445 research outputs found
Salix diazii M. Idrees & J. M. H. Shaw 1015, nom. nov.
No full textSalix × diazii M. Idrees & J.M.H. Shaw, nom. nov. Replaced name:— Salix × longissima T.E.Díaz & J.Andrés (1987: 132), nom. illeg., non S. longissima P.Wessel (1855: 140). Type:— SPAIN. Léon Province: La Martina, 490 m, 29TPH91, 16 June 1985, T.E. Díaz et al. s.n. (holotype, LEB29538!, isotypes LEB29539!, LEB30605!). Etymology:— The specific epithet honours Prof. Dr. Tomás Emilio Díaz González (University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain), author of the replaced name, for his tremendous contributions to the taxonomy of the genus Salix. Distribution:— Spain, Léon Province (La Martina).Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Shaw, Julian M. H., 2022, A new name for extant Salix × longissima T. E. Díaz & J. Andrés (Salicaceae), pp. 213-214 in Phytotaxa 550 (2) on page 213, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.550.2.11, http://zenodo.org/record/664103
Lysimachia neolongipedicellata M. Idrees & J. M. H. Shaw 2022, nom. nov.
No full textLysimachia neolongipedicellata M. Idrees & J. M. H. Shaw, nom. nov. Replaced name: — Lysimachia longipedicellata R.Trevis., Funez & Hassemer (2021: 147), nom. illeg. non L. longipedicellata (Lunell) Hand.-Mazz. (1928: 80). Type: — BRAZIL. Santa Catarina: Lages, em Direção a Otacílio Costa, 11 Nov. 2013, R. Trevisan 1378 (holotype FLOR0061999). Distribution: — Paraná and Santa Catarina (South Brazil); Endangered (Funez et al. 2021).Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad, Li, Meng & Shaw, Julian M. H., 2022, Lysimachia neolongipedicellata, a new name for L. longipedicellata R. Trevis., Funez & Hassemer (Primulaceae), pp. 197-198 in Phytotaxa 574 (2) on page 197, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.574.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/738081
Astragalus wui M. Idrees & Z. Y. Zhang 2021, nom. nov.
No full textAstragalus wui M. Idrees & Z.Y. Zhang, nom. nov. Replaced name:— Astragalus sylvaticus Y.H. Wu (2015: 718), nom. illeg., non A. sylvaticus (Pall.) Willd. (1802: 1300). Type:— CHINA. Xinjiang: Yecheng Country, Sukepiya, in border forest, alt. 3000 m, 15 Aug. 1987, Exped. Qinghai-Tibet Wu Yuhu 1067 (holotype: QTPMB, not seen). Etymology:—The specific epithet honours Prof. Dr. Wu Yuhu (Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Xining, China), author of the replaced name, who first described this new species.Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2021, Astragalus wui, a new replacement name for A. sylvaticus Y. H. Wu (Galegeae, Papilionoideae, Fabaceae), pp. 210-211 in Phytotaxa 524 (3) on page 210, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.524.3.6, http://zenodo.org/record/564936
Litsea pseudolongifolia Kosterm. ex Idrees 2021, nom. nov.
No full textLitsea pseudolongifolia Kosterm. ex Idrees, nom. nov. Type:— Thailand. Loei, PhuKradueng (PooKradeng), alt. 1300 m, 25 Nov. 1958, T. J . SØrensen, K. Larsen, B. Hansen, 6221 (holotype: C!; isotypes: AAU!, BKF!). Replaced name: Litsea pseudoelongata Kosterm., Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 25(3–4): 38. 1974 nom. illeg., non L. pseudoelongata H. Liou, Laurac. Chine & Indochine 179, f. 13. 1934. Distribution: N. E. Thailand: Loei (PhuKradueng, PhuLuang). The species is endemic to Thailand.Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2021, Litsea pseudolongifolia, a new replacement name for L. pseudoelongata Kosterm. (Lauraceae), pp. 259-260 in Phytotaxa 507 (3) on page 259, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.507.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/542567
Hieracium sellii M. Idrees & Z. Y. Zhang 2022, nom. nov.
No full textHieracium sellii M. Idrees & Z.Y. Zhang, nom. nov. Replaced name:— Hieracium atriglandulosum Sell (2006: 538), nom. illeg., non H. atriglandulosum Brenner (1925: 65). Type:— GREAT BRITAIN. Ben More: 27/4425, Perthshire, v.c. 88, 1980, A.G. Kenneth 2780 (holotype: CGE, not seen). Vernacular name:—Black-glandular Hawkweed.Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2022, A new replacement name for Hieracium atriglandulosum P. D. Sell (Cichorieae, Asteraceae), pp. 88-90 in Phytotaxa 531 (1) on page 88, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.531.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/585023
Allium tauricum var. pilosum Kocyigit & Ozhatay ex M. Idrees & J. M. H. Shaw 2022, comb. nov.
No full textAllium tauricum var. pilosum (Kollmann & Koyuncu) Koçyiğit & Özhatay ex M.Idrees & J.M.H.Shaw, comb. nov. Basionym:— Allium flavum var. pilosum Kollmann & Koyuncu (1983: 247) ≡ Allium villosiusculum Seregin (2004: 102) ≡ A. tauricum (Besser ex Reichenbach 1828: 9) Grossheim (1928: 213) var. pilosum (Kollmann & Koyuncu) Koçyiğit & Özhatay in Özhatay & Koçyiğit (2019: 78, 81), comb. inval. Type (holotype):— TURKEY. Gaziantep: about 2 km E. of Gaziantep on the road to Urfa, s.d., Alava 6705b (TUR, not seen, isotype HUJ).Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Shaw, Julian M. H., 2022, Nomenclature notes on two names in Allium (Amaryllidaceae), pp. 140-142 in Phytotaxa 566 (1) on page 141, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.566.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/710355
Lectotypification of Photinia dubia Lindl. (Rosaceae)
No full textIdrees, Muhammad, Shaw, Julian M. H. (2022): Lectotypification of Photinia dubia Lindl. (Rosaceae). Adansonia (3) 44 (4): 23-27, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2022v44a
Dendrobium neoconcolor, a new name for Flickingeria concolor (Orchidaceae) and notes on D. concolor hort.
No full textIdrees, Muhammad, Shaw, Julian M. H. (2021): Dendrobium neoconcolor, a new name for Flickingeria concolor (Orchidaceae) and notes on D. concolor hort. Phytotaxa 522 (2): 161-163, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.522.2.
Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus H. Leveille 1910
No full text5. Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus Léveillé (1910: 358) Type (lectotype designated here):— KOREA. Quelpaert: in silvis Hallaisan, June 1909, T. Taquet 2845 (barcode E00313541!). [Image available at https://data.rbge.org.uk/herb/ E00313541]. Note:— Léveillé (1910) cited three collections (Taquet 2834, 2835 & 2845)” in the protologue when he described this variety, but did not indicate the holotype specimen. In addition, no author has designated a lectotype, even inadvertently (Art. 7.11 of ICN). According to Stafleu and Cowan (1979), all of the Léveillé’ type specimens have been purchased by E in 1919. We locate three collections, one of them “ Taquet 2834 ” deposited in E (barcode 00010578), one of them “ Taquet 2835 ” in E (barcode 00313542), and the other material “ Taquet 2845 ” in E (barcode E00313541); all these collections should be regarded as syntypes (Art. 9.6 of ICN). All the specimens in E bear the information “ Syntype Rubus coreanus var. nakaianus H. Léveillé ”, and it is necessary to select one of them as the lectotype (Art. 9.12 of ICN). Hence, we designate the blooming specimen of “ T. Taquet 2845 ” in E (barcode E00313541) as the lectotype. The selected sheet bear the same locality and is morphological complete with the presence of stem, leaves, and flower that fully correspond with the protologue.Published as part of Idrees, Muhammad & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2022, Lectotypification of 16 names in Rubus subg. Idaeobatus, 12 names in R. subg. Malachobatus, and 1 name in R. subg. Chamaebatus (Rosaceae), pp. 13-24 in Phytotaxa 559 (1) on page 15, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.559.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/700928
Lysimachia neolongipedicellata, a new name for L. longipedicellata R.Trevis., Funez & Hassemer (Primulaceae)
No full textIdrees, Muhammad, Li, Meng, Shaw, Julian M. H. (2022): Lysimachia neolongipedicellata, a new name for L. longipedicellata R.Trevis., Funez & Hassemer (Primulaceae). Phytotaxa 574 (2): 197-198, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.574.2.10, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.574.2.1
- …
