1,720,990 research outputs found

    Hedychridium irregulare subsp. insulare Lins. Linsenmaier 1959

    No full text
    Hedychridium irregulare insulare Linsenmaier, 1959 Hedychridium irregulare ssp. insulare Linsenmaier, 1959: 62. Holotype ♂, Cyprus: Limassol (NMLU). Type locality: Cyprus: “ Cypern, Rhodos. ♁ Type (Cypern, Limassol, V.1949, leg. Mavromoustakis) und ♁♁ Paratypen Coll. m. ”. Paratype, ♂: Cypern Limassol Mavromoustakis 14.5.49 // Paratype Hedychridium Ab. irregulare ssp. insulare Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. Hedychridium irregolare insulare Linsenmaier, 1959 is both homonymous and synonymous of Hedychridium insulare Balthasar, 1954 (Arens 2010).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 197, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Ellampus violaceus subsp. virens Mocsary 1889

    No full text
    Ellampus violaceus virens Mocsáry, 1889 Ellampus (Ellampus) violaceus var. virens Mocsáry, 1889: 107. Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1964b: 435); Germany: Blankenburg, Thuringia (HMNH). Type locality: “ Patria: Germania (Thuringia, Coll. Schmiedeknechti!); Caucasus (Mus. Vindob.!) ”. Specimens, 1 ♂: Siders // violaceus var. virens det. Mocsary // 787 // Omalus Pz. violaceus Sc. Linsenmaier det. Remarks. As in the previous species, the specimen bears the same identification label and printed number observed with other specimens examined by Mocsáry. However, the locality Siders was not reported in the original description and for this reason this specimen is not considered type. It was synonymised by Linsenmaier (1951) with Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli, 1763) and transferred to Pseudomalus by Kimsey & Bohart (1991).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Ellampus sareptanus subsp. inflammatus Mocsary 1890

    No full text
    Ellampus sareptanus inflammatus Mocsáry, 1890 (Fig. 10 A–D) Ellampus sareptanus var. inflammatus Mocsáry, 1890: 50. Holotype ♀; Iran: Astrabad [= Gorgan] (ETHZ). Omalus sareptantus var. inflammatus: Trautmann 1927: 35 (cat.), 36 (descr.). Omalus (Omalus) horvathi ssp. inflammatus: Linsenmaier 1959: 20 (cat., descr., distr.). Philoctetes sareptanus inflammatus: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 257 (cat.). Type locality: “ Patria: Astrabad in Persia (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi!) ”. Holotype, ♀: Astrabad // sareptanus v. inflammatus det. Mocsary // 731 // Omalus Pz. horwathi [!] Mocs. ssp. inflammatus Mocs. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. This taxon is closely related to Philoctetes deflexus (Abeille de Perrin, 1878) and should be one of its colour variations. The red colouration is variable in examined specimens (see Farhad et al. 2018 under Ph. deflexus).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Chrysis purpureifrons subsp. helleniensis Linsenmaier 1968

    No full text
    Chrysis purpureifrons helleniensis Linsenmaier, 1968 Chrysis (Chrysogona) purpureifrons ssp. helleniensis Linsenmaier, 1968: 48. Holotype ♀; Greece: Athen (NMLU) (dichroa group). Chrysura purpureifrons ssp. helleniensis: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 494 (cat.). Type locality. Greece, former Yugoslavia, Southern Russia: “ Griechenland, Jugoslawien, Süd-Russland. ♀ Type von Athen, ♁ Allotype von Korinthos in Coll. m. Paratypen in Coll. de Beaumont, Verhoeff und m. ”. Paratypes, 2♀♀: Graecia, Pelop. Sparta 15. V.62 leg. Linsenmaier // Paratype Chrysis L. purpureifrons helleniensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 63 // Paratypus . Remarks. Taxon currently included in Chrysura Dahlbom, 1845.Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 188, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Chrysis friederichsi von Schulthess 1918

    No full text
    Chrysis friederichsi von Schulthess, 1918 Chrysis (Dichrysis) Friederichsi von Schulthess, 1918: 98. Syntype ♂; Madagascar: Diego Suarez, Antananarivo (ETHZ, MfN). Chrysidea friederichsi: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 313 (synonymous of Chrysidea bellula (Guérin-Méneville, 1842)). Type locality. Madagascar: “ Diegod, Suarez, Madagaskar borealis Kiesw, Antananarivo 2♁ (Dr. Friederichs captivus Gallorum leg. 1916 (c.m.) ”. Syntype, ♂: Antanarivo Madagascar // Chrysis friederichsi det. Schulthess 91 6 // Type // Chrysis L. bellula Guér. Linsenmaier det. // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. The second syntype is housed at MfN, in Trautmann’s collection. Chrysis friederichsi was apparently synonymised with Chrysidea bellula (Guérin-Méneville, 1842) for the first time by Kimsey & Bohart (1991) (Azevedo et al. 2010).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on pages 184-185, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Cleptes fallax Mocsary 1889

    No full text
    Cleptes fallax Mocsáry, 1889 Cleptes fallax Mocsáry, 1889: 49. Lectotype ♂ designated by Móczár (1962: 119); Hungary: Budapest (HNHM). Cleptes (Leiocleptes) fallax: Móczár 1962: 119 (lectotype designation, synonymised with Cleptes nitidulus (Fabricius, 1793)). Type locality: Austria, Switzerland: “ Patria: Helvetia (Frey-Gessner); Austria ad Vindobonam [= Vienna] (Coll. Schultess-Rechbergi); Hungaria centralis, in unico solum specimen inventus (Mus. Hung.) ”. Paralectotype, ♂: 2285 // 852 // Fallax det. Mocsary // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. Móczár (1962) designated the lectotype, which is deposited at Budapest (HMNH). Rosa et al. (2017b) erroneously considered the lectotype invalid for an incorrect interpretation of the original type locality. Móczár’s (1962) lectotype designation was validly designated.Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Omalus pusillus subsp. bulgariensis Linsenmaier 1959

    No full text
    Omalus pusillus bulgariensis Linsenmaier, 1959 Omalus (Omalus) pusillus ssp. bulgariensis Linsenmaier, 1959: 19. Holotype ♂; Bulgaria: Bilo (ETHZ). Pseudomalus pusillus ssp. bulgariensis: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 269 (cat.). Type locality: Bulgaria: “ Bulgarien, (Bilo) ♂ Type und Paratypen Coll. Schulthess (Zürich), Paratypen Coll. m. ”. Holotype, ♂: Bilo Bulgar. // Ell. pusillus det. Mocsáry // Type Omalus Pz. ♁ pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57. Paratypes, 1♂: Bilo Bulgar. // Ell. pusillus det. Mocsary // Paratype Omalus Pz. pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57; 1♂: Aetoz Bulgarien // Paratype Omalus Pz. pusillus F. ssp. bulgariensis Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Schulthess Rechberg Collection.Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 198, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Chrysis leachii subsp. mauritanica Trautmann 1927

    No full text
    Chrysis leachii mauritanica Trautmann, 1927 (Fig. 4 A–D) Chrysis leachii var. mauritanica Trautmann, 1927: 133 [not 153]. Syntypes ♁♁ and ♀♀; Tunisia (MfN, ETHZ). Chrysis (Chrysis) mauritanica: Linsenmaier 1959: 118 (key), 120 (descr.), 190 (cat., leachii group), 204 (fig. 336), 207 (fig. 467), 208 (fig. 481). Chrysis mauritanica: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 437 (cat., succincta-leachii group). Type locality. Tunisia: “ Tunis, Coll. Trautmann, Coll. Schulthess ”. Syntypes, 1♂, 1♀: Tunisie Hammamet Santschi VII.16 // Collectio Reichensperger // Chrysis leachii Shuck. var. nov. mauritanica Tr. Cotype! u. Ubergang det. Trautmann // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. Other syntypes are housed at MfN, in Trautmann’s collection. It was ranked as species by Linsenmaier (1959).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 187, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822

    Chrysis confinis Mocsary 1912

    No full text
    Chrysis confinis Mocsáry, 1912 Chrysis (Tetrachrysis) confinis Mocsáry, 1912: 404. Lectotype ♀ designated by Bohart (in Bohart & French 1986: 341); South Africa: Limpopo Province: Shilouvane [= Shiluvane] (HMNH). Chrysis confinis: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 399 (cat., maindroni group). Type locality. South Africa: “ Transvaal: Shilouvane (Coll. Schulthess-Rechbergi et Mus. Hung.) ”. Paralectotype, ♀: Shilouvane N. Transvaal (Junod) // confinis Mocs. typ. det. Mocsáry. // TYPUS // Schulthess Rechberg Collection. Remarks. The lectotype was designated by Bohart (in Bohart & French 1986) based on a female specimen deposited at Budapest, in Mocsáry’s collection. The paralectotype housed at ETHZ is conspecific with the lectotype. Chrysis confinis Mocsáry belongs to Chrysis maindroni species group (Madl & Rosa 2012).Published as part of Rosa, Paolo & Greeff, Michael, 2021, Types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in Zürich, pp. 181-204 in Zootaxa 4908 (2) on page 184, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/443822
    corecore