170,089 research outputs found

    Parapharyngodon hemidactylii Gupta, Bhaskar & Gupta, 2009, n. sp.

    No full text
    Parapharyngodon hemidactylii n. sp. (n= 15 males, n= 20 females) The parasite is a tender white cylindrical worm tapering at both the ends. Prominent annulations visible beginning just behind cephalic extremity and continuing up to the anus. Sexual dimorphism is clearly distinct. Triangular oral opening is surrounded by 3 bilobed lips. Adult male (All measurements are in mm. unless otherwise stated). Cylindrical worm 0.755 (0.47–0.96) long, 0.236 (0.18–0.37) wide at its maximum width (Plate I Fig. 1; Plate III Fig. 1). Cuticle with annulations forming swollen rings in posterior region. Esophageal tube 0.283 (0.20–0.54) long and 0.031 (0.02–0.04) wide. Esophageal bulb 0.079 (0.05–0.11) long and 0.089 (0.07–0.11) wide (Plate I Fig. 2). Nerve ring not clearly distinct. Caudal papillae absent. Spicules 0.049 (0.035–0.085) long and pointed (Plate I Fig. 3). Tail filament 0.065 (0.01–0.09) long, terminal in position and directed posteriorly (Plate I Fig. 4, 5; Plate III Fig. 2). Adult female (All measurements are in mm. unless otherwise stated). Body length 3.47 (2.47–4.05), width 0.405 (0.33–0.51) at maximum width (Plate II Fig. 1, 2; Plate III Fig. 3). Cuticle with annulations approximately 0.032 (0.01–0.055) long and 0.021 (0.015–0.035) in width (Plate II Fig. 1; Plate III Fig. 4). Esophageal tube or corpus 0.55 (0.50–0.64) in length and 0.05 (0.045–0.06) in width and esophageal bulb 0.194 (0.17–0.215) in length and 0.225 (0.21–0.26) in width (Plate II Fig. 2; Plate III Fig. 5). Reproductive structures confined to body cavity between vulva and anus and the developing ova visible in the uterus (Plate III Fig. 6). Nerve ring not clearly distinct. Excretory pore and vulva situated at 1.18 and 1.44 (1.20–1.70) respectively from the anterior end (Plate II Fig. 3; Plate IV Fig. 1). Body with conical termination (Plate II Fig. 5; Plate IV Fig. 2). Tail 0.11 (0.075–0.135) long and 0.063 (0.045–0.10) wide (Plate IV Fig. 3). Eggs oval 0.08 (0.02–0.10) long, 0.041 (0.01–0.06) wide (Plate II Fig. 4, 6; Plate IV Fig. 4) PLATE I Camera lucida diagrams of Thelandros hemidactylii n. sp. Male showing Fig. 1 Anterior most region; Fig. 2 Anterior region; Fig. 3 Spicule; Fig. 4 Posterior region (dorsoventral view); Fig. 5 Posterior region (lateral view). PLATE II Camera lucida diagrams of Thelandros hemidactylii n. sp. Female showing Fig. 1 Anterior most region; Fig. 2 Anterior region with oesophagus and intestine; Fig. 3 Vulva region; Fig. 4 Egg; Fig. 5 Posterior region; Fig. 6 Middle region with eggs. PLATE III Photomicrographs of Thelandros hemidactylii n. sp. (X 400). Male showing Fig. 1 Anterior end; Fig. 2 Posterior end; female Fig. 3 Anterior end showing oesophageal region; Fig. 4 Surface of Thelandros showing cuticular annulations; Fig. 5 Oesophageal bulb and intestinal junction; Fig. 6 Intestinal region showing developing ova. PLATE IV Photomicrographs of Thelandros hemidactylii n. sp. (Fig. 1– 3 X 400). Female showing Fig. 1 Parasite showing vulva region; Fig. 2 Parasite showing posterior end with eggs; Fig. 3 Parasite showing tail region; Fig. 4 Parasite showing eggs (X 1000).Published as part of Gupta, Neelima, Bhaskar, Manju & Gupta, Dileep Kumar, 2009, Gastro-intestinal invasion in Hemidactylus flaviviridis with a new species of Parapharyngodon (Oxyuroidea: Pharyngodonidae), pp. 39-51 in Zootaxa 2165 on pages 40-44, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18908

    Epinephelus cameronii Gupta 1963, n

    No full text
    Eucreadium cameronii Gupta 1963 Synonyms: Hamacreadium manteri Gupta & Kumari, 1974 n . syn. Records. From Securicula gora (Hamilton) [as Chela gora (Hamilton)] (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India by Gupta (1963). From S. gora [as Chela gora] from Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India by Gupta & Govind (1983). From the large razorbelly minnow, Salmophasia bacaila (Hamilton) [as Chela bacaila (Hamilton)] (Cyprinidae) and Se. gora [as Chela gora] from Ludhiana and Rupnagar, Punjab, India by Gupta & Kumari (1974) as H. manteri. Remarks. The specimens described by Gupta & Kumari (1974) clearly do not belong in Hamacreadium because the genital pore is medial, the ovary is entire, the vitelline field reaches to the oral sucker and the hosts are freshwater fishes. The oral and ventral suckers are also of similar size, suggesting a species of Eucreadium, three species of which have been proposed from cyprinids in India: E. cameronii, Eucreadium hemlatae Gupta & Govind, 1983 and Eucreadium jhingrani Srivistava & Singh, 1967. The description of Gupta & Kumari (1974) is indistinguishable from E. cameronii and so H. manteri is synonymised with that species here.Published as part of Martin, Storm B., Cutmore, Scott C., Ward, Selina & Cribb, Thomas H., 2017, An updated concept and revised composition for Hamacreadium Linton, 1910 (Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) clarifies a previously obscured pattern of host-specificity among species, pp. 151-187 in Zootaxa 4254 (2) on page 174, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4254.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/54586

    Gupta, N.

    No full text

    Cyphococcus williamsi Joshi & Gupta & Rajgopal & Venkatesan 2022, sp. n.

    No full text
    <i>Cyphococcus williamsi</i> Joshi & Rajgopal sp. n. <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: E0861859-4673-4BCE-8D23-1DCFA60A4F2C</p> <p> <b>Type material</b>. <b>Holotype:</b> adult ♀ mounted singly, INDIA, Gangenahalli / Bengaluru, <i>Annona reticulata</i> L. / 09. VI.2020 / Sunil Joshi leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /090620–01].</p> <p> <b>Paratypes:</b> 6 adult ♀♀ mounted singly, INDIA, Gangenahalli / Bengaluru, <i>Pongamia pinnata</i> (L.) Pierre / 10.IX.2010 / Sunil Joshi leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /100910-02 to 07]; 4 adult ♀♀ mounted singly, INDIA, Vasanth Nagar / Bengaluru, <i>Annona reticulata</i> L. / 05.I.2019 / N.N. Rajgopal leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /050119-08 to 11]; 8 first-instar nymphs on 3 slides, INDIA, Gangenahalli / Bengaluru, <i>Annona reticulata</i> L. / 09. VI.2020 / Sunil Joshi leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /090620–12 to 14]; 10 male pupae on 3 slides, INDIA, Vasanth Nagar / Bengaluru, <i>Annona reticulata</i> L. / 05.I.2019 /Sunil Joshi leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /050119-15 to 17]; 16 adult males mounted singly, INDIA, Vasanth Nagar / Bengaluru, <i>Annona reticulata</i> L. / 05.I.2019 / K. Harish leg. / [ICAR / NBAIR / COCCI / Cyphococcus /050119-18 to 33]. Altogether there are 33 type slides.</p>Published as part of <i>Joshi, Sunil, Gupta, Ankita, Rajgopal, N. N. & Venkatesan, T., 2022, Taxonomic notes on the genus Cyphococcus Laing (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha Coccidae), with description of a new species from India, pp. 531-544 in Zootaxa 5104 (4)</i> on page 533, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.4.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6332166">http://zenodo.org/record/6332166</a&gt

    Charops plautus Gupta & Maheshwary

    No full text
    Charops plautus Gupta & Maheshwary from host Udaspes folus (Cramer) (Figs. 17, 18 & 19) The solitary pupal parasitoid Charops plautus Gupta & Maheshwary was reared from the host Udaspes folus Gupta & Maheshwary (1970). No male specimens were bred and the species was identified based on females. Udaspes folus is the first host record of the parasitic wasp genus Charops. Brief diagnosis: This species has following characters: scape and pedicel ventrally yellow; tegula pale yellow. Mesopleuron reticulate rugose; malar space 0.7 × basal width of mandible; inter-ocellar distance 3 × ocello-ocellar distance; fore coxa with a mix of black and yellow patches; trochanter pale yellow and femur yellow brown medially; tarsus pale yellow. Mid leg with coxa black; trachanter pale yellow; femur yellow brown with very faint black infuscation on dorso-apical region. Hind leg with coxa black; femur yellow brown with a black patch ventrally in basal half; hind tibia yellow brown with apical 1 / 4 th black; tarsi brown with basitarsus darker; tibial spurs pale yellow. Metasoma with petiole black except at extreme apical region. Second tergite yellow brown with apical margin black; rest metasoma yellowish brown. Specimens examined: Two females, Powai, IIT-Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; 19.12 °N 72.91 °E, elevation 50 m (160 ft), 22.ix. 2012, bred from pupa of U. folus (Grass Demon) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), coll. Swapnil Lokhande & Abhay Soman; NBAII/Brac/Micro/ Charops /plau/0912. All specimens deposited in NBAII.Published as part of Gupta, Ankita, Lokhande, Swapnil A. & Soman, Abhay, 2013, Parasitoids of Hesperiidae from peninsular India with description of a new species of Dolichogenidea (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitic on caterpillar of Borbo cinnara (Wallace) (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), pp. 277-290 in Zootaxa 3701 (2) on page 283, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3701.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/24927

    The Forman Christian College Monthly

    No full text
    Editorials. pp. 3-7; Chapel Talks. pp. 8-17; Gupta, S. N. Das-Article-Religious Teaching as a Profession. pp. 18-26; Lekh Raj Puri-Essay-The Religion of George Eliot. pp. 26-29; Jai Chand Banati-Essay-Guru Nanak and Ourselves. pp. 30-33; Greene, T. M.-First Impression of India. pp. 34-38; Kesar Chand-My Home Town. pp. 39-40; Hira Lall-Article-The Transformation of a Punjab Village Under the Y.M.C.A. Service. pp. 40-44; Zahir-ud-Din Afridi-Zahir in the Hands of the Waziris. pp. 44-46; Mulk Raj Kapur-How to Write ""High English"". pp. 47-48; Book Reviews. pp. 49-51; Swadesh Pal Gupta-Magic Squares. pp. 51-5

    Neolebouria leiperi Gupta 1956, n. comb.

    No full text
    <i>Neolebouria leiperi</i> (Gupta, 1956) n. comb. <p> <b>Synonyms:</b> <i>Hamacreadium leiperi</i> Gupta, 1956.</p> <p> <b>Records.</b> From an unidentified “marine catfish” in the Gulf of Mannar by Gupta (1956).</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> This species was described based on two specimens and was considered a synonym of <i>H</i>. <i>mutabile</i> by Hafeezullah (1971). However, the ovary is distinctly tri-lobed, the genital pore is distinctly inter-caecal and the anterior extent of the excretory vesicle was not described. Therefore, it is consistent with the current concept of <i>Neolebouria</i>. In particular, it closely resembles species placed in the “maorum” body-type group by Dronen <i>et al</i>. (2014), which are characterised by an elongate linguiform body, a relatively small equatorial ventral sucker and a distinctly post-bifurcal and inter-caecal genital pore. One of these species, <i>N</i>. <i>capoori</i>, was also described from Indian waters, but that species is smaller (1,920–2,520 <i>vs</i> 3,500–5,500 µm long) and has larger pre-ovarian and post-testicular areas. Therefore, <i>N</i>. <i>leiperi</i> n. comb. is considered a distinct species of <i>Neolebouria</i>. Although Gupta (1956) possibly described <i>N</i>. <i>krusadaiensis</i> and <i>N</i>. <i>leiperi</i> from the same host species, perhaps even individual “catfish”, on the basis of limited material, the two appear to be distinct species because the former has a prebifurcal genital pore.</p>Published as part of <i>Martin, Storm B., Cutmore, Scott C., Ward, Selina & Cribb, Thomas H., 2017, An updated concept and revised composition for Hamacreadium Linton, 1910 (Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) clarifies a previously obscured pattern of host-specificity among species, pp. 151-187 in Zootaxa 4254 (2)</i> on page 176, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4254.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/545862">http://zenodo.org/record/545862</a&gt

    Parapanteles eros Gupta, n. sp.

    No full text
    Parapanteles eros Gupta n. sp. Plates. I, II & XXI. Figs 1 −10, 77. Female. Holotype (Fig. 3). Body length = 3.43 mm. Diagnosis. Propodeum areola 1.15 × longer than wide; anterior diagonal carinae of propodeum shallowly merging anterior margin of propodeum. Hind tibia (0.83) 4.37 × longer than exserted part of ovipositor (0.19). First metasomal tergal plate longer than wide, 3 / 4 th apical with punctations and rugosity; second tergum wider than long; second tergum median length 0.72 × of third tergum. Ovipositor sheaths curved and hairy in apical half; gently decurved, projecting beyond apex of gaster. Body colour. Black. Head black. Ocelli brown, antenna (including scape, pedicel) black, eyes dark brownish black with pale yellow palps. Fore leg with coxa and trochanter black, femur dark yellow brown in basal half, apically yellow, remaining leg yellow except brown apex of apical tarsus; mid leg and trochanter black, basal 3 / 4 th of femur dark yellow brown, apical 1 / 4 th paler, basal half of tibia yellow, apical dark brown, tarsus brown; hind leg dark brown to black except extreme apex of femur and basal 1 / 4 th of tibia, tibial spurs testaceous, tarsus dark brown. Mesosoma black. Wings hyaline, veins C+SC+R and metacarpus (R 1) dark brown; pterostigma brown (except extreme pale apex), vein (RS+M)a, m-cu, 1 M testaceous; veins r, 2 RS light brown and 2 M dark brown; hind wing veins translucent. Tegula black. Head. (Fig. 6). Eyes densely setose. Face rough with shallow closely placed punctations; vertex rough and dull with sparse pilosity; clypeus densely setose. Head width/height = 0.95 / 0.75 mm; compound eye height = 0.52 mm; inter tentorial pit distance = 0.21 mm; width of face at dorsal clypeal edge = 0.46 mm; clypeus width = 0.05 mm; vertex width = 0.63 mm; length of first flagellomere = 0.24 mm; width of first flagellomere = 0.10 mm; length of second flagellomere = 0.21 mm; width of second flagellomere = 0.11 mm; length of third flagellomere = 0.21 mm; width of third flagellomere = 0.10 mm; terminal flagellomere length = 0.12 mm; terminal flagellomere width = 0.06 mm; penultimate flagellomere length = 0.10 mm; penultimate flagellomere width = 0.07 mm; terminal flagellomere length/width = 2.0; malar space height/basal width of mandible = 0.94; ocello-ocular distance = 0.17 mm; inter-ocellar distance = 0.17 mm; face width at upper edge of posterior ocelli = 0.68 mm. Mesosoma (Figs 4 & 5). Mesosoma median length = 1.43 mm; mesosoma length/width (1.01) = 1.41. Mesonotum with coarse punctate sculpture that fades near the scutellar groove; scuto-scutellar groove distinctly crenulate with 10 deep costulae; pilosity dense with longer setae above the scuto-scutellar groove; scutellum with shallow and distantly placed punctations, with evenly placed white long setae, setae dense on the lateral edges; scutellum laterally with costulate sculpture which become narrower and elongated towards posterior edge; posterior band of scutellum polished; metanotum subrectangular. Mesopleuron dull rugose with dense pilosity in 3 / 4 th diagonal posterior half (anterior half smooth shiny and devoid of setae). Metapleuron with shallow punctures in the anterior most region and in the diagonal posterior region, anterior pit smooth, shiny and deep. Hind coxa laterally dull with shallow punctures and long setae. Propodeum with clearly defined wide, strong and shiny areola (areola devoid of setae); propodeum rugose with dense pilosity in basal half excluding areola. Areola 1.15 × longer than wide; anterior diagonal carinae of propodeum shallowly merging anterior margin of propodeum (evident in KOH treated samples, Fig. 5); areola open near the anterior edge; costulae complete and prominent, anterior diagonal carinae sloping down behind spiracles; spiracles large and oval, a diagonal carina arising from each spiracle which runs parallel to a distance equal to half length of carina running behind the spiracle. Wings (Fig. 7). Pterostigma length (0.40)/height (0.28) = 1.42. 1 RS length = 0.07 mm; 1 r = 0.26; 2 Rs = 0.17; 1 CUa length (0.22)/ 1 CUb length (0.27) = 0.81; RS+Ma length = 0.55 mm; M+CU length = 1.08 mm; Hind wing: 1 M length = 0.37 mm; 1 M length (0.48)/M+CU length (0.42) = 1.14; length r-m (0.19)/length cu-a (0.20) = 0.95; 1 A length = 0.31 mm. Metasoma (Fig. 8 & 9). Metasoma median length = 1.5 mm (including exserted ovipositor = 0.19 mm); first tergum length = 0.55 mm; first tergal plate 1.14 × longer than wide; apical 3 / 4 th rugose with punctations (separated more than individual diameter); apical 1 / 4 th comparatively smooth; widest pre-apically. Second and subsequent tergites with fine granulations. Second tergum wider than long, second tergum median length 0.72 × of third tergum. First tergum basal width = 0.48 mm; first tergum apical width = 0.36 mm; first tergum median width = 0.46 mm; first tergum length /distal width = 1.52; second tergum basal width = 0.55 mm; second tergum median length = 0.13 mm; second tergum apical width = 0.51 mm; third tergum median length = 0.18 mm; third tergum basal width = 0.65 mm. Ovipositor sheaths projecting beyond the apex of gaster (Fig. 77). Exserted part of ovipositor = 0.19 mm. Ovipositor sheaths long and slender in lateral view, hairy in apical half; gently decurved, projecting beyond apex of gaster. Hind tibia (0.83) 4.36 × longer than exserted part of ovipositor (0.19). Male (Fig. 3 A). Sexually dimorphic in having fore wing pterostigma pale in colour, other characters similar. Host. Chilades pandava (Horsfield) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) (Figs 1 & 2) on the host plant Cycas revoluta Thunb. (Cycadaceae). Type material. Holotype, one female on card, INDIA, Karnataka, NBAII campus, 6.vii. 13, coll. Ankita Gupta, ex. larvae of Chilades pandava Horsfield (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on Cycas revoluta Thunb. (Cycadaceae). Paratypes, two females and two males on card, with same data as holotype. Repository. All types & specimens deposited in NBAII, Bangalore, India. Code. NBAII /Bra/Mic/Para/ eros / 060613 -A(Holotype), NBAII /Bra/Mic/Para/ eros / 060613 -B (Paratype). Etymology. This species is named after the host Chilades pandava which is commonly known as ‘Plains cupid’; ‘ eros ’ is the Greek counterpart of ‘cupid’. PLATE I. Parapanteles eros n. sp. Figs 1−5. 1 —Parasitized caterpillars of Chilades pandava (Horsfield). 2 —Solitary cocoon of P. eros n. sp. with caterpillar. 3 —Dorsal view, female. 3 A—Habitus, male. 4 — Mesosoma, female. 5 — Mesosoma (KOH treated), female. PLATE II. Parapanteles eros n. sp. Figs 6−10. 6 —Head in frontal view (KOH treated), female. 7 —Wings, female. 8 —Propodeum with metasoma, female. 9 —Metasoma (KOH treated), female. 10 —Ovipositor ((KOH treated).Published as part of Gupta, Ankita, Churi, Paresh V., Sengupta, Ashok & Mhatre, Sarang, 2014, Lycaenidae parasitoids from peninsular India with description of four new species of microgastrine wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) along with new insights on host relationships, pp. 439-470 in Zootaxa 3827 (4) on pages 440-443, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3827.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25237

    The transition from 3C SiC(111) to graphene captured by ultra high vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy

    No full text
    In this paper we clarify the transformation mechanism of 3C-SiC into graphene upon thermal decomposition, by a combination of high resolution Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) images and first principle calculations. We studied the transition from 3C-SiC to graphene by high temperature annealing of C-terminated 3C SiC (1 1 1)/Si (1 1 1) samples in Ultra High Vacuum. By using STM we were able to observe very clear atomic resolution images of the transition from SiC (v3׶3)R30࠴o a new intermediate stage SiC View the MathML source (very close to the graphene (2 נ2) reconstruction) after annealing at 1250 î We also obtained images of the transformation of the intermediate structure into a (1 נ1) monolayer graphene, caused by further sublimation of atoms in the subsurface layer. We have interpreted the results by using Density Functional Theory - Local Density Approximation calculations, which give full account of the SiC (v3׶3)R30࠲econstruction, but fail to describe the SiC View the MathML source structure due to its incommensurability with the 3C-SiC (1 1 1) lattice.Full Tex
    corecore