1,721,042 research outputs found
Do platinum salts fit all triple negative breast cancers?
No full textTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease with limited treatment options and poor prognosis once metastatic. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that TNBC could be more sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, especially among BRCA1/2-mutated patients. In recent years, several randomised trials have been conducted to evaluate platinum efficacy in both early-stage and advanced TNBC, with conflicting results especially for long-term outcomes. Experimental studies are now focusing on identifying biomarkers of response to help selecting patients who may benefit most from platinum-based therapies, including BRCA1/2 mutational status and genomic instability signatures (such as HRD-LOH or HRD-LST scores). A standard therapy for TNBC is still missing and platinum-based regimens represent an emerging therapeutic option for selected patients with a defect in the homologous recombination repair system. The identification of these patients through validated biomarker assays will be crucial to optimize the use of currently approved agents in TNBC
Complementary and alternative medicine in oncology [Le terapie alternative e complementari in oncologia]
No full textThe role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) treatments in oncology has always been heavily debated. It is estimated that about half of cancer patients experience at least one form of CAM through their life and because of the growing spread of these on the internet, the proportion is destined to grow. There is no clear distinction between alternative and complementary treatment due to the possibility to use the same remedy both alongside and instead of traditional therapies. The use of CAM may expose the patients to a wide spectrum of risks that may range from under treatment due to the delay in using official medicine treatment, to toxicities derived both as a direct consequence of the alternative molecule or because of drug interaction with conventional treatments. Because of the uncertainty regarding the risk-benefit ratio and the fact that the patients often do not declare their use if no specifically requested, this topic is relevant for physicians. Aim of this review is to cover the preeminent CAM, their supposed benefits, toxicities and interactions with conventional therapeutic agents
Body mass index impacts adverse events and drug plasma concentration: should dose intensity be included in the palbociclib equation?
No full text
Tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: When, how, and how long?
No full textEndocrine therapy represents the gold standard for the adjuvant treatment of luminal-like early breast cancer, but its personalization is still a major point of debate. To define the most appropriate therapeutic strategy, both the patient's menopausal status at the moment of diagnosis and the individual risk of disease recurrence should be taken into account. Five years of therapy with tamoxifen represent the standard of care for low-risk pre/perimenopausal patients, whilst the combination of ovarian suppression with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor should be considered for high-risk patients. Also, to high-risk patients, an extended strategy can be proposed. Postmenopausal patients, instead, should receive an upfront aromatase inhibitor and an extended strategy can be considered for a high risk of disease recurrence. Aim of this review is to set a focus on the major studies investigating the optimal type and duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy and evaluate emerging options
Treatment of metastatic breast cancer in a real-world scenario: Is progression-free survival with first line predictive of benefit from second and later lines?
Full text linkINTRODUCTION:
Despite the availability of several therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), no robust predictive factors are available to help clinical decision making. Nevertheless, a decreasing benefit from first line to subsequent lines of treatment is commonly observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of benefit from first-line therapy on outcome with subsequent lines.
METHODS:
We analyzed a consecutive series of 472 MBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2004 and 2012. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) at first (PFS1), second, third, and fourth therapeutic lines, according to treatment (ET and/or CT) and tumor subtypes.
RESULTS:
In the whole cohort, median overall survival was 34 months, and median PFS1 was 9 months. A 6-month benefit was shown by 289 patients (63.5%) at first line, 128 (40.5%) at second line, 76 (33.8%) at third line, and 34 (23.3%) at fourth line. Not having a 6-month benefit at PFS1 was associated with less chance of benefit at second line (odds ratio [OR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.77, p = .0026) and at any line beyond first (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.62, p < .0001). In the total series, after stratification for tumor subtypes, a strong predictive effect was observed among HER2-positive tumors (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p = .0152).
CONCLUSION:
Our results suggest that the absence of at least a 6-month benefit in terms of PFS with first-line therapy predicts a reduced probability of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines, especially in HER2-positive disease.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:
This study supports evidence showing that the absence of a 6-month benefit in terms of progression-free survival with first-line therapy predicts a lack of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines in metastatic breast cancer. The random distribution of benefit experienced by a subset of the cohort further spurs an interest in identifying predictive factors capable of identifying the most appropriate therapeutic strategy
The use of liquid biopsy in early breast cancer: clinical evidence and future perspectives
No full textLiquid biopsy, including both circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA, is gaining momentum as a diagnostic modality adopted in the clinical management of breast cancer. Prospective studies testing several technologies demonstrated clinical validity and, in some cases, achieved the United States Food and Drug Administration approval. The initial testing and clinical application of liquid biopsy focused primarily on the diagnosis, while molecular characterization and monitoring of metastatic disease, with larger data from prospective studies, came in the last two decades. Although its role in metastatic setting is thus widely recognized, the current evidence does not provide support for the routine clinical use of liquid biopsy methods for the earlier stage of this disease. Considering the relevance of early detection, characterization, and management of breast cancer in the early-stage, this clinical setting is the most suitable to increase the chances for effective treatment selection and improved prognosis, and a better understanding of the main application of liquid biopsy tools in the earlier stage of breast cancer is therefore crucial. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical evidence and subsequent potential applications of liquid biopsy in early breast cancer, identifying the main existing caveats and the possible future scenarios
The puzzling clinical presentation of fluoropyrimidines cardiotoxicity
No full textThe cardiotoxicity of fluoropyrimidines (FP) [5-Fluorouracil and Capecitabine] is often reported as acute cardiac ischemia with rest typical angina, signs of ischemia at electrocardiogram (ECG), and ventricular kinetics abnormalities. However, silent ischemia, effort-related toxicity, and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) have been also described. The aim of this study is to report a consecutive series of 115 patients with FP cardiotoxicity observed in a single center both within clinical prospective studies and during the clinical routine. The clinical presentation widely varied as regards symptoms, ECG abnormalities, and clinical outcomes. We report also the strategies used to prevent cardiotoxicity in a subgroup of 35 patients who continued o rechallenged FP therapy after cardiotoxicity. In nearly half of the patients, the cardiotoxicity was triggered by physical effort. Typical angina was rare: the symptoms were absent in 51% of cases and were atypical in half of the other cases. ST-segment elevation and VA were the most frequent ECG abnormality; however, ST segment depression or negative T waves were the only abnormalities in 1/3 of the cases. Troponins essays were often within the normal limits, even in presence of extensive signs of ischemia. The most effective strategy to prevent cardiotoxicity at rechallenge was reducing FP dosage and avoiding physical effort. Anti-ischemic therapies were not always effective. Raltitrexed was a safe alternative to FP. Fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity shows a wide variety of clinical presentations in real life, from silent ischemia to atypical symptoms, acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), VA, or complete atrio-ventricular block. Physical effort is the trigger of cardiotoxicity in nearly half of the cases. The recognition of cardiotoxicity cannot rely on symptoms only but requires an active screening with ECG and stress test in selected cases
- …
