57 research outputs found
Ukraine Dataset
No full textHuman Reactions to War in the Ukraine
Project Funded by : Prof. Eli Leshem & Prof. Yaira Hamama-Raz.
Project Contributors:
Prof. Eli Leshem
Prof. Yaira Hamama-Raz
Prof. Robin Goodwin
Prof. Menachem Ben-Ezra
Dr. Yafit Levi
Ukraine Dataset
No full textHuman Reactions to War in the Ukraine
Project Funded by : Prof. Eli Leshem & Prof. Yaira Hamama-Raz.
Project Contributors:
Prof. Eli Leshem
Prof. Yaira Hamama-Raz
Prof. Robin Goodwin
Prof. Menachem Ben-Ezra
Dr. Yafit Levi
Meaning in Life, Self-Control, Positive and Negative Affect: Exploring Gender Differences Among Adolescents
No full textCoping, meaning in life, and quality of life during ongoing conflict: insights from Israeli populations
No full textAbstract Background Conducted in May 2024, this study examines the well-being of Israeli evacuees and non-evacuees from conflict zones. We assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), meaning in life (MIL), coping strategies, psychological symptoms, and self-mastery. Aims include exploring effects of trauma and socio-demographics on HRQoL and MIL, analyzing mediating roles of psychological symptoms and coping, and evaluating if evacuation status moderates these relationships during ongoing conflict. Methods In May 2024, seven months post–October 7th attacks, we conducted a cross-sectional study with 366 participants (221 evacuated, 145 non-evacuated) via a survey company. We assessed HRQoL (SF-12), MIL (MLQ), psychological symptoms (PHQ-4), self-related and other-related coping strategies (Brief COPE), and self-mastery (Self-Mastery Scale) through self-reported measures. Path and moderated mediation analyses evaluated relationships among socio-demographics, psychological symptoms, coping variables, HRQoL, and MIL. Results Except for self-mastery, northern and southern evacuees showed no significant differences and were combined into one group. Path analysis revealed significant associations between traumatic life events, HRQoL, and MIL. Traumatic events were negatively associated with the physical component summary (PCS) of HRQoL and positively with anxiety, depression, and coping (self and others- problem-solving). Depression negatively related to PCS, mental component summary (MCS), and MIL, while coping (self and others) was positively associated with MIL. Moderated mediation analysis showed evacuated participants had higher dysfunctional coping, whereas non-evacuated participants demonstrated a stronger positive relationship between anxiety and the search for meaning. Conclusion Despite regional differences, evacuees exhibited similar psychological responses, likely due to the shared experience of displacement. Traumatic events negatively impacted their HRQoL and MIL. Adaptive coping strategies—self-related and problem-focused coping through helping others—played significant roles in mitigating these effects. The theoretical frameworks of Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, Taylor’s “tend and befriend” model, and Frankl’s existential framework provided a basis for explaining these findings
Factors Associated with Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Israel: A Comparison between Participants with and without a Chronic Disease
No full textThis study examined differences regarding climate change pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs), comparing between individuals with chronic diseases and those without. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 402 adults, of whom 25% had a chronic disease. Participants completed measures for PEBs, climate change exposure (i.e., exposure to its effects), climate change risk appraisal, environmental self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and sociodemographic variables. Results revealed a significant difference between participants with and without chronic diseases in climate change risk appraisal. Having a chronic disease was associated with higher climate change risk appraisal (β = 0.16, p < 0.001), which in turn was associated with higher collective efficacy (β = 0.29, p < 0.001). The latter was associated with more PEBs (β = 0.10, p = 0.049). Furthermore, higher climate change exposure was associated with higher climate change risk appraisal (β = 0.49, p < 0.001), which in turn was associated with collective efficacy (β = 0.29, p < 0.001). The latter was associated with more PEBs (β = 0.10, p = 0.049). In addition, higher climate change exposure was directly associated with both self-efficacy (β = 0.33, p < 0.001) and collective efficacy (β = 0.10, p = 0.049), which in turn were associated with more PEBs (β = 0.28, p < 0.001 and β = 0.10, p = 0.049, respectively). This study highlights the need to provide efficacy-enhancing information in climate change messaging for PEBs in general. A threat component in environment-relevant messages for people with chronic diseases, specifically, should also be adopted
The Association between Climate Change Exposure and Climate Change Worry among Israeli Adults: The Interplay of Risk Appraisal, Collective Efficacy, Age, and Gender
No full textGuided by the transactional model of stress and coping, we examined the association between climate change exposure and climate change worry among Israeli adults, with the interplay of risk appraisal, collective efficacy, age, and gender. Using an online survey with 402 participants, we found moderate levels of climate change worry. Higher climate change exposure, increased risk appraisal, and greater collective efficacy were associated with higher worry levels. Climate change risk appraisal mediated the relationship between climate change exposure and worry, whereas gender moderated the association between collective efficacy and worry. This study highlights the significant impact of climate change exposure on worry, emphasizing the roles of risk appraisal and collective efficacy, particularly among women, and underscores the need for tailored interventions to address emotional responses to climate change
Climate Change Anxiety Among Individuals with and Without Chronic Illnesses: The Roles of Exposure, Awareness, and Coping Strategies
No full textClimate change poses a significant threat to individuals with chronic illnesses, yet research on the psychological effects of climate change among this population remains scarce. This study’s aim was to compare levels of climate change anxiety among individuals without chronic illnesses, with cardiovascular disease, and with respiratory disease, and to examine the roles of exposure, awareness, and coping strategies in predicting anxiety. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 522 Israeli adults recruited from a national online panel, including groups with and without chronic illnesses. Participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing climate change exposure, awareness, coping strategies, and anxiety. Analyses revealed that individuals with cardiovascular disease reported higher levels of climate change anxiety than those without a chronic illness or with respiratory disease. Across groups, greater climate change exposure and greater use of problem-focused coping were associated with higher climate change anxiety, whereas meaning-focused coping and awareness were not significant predictors. Additionally, climate change exposure predicted anxiety only among participants with respiratory disease. These findings underscore the differential psychological impact of climate change based on health status, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address climate change anxiety among vulnerable populations
Climate change worry, awareness, risk appraisal, and pro-environmental behaviors: Are these factors different for individuals with and without chronic diseases?
No full text
- …
