1,265 research outputs found
The new horticulture
No full textVon H. M. Stringfellow. Autorisierte Übers. aus d. Engl. von Friedrich WannieckIn Fraktu
A pilot-scale trial comparing mesophilic and thermophilic digestion for the stabilisation of source segregated kitchen waste
No full textSource segregated food waste was collected from domestic properties and its composition determined together with the average weight produced per household, which was 2.91 kg per week. The waste was fed over a trial period lasting 58 weeks to an identical pair of 1.5 m3 anaerobic digesters, one at a mesophilic (36.5 oC) and the other at a thermophilic temperature (56 oC). The digesters were monitored daily for gas production, solids destruction and regularly for digestate characteristics including alkalinity, pH, volatile fatty acid (VFA) and ammonia concentrations. Both digesters showed high VFA and ammonia concentrations but in the mesophilic digester the pH remained stable at around 7.4, buffered by a high alkalinity of 13,000 mg l-1; whereas in the thermophilic digester VFA levels reached 45,000 mg l-1 causing a drop in pH and digester instability. In the mesophilic digester volatile solids (VS) destruction and specific gas yield were favourable, with 67% of the organic solids being converted to biogas at a methane content of 58% giving a biogas yield of 0.63 m3 kg-1 VS added. Digestion under thermophilic conditions showed potentially better VS destruction at 70% VS and a biogas yield of 0.67 m3 kg-1 VS added, but the shifts in alkalinity and the high VFA concentrations required a reduced loading to be applied. The maximum beneficial loading that could be achieved in the mesophilic digester was 4.0 kg VS m-3 d-1
Erratum: Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study (Jmir Form Res (2021)5:7 (E27327) Doi: 10.2196/27327)
No full textIn “Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study” (JMIR Form Res 2021;5(7):e27327), three errors were noted. Due to a system error, the name of one author, Cynthia F Corbett, was replaced with the name of another author on the paper, Elizabeth M Combs. In the originally published paper, the order of authors was listed as follows: Elizabeth M Combs, Elizabeth M Combs, Peyton S Chandarana, Isabel Stringfellow, Karen Worthy, Thien Nguyen, Pamela J Wright, Jason M O\u27Kane This has been corrected to: Cynthia F Corbett, Elizabeth M Combs, Peyton S Chandarana, Isabel Stringfellow, Karen Worthy, Thien Nguyen, Pamela J Wright, Jason M O\u27Kane In the originally published paper, the ORCID of author Cynthia F Corbett was incorrectly published as follows: 0000-0002-2254-6958 This has been corrected to: 0000-0003-2706-2116 In the originally published paper, the email of the Corresponding Author was incorrectly published as follows: [email protected] This has been corrected to: [email protected] The correction will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website on January 27, 2022, together with the publication of this correction notice. Because this was made after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text repositories, the corrected article has also been resubmitted to those repositories
SWIMS Database input tables and example output results tables
No full textAssigned DOI: 10.5258/SOTON/D0382
Solid Waste Infrastructure Modelling System (SWIMS) complete input and lookup tables for use with NISMOD 1 version of SWIMS.
Complete results for model run 2740 reported within paper entitled "Solid Waste Infrastructure Modelling System (SWIMS): a dynamic optimisation and decision support tool for solid waste infrastructure management".
Model simulation was run within the Newcastle University servers for NISMOD 1 by Jon Coello. details of which are available "Hall, J.W., Tran, M., Hickford, A.J., Nicholls, R.J., 2016. The Future of National Infrastructure: A System-of-Systems Approach. Cambridge University Press."
Data is complete for all 11 GOR of GB.
All LCI data is derived from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) LCA software EASETECH and should be referenced accordingly when used : "Clavreul, J., Baumeister, H., Christensen, T.H., Damgaard, A., 2014. An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies. Environmental modelling & software 60, 18-30."
Nomenclature:
SW Solid Waste
I Input - standard inputs e.g. area
IO input output file - data required for following years e.g. staged infrastructure builds
LU Look Up - readily editable input file e.g. built facilities
O Output - Main results e.g. CO2e output from waste treatment.</span
A pilot-scale comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of source segregated domestic food waste
No full textSource segregated food waste was collected from domestic properties and its composition determined together with the average weight produced per household, which was 2.91 kg per week. The waste was fed over a trial period lasting 58 weeks to an identical pair of 1.5 m3 anaerobic digesters, one at a mesophilic (36.5°C) and the other at a thermophilic temperature (56°C). The digesters were monitored daily for gas production, solids destruction and regularly for digestate characteristics including alkalinity, pH, volatile fatty acid (VFA) and ammonia concentrations. Both digesters showed high VFA and ammonia concentrations but in the mesophilic digester the pH remained stable at around 7.4, buffered by a high alkalinity of 13,000 mg l-1; whereas in the thermophilic digester VFA levels reached 45,000 mg l-1 causing a drop in pH and digester instability. In the mesophilic digester volatile solids (VS) destruction and specific gas yield were favourable, with 67% of the organic solids being converted to biogas at a methane content of 58% giving a biogas yield of 0.63 m3 kg-1 VSadded. Digestion under thermophilic conditions showed potentially better VS destruction at 70% VS and a biogas yield of 0.67 m3 kg-1 VSadded, but the shifts in alkalinity and the high VFA concentrations required a reduced loading to be applied. The maximum beneficial loading that could be achieved in the mesophilic digester was 4.0 kg VS m-3 d-1
Clustering Properties of Far-infrared Sources in Hi-GAL Science Demonstration Phase Fields
No full textWe use a minimum spanning tree (MST) algorithm to characterize the spatial distribution of Galactic far-IR sources and derive their clustering properties. We aim to reveal the spatial imprint of different types of star-forming processes, e.g., isolated spontaneous fragmentation of dense molecular clouds, or events of triggered star formation around H II regions, and highlight global properties of star formation in the Galaxy. We plan to exploit the entire Herschel infrared GALactic (Hi-GAL) survey of the inner Galactic plane to gather significant statistics on the clustering properties of star-forming regions and to look for possible correlations with source properties such as mass, temperature, or evolutionary stage. In this paper, we present a pilot study based on the two 2° × 2° fields centered at longitudes l = 30° and l = 59° obtained during the science demonstration phase of the Herschel mission. We find that over half of the clustered sources are associated with H II regions and infrared dark clouds. Our analysis also reveals a smooth chromatic evolution of the spatial distribution where sources detected at short wavelengths, likely protostars surrounded by warm circumstellar material emitting in the far-infrared, tend to be clustered in dense and compact groups around H II regions while sources detected at long wavelengths, presumably cold and dusty density enhancements of the ISM emitting in the submillimeter, are distributed in larger and looser groups
- …
