98,142 research outputs found
Studien über Goethe / von Friedrich Wilhelm Grohmann, früherer k. preußischer und k. sächsischer Hofschauspieler, dann Mitglied des Stadttheaters zu Pesth, und des k. k. pr. Theaters an der Wien zu Wien
No full textSTUDIEN ÜBER GOETHE / VON FRIEDRICH WILHELM GROHMANN, FRÜHERER K. PREUSSISCHER UND K. SÄCHSISCHER HOFSCHAUSPIELER, DANN MITGLIED DES STADTTHEATERS ZU PESTH, UND DES K. K. PR. THEATERS AN DER WIEN ZU WIEN
Studien über Goethe / von Friedrich Wilhelm Grohmann, früherer k. preußischer und k. sächsischer Hofschauspieler, dann Mitglied des Stadttheaters zu Pesth, und des k. k. pr. Theaters an der Wien zu Wien (1)
Cover (2)
Titelseite (5)
Vorrede (7)
Zweite Vorrede und Biographie Goethe's (9)
I. Die Romane (17)
Titelseite (Zweites Heft) (35)
Von 1764 bis ... 1786 (36)
Faust. Die Chroniken und Sagen (54)
Titelseite (3. Heft) (68)
Fortsetzung (69)
Faust. Deutsche Chronik (75)
Leben des Christoph Wagner, Faust's hinterlassenen Famulus (87)
Faust. Die Dramen (97)
Einlage (101
On predication, derivation and anti-locality
No full textThis paper pursues the question what the implications of the Anti-Locality Hypothesis could be for the syntax of secondary predication. Focus of the discussion will be an investigation of what their internal structure of small clause complements must look like, how these small clause complements connect to their matrix environments, and what the relevance could be for the formulation of anti-locality presented here. Anti-locality is defined over a tripartite clause structure (split into three Prolific Domains) and a PF-condition on the computation (the Condition on Domain-Exclusivity). The investigation revolves around two leading questions: (i) does the syntax of small clauses involve more structure than simply [SC DP XP] and (ii) do small clauses constitute their own Prolific Domain (or maybe even more)? The results, affirmative answers to both questions, are also relevant for other types of secondary predication
Joshua Davis: Author of Spare Parts
No full textCitation: K-State First (2016). Joshua Davis: Author of Spare Parts [Flier]. Manhattan, Kansas: K-State First.Flyer advertising Joshua Davis's author talk at Kansas State University
"Natural relations" : a note on X'-structure
No full textWith the rise of minimalism, many concepts related to the geometrical relations of phrase structure held fast to in earlier approaches have been reconsidered. This article deals with distinguishing (relational and technical) properties of specifiers and adjuncts in a Bare Phrase Structure framework (X'-Theory). I extend specific aspects of X-structure relevant to the discussion of specifiers vs. adjuncts. I argue that unique specifiers can be derived from the system and that adjunction, possibly multiple, results from Direct Merge only. The final product is a series of relationships in line with recent thoughts and minimalist premises, but formally more similar to earlier conceptions of the X'-schema.
I address conceptual, empirical and theoretical arguments against multiple specifiers and related issues next, that is beyond the predictions immediately following from the tripartitional view of clause structure proposed in Grohmann (2000). After laying out my motivations to critically consider the issue, I present a set of data that casts serious doubt over the justifications offered to replace Agr with v as the accusative casemarker. Having conceptual and empirical back-up, I then tackle the theoretical validity of specifiers, and ways to distinguish unique specifiers from (multiple) adjuncts. I introduce a version of Bare Phrase Structure that does so, yet keeps the spirit of defining structural identification over relational rather than categorial properties
Steven Johnson Author Talk Poster
No full textK-State Book NetworkA poster advertising an author talk by Steven Johnson at Kansas State University on September 3, 2014. Steven Johnson's book "The Ghost Map" was the 2014-2015 common book
Clausal tripartition, anti-locality and preliminary considerations of a formal approach to clause types
No full textWe will see how it is reasonable to speak of a minimum distance that an element must cross in order to enter into a well-formed movement dependency. In the course of the discussion of this notion of anti-localiry, a theoretical framework unfolds which is compatible with recent thoughts on syntactic computation regarding local economy and phrase structure, as well as the view that certain pronouns are grammatical formatives, rather than fully lexical expressions. The upshot will be that if an element does not move a certain distance, the derivation crashes at PF, unless the lower copy is spelled out as a pronominal element. The framework presented has a number of implications for the study of clause-typing, of which some will be discussed towards the end
Prolific domains and the left periphery
No full textThe left periphery has enjoyed extensive study over the past years, especially drawn against the framework of Rizzi (1997). It is argued that in this part of the clause, relations are licensed that have direct impact on discourse interpretation and information structure, such as topic, focus, clause type, and the like. I take this line of research up and argue in favour of a split CP on the basis of strictly left-peripheral phenomena across languages. But I also want to link the relation of articulated clause structure, syntactic derivations, and information structure. In particular, I outline the basics of a model of syntactic derivation that makes explicit reference to the interpretive interfaces in a cyclic, dynamic manner.
I suggest a return to older stages of generative grammar, at least in spirit, by proposing that clausal derivation stretches over three important areas which I call prolific domains: the part of the clause which licenses argument/thematic relations (V- or θ-domain), the part that licenses agreement/grammatica1 relations (T- or ϕ-domain), and the part that licenses discourse/information-relevant relations (C- or ω-domain). It is thus a rather broad and conceptual notion of "adding" and "omitting" that I am concerned with here, namely licensing of material to relate to information structure, and the desire to find an answer to the question which elements might be added or omitted across languages to establish such links
Psychotropic drug use in psychiatric inpatients: Recent trends and changes over time-data from the AMSP study
No full textA considerable number of new drugs were introduced over the last few years. In this report we analyze to what extent they have come to be used in clinical practice and what changes in drug use have resulted from the availability of the new compounds. For this purpose, data on drug use in 1995 and 2001 assessed at two reference days per year and per hospital within the drug safety program AMSP were compared for 10 hospitals that had been participating in both years. Atypical neuroleptics (NL) were used in 59.9% of patients on NLs in 2001 (16.7% in 1995), most frequently olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine, and quetiapine, in this order. Thirty-nine percent of patients still received typical NLs in antipsychotic indication (77.1% in 1995), and 30.8% received typical hypnosedative NLs (38.1% in 1995). SSRIs, other new ADs, and TCAs were used in similar rates in 2001, i.e., in 40.5%, 37.9%, and 34.8% of AD patients, respectively (1995: 24.2%, 6.2%, and 72.3%, respectively). Mirtazapine was the most common AD in 2001, followed by citalopram, sertraline, and doxepin. Hypnotics were prescribed more frequently in 2001 (17.6% vs. 11.7%), mostly BZD agonists at that time, whereas overall anxiolytic use (in approximately 30%) hardly changed over time. Mood stabilizers and anti-dementia drugs were given comparatively rarely, even in pertinent diagnoses. Polypharmacy was observed in about three-quarters of patients on psychotropic drugs, with a trend towards increasing use over time. Combinations of two NLs, of NL + AD, and of NLs + anxiolytic were most common in both years. Twenty percent of patients on atypical NLs received typical antipsychotic NLs additionally; typical hypnosedative NLs were used along with typical antipsychotics and atypical NLs in 20% and 22% of patients, respectively. TCAs and either SSRIs or other new ADs were still the most common AD combinations in 2001. Data were also analyzed according to the main diagnostic categories
Drug safety in the psychiatry - Comparison of the undesirable effects of drug from citalopram and escitalopram
No full text- …
