1,721,050 research outputs found

    Tarsius lariang: A new primate species from western central Sulawesi

    No full text
    On the basis of morphological, anatomical, and acoustic analyses, the tarsiers of the Gimpu region on Sulawesi belong to a previously undescribed species of the genus Tarsius Storr, 1780. We describe the new taxon as Tarsius lariang new species. In November 2001, S. Merker collected 8 specimens of Tarsius lariang near Gimpu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Four of them were transferred to the Indonesian Institute of Sciences at Cibinong to be held in an enclosure, and after their deaths become part of the collection of the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Bogor. The new species is distinctive in pelage, skull, and body proportions, and in vocalization. We describe the unique territorial duet song characteristic for them and place the taxon into a biogeographic framework developed in previous studies

    The Tenasserim Lutung, Trachypithecus barbei (Blyth, 1847) (Primates: Cercopithecidae): Description of a live specimen, and a reassessment of phylogenetic affinities, taxonomic history, and distribution

    No full text
    The Tenasserim lutung Trachypithecus barbei was previously known from museum specimens and field observations only. We discovered a zoo specimen and present the first confirmed evidence for the continued existence of the species since 1967. We describe the cranial pelage and coloration characteristics of this species which were previously unknown. We present first molecular evidence for recognizing T. barbei as a distinct species and for assessing its phylogenetic affinities relative to other members of the genus Trachypithecus . We document the taxonomic history of T. barbei and present a distribution map based on a compilation of all known locality records

    Pongo pygmaeus subsp. pygmaeus pygmaeus (Linnaeus 1760

    No full text
    Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus (Linnaeus, 1760)Published as part of Brandon-Jones, Douglas, Groves, Colin P. & Jenkins, Paulina D., 2016, The type specimens and type localities of the orangutans, genus Pongo Lacépède, 1799 (Primates: Hominidae), pp. 2051-2095 in Journal of Natural History 50 on page 2085, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1190414, http://zenodo.org/record/399288

    Overlooked mammal diversity and conservation priorities in Italy: Impacts of taxonomic neglect on a Biodiversity Hotspot in Europe

    No full text
    Gippoliti, Spartaco, Groves, Colin P. (2018): Overlooked mammal diversity and conservation priorities in Italy: Impacts of taxonomic neglect on a Biodiversity Hotspot in Europe. Zootaxa 4434 (3): 511-528, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4434.3.

    The taxonomy of the endemic golden palm civet of Sri Lanka

    No full text
    Figure 9. Skull height (ht). Sample sizes as for Figure 6, except that dark dry = 6.Published as part of Groves, Colin P., Rajapaksha, Channa & Manemandra-Arachchi, Kelum, 2009, The taxonomy of the endemic golden palm civet of Sri Lanka, pp. 238-251 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 155 (1) on page 247, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00451.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544486

    Pongo pygmaeus Linnaeus 1760

    No full text
    <i>Pongo pygmaeus</i> possibly unnamed subspecies [?] <i>Simia Agrias</i> Schreber, 1799 <p> Southern Kalimantan, Indonesia, between the Kahayan and Kapuas rivers and formerly possibly farther west to Pontianak (in which case it takes the name <i>Pongo pygmaeus borneo</i>). Resembles <i>Pongo pygmaeus borneo</i> in palate size but rest of skull much larger.</p>Published as part of <i>Brandon-Jones, Douglas, Groves, Colin P. & Jenkins, Paulina D., 2016, The type specimens and type localities of the orangutans, genus Pongo Lacépède, 1799 (Primates: Hominidae), pp. 2051-2095 in Journal of Natural History 50</i> on page 2086, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1190414, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/3992882">http://zenodo.org/record/3992882</a&gt

    A New Reconstruction of the Shanidar 5 Cranium

    No full text
    A reconsideration of the Iraqi Neandertal Shanidar 5 cranium has demonstrated that the left parietal bone was incorrectly oriented. The proper orientation removes any indication of the mid-sagittal parietal profile of the specimen. It is therefore no longer possible to maintain that the individual experienced artificial cranial deformation, although Shanidar 5 and the other Shanidar Neandertal crania have unusual levels frontal mid-sagittal flatness.Une nouvelle observation du crâne néandertalien Shanidar 5 (Irak), a montré que, lors de sa reconstruction, le pariétal gauche avait été mal positionné. Une correction de l'orientation du pariétal enlève toute indication du profil sagittal des pariétaux. Il n 'est donc plus possible de maintenir que Shanidar 5 a subi une déformation artificielle du crâne et ce même si tous les crânes néandertaliens de Shanidar présentent un aplatissement frontal exceptionnel.Chech M., Groves Colin P., Thorne Alan, Trinkaus Erik. A New Reconstruction of the Shanidar 5 Cranium. In: Paléorient, 1999, vol. 25, n°2. pp. 143-146

    Figure 4. A in The taxonomy of the endemic golden palm civet of Sri Lanka

    No full text
    Figure 4. A, discriminant analysis, based on four variables. Adult specimens only. DF1 accounts for 95.6% of the variance, and contrasts palate length, bicanine breadth and occipital crest breadth with greatest length; DF2 accounts for 4.4%, and contrasts greatest length with palate length. B, same as for (A), but including juveniles, subadults, and two skulls of Paradoxurus jerdoni. DF1 accounts for 98.2% of the variance, and, as in (A), contrasts palate length, bicanine breadth, and occipital crest breadth with greatest length; DF2 accounts for 1.8%, and again contrasts greatest length with palate length.Published as part of Groves, Colin P., Rajapaksha, Channa & Manemandra-Arachchi, Kelum, 2009, The taxonomy of the endemic golden palm civet of Sri Lanka, pp. 238-251 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 155 (1) on page 244, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00451.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544486

    Pongo borneo Lacepede 1799

    No full text
    Pongo borneo Lacépède, 1799 Pongo Wurmbii Tiedemann, 1808 Simia Morio Owen, 1837 [?] S [imia] Wallichii Gervais, 1838 [?] Simia Crossii Wagner, 1839 [?] S [imia] Hendrikzii Wagner, 1839 [?] Simia Straussii Wagner, 1839 [?] Pithecus Brookei Blyth, 1853 (in part) P [ithecus] Owenii Blyth, 1853 Pithecus curtus Blyth, 1856b P [ithecus] satyrus batangtuensis Selenka, 1896 P [ithecus] satyrus dadappensis Selenka, 1896 P [ithecus] satyrus genepaiensis Selenka, 1896 Pithecus satyrus landakkensis Selenka, 1896 P [ithecus] satyrus rantaiensis Selenka, 1896 P [ithecus] satyrus skalauensis Selenka, 1896 P [ithecus] satyrus tuakensis Selenka, 1896 Simia satyrus Wallacei Selenka, 1898 Troglodytes Dawsoni Boule, 1915 Pan vetus Miller, 1915 Boreopithecus dawsoni Friederichs, 1932 Pongo satyrus borneensis Röhrer-Ertl, 1984 Southern Sarawak, Malaysia, and adjacent Indonesia, formerly possibly farther west to the Kapuas River. If its distribution excludes the Pontianak vicinity (the type locality of Pongo borneo) it will require renaming. Cranially resembles Pongo p. pygmaeus but adult male skulls larger, especially in mandibular dimensions.Published as part of Brandon-Jones, Douglas, Groves, Colin P. & Jenkins, Paulina D., 2016, The type specimens and type localities of the orangutans, genus Pongo Lacépède, 1799 (Primates: Hominidae), pp. 2051-2095 in Journal of Natural History 50 on pages 2085-2086, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1190414, http://zenodo.org/record/399288
    corecore