6,944 research outputs found

    Frederic-Marcel Aguessy and Steven Hall, Preliminaries Phase I, 5th Van Cliburn Competition (1977)

    No full text
    Piano sonata no. 3 in C major, op. 2, no. 3. Allegro con brio / Beethoven ; Keyboard partita no. 1 in B-flat major, BWV 825. Praeludium / J. S. Bach ; Ballade no. 1 in G minor, op. 23 / Chopin (Aguessy) -- Piano sonata no. 16 in G major, op. 31, no. 1. Allegro vivace / Beethoven ; Piano sonata no. 16 in G major, op. 31, no. 1. Adagio grazioso / Beethoven ; English suite no. 4 in F major, BWV 809. Gigue / J. S. Bach ; Ballade no. 4 in F minor, op. 52 / Chopin ; Études, op. 25. No. 6 in G-sharp minor / Chopin (Hall)

    Impact of coupling an ocean model to WRF nor’easter simulations

    No full text
    The impact of ocean-atmosphere coupling and its possible seasonal dependence upon Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations of seven, winter-time cyclone events was investigated. Model simulations were identical aside from the degree of ocean model coupling (static SSTs, 1D mixed-layer model, full-physics 3D ocean model). Both 1D and 3D ocean model coupling simulations show that SSTs following the passage of a nor’easter did tend to cool more strongly during the early season (Oct-Dec) and were more likely to warm late in the season (Feb-Apr). Model simulations produce SST differences of up to 1.14 K, but this change did not lead to significant change in storm track ( 1) and have low-to-moderate threat scores (0.31 – 0.59). Analysis of the storm environment and the overall simulation failed to reveal any statistically significant differences in model error attributable to ocean-atmosphere coupling. Despite this result, ocean model coupling can reduce dynamical field error at a single level by up to 20%, and this was slightly greater (1-2%) with 3D ocean model coupling as compared to 1D ocean model coupling. Thus, while 3D ocean model coupling tended to generally produce more realistic simulations, its impact would likely be more profound for longer-term simulations.© Copyright 2015 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be “fair use” under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act September 2010 Page 2 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC §108, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the AMS’s permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form, such as on a web site or in a searchable database, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, requires written permission or a license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy, available on the AMS Web site located at (http://www.ametsoc.org/) or from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or [email protected] reviewe

    Impact of Coupling an Ocean Model to WRF Nor’easter Simulations

    No full text
    The impact of ocean–atmosphere coupling and its possible seasonal dependence upon Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model simulations of seven, wintertime cyclone events was investigated. Model simulations were identical aside from the degree of ocean model coupling (static SSTs, 1D mixed layer model, full-physics 3D ocean model). Both 1D and 3D ocean model coupling simulations show that SSTs following the passage of a nor’easter did tend to cool more strongly during the early season (October–December) and were more likely to warm late in the season (February–April). Model simulations produce SST differences of up to 1.14 K, but this change did not lead to significant changes in storm track ( 1) and have low-to-moderate threat scores (0.31–0.59). Analysis of the storm environment and the overall simulation failed to reveal any statistically significant differences in model error attributable to ocean–atmosphere coupling. Despite this result, ocean model coupling can reduce dynamical field error at a single level by up to 20%, and this was slightly greater (1%–2%) with 3D ocean model coupling as compared to 1D ocean model coupling. Thus, while 3D ocean model coupling tended to generally produce more realistic simulations, its impact would likely be more profound for longer-term simulations.© Copyright 2015 American Meteorological Society (AMS). Permission to use figures, tables, and brief excerpts from this work in scientific and educational works is hereby granted provided that the source is acknowledged. Any use of material in this work that is determined to be “fair use” under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act September 2010 Page 2 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC §108, as revised by P.L. 94-553) does not require the AMS’s permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form, such as on a web site or in a searchable database, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, requires written permission or a license from the AMS. Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy, available on the AMS Web site located at (http://www.ametsoc.org/) or from the AMS at 617-227-2425 or [email protected] reviewe

    "The Translingual Sensibility: A Conversation Between Steven G. Kellman and Ilan Stavans"

    No full text
    Dialogue might be the most appropriate medium for reflections on translingualism. In a dialogue conducted by email over the course of ten days, Steven G. Kellman and Ilan Stavans consider the validity and implications of linguistic determinism. Their conversation examines whether some words that seem to embody the unique Weltanschaaung of a particular culture – such as Schadenfreude, duende, or mångata – can be appropriated, if not translated, into another culture. Pondering whether there are any inherent qualities that distinguish texts by monolingual writers such as Jane Austen and William Faulkner from work by authors who switch languages, such as Samuel Beckett and Vladimir Nabokov, they agree on the usefulness of thinking in terms of a translingual sensibility. Apart from the biographical circumstances of the author, a text possesses a translingual sensibility if it embodies an awareness of both the power and the limitations of its own verbal medium

    A Cross-Layer Multicast-Push Unicast-Pull (MPUP) Architecture for Reliable File-Stream Distribution

    No full text
    The growing deployment of OpenFlow/SDN networks makes it increasingly possible to leverage network multi-cast services. This work proposes a novel cross-layer Multicast- Push Unicast Pull (MPUP) architecture that includes functionality in the application, transport and link layers to offer users a reliable file-stream distribution service to multiple subscribers. A prototype implementation of the MPUP architecture was realized in a new version of Local Data Manager (LDM), LDM7, a software program that has been in use since 1994 for real-time meteorology data distribution. LDM6, the currently deployed version, uses application-layer multicast. Experiment were run on the GENI infrastructure to compare LDM7 and LDM6. The two main findings are (i) LDM7 can be run at a higher sending rate than LDM6 allowing for improved performance (lower file-delivery latency), and (ii) to achieve the same performance, LDM7 uses significantly lower bandwidth and compute capacity. A three-fold improvement in performance improvement was possible with LDM7, and a bandwidth reduction from 350 Mbps to 21.4 Mbps was observed with 24 receivers.Peer reviewe

    Frederic-Marcel Aguessy, Steven Hall, Daniel Blumenthal, Ian Hobson, Preliminaries Phase I, 5th Van Cliburn Competition (1977)

    No full text
    Piano sonata no. 3 in C major, op. 2, no. 3. Allegro con brio / Beethoven ; Keyboard partita no. 1 in B-flat major, BWV 825. Praeludium / J. S. Bach ; Ballade no. 1 in G minor, op. 23 / Chopin (Aguessy) -- Piano sonata no. 16 in G major, op. 31, no. 1. Allegro vivace / Beethoven ; Piano sonata no. 16 in G major, op. 31, no. 1. Adagio grazioso / Beethoven ; English suite no. 4 in F major, BWV 809. Gigue / J. S. Bach ; Ballade no. 4 in F minor, op. 52 / Chopin ; Études, op. 25. No. 6 in G-sharp minor / Chopin (Hall) -- Ballade no. 4 in F minor, op. 52 / Chopin ; Keyboard partita no. 1 in B-flat major, BWV 825. Praeludium / J. S. Bach ; Études, op. 10. No. 4 in C-sharp minor / Chopin (Blumenthal) -- Scherzo no. 4 in E major, op. 54 / Chopin ; Keyboard partita no. 5 in G major, BWV 829. Allemande / J. S. Bach ; Piano sonata no. 4 in E-flat major, op. 7. Allegro molto e con brio / Beethoven ; Études, op. 25. No. 6 in G-sharp minor / Chopin (Hobson)

    John L. Hall

    No full text
    JOHN L. HALL Inducted: 2005 Citation: For his distinguished work in in optical and laser physics, including advances in precision spectroscopy that were recognized by the award of the 2005 Nobel Prize in physics. Tenure: 1961-2004 B: 1934, Denver, Colorado Education: Carnegie Institute of Technology, BS (Physics), 1956 Carnegie Institute of Technology, MS (Physics), 1958 Carnegie-Mellon University, PhD (Physics), 1961 Positions held: Physicist, 1961-1978, Senior Scientist, 1979 - 2004 Senior NBS/NIST Fellow 1988 & Fellow of JILA, 1964-present Honors: More than 20 awards including Nobel Prize in Physics 2005 (joint with T. Hänsch and R. Glauber) U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medals (1969, 1974, 2001) NBS Stratton Award (1971); NBS Condon Award (1979); NIST Astin Award (2000) OSA Townes Award (1984) (joint with V. P. Chebotayev); OSA Ives Medal (1991); Born Award (2002) APS Davisson-Germer Prize (1988); APS/DLS Schawlow Prize (1993) Presidential Rank Award (1980, 2002); IEEE Rabi Award, IEEE (2004) Republic of France Légion d'Honneur (2004) Memberships: American Physical Society (Fellow) Fellow, Optical Society of America (Fellow) Delegate, Consultative Committee for the Definition of the Meter (BIPM) Sèvres, France, 1970-2004 National Academy of Sciences, 1984-present International Union of Radio Science (URSI) Publications: More than 235 publications and ten patents, including: K. M. Evenson, J. S. Wells, F. R. Peterson, B. L. Danielson, G. W. Day, R. L. Barger, and J L. Hall, “Speed of light from direct frequency and wavelength measurements of the methane-stabilized laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1346-1349 (1972) J. L. Hall, C. J. Bordé and K. Uehara, “Direct optical resolution of the recoil effect using saturated absorption spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1339-1342 (1976) J. L. Hall and D. Hils, “Improved Kennedy-Thorndike Experiment to Test Special Relativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1697 (1990) David J. Jones, Scott A. Diddams, Jinendra K. Ranka, Andrew Stentz, Robert S. Windeler, John L. Hall, Steven T. Cundiff, “Carrier-Envelope Phase Control of Femtosecond Mode-Locked Lasers and Direct Optical Frequency Synthesis,” Science, 288 635 (2000). John L. Hall, Jun Ye, Scott A. Diddams, Long-Sheng Ma, Steven T. Cundiff, and David J. Jones, “The four Laser Ultras: a New Alliance for Physics and Metrology,” IEEE J. of Quantum Electron. 37, 1482-1492 (2001). Mark Notcutt, Longsheng Ma, Jun Ye, and John L. Hall, “Simple and compact 1-Hz laser system via improved mounting configuration of a reference cavity,” Opt. Lett.30, 1815 (2005

    Personal-level factors and Google Docs use in Monmouth County middle schools

    No full text
    Technology is essential in both personal and professional lives. Also, digital assessments, such as those being implemented as part of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), will soon be instituted; these require students to utilize computer technology in order to complete the assessment. Therefore, it is imperative that administrators be aware of factors associated with increased frequency and complexity of technology use in teachers’ classrooms. This study examined the factors associated with the diffusion and implementation of a technological innovation (Google Docs) through schools/districts in Monmouth County, NJ. An online survey provided quantitative data about teachers’ personal-professional characteristics and the frequency and complexity of respondents’ uses of Google Docs. Data was collected from 35 of the 53 schools in Monmouth County; 45% of the surveyed population provided viable responses. Linear regression determined which factors had a statistically significant association with the dependent variable “Google Docs Usage Score” (GDUS), a measure of frequency and complexity of Google Docs use. Independent variables culled from the literature were decision method (optional, collective, or authority); innovator type (innovator, early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard); and the following personal characteristics: years of teaching experience; subject area taught; grade levels taught; number of types of technology used personally; number of types of technology used professionally; and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) score (Mishra & Koehler, 2003). This study determined there was a statistically significant association between the GDUS and the following variables: optional decision method; innovator, early adopter, and early majority innovator types; the subject areas Mathematics and Visual and/or Performing Arts; the number of types of technology used professionally; and TPACK score. These findings provide administrators with specific factors to consider when encouraging diffusion of a technological innovation such as Google Docs into a school. Combined with research by Wisnicki (2014), it was found that personal factors have a larger impact on GDUS than do environmental factors. This study builds on the diffusion work of Rogers (2003) and the Concerns-Based Adoption Model of Hall, Wallace, & Dosset (1973), and adds clarity to the literature on diffusion of educational technology within schools. This study also provides a new theoretical construct for examining levels of use of Google Docs, which could potentially be expanded to act as a measurement for other types of educational technology.Ed. D.Includes bibliographical referencesby Steven G. Tetreaul

    GUEST ARTIST RECITAL STEVEN GLASER, Piano Tuesday, April 12, 1994 8:00 p.m. Lillian H. Duncan Recital Hall

    No full text
    Quality of recording varies.Program: Sonata in D Major, L. 465, K. 96; Sonata in A minor, L. 241, K. 54; Sonata in F Major, L. 188, K. 525 / Domenico Scarlatti -- Sonata in D Major, Op. 25 No. 6 / Muzio Clementi -- Wake-up and Dance / Steven Paxton -- Seven Etudes: C minor, Op. 10 No. 12 "Revolutionary"; A-flat Major, Op. 25 No. 1 "Aeolian Harp"; C-sharp minor, Op. 10 No. 4; E Major, Op. 10 No. 3; E minor, Op. 25 No. 5; A minor, Op. 25 No. 11 "Winter Wind"; C minor, Op. 25 No. 12 "Ocean" / Frederic Chopin -- Berceuse, Op. 57 / Frederic Chopin -- Transcendetal Etude in F minor / Franz Liszt -- Valse Oubliee / Franz Liszt -- Mephisto Waltz / Franz Liszt -- Prelude in C-sharp minor, Op. 3 No. 2; Prelude in G minor, Op. 23 No. 5 / Sergei Rachmaninof

    Alternatives to lower juvenile recidivism rates at James G. Bowels Juvenile Hall

    No full text
    America’s future rests in the hands of juveniles. It is important to put a stop to the number of crimes being committed by juveniles and effectively rehabilitate them. Recidivism rates of juveniles released from detentions centers continues to remain high throughout the state suggesting rehabilitation programs are not working. Many juvenile institutions have been kept at maximum capacity forcing them to release detained juveniles early when they receive a new juvenile that has committed a serious crime. Many institutions currently have programs in place that attempt to provide positive reinforcements and intervention, but have failed to make a significant difference. Many of the programs that have failed to make an impact and are still in place. There are many juveniles sent back to James G. Bowels Juvenile Hall to await another conviction and possibly another commitment program. The current programs at Juvenile Hall have kept juveniles busy during their time served, but the programs currently implemented have not rehabilitated juveniles. The increasing rate of juveniles returning to Juvenile Hall suggests that implementing other programs may be what is needed to increase the number of juveniles that leave rehabilitated and reduce recidivism rates. The purpose of this policy analysis is to present alternative programs focused on recidivism rates of juveniles being re-booked in Juvenile Hall and what is causing these juvenile offenders to recidivate. These alternative programs will help to identify beneficial programs and reduce the recidivism rate of juveniles returning to Juvenile Hall. If an alternative program succeeds then Juvenile Hall will be able to effectively rehabilitate more juveniles and start reducing the currently growing percentage of juvenile recidivism rates
    corecore