2,645 research outputs found

    On “The Grand Strategic Thought of Colin S. Gray” and Author\u27s Response

    No full text
    This commentary responds to Lukas Milevski’s article, “The Grand Strategic Thought of Colin S. Gray,” published in the Winter 2021–22 issue of Parameters (vol. 51, no. 4)

    Colin S. Gray. Strategic Studies. A Critical Assesment

    No full text
    Coutau-Bégarie Hervé. Colin S. Gray. Strategic Studies. A Critical Assesment. In: Politique étrangère, n°2 - 1983 - 48ᵉannée. pp. 485-486

    Colin S. Gray. Strategic Studies. A Critical Assesment

    No full text
    Coutau-Bégarie Hervé. Colin S. Gray. Strategic Studies. A Critical Assesment. In: Politique étrangère, n°2 - 1983 - 48ᵉannée. pp. 485-486

    Colin Humphris

    No full text
    "Colin Humphris 2 Sqdrn. RAAF. 1941 - 1942 Author of - 'Trapped on Timor' (as a result of bombing of Darwin Feb. 19, 1942)".Colin Humphris. 2 Squadron, Royal Australian Air Force 1941 - 1942. Author of - 'Trapped on Timor' (as a result of bombing of Darwin February 19, 1942)

    Conclusions: Common themes and future perspectives

    No full text
    The aim of the chapter is to identify and pull together the key issues and lessons emerged from the findings presented in the book. The common themes ... include social influence processes, staged learning and adoption, and risk perception. The chapter will then conclude in a brief review of current ICT trends affecting consumers and organizations plus some speculative reflections on future developments

    The Geopolitics Of Super Power

    No full text
    What is Soviet-American competition all about? Is the Soviet Union a security problem that the United States must solve? Or is it an insecurity condition with which the U.S. must learn to live—and if so, on what terms? What kind of a player is the United States in the great game of power politics? In The Geopolitics of Super Power, one of our most respected strategic theorists answers these and other questions. In geopolitical terms, Colin Gray sees the Soviet-American antagonism as an enduring contest between a continental empire and a maritime coalition, each with its distinctive character and purposes. Gray explores the roots of the American style in foreign policy and strategy, and how that style relates to defense options. He identifies four broad alternatives for U.S. national security policy: passive and active means of containment, disengagement from foreign security commitments, and the rollback of the Soviet empire. Gray argues vigorously for active containment, for the systematic deemphasis of nuclear weapons, and for the intelligent use, for deterrence and defense purposes, of the West\u27s great competitive strengths in the political, economic, and technological spheres. Colin S. Gray is founder and president of the National Institute for Public Policy and the author of Strategic Studies and Public Policy: The American Experience. Gray—author, think-tank denizen, and Administration consultant—here employs a geopolitical theory to advance a ‘grand strategy’ of American national security. This is hard-core, hard-line, replete with chestnuts, bromides, gross caricatures, and shrewd observations. —Kirkus Reviews Reads extremely well. A provocative and challenging study. —Journal of American Historyhttps://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_science_international_relations/1021/thumbnail.jp

    The Grand Strategic Thought of Colin S. Gray

    No full text
    Colin S. Gray distinguished himself from other scholars in the field of strategic studies with his belief that grand strategy is indispensable, complex, and inherently agential. This article identifies key themes, continuities, conceptual relationships, and potential discontinuities from his decades of grand strategic thought. Gray’s statement that “all strategy is grand strategy” remains highly relevant today, emphasizing the importance of agential context in military environments—a point often neglected in strategic practice

    Strigocuscus Gray 1862

    No full text
    Strigocuscus Gray, 1862. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1861:319 [1862]. TYPE SPECIES: Cuscus celebensis Gray, 1858. COMMENTS: Flannery et al. (1987) resurrected this genus for S. celebensis, and provisionally for S. gymnotis.Published as part of Colin P. Groves, 1993, Order Diprotodontia, pp. 45-62 in Mammal Species of the World (2 nd Edition), Washington and London :Smithsonian Institution Press on page 47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.735307
    corecore