10,700,304 research outputs found
Rovaniemi / tarkastanut Victor Hackman
ROVANIEMI / TARKASTANUT VICTOR HACKMAN
Kivilajikartta (-)
Rovaniemi / tarkastanut Victor Hackman (C6) ( -
Savonlinna / tarkastanut V. Hackman ja H. Berghell
SAVONLINNA / TARKASTANUT V. HACKMAN JA H. BERGHELL
Kivilajikartta (-)
Savonlinna / tarkastanut V. Hackman ja H. Berghell (D2) ( -
Letter from Gabe Hackman to W. T. Johnson
Letter from Gabe Hackman to W. T. Johnson, giving him information for radio program
Harvey C. Hackman Interview, April 23, 1974
Harvey Hackman provides biographical information on people living in Ninemile and Stark areas of Montana during the 1940s and 1950s. He also discusses the history of Ninemile, Montana.https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ninemile_oralhistory/1001/thumbnail.jp
Paracosmetopus Hackman 1956
Paracosmetopus Hackman, 1956 Paracosmetopus Hackman, 1956: 26. Type species: Paracosmetopus helleni Hackman, 1956: 26; by original designation.Published as part of Šifner, František, 2008, A catalogue of the Scathophagidae (Diptera) of the Palaearctic region, with notes on their taxonomy and faunistics, pp. 111-196 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 48 (1) on page 145, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.534249
Paracosmetopus helleni Hackman 1956
Paracosmetopus helleni Hackman, 1956 Paracosmetopus helleni Hackman, 1956: 26. HOLOTYPE: J, Russia, European part, Kola peninsula, Kusomen [= Kuzomen], W. Hellén leg. (MZHF). Distribution. Czech Republic (ŠIFNER 2003a: 43); Russia – European Russia (GORODKOV 1986: 25).Published as part of Šifner, František, 2008, A catalogue of the Scathophagidae (Diptera) of the Palaearctic region, with notes on their taxonomy and faunistics, pp. 111-196 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 48 (1) on page 145, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.534249
Drosophila (Drosophila) lummei Hackman 1972
<i>Drosophila</i> (<i>Drosophila</i>) <i>lummei</i> Hackman, 1972 <p>DISTRIBUTION. Widespread in Palearctic region (Bächli & Rocha Pité, 1984) and Russia (Gornostaev, 1997; Sidorenko, 2001).</p> <p>NOTES. This species was recorded from Krasnodarsky krai by Gornostaev (1997).</p>Published as part of <i>Gornostaev, N. G. & Lyupina, Yu. V., 2023, AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE DROSOPHILID FLIES (DIPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE) OF KRASNODARSKY KRAI, pp. 10-16 in Far Eastern Entomologist 490</i> on page 12, DOI: 10.25221/fee.490.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10135120">http://zenodo.org/record/10135120</a>
Introduction:the DVI casebook, UK incidents
A professional and successful disaster victim identification (DVI) deployment relies on preparedness, advanced communication networks, inter-agency cooperation, crisis management capabilities, efficient implementation of emergency plans, and a response by trained personnel. In any mass fatality event an early, rapid deployment of a DVI reconnaissance team led by an experienced DVI commander is essential if the requirements of victim recovery and identification are to be met to the standard of excellence required. A "Gold," "Silver," "Bronze" command structure (or, respectively, Strategic, Tactical, and Operational) is used by UK emergency services to establish a hierarchical framework for the command and control of major incidents and disasters, including mass fatality incidents (MFIs). While this system does not explicitly signify hierarchy of rank, the chain of command loosely follows rank order, with the most senior and experienced officers tending to occupy key roles. This structure was adopted for response to disasters; however, it has been successfully used for all manner of preplanned operations, including football matches and firearms operations. The individuals for each element of the team are selected largely as a result of the police area (Figure 1.1) in which the incident occurs and in recognition of their training and experience
Miscarriages of Justice and the Role of the Expert Witness
This chapter examines the role of the expert witness and the ways in which it has been both informed and formed by the high-profile miscarriages of justice. The expert witness is alone in the courtroom in being able to give opinion evidence and is there to assist the court with elucidating and presenting information about a specialist subject which is outside the expertise of the jury. This anomalous role was developed during the eighteenth century and the ability to give an opinion remains the primary factor that separates the role of the expert witness from that of other witnesses in court. In addition to the issue of non-disclosure, the appeals into the Maguire Seven, Birmingham Six and Judith Ward all exposed the problem of bias in relation to the evidence given by the expert witnesses. The experts were accused of having lost their impartiality.</p
- …
