129,009 research outputs found
Ji Han xiang chen zhuan
No full text[V.1-2]. 前漢相臣傳 : 十二卷 -- [v.3-5]. 後漢相臣傳 : 十六卷 -- [v.6]. 季漢相臣傳 : 六卷.[V.1-2]. Qian Han xiang chen zhuan : shi er juan -- [v.3-5]. Hou Han xiang chen zhuan : shi liu juan -- [v.6]. Ji Han xiang chen zhuan : liu juan.魏顯國纂述 ; 魏一鵬編次.綫裝, 1函.框22x14.3公分, 10行20字, 白口, 單黑魚尾, 四周單邊, 版心上鐫題名, 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次及小題.刻書年據《四庫全書存目叢書》鈐有"元鑑齋", "潤州笪重光鑒定印", "毛氏收藏子孫永保"印.Library's copy: 本館只存《歷代相臣傳》中《前漢》, 《後漢》, 《季漢》共六冊.Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 22 x 14.3 gong fen, 10 hang 20 zi, bai kou, dan hei yu wei, si zhou dan bian, ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci ji xiao ti.Ke shu nian ju "Si ku quan shu cun mu cong shu"Wei Xianguo zuan shu ; Wei Yipeng bian ci.Qian you "Yuan jian zhai", "Runzhou Da Chongguang jian ding yin", "Mao shi shou cang zi sun yong bao" yin.Library's copy: ben guan zhi cun "Li dai xiang chen zhuan" zhong "Qian Han", "Hou Han", "Ji Han" gong liu ce
Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Chen, Han and Fang 2002
No full text118. Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Chen, Han and Fang, 2002:240, figs. 1–2 Holotype: NMMBP 465 (44.7), Laonon River, Kaoping basin, Darjin, Liukuei, Pingtung County, Taiwan, Aug. 1994, coll. I.–S. Chen. Paratype: NMMBP 466 (3, 36.8–40.3), same data as holotype; NMMBP 467 (7, 33.4–44.2), Laonon River, Kaoping basin, Tsaolan, Liukuei, Pingtung County, S Taiwan, Feb. 1995, coll. I.–S. Chen et al.; NMMBP 468 (2, 29.8–35.6), Nanhaur River, Tzengwen River, Peiliao, Tainan County, Taiwan, 29 Oct. 1999, coll. I.–S.Chen and R.–S. Wu.Published as part of Ho, Hsuan-Ching & Shao, Kwang-Tsao, 2011, 2957, pp. 1-74 in Zootaxa 2957 on page 3
Tiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang 1990
No full textTiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990 Tiphia (Jaynesia) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990: 253–255. Material examined. ♀, China, Shanxi prov., Datong City, 39°40’32”N, 113°42’29”E, 1212m, 26.VII.2001, Zhiguo Li (YNAU); 15♂♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Hohehot City, Horinger County, Suojiayao Village, 40°34’10”N, 111°57’39.36”E, 1221m, 15.VII.2019, Xu Zhang (CNU); ♀, China, Inner Mongolia, Hailar District, 49°12’35”N, 119°43’41”E, 628m, 4.VIII.1981, Jiang Xiong (KIZ); ♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Ulanqab, 41°1’50”N, 113°6’22”E, 1415m, 30.VII.2009, Rui Zhang (KIZ); ♀ 2♂♂, China, Inner Mongolia, Otog Front Banner, 37°44’4”N, 106°26’2”E, 1260m, 24.VII.2006, Haiyan Zhang (YNAU); ♀ 11♂♂, China, Gansu prov., Zhangye City, Gao- tai County, Heiquan Town, Yanzhibao Village, 39°32’33”N, 99°37’28”E, 1321m, 1. VI.2019, Qian Han (CNU); 15♀♀ 13♂♂, China, Ningxia prov., Wuzhong City, Yanchi County, Shaquanwan Village, 37°16’2”N, 106°49’5”E, 1638m, 24.VII.2020, Qian Han (CNU). Distribution. China (Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Henan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia).Published as part of Han, Qian, Chen, Bin & Li, Ting-Jing, 2021, Three new species of the subgenus Jaynesia Allen, 1969 of the genus Tiphia Fabricius, 1775 (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae) from China, with a key to all known species, pp. 313-324 in Zootaxa 4970 (2) on page 322, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4970.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/476180
Campoplex xuthomelonus Han & Achterberg & Chen 2021, sp. nov.
No full textCampoplex xuthomelonus sp. nov. Figs. 83–84 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 20.IX.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 964206; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.VIII.1984, Zhang Kechi, No 860667; 1 female, 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 943666, 943664; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Qiliguadun, 18.IV.2009, Zengjie, No 201605323; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Sangangguadun, 18.IV.2009, Wang Manman, No 201605775; 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806165; 1 male, Guangxi Damingshan, 6.VIII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201108006; 2 males, Guizhou, Dushan, 6. V.1980, Zhou Shengzhen, No 860552, 860539; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 10.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 937487; 2 females, Guizhou, Xishui, 26.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102281, 200102738; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiapin, 21. V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204451; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Dahe, 20.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206019; 1 male, Sichuan, Chongqing, 24.VII.1980, He Junhua, No 801974; 1 female, Sichuan, Guanxian, 4.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802013; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Ninglangladuhe, 19.VIII.2003, Li Tingjing, No 20046213; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1991, He Junhua, No 911187; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 21. V.1983, He Junhua, No 830292; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 12. VI.1958, Hu Cui, No 5855.7; 14 males, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 22.IV.1994, Wu Hong, No 947063, 947029, 947070, 947071, 947028, 947072, 947073, 947025, 947073, 947025, 947074, 947076, 947075, 947067, 947069, 980639; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 7.VII.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 924533; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 27. VI.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 954191; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 16.X.1982, He Junhua, No 826303; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 995361,995783; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 30.VII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999236; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. VI.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999517; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877098; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980674; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726. Description. Female (Fig. 83) holotype. Body length 6.3 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.35× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 84E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 84E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 84F) 1.45× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 84G) granulose. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose-punctate, transstriate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 84C) with anterior transverse carina close to base; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 84A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.52× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 84H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.73× as long as first tergite, 1.7× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, small, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its length. Third tergite 1.1× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 84D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, malar space, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; all coxae and hind trochanter, black; remainder of leg yellowish brown with base and apex of hind tibia, apical segments of fore and middle tarsus and whole of hind tarsus, infuscated; metasoma entirely black. Male. Propodeal carina stronger and surface structure of propodeum coarser; otherwise similar to female. Variation. Propodeal lateral carina weak to strong, second metasomal tergite 1.7–2.0× longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hubei, Shanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having the malar space yellowish brown, all propodeal carinae strong, and punctures of mesopleuron dorsally larger and denser than in C. anotolus. Etymology. Name derived from “xuthos” (Greek for “yellowish brown”) and “melon” (Greek for “cheek”), because its malar space is yellowish brown.Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 115-120, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/565393
The interaction between individual cultural values and the cognitive and social processes of global restaurant brand equity
No full textThe aim of this study is to increase understanding of the relationship between brand equity and individual cultural values in the marketing strategies of global restaurant brands. The study developed three research models and investigated global brand equity from the perspective that global brand equity has an impact on individual cultural values. The three models were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. The findings indicate that both cognitive process and the social process of brand equity have an effect on cultural values. In particular, social process elements such as brand prestige and brand identification can reduce the risk of consumer uncertainty. This study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between global restaurant brand equity and individual cultural values, and the hierarchy of individual cultural values that has not, to the best of our knowledge, been explored in previous research.</p
Chrysosporium laterisporum Z. Li, Y. W. Zhang, W. H. Chen & Y. F. Han 2019, sp. nov.
No full textChrysosporium laterisporum Z. Li, Y.W. Zhang, W.H. Chen & Y.F. Han sp. nov. (Fig. 2) MycoBank No.: MB 819480, GenBank: KY350785, KY350786 Type: — CHINA. Fujian Province: Fuzhou City, 26°08´N, 119°28´E, GZUIFR-G310 (dried culture) isolated from soil of forest park. Colonies on PDA, attaining 32 mm in 7 d at 25 °C, white to yellowish, fluffy, ridges in the center, margin irregular; reverse yellowish. Hyphae hyaline, septate, smooth, 1.2–3.3 μm wide. Racquet hyphae absent. Terminal and lateral conidia sessile or on short protrusions or side branches, solitary, hyaline, smooth, single-celled, obpyriform to ellipsoidal, 5–12.5 × 2.5–10 µm (x =7.5 × 5.8, n= 60), basal scars 0.8–1.5 µm wide. Intercalary conidia and chlamydospores absent. Etymology: – laterisporum (Latin), referring to the abundant lateral conidia. Material examined: — The ex-type G310.1 and ex-isotype G310.2 were isolated from the soils of the forest park in November 2014 by Y.F. Han. The ex-type G310.1 culture was dried as the type GZUIFR-G310. They were deposited in the Institute of Fungus Resource, Guizhou University (GZAC). Distribution: —Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.Published as part of Li, Zhong, Zhang, Yan-Wei, Chen, Wan-Hao & Han, Yan-Feng, 2019, Morphological traits and molecular analysis for two new Chrysosporium species from Fujian Province, China, pp. 257-264 in Phytotaxa 400 (5) on pages 260-261, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.400.5.1, http://zenodo.org/record/558572
Chrysosporium ovalisporum Z. Li, Y. W. Zhang, W. H. Chen & Y. F. Han 2019, sp. nov.
No full textChrysosporium ovalisporum Z. Li, Y.W. Zhang, W.H. Chen & Y.F. Han sp. nov. (Fig. 3) MycoBank No.: MB 819481, GenBank: KY350787, KY350788 Type: — CHINA. Fujian Province: Fuzhou City, 26°08´N, 119°28´E, GZUIFR-G446 (dried culture) isolated from soils of the zoo park. Colonies on PDA attaining 28 mm in 14 d at 25 °C, white to yellowish, powdery, flat, margin irregular; reverse brown. Hyphae hyaline, septate, smooth, 2.5–3.5 μm wide. Racquet hyphae absent. Terminal and lateral conidia on long or short stalk perpendicular to hyphae, solitary, hyaline, smooth, single-celled, occasionally 2-celled, long obovate to clavate, few cylindrical, 5–15 × 2.5–7 µm (x = 6.5 × 4.6, n = 60), basal scars 0.8–2.5 µm wide. Intercalary conidia and chlamydospores absent. Etymology:— ovalisporum (Latin), referring the conidia that are long obovate. Material examined: — The ex-type G446.1 and ex-isotype G446.2 isolated from the soils of the zoo park in November 2014 by Y.F. Han. The ex-type G446.1 culture was dried to form the type GZUIFR-G446. They were deposited in the Institute of Fungus Resource, Guizhou University (GZAC). Distribution: —Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.Published as part of Li, Zhong, Zhang, Yan-Wei, Chen, Wan-Hao & Han, Yan-Feng, 2019, Morphological traits and molecular analysis for two new Chrysosporium species from Fujian Province, China, pp. 257-264 in Phytotaxa 400 (5) on page 261, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.400.5.1, http://zenodo.org/record/558572
Tiphia (Jaynesia) rotunda Han, Chen & Li 2021, sp. nov.
No full textTiphia (Jaynesia) rotunda Han, Chen & Li, sp. nov. (Figs 22–30) Diagnosis. This species can be recognized by the following combination of characters: posterior margin of tegula without transverse impressed line (Fig. 25), lateral carina of propodeum obsolete (Fig. 26), S1 (Fig. 28) without lateral groove on posterior half, and T2 1.7× wider than long and its lateral margin rounded (Fig. 22). Material examined. Holotype, ♂, China, Gansu prov., Zhangye City, Linze County, Xinhua Town, Xiaoquanz- itan Village, 39°2′48″N, 99°9′35″E, 1394 m, 27.VI.2019, Xue Zhang (CNU). Description. Male (Fig. 22). Body length 5.27 mm. Forewing length 4.0 mm. Black with erect long whitish setae, with flagellum, tegula, tibiae, tarsi, pterostigma and wing venation brown; mandible reddish brown; coxae and femora dark brown; wings translucent (Figs 22–23, 25). Head. Mandible without distinct medial transverse groove, at most with obsolete intermittent impressed line; W: OW: L: IOD=40: 16: 21: 25; OOD: POD: Od=12: 13: 6; AOD: WAS: IAD: CL: CAW=26: 20: 11: 25: 18; clypeus (Fig. 23) with dense punctures and evenly distributed, ventral margin medially convex and slightly emarginated in middle, lateral margin convex, without thickened; frons (Fig. 23) without one medial longitudinal narrow groove or carina; upper frons with sparse punctures; lower frons with denser punctures; vertex (Fig. 24) with sparse and small punctures on lateral side of ocellus, postocellar area relatively smooth, rare punctures, upper anterior-ocellus with sparse and small punctures, with interspaces smooth. Mesosoma. Pronotal dorsal face with sparse and small punctures, almost evenly spaced (Fig. 25); pronotal lateral face ventrally with dense oblique striae; mesoscutum with notaulus and dense punctures; mesopleuron with dense and minute punctures; metanotal trough and metascutellum with sparse and small punctures (Fig. 26); lateral carina of propodeum obsolete, and posteriorly with short striae connecting transverse carina; propodeal areola slightly convergent posteriorly, APWL=1.58: 0.9: 1.63, medial longitudinal carina reaching posterior 1/2 of areola; surface of propodeal areola medially flat and smooth (Fig. 26); propodeal lateral face anteriorly with long dense oblique wrinkles, posteriorly with dense and minute punctures, without short medial longitudinal carina; tegula (Fig. 25) smooth, with erect long whitish setae on its anterior and inner margin, without transverse impressed line; forewing (Fig. 22) with pterostigma, and apex of marginal cell not exceeding the second submarginal cell. Metasoma. T1 (Figs 22, 27) with sparse punctures, subposterior groove with a row of minute punctures; S1 (Fig. 28) smooth and impunctate, and without posterolateral groove and medial carina; T2 (Fig. 22) 1.7× wider than long, and its lateral margin rounded, anteriorly with transverse row of short longitudinal striae; T1–T7 with erect long whitish setae; T2–T6 with sparse punctures (Fig. 22); T1–T6 posteriorly with thin lamellae; posterior margin of S2–S5 with sparse recumbent long whitish setae; S5 (Fig. 29) with lateral denticle, nearly longitudinal and slightly curved inwards, without distinct hollow; T7 (Fig. 30) with one medial longitudinal impunctate area. Female. Unknown. Distribution. China (Gansu). Remarks. This species is similar to T. (J.) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990 by having the following character states: pronotal lateral face ventrally with dense oblique striae; mesoscutum (Fig. 25) with notaulus and dense punctures; apex of marginal cell of forewing not exceeding the second submarginal cell; T2–T6 (Fig. 22) with sparse punctures. However, this new species differs from it by having the lateral carina of propodeum obsolete; propodeal areola slightly convergent posteriorly, medial longitudinal carina reaching posterior 1/2 of areola (Fig. 26); S1 smooth and impunctate (Fig. 28); T2 1.7× wider than long, and its lateral margin rounded (Fig. 22). Etymology. The specific name rotunda is derived from a Latin adjective rotundus (= round), referring to the lateral margin of T2 that is rounded in dorsal view.Published as part of Han, Qian, Chen, Bin & Li, Ting-Jing, 2021, Three new species of the subgenus Jaynesia Allen, 1969 of the genus Tiphia Fabricius, 1775 (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae: Tiphiinae) from China, with a key to all known species, pp. 313-324 in Zootaxa 4970 (2) on pages 320-321, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4970.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/476180
sj-pdf-1-han-10.1177_15589447211038679 – Supplemental material for Gender Diversity in Hand Surgery Leadership
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-han-10.1177_15589447211038679 for Gender Diversity in Hand Surgery Leadership by Alyssa K. Brisbin, Wendy Chen, Ezequiel Goldschmidt, Brandon T. Smith and Debra A. Bourne in HAND</p
Hemymizon yushanensis Chen & Harefa & Chang & Han 2022, new species
No full textHemymizon yushanensis new species (Figure 1) Holotype.- NTOUP-2021-12-325, 55.3 mm SL, Nar-Mar-Shar County, Nan-Tsi-Shien River, Kaoping River basin, coll. C.C. Han, July, 20, 2021, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC. Paratypes.- NTOUP-2021-12-326, 8 specimens, 51.9–66.6 mm SL, Nar-Mar-Shar County, Nan-Tsi-Shien River, Kaoping River basin, Coll. C.C. Han, July, 20, 2021, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC. Non-types.- NTOUP-2007-12-175, 5 specimens, 37.6–55.0 mm SL, Jo-Kou River, Kaoping River basin, Coll. By I-S. Chen, Oct. 15, 1995. Diagnosis The new species can be well distinguished from other congeneric species by following combination of features: (1) dorsal fin rays 3 + 8; pectoral fin rays 11–13 + 9–11 (total 22–23; modally 22); (2) lateral-line scales 69–72 (modally 70); predorsal scales 25–30 (26–27); (3) pelvic fin moderate large, extending to rear vertical of dorsal fin; (4) position of anus with larger distance of pelvic rear tip to anus about 1.5–2.0 times of that of anus to anal fin origin; and (5) specific coloration: predrorsal region and head with rounded creamy yellow spots, pectoral and pelvic fins with several small whitish spots on greenish brown background. Description The morphometrics of this new species as percentages of standard length are listed in Table 1 and meristic features are listed in Table 2. Head and body strongly depressed with flat ventral side anteriorly. Posterior trunk from anus to caudal peduncle rather compressed. See Table 1 for morphometric characters. Head with a few tiny tubercles. Upper lip with 16-18 small papillae; no distinct papillae on lower lip except a pair of somewhat crescent projections on inner side. Four rostral barbels and two barbels at both corners of mouth which anterior one much larger than the very tiny posterior one. The length of anterior barbels less than the eye diameter. Interorbital region rather wide. Gill-opening small and very restricted, merely extending above anterior origin of pectoral fin. The location of anus is closer to anal fin origin, with large distance of rear tip of pelvic fin to anus about 1.2-1.7 times to that of anus to anal fin origin. Dorsal fin 3+8; anal fin 2+5; pectoral fin 11–13 + 9–11 (total 22–23; modally 22); pelvic fin 4–6 + 9–10 (totally 13–15 modally 14). Origin of dorsal fin behind origin of pelvic fin origin. Pectoral fin rather large, its rear margin extending beyond origin of pelvic fin. Pelvic fin well separate, the gap between the attachment of their innermost rays about 1.5-2.0 times of eye diameter; its rear margin extending to or beyond the rear tip of dorsal fin when depressed. Caudal fin forked, its lower lobe longer than upper one. Dorsal part of body with very small cycloid scales, larger specimens with reduced, smaller cycloids which not reaching the nape. Larger specimens with reduced, smaller size of predorsal scales. Ventral region between the paired fins naked. Body scales slightly larger posteriorly. Lateral-line scales 69–72 and predorsal scales 25–30. Coloration in fresh Dorsum of body olive brown. Predrorsal region and head olive brown to deep brown with rounded creamy yellow spots, pectoral and pelvic fins with several small whitish spots on greenish brown background. The rear part of dorsal region behind dorsal fin with some irregularly creamy yellow marks. Lateral body uniformly olive brown to deep brown. Ventral side unique pale white. Dorsal fin pale white with deep brown rays with 2 major horizontal rows of creamy white spots. Anal fin pale white with deep brown rays. Caudal fin with broad black outer margin with 3–4 oblique, zigzag creamy white streaks. Distribution The new species is only found from the several localities of hill streams of the Kaoping River basin, both Kaohsiung City and Pingtung County and also the southern region of the Yushan National Park. Etymology The specific name, yushanensis is referred to the main drainages of Kaoping River originating and southward from the highest mountain of Taiwan, the Yushan mountain Ridge. H: Holotype; P: Paratype. Discussion In the taxonomy of Hemimyzon, four nonimal species were documented in mainland China (Yue 2000) while recorded two endemic species (Tzeng & Chen 1982; Shen 1993) before 2000. After then, Chen and Fang (2009) described Hemimyzon sheni from eastern Taiwan added the third endemic species to Taiwan. Before the current species description of this new balitorid fish, Chen & Chang (2005) firstly mentioned for the potential, undescribed species (Hemimyzon sp.) from Kaoping River basins. Therefore, soon after Wang et al. (2007) published the molecular phylogenetics of this balitorid genus in Taiwan based on mtDNA D-loop sequences. Wang et al. (2007) clearly mentioned the results: the deep mtDNA genetic divergence implies that cryptic species might have arisen from southern population of H. formosanus, which is unique in differing from others in Taiwan; a recent study (Chen & Chang 2005) described several morphological differences between southern population of Hemimyzon formosanus and other populations of H. fromosanus, which supports the southern population being a cryptic species. In summary, both independent studies strongly suggest that the so-called “southern population” from the Kaoping river basin should be classified as a distinct species. In the zoo-geographical pattern of primary freshwater fishes in Taiwan, the distribution of the new species, H. yushanensis, shares the same geographical region with the Opsariichthys kaopingensis, Gobiobotia intermedia, Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis, Rhinogobius nantaiensis and also Rhinogobius sp. It reflects the same congruent speciation event for those fish genera which happened in “the same historical event of great isolation” of the Kaoping River basin, southern Taiwan (Chen & Chang 2005; Chen unpublished data). Since their high endemicity in Taiwanese waters, the new species H. yushanensis established, this species at least can be found from hill tributaries of the Kaoping River basin in the both regions of Kaohsiung City and Pingtung County. Therefore, the true range of H. formosanus would be restricted to further northern regions as all river basins from the Ilan County, Taipei City, Taipei City, Taoyuan City, Shinchu County, then southward to Tainan City which mainly in the western slope of Central Mountain Ridge. H. taitungensis can be seen from 3 main river basins from Hualian to Taitung County. H. sheni can only be seen in Tarchu river basin of Taitung County. Among them, all of them share allopatric distribution pattern without range overlapping. Among the three endemic species of Taiwan, about the differentiation of dorsal fin rays, there are apparently two groups of Hemimyzon in Taiwan. One group is dorsal fin rays 3+7 which seen in wide distributed species, H. formosanus; another group is dorsal fin rays 3+8 which can be seen in the following three species as H. taitungensis, H. sheni as well as H. yushanensis. The 3+8 group only can be seen in eastern Taiwan as both H. taitungensis and H. sheni. H. yushanensis can be only found from the Kaoping River basin originating from southern slope of the Yushan mountain Ridge in southern Taiwan. H. yushanensis shares the same dorsal fin ray formula, 3+8 with both H. taitungensis and H. sheni. However, H. yushanensis can be well distinguished from H. taitungensis by the pectoral fin rays 22–23 vs. 25–26; pelvic fin rays 13–15 vs. 17. It also can be well distinguished from H. sheni by the lower counts of pectoral fin rays 22–23 vs. 24; lateral-line scales 69–72 vs. 78–80; rear tip of pelvic fin extending to or beyond dorsal fin when depressed vs. rear tip of pelvic fin not extending to dorsal fin when depressed. The limited distribution of current species is needed for further concern of conservation issue.Published as part of Chen, I-Shiung, Harefa, Tonisman, Chang, Yung-Ching & Han, Chiao-Chuan, 2022, Hemimyzon yushanensis, a new species of balitorid fish (Teleostei: Baltiordae) from southern Taiwan, pp. 6-12 in Zootaxa 5189 (1) on pages 7-11, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5189.1.3, http://zenodo.org/record/711962
- …
