949, recalling Gustave Thibon, one of the speakers of the summer courses held in Santander in August 1948. Thibon, to whom the French philosopher had entrusted part of her writings, published a selection of them in 1948, and Eugenio d’Ors, always attentive to what aroused interest outside of Spain, gives his impressions about the book. A little later, in 1951, it will be José Luis L. Aranguren, surely alerted by his teacher, who is interested in Weil’s work in that same vein to make Spanish readers participate in the thought in vogue in Europe. But Aranguren, who feels challenged by the work of Simone Weil, dwells more on it and frames it in the reality of the present, wondering how the man of his time relates to God.Eugenio d’Ors es el primer autor que en España escribe sobre Simone Weil. Lo hace en una glosa de mayo de 1949, recordando a Gustave Thibon, uno de los profesores de los cursos de verano celebrados en Santander en agosto de 1948. Thibon, a quien la filósofa francesa había confiado parte de sus escritos, publicó una selección de ellos en 1948, y Eugenio d’Ors, siempre atento a lo que despertaba interés fuera de España, da sus impresiones acerca del libro. Poco más tarde, en 1951, será José Luis L. Aranguren, alertado seguramente por su maestro, quien se interese por la obra de Weil en ese mismo empeño por hacer partícipes a los lectores en español del pensamiento que estaba en boga en Europa. Pero Aranguren, que se siente interpelado por la obra de Simone Weil, se detiene más en ella y la enmarca en la realidad del presente preguntándose cómo se relaciona con Dios el hombre de su tiempo

    Rhinus gilbertus Simone & Casati, 2013, new species

    No full text
    <i>Rhinus gilbertus</i> new species <p>(Figs. 23–34)</p> <p> <b>Types.</b> Holotype MZSP 112449 (Figs. 24–28). Paratypes MZSP 111827, 27 shells (sta. P2), MZSP 111835, 98 shells (sta. P2), MZSP 111839, 50 shells (sta. P2), MZSP 111844, 9 shells (sta. P1) (Figs. 30–31), MZSP 111845, 9 shells (Figs. 32–33), USNM, 2 shells; MNRJ, 2 shells. All from type locality.</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> BRAZIL. <b>Piauí</b>; Serra da Capivara; Coronel José Dias municipality, close to Sítio do Mocó town, Cave Toca de Cima dos Pilão, 8°51’47.10”S 42°33’26.96”W (R. Casati col, 2012).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Shell somewhat elongated, with width/length ratio of ~40%. Axial undulations relatively strong, almost forming sculpture. Peristome occupying ~30% of shell length, strongly deflected. Umbilicus opened, narrow.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Shell of about 20 mm. Color pure white to pale brown. Periostracum not preserved. Outline somewhat turriform to bulimuloid; width ~40% of length. Protoconch of 1.5 whorls, opaque, obese, suture wellmarked; sculptured by delicate, uniform, undulating striae (Figs. 23, 29); occupying ~5% of shell length and ~25% of shell width; border protoconch-teleoconch clear, slightly prosocline (angle ~10° with longitudinal axis) (Figs. 28, 31, 33). Spire of ~6 rounded whorls, tall, being wider in penultimate whorl; angle ~50° (Figs. 24–26, 29, 30– 33); suture well-marked. Sculpture uniform series of axial, narrow undulations, from suture to suture, ~ 60 in penultimate whorl; interspaces between undulations equivalent to their width. Body whorl equal (Figs. 30, 31) to ~5% narrower (Figs. 24, 26, 32, 33) than preceding whorl. Peristome deflected outwards, expanding ~10% width of preceding whorl; aperture orthocline (Figs. 25, 31, 33). Aperture elliptical, occupying ~30% of shell length and ~50% of width (Figs. 24, 30, 32); lacking teeth; outer lip rounded, with middle region slightly straight; inner lip highly concave, superior half almost straight, inferior half also almost straight and wide, as tube surrounding umbilicus; low, blunt columellar carina somewhat distinct (Fig. 25). Callus thin, planar, simple, narrowly attached to penultimate whorl (Figs. 24, 25, 30, 32). Umbilicus opened, narrow, partially occluded by inner lip (Fig. 27, 34).</p> <p> <b>Measurements</b> (in mm): Holotype MZSP 112449: 21.9 by 8.3 (Figs. 24–28); paratypes: 111844 (Figs. 30–31): 18.7 by 7.5; MZSP 111845 (Figs. 32–33): 18.7 by 8.1.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Only known from type locality.</p> <p> <b>Habitat.</b> Caatinga semi-dry environment; collected inside caves.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> Types. Non-type material from type locality MZSP: 112347, 10 shells, 112356, 10 shells, 112357, 9 shells, 112367, 4 shells, 112368, 7 shells, 112373, 7 shells, 112399, 15 shells, 112415, 25 shells, 112420, 15 shells, 112432, 40 shells, 112437, 20 shells, 112442, 18 shells.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific epithet refers to the father of junior author, Gilberto Casati, who provided financial support and encouragement from his academic affairs.</p> <p> <b>Systematic remarks.</b> The main character of the genus <i>Rhinus</i> is the hairy periostracum, a character that cannot be seen in the examined material, composed of mostly long dead shells. However, the resemblance of <i>R. gilbertus</i> with several species of this genus suggests the generic attribute. Another character suggestive of the genus is the striated protoconch (Figs. 23, 29). Only few of the <i>Rhinus</i> that have elongated shell; most has a more globose shape. The elongated-shaped <i>Rhinus</i> (Simone, 2006), <i>R. gilbertus</i> resembles <i>R. constrictus</i> (Pfeiffer, 1841), from NE Brazil, differing in being more slender (width/length ratio of ~40%, against ~62% of that species); it also resembles <i>R. evelinae</i> Leme, 1986, from São Paulo, and <i>R. obeliscus</i> Haas, 1936, from Santa Catarina. It differs in having a slightly more rounded outline, as that two species are still more elongated (ratio of both species ~35%), and two fewer whorls. <i>R. gilbertus</i> is the most elongated <i>Rhinus</i> from the NE Brazil, as elongated shape is more common in SE Brazilian species. A young specimen is shown in Fig. 29, displaying a different shape.</p>Published as part of <i>Simone, Luiz Ricardo L. & Casati, Rafael, 2013, New land mollusk fauna from Serra da Capivara, Piauí, Brazil, with a new genus and five new species (Gastropoda: Orthalicoidea, Streptaxidae, Subulinidae), pp. 145-158 in Zootaxa 3683 (2)</i> on pages 153-154, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3683.2.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/218653">http://zenodo.org/record/218653</a&gt

    The reach of a long-arm stapler: calling in microaggressions in the LIS field through zine work

    No full text
    Preprint of article published as: Arroyo-Ramirez, Elvia & Chou, Rose L. & Freedman, Jenna & Fujita, Simone & Orozco, Cynthia Mari. "The Reach of a Long-Arm Stapler: Calling in Microaggressions in the LIS Field through Zine Work." Library Trends, vol. 67 no. 1, 2018, pp. 107-130. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/lib.2018.0028Since its inception in March 2014, the LIS Microaggressions project (www.lismicroaggressions.com) has grown as an online source and zine publication for library and information science (LIS) workers from marginalized communities to share their experiences with microaggressions in the workplace. This article will examine the project’s efforts to move conversations on diversity, race, racism, and antiracism in the LIS field to transgressive and actionable steps. Through conference presentations, zine-making workshops, and distribution of zines at LIS conferences, the LIS Microaggressions collective wishes to “call in” or otherwise actively engage the LIS profession for critical reflection and analysis about microaggressions in the workplace with the ultimate goal of fostering support and a participatory community for library workers dealing with microaggressions
    corecore