1,720,983 research outputs found
Questioning and knowing: the logic of questioning in Bernard Lonergan's theory of knowing
No full textFull text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only.The aim of this investigation is to explore and develop the logic of questioning as it relates to knowing. The central thesis of the investigation is that the practice of questioning is an expression of the desire to know that is dynamically oriented towards knowing everything. It recognizes that the domain of questioning is larger than the domain of knowledge, for we can always ask more questions than we are able to answer. It discusses the relationship between questioning and ignorance; it points out conceptual similarities and differences between questioning, doubt, wonder, interest and attention. It discusses Aristotle's logic of questions in relation to gaining knowledge, as answers to different types of questions. It examines Hintikka's approach to the logic of questioning and argues that his Game Theory model of questioning is restrictive. It distinguishes between the act of questioning and the content of questions. It argues that the practice of questioning grounds a critical realist theory of knowledge that is coherent and verifiable, and that any theory of knowing that restricts questioning is itself questionable. The major part of the investigation is an examination of the place of questioning in the arguments used by Bernard Lonergan to develop a theory of knowing and being in his major work, Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. It shows how Lonergan employed an unrestricted logic of questioning that is oriented to knowing everything about everything. It argues that questioning not only initiates the movement towards knowing but also that it is the guiding methodology by which we discovery further knowledge. It examines Lonergan's theory of being as the objective of an unrestricted desire to know, and shows how his argument for the existence of transcendent being are related to the practice of raising further questions. The conclusion outlines key features of questioning that need to be included in a full account of the logic of questioning. In an Appendix it provides a brief sketch of Bernard Lonergan's intellectual life and discusses related aspects of his work
Parmenides Demythologised
No full textIn this paper I argue that, given three popular modern doctrines which are combined in some accounts of modality, the outcome is equivalent to a suitably demythologised metaphysics of Parmenides. Prior has some anticipatory comment on the possible outcomes
Comments on Hitchcock's "Enumerative Induction"
No full textConference Papers and Commentary
Three contrasts in Quine on modality
No full textConsider the reaction of some graduate student who has only heard vague allusions to Quine. Say also that they had read a great deal of modal logic. They hear of the 50th 'birthday' of Word and Object. For the first time they open the text and go at once to the section on modality, §41. They quickly form the impression that Quine's treatment is not only brief, but is naive and botched
- …
