1,822,785 research outputs found
PREMESSA. Il disegno tra sguardo e pensiero
No full textVolume curato da Barbara Messina e Maria Ines Pascariello; il titolo, con i verbi che lo
compongono, evoca le motivazioni poste alla base dell’iniziativa che, in forma
di workshop, ho avviato nell’anno accademico 2013-2014, con la collaborazione di alcuni colleghi del settore, e che nel corso degli anni è stata riproposta,
con esiti anche pubblicati, come esemplifica il volume in presentazione
Ines Jacoby Collection 1839-1939
No full textDeed of sale (1839), 2 letters (1884, 1889), and an identity card (1939).Ines JacobyProcessed for digitizationSent for digitizationReturned from digitizationSent to Internet Archive New Jersey for rescanningReturned from digitizationLinked to online manifestationdigitize
Dicelis eudrilii Ivanova & Hope, 2009, n. sp.
No full textDicelis eudrilii n. sp. (Figs 1–2) Measurements: Table 1. TABLE 1. Morphometrics of Dicelis eudrilii n. gen., n. sp. Measurements are ranges in µm. Adult: Large drilonematids. Body long, cylindrical, barely tapering to anterior end, with short conoid tail in both sexes. Cuticle finely striated. Lateral chords about 13–18 µm wide, comprised of two rows of vacuolated cells. Head bluntly rounded, bearing two circles of small cephalic papillae (6 + 4). Mouth aperture terminal. Stoma short, infundibular. Amphidial apertures not discernible, short bundle of sensilla conspicuous posterior to head papillae. Pharynx short, cylindroid and heavily muscled: cardia short. Nerve ring surrounding constriction of intestine about 2–3 body diameters posterior to pharynx base. Excretory pore about 2 µm in diameter, 1 body diameter posterior to nerve ring. Excretory duct as wide as excretory pore, about 13–22 µm long and cuticularised; excretory cell enormous. Intestine well-developed, thick-walled. Tail bearing small fimbriate caudal organs situated slightly asymmetrically near mid-tail length. Male: Body about 2.6–3.4 mm long. Stoma 2–5 µm long and 7–10 µm in diameter. Pharynx 22–25 µm in diameter. Testis long, reflexed slightly posterior to excretory pore. Distal end of testis flexure 220–570 µm long. Immature sperm spherical, about 5–6 µm in diameter. Spermatids in ejaculatory duct about 17–20 µm x 14–18 µm in size. Copulatory muscles prominent. Spicules long, distinctly cephalate, heavily sclerotized, uniformly curved and bearing paired, serrated ventrolateral ridges; capitula about 1 / 7 of length, slightly elongated, and similar in diameter to shaft; distal tips long, thin, rounded. Gubernaculum about 1 / 2 of spicule length, plate-like, sometimes with short proximal process bent posteriad. Paired, prominent precloacal papillae present in front of cloaca and a pair of smaller ones just posterior to cloaca, both subventrally placed and covered by very thin membrane. Fimbriate caudal organs slightly raised, with a circular aperture 6–9 µm in diameter and convex radially striated rim 10–12 µm in diameter, located just anterior of mid-tail length. Tail well-tapered, tail tip rounded. Female: Body about 4 –5.3 mm long. Stoma 7–10 µm long and 8–15 µm in diameter. Pharynx 30–32 µm in diameter. Proximal tip of ovary situated between vulva and anus; ovary looped twice between distal and proximal ends of ovary; oviduct flexed posteriorly at junction with about 3 pharynx lengths from anterior. Spermatheca, 240–275 µm long, directed anteriorly from flexed juncture of ovary and oviduct and filled with large bean-like spermatozoa 8–14 µm x 4–6 µm in size. Oviduct looped and bearing spherical cells (of glandular nature?). Uterus large, thin-walled, packed with numerous eggs. Eggs widely elliptical, shell about 1.5 µm thick, covered by irregularly shaped, flat, densely packed minute tubercles. Vagina straight, short. Vulval lips not prominent. Vulva post-median. No post-uterine sac present. Rectum long with sclerotized lining. Rectal glands present. Tail slightly larger in diameter than in males, tapering to the end with blunt conical tip 2–3 µm long. Fimbriate organs situated at mid-tail or slightly further back; the same in structure as in males, 17–25 µm in diameter of outer rim, aperture 8–15 µm in diameter. Three caudal glands present. Juvenile. Head end, pharynx, nerve ring and excretory pore as in adult nematodes. L III: vulval primordium situated at posterior end of genital primordium measuring 620 µm long. Type material: Holotype female USNM 1117733, paratype female USNM 1117734, 2 paratype males USNM 1117735 and 1117736, immature female USNM 1117737 and juvenile USNM 1117738 deposited in the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History. Further paratype female No 1068 deposited in the Museum of Helminthological Collections in the Centre of Parasitology of A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Moscow, Russia and paratype male and fragments of male and female are in the first author’s collection. Type host and locality: Coelomic cavity of Eudrilus sp., USNM 52754, collected 145 miles NW from Lagos, University of Ifa, Nigeria, May–June 1975, leg. A.O. Segun. Etymology: The species is named after its earthworm host. Diagnosis and relationships. Drilonematoidea, Drilonematidae, Dicelinae. This species is characterized by well-tapered, conoid tail in both sexes, cephalic papillae in two circles, cylindroid pharynx, faint amphids with pore-like apertures, conspicuous excretory pore, nerve ring situated around intestine in front of excretory pore in adults and juveniles, long off-set spermatheca, post-median position of vulva, lack of post-uterine sac, smallish fimbriate organs, strong long spicules, and male caudal papillae reduced to two pairs. A narrowly conoid tail, prominent excretory pore, very long spermatheca, relatively long spicules and presence of only two pairs of male caudal papillae distinguish this species from the other nominal species in the genus, all of them of Palearctic origin and parasitic in lumbricid earthworms. The genus Dicelis includes 14 species, viz. D. filaria Dujardin, 1845 (type species), D. caledoniensis Spiridonov, Ivanova & Wilson, 2005, D. eiseniae Timm, 1967, D. hyrcanus Belostotskaya, Kozodoi & Spiridonov, 1987, D. keimeri Morand, Ivanova & Vaucher, 1996, D. kimmeriensis Ivanova, 1993, D. lovatiana Ivanova, 1993, D. lumbricicola Ivanova, 1993, D. nira Chitwood & Lucker, 1934, D. pereliae Ivanova, 1993, D. rossica Timm, 1967, D. rubidi Ivanova, 1994, D. sibirica Ivanova, 1994 and D. ussuriensis Spiridonov, Ivanova & Wilson, 2005. All of them have shorter, broader, cylindroid or conoid tails, often with digitiform appendages, much smaller and sometimes morphologically indistinct spermatheca, shorter spicules and indistinct excretory pore and duct. Exceptional for, and characteristic of, D. eiseniae, are the position of the vulva near mid-body and the presence of a post-uterine sac. The characters by which this species differs from other species of Dicelis, namely the narrowly conoid tail, prominent excretory pore, very long spermatheca and spicules, post-median vulva position and fimbriate organs, are more similar to characters of another genus of the same subfamily, namely Adieronema Timm, 1967. This latter genus is parasitic in megascolecid earthworms of East-Asian origin, but Dicelis differs from this genus by the absence of polar differentiation in eggs, (present in Adieronema). Remarks. The Dicelinae, to which this species is assigned, contains only two genera, Dicelis and Adieronema. The first is parasitic in lumbricid earthworms and the second in megascolecids. Our new species is the first representative of the subfamily parasitic in a host from another family and geographical region. Timm (1967) differentiated Adieronema from Dicelis on the basis of a few characters, i.e. larger size, prominent excretory pore and very numerous typical ova with bipolar corona. This species displays affinities with species of both genera. In terms of general appearance it more strongly resembles species of Adieronema than those of Dicelis, but shares similarities with Dicelis spp. in body size, and less numerous (several dozens vs several hundreds), but larger sized eggs lacking polar differentiation. For several species of Dicelis (D. hyrcanus, D. lovatiana, D. rubidi, D. caledoniensis) it has been shown that the nerve ring in juveniles is situated around the pharynx, but that it “slips” to a position around the intestine during the growth of the nematodes. In the new species the nerve ring position remains the same in both adults and juveniles. This species may represent yet another lineage of the genus, associated with eudrilid earthworms. Paradicelis gen. n. Diagnosis. Drilonematoidea, Drilonematidae, Dicelinae. Four papilliform cephalic sensilla. Mouth aperture terminal. Stoma short, infundibular. Amphids pore-like. Pharynx cylindroid. Nerve ring circum-intestinal. Excretory pore anterior to nerve ring. Males monorchic; spicules paired and curved; gubernaculum plate-like. Irregular bursa supported by whip-like sensilla. Paired small caudal fimbriate organs present. Females unknown. Etymology: The generic name reflects an affinity with the genus Dicelis. Type and only species: Paradicelis bursata gen. n., sp. n.Published as part of Ivanova, Elena S. & Hope, Duane, 2009, A new genus and three new species of Drilonematidae (Rhabditida, Drilonematoidea) from earthworms, pp. 53-67 in Zootaxa 2293 on pages 54-58, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19146
Naissance d'une nouvelle discipline : l'IPSOLOGIE© par Ines Orchani
No full textInventing IPSOLOGY© by Ines Orchan
Presentazione di Ines Testoni
No full textLa Death Education è una realtà che, negli Stati Uniti, nell’Europa settentrionale ed in Israele, ha già assunto una consistenza significativa, e, che, da qualche tempo, si sta diffondendo anche in Italia. Se nel secolo scorso i temi inerenti al morire venivano rubricati – come sottolineava in un celebre articolo Geoffrey Gorer del 1955 “The pornography of death” – tra gli argomenti osceni, con il nuovo millennio sembra che stia lentamente tramontando la volontà di occultare l’evidenza della morte e la sua inevitabilità. Possiamo infatti annoverare un numero sempre crescente di iniziative artistiche e di occasioni scientifiche che discutono di questo per promuoverne la presa di coscienza individuale e collettiva, alla ricerca dei linguaggi da adottare e dei contenuti su cui soffermarsi per descrivere la finitudine umana e i vissuti di perdita che la caratterizzano. L’allungamento del lifespan garantito dallo sviluppo della medicina ha prodotto un ulteriore effetto consistente nel prolungamento delle fasi finali e terminali della vita e della malattia, esponendo quindi le persone a dover fare i conti con l’evidenza del dover morire. La linea culturale, sviluppata a partire dal secondo dopoguerra caratterizzata da censura e negazionismo rispetto a questa necessità, ha prodotto infatti un esito fortemente disfunzionale che oggi richiede di essere gestito e risolto, perché ha reso intere generazioni abituate all’agio, al benessere, alla ricchezza e alla pace, a non sapere come gestire il momento più difficile ma anche forse più importante della vita: quello del congedo dal mondo. L’attuale mancanza di linguaggi appropriati per comunicare con chi muore e con i dolenti, come pure l’assenza di una cultura che illustri i significati che hanno caratterizzato la storia dell’umanità per affrontare la prova esistenziale più difficile è l’esito appunto di mezzo secolo di scotomizzazioni sistematiche che non possono più essere ammesse, data l’istanza diffusa di riconquistare categorie in grado di farci assumere la morte come elemento essenziale del significare la vita
Andrée Chedid ou la prophétie au féminin par Ines Horchani
No full textInes Horchani, "Andrée Chedid", Dictionnaire de La Bible dans les littératures du monde, éditions du Cerf, 2016 ISBN 978220411388
Discussion: Dynamic penetration resistance and the prediction of the compressibility of a fine-grained sand—a laboratory study
No full textAuthors repl
Correction: Ivanova, B. Stochastic Dynamic Mass Spectrometric Quantitative and Structural Analyses of Pharmaceutics and Biocides in Biota and Sewage Sludge. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6306
No full textFollowing a request from Dortmund University, the previous affiliation of the Guest Editor, Bojidarka Ivanova, in the original publication [...
Can Deliberative Minipublics Influence Public Opinion? Theory and Experimental Evidence
No full textThis replication package replicates the findings reported in Sean Ingham and Ines Levin, “Can Deliberative Minipublics Influence Public Opinion? Theory and Experimental Evidence.” Forthcoming in Political Research Quarterly
Can Deliberative Minipublics Influence Public Opinion? Theory and Experimental Evidence
No full textThis replication package replicates the findings reported in Sean Ingham and Ines Levin, “Can Deliberative Minipublics Influence Public Opinion? Theory and Experimental Evidence.” Forthcoming in Political Research Quarterly
- …
