1,721,036 research outputs found
Understanding hotspots of health disadvantage: Challenges and opportunities [Workshop]
No full textHealth needs and health inequalities are not evenly geographically distributed. In order to address this health services and systems have to identify areas of greatest need, so they can respond proportionately and target prevention activities.
Broader changes such as migration, gentrification and social housing reforms mean that the distribution of health needs is also rapidly changing. Historical pockets of locational disadvantage may no longer be the areas that services should focus on. Without an accurate understanding of social needs, the preventable use of clinical services, and the decision-making context at local levels, investment may be mis-targeted.
This workshop will provide a brief overview of approaches to identifying hotspots of health disadvantage, based on case studies that:
profile locational health disadvantage at the suburb level
analyse potentially preventable hospitalisation data
describe experiences in identifying and tackling local needs from the Healthy Cities movement.
The workshop will focus on (i) establishing shared challenges to identifying hotspots, and (ii) identifying opportunities and potential solutions for health services and systems
Locational Disadvantage: Program Logic
Full text linkThis document sets out the program logic for the Locational Disadvantage program. It describes how it was developed, identifies the three streams of work and the activities to be conducted within those streams, and the short and long term outcomes
Reducing green tape or rolling back IA in Australia: what are four jurisdiction up to?
Full text linkProposed changes to the EU directive on EIA released in October 2012 contain ten changes to the Articles of the Directive, with six of these referring to either 'streamlining' EIA or introducing specific timeframes for parts of the EIA process (European Commission 2012). This scrutiny has not been restricted to economies in recession, but includes those that have avoided recession because of strong resources sectors.
The same appears to be happening in Australia, and this paper reports on these and other possible 'efficiency' changes to EIA in Australia at both national and sub-national levels. We attempt to critically examine the nature of such changes and the risks that may be associated with their implementation. Changes to three of the sub-national EIA processes are reviewed in detail, as well as the proposed changes to the national EIA process.
There is always room for more timely assessments, but a critical examination of the potential consequences of these "reforms" on the conduct of EIAs is needed, including whether these efficiency changes will deliver sound environmental management and sustainability-oriented decision-making.Garry Middle, Beverly Clarke, Daniel Franks, Lex Brown, Jon Kellett, Stewart Lockie, Angus Morrison-Saunders, Jenny Pope, John Glasson, Elizabeth Harris, Ben Harris-Roxa
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
“Rich people get lots of it. Poor people don’t get any of it!” Fifty years of tackling the Inverse Care Law [Invited Keynote]
Full text linkDispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
