14,486 research outputs found

    Xi jing za ji: liu juan.

    No full text
    葛洪集 ; 程榮校.綫裝, 1函.框19.9x14.2公分, 9行20字, 白口, 單白魚尾, 版心上鐫題名, 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次.明刻"漢魏叢書"本?Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 19.9 x 14.2 gong fen, 9 hang 20 zi, bai kou, dan bai yu wei, ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Ming ke "Han Wei cong shu" ben?Ge Hong ji ; Cheng Rong jiao

    Zhongguo xiao shuo da ci dian; Xian Qin zhi Nan Bei chao juan

    No full text
    Ben juan gong shou ci mu 1826 tiao, nei rong bao gua cheng wei, zhuan zhe, zhu lu shu huo chu chu, ban ben, zhong xin si xiang he ying xiang den

    Mu tian zi zhuan: liu juan.

    No full text
    郭璞註 ; 程榮校.綫裝, 1函.框20.1x14.2公分, 9行20字, 小字雙行同, 白口, 單白魚尾, 左右雙邊. 版心上鐫題名, 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次.明刻"漢魏叢書"本?卷末鐫"錢塘郭志學寫"Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 20.1 x 14.2 gong fen, 9 hang 20 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong, bai kou, dan bai yu wei, zuo you shuang bian. Ban xin shang juan ti ming, zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Ming ke "Han Wei cong shu" ben?Juan mo juan "Qiantang Guo Zhixue xie"Guo Pu zhu ; Cheng Rong jiao

    Jingju a cappella singing voice test dataset for "An efficient deep learning model for musical onset detection"

    No full text
    <p>Jingju a cappella singing voice test dataset used in the paper "An efficient deep learning model for musical onset detection".</p> <p>Arxiv paper link: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06773">https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06773</a></p> <p>Supplementary information and code for the paper: <a href="https://github.com/ronggong/musical-onset-efficient">https://github.com/ronggong/musical-onset-efficient</a></p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <ol> <li>ismir_2018_dataset_for_reviewing.zip: audio, syllable boundary and label annotation</li> <li>jingju dataset train test split filenames.xlsx: train and test split filename list</li> </ol> <p><strong>Citation:</strong></p> <pre>@article{gong2018towards, title={Towards an efficient deep learning model for musical onset detection}, author={Gong, Rong and Serra, Xavier}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06773}, year={2018} } </pre> <p><strong>Contact:</strong></p> <p>Rong Gong: rong.gong<at>upf.edu</p&gt

    Fen lei Zeng Wenzheng gong ri ji.

    No full text
    [曾國藩撰] ; 王啓原編.附: 曾文正公家訓 -- 曾文正公大事年表 -- 曾文正公榮哀錄.[Zeng Guofan zhuan] ; Wang Qiyuan bian.Fu: Zeng Wenzheng gong jia xun -- Zeng Wenzheng gong da shi nian biao -- Zeng Wenzheng gong rong ai lu

    Tomocerus pseudospinulus Gong & Qin & Yu 2018, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Tomocerus pseudospinulus</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 1A, 2, 3</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype: male on slide, near group of waterfalls, Tiantangzhai National Nature Reserve, Jinzhai County, Anhui Province, China, 115°46′40″E, 31°07′49″N (WGS84), alt. 995m, 27.iii.2016, leg. Daoyuan Yu and Chunyan Qin (16 TTZ10). Paratypes: 2 females and 1 male on slides, 4 in alcohol, same data as holotype. All types deposited in NJAU.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Body length 2.8–3.3 mm (average 3.0, 4 specimens). Background body colour light yellow. Ant. I and Ant. II antero-laterally with diffuse purple pigment; ground colour of Ant. III grey, basally and apically with purple pigment, gradually darker towards apex; Ant. IV dark purple. Eye patch black, small purple patch behind eye. Clypeus with diffuse light purple pigment. Tibiotarsi usually with purple pigment (Fig. 1A).</p> <p>Intact four-segmented antennae 0.6–0.75× length of body (average 0.72, 3 specimens). Length ratio of Ant I:II:III:IV = 1.0:1.2–1.4:6.9–7.5:1.3–1.4. Ant. III unscaled. Cephalic dorsal macrochaetotaxy: anterior area: 2 (A2), 4 (A3, A5); interocular area: 2 (M2), 7 (S0, S2, S5, S 5i); postocular area: 2+2 (Pa5, Pa6); posterior area: 3+3 (Pa2, Pp3, Pe3). Posterior margin of head with 30–40 chaetae on each side (Fig. 2A).</p> <p>Pattern of body chaetotaxy as in Fig. 2B. Number of macrochaetae or large mesochaetae in posterior row as 3 (p2, p3, p4), 3 (p1, p3, p5)/ 3 (m2, m3, m4), 3 (m2, m3, m4), 4 (p1, p3, p6, p7), 2 (p6, p7), 4 (m2, m3, m5, m6) from Th. II to Abd. V respectively. Th. II with macrochaetae a3, a4, a4a and a5a behind anterior marginal macrochaetae cluster; central macrochaetae a2, a5, m1, m2 and m3 arranged in triangle, m4 lateral to m2; Th. III with anterior macrochaeta a4; Abd. III with two anterior macrochaetae m3 and m6; Abd. IV with antero-lateral macrochaeta m6; Abd. VI with numerous chaetae of different sizes.</p> <p>Trochantero-femoral organ with 1, 1 slender chaetae subequal in length (Fig. 2C). Tibiotarsi I, II, III ventrally with 8–9, 8, 8 strong chaetae, 4–6, 6, 8 of them blunt (Fig. 2D). Tenent hair 1.0–1.2× length of inner edge of unguis (average 1.1, 2 specimens); accessory chaetae weaker than pretarsal chaetae; guard chaetae 0.8–0.9× length of tenent hair (average 0.85, 2 specimens). Unguis slender, with baso-internal ridges about 1/4 – 1/3 distance from base; lateral teeth pointed, of moderate size. Inner edge of unguis with basal tooth and 4–6 (average 5, 4 specimens) more distal teeth, sub-basal tooth larger. Unguiculus lanceolate, about 0.55–0.75× length of unguis (average 0.68, 4 specimens), its inner edge with one tooth (Fig. 2E).</p> <p> Ventral tube scaled on both faces. Anterior face with 25–36 (average 31, 4 specimens) chaetae on each side, posterior face with 75–106 (average 90, 4 specimens) chaetae, each lateral flap with 70–106 (average 82, 4 specimens) chaetae and occasionally 1–2 scales. Anterior face of tenaculum with 7–10 (average 8, 3 specimens) chaetae and without scales (Fig. 2F). Ratio manubrium:dens:mucro = 3.1–3.5:4.1–4.5:1.0. Manubrium ventrally scaled without chaetae; laterally with large round scales and 9–10 chaetae, proximal 1–2 chaetae slender, distal chaetae strong; each dorsal chaetal strip with 130–180 (average 153, 4 specimens) chaetae of different sizes, an irregular row of scales from base to 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/10, 4 specimens) length of manubrium along inner edge, and 9–12 (average 10, 4 specimens) pseudopores on lateral side; without distinct prominent chaetae (Fig. 3A); external distal corner chaeta as large as small mesochaetae in chaetal strip (Fig. 3B). Dens basally with prominent blunt dorsal chaeta. Dental spine formula as 3–4/5–6, <b>1</b>, sizes of spines gradually increase on basal subsegment (Fig. 3C); small spines with large denticles at basal half and a few small to moderate-size denticles, large spines with numerous small to moderate-size denticles (Fig. 3D). Mucro with 2–5 (average 4, 4 specimens) intermediate teeth (Fig. 3E).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> Combination of the Ancient Greek word <i>pseudḗs</i>: false, and the specific name of the similar species <i>T. spinulus</i>.</p> <p> <b>Habitat.</b> Living in moss on rocks.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Of other species in the <i>T. ocreatus</i> group, <i>T. pseudospinulus</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> most resembles <i>T. spinulus</i> in having short antenna, a similar chaetotaxy and a single large distal dental spine, but differs from the latter mainly in absence of the distinct prominent chaetae on the manubrium, presence of a blunt prominent chaeta on the dens and larger denticles on the dental spines (Table 1). Also the body colour of the new species is bright yellow and, in some individuals, with very light greenish tinge, while <i>T. spinulus</i> is dirty greyish yellow in the adults and light yellow only in the subadults. The type localities of <i>T. pseudospinulus</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> and <i>T. spinulus</i> are about 250 km apart, one belonging to the Dabie Cordillera and the other the Yellow Mountain Cordillera, respectively, which are geographically divided by the Yangtze River.</p>Published as part of <i>Gong, Xin, Qin, Chunyan & Yu, Daoyuan, 2018, Two new species of Tomocerus ocreatus group with a single large distal dental spine (Collembola, Tomoceridae), pp. 273-282 in Zootaxa 4514 (2)</i> on pages 275-278, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.2.10, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/2607838">http://zenodo.org/record/2607838</a&gt

    Zeng Wenzheng gong shi ji : 4 juan /

    No full text
    Changsha Tao Bi Qin zhai ke zi.In case with the author's Zeng Wenzheng gong wen ji [n.p.] Tongzhi 13 [1874]Mode of access: Internet.EAST; 5511.1.1874: With: Zeng Wenzheng gong wen j

    Tomocerus paraspinulus Gong & Qin & Yu 2018, sp. nov.

    No full text
    Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. Figs. 1B, 4, 5 Type material. Holotype: male on slide, near entrance of Baixiong Valley, Wanglang National Nature Reserve, Pingwu County, Sichuan Province, China, 104°1′12″E, 33°0′8″N (WGS84), alt. 2845m, 29.vii.2017, leg. Daoyuan Yu and Qibao Yan (17SC9). Paratypes: 5 females on slides, 11 in alcohol, same data as holotype. All types deposited in NJAU. Description. Body length 3.2–4.1 mm (average 3.7, 4 specimens). Background body colour light yellow. Ant. I antero-laterally with small purple patches, Ant. II distally with diffuse purple pigment, Ant. III and Ant. IV purple. Antennal base with purple ring. Eye patch black, diffuse light purple pigment around eye and on clypeus. Antero-lateral side of subcoxae and coxa I with purple pigment. Tibiotarsi with light purple pigment (Fig. 1B). Intact four-segmented antennae 0.9–1.0× length of body (average 0.95, 3 specimens). Length ratio of Ant I:II:III:IV = 1.0:1.2–1.4:9.5–10.2:1.1–1.2. Ant. III unscaled or with 1–2 basal scales. Cephalic dorsal macrochaetotaxy: anterior area: 2 (A2), 4 (A3, A5); interocular area: 2 (M2), 7 (S0, S2, S5, S 5i); postocular area: 2+2 (Pa5, Pa6); posterior area: 3+3 (Pa2, Pp3, Pe3). Posterior margin of head with 25–30 chaetae on each side (Fig. 4A). Pattern of body chaetotaxy as in Fig. 4B. Number of macrochaetae or large mesochaetae in posterior row as 3 (p2, p3, p4), 3 (p1, p3, p5)/ 3 (m2, m3, m4), 3 (m2, m3, m4), 4 (p1, p3, p6, p7), 2 (p6, p7), 4 (m2, m3, m5, m6) from Th. II to Abd. V. Th. II with macrochaetae a3, a4, a4a and a5a behind anterior marginal macrochaetae cluster; central macrochaetae a2, a5, m1, m2 and m3 arranged in triangle, m4 lateral to m2; m3 and m4 occasionally absent. Th. III with anterior macrochaeta a4; Abd. III with two anterior macrochaetae m3 and m6; Abd. IV with antero-lateral macrochaeta m6; Abd. VI with numerous chaetae of different sizes. Trochantero-femoral organ with 1, 1 slender chaetae, femoral chaeta longer (Fig. 4C). Tibiotarsi I, II, III ventrally with 7–8, 7–9, 8–9 strong chaetae, 4–7, 6–8, 6–9 of them blunt (Fig. 4D). Tenent hair 1.0–1.2× length of inner edge of unguis (average 1.1, 3 specimens); anterior accessory chaeta weaker than pretarsal chaetae, posterior accessory chaeta stronger than pretarsal chaetae; guard chaetae 0.9× length of tenent hair. Unguis slender, with baso-internal ridges about 1/4 – 1/3 distance from base; lateral teeth pointed, of moderate size. Inner edge of unguis with basal tooth and 4–6 (average 5, 6 specimens) more distal teeth, sub-basal tooth larger. Unguiculus lanceolate, about 0.55–0.75× length of unguis (average 0.67, 4 specimens), its inner edge with one tooth (Fig. 4E). Ventral tube scaled on both faces. Anterior face with 35–50 (average 41, 4 specimens) chaetae on each side, posterior face with 85–100 (average 93, 4 specimens) chaetae, each lateral flap with 100–136 (average 120, 4 specimens) chaetae, without scale. Anterior face of tenaculum with 14–18 (average 16, 6 specimens) chaetae and without scales (Fig. 4F). Ratio manubrium:dens:mucro = 2.8–3.3:3.2–4.1:1.0. Manubrium ventrally scaled without chaetae; laterally with large round scales and 9–10 chaetae, proximal 1–2 chaetae slender, distal chaetae strong; each dorsal chaetal strip with 160–240 (average 185, 5 specimens) chaetae of different sizes, an irregular row of scales from base to 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/10, 6 specimens) length of manubrium along inner edge, and 9–13 (average 11, 6 specimens) pseudopores on lateral side; prominent chaetae 1+1, blunt, at about 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/ 10, 6 specimens) length from base of manubrium (Fig. 5A); external distal corner chaeta as large as small mesochaetae in chaetal strip (Fig. 5B). Dens basally with prominent blunt dorsal chaeta. Dental spine formula as 3– 5/5–8, 1, sizes of spines gradually increase on basal subsegment (Fig. 5C); spines with almost evenly distributed numerous small denticles (Fig. 5D). Mucro with 4–7 (average 5, 6 specimens) intermediate teeth (Fig. 5E). Etymology. Combination of the Ancient Greek word pará: beside, near, and the specific name of T. spinulus. Habitat. Living in mosses and lichens on trunks of fir tree. Remarks. Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. resembles T. spinulus in having a single large distal spine on the dens and almost evenly distributed small denticles on the dental spines, but differs from the latter mainly in having longer intact antenna, more chaetae on the tenaculum and blunt prominent chaetae on the manubrium and dens (Table 1). In addition, in the new species two accessory chaetae of the tenent hair are unequal in size, and the prominent manubrial chaeta is more distally positioned than in T. spinulus. Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. is also similar to T. pseudospinulus sp. nov., but differs mainly in having longer intact antenna, prominent blunt manubrial chaeta and smaller denticles on the dental spines (Table 1). The type locality of Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. is at the eastern edge of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, more than 1100 km away from those of T. pseudospinulus sp. nov. and T. spinulus, with about 2000 m altitudinal difference.Published as part of Gong, Xin, Qin, Chunyan & Yu, Daoyuan, 2018, Two new species of Tomocerus ocreatus group with a single large distal dental spine (Collembola, Tomoceridae), pp. 273-282 in Zootaxa 4514 (2) on pages 278-281, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/260783

    Jingju Phoneme Classification Features for EUSIPCO 2017 paper

    No full text
    <p>This dataset contains the pre-computed Mel-bands features from the training part of </p> <blockquote> <p>Rong Gong, Rafael Caro Repetto, & Yile Yang. (2017). Jingju a cappella singing dataset part1 [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.344932</p> </blockquote> <p>This dataset is used for reproducing the singing voice phoneme classification experiment described in the following paper:</p> <blockquote> <p>Timbre Analysis of Music Audio Signals with Convolutional Neural Networks  </p> </blockquote> <p>For the usage and code, please refer to https://github.com/ronggong/EUSIPCO2017 </p&gt
    corecore