5 research outputs found
F.m.VIb.55 (1. Decretum Gratiani / 2. Breviarium ad omnes materias in iure canonico inveniendas)
No full text1. Decretum Gratiani / 2. Breviarium ad omnes materias in iure canonico inveniendasLegalCONTENT: Breviarium ad omnes materias in iure canonico inveniendas; Decretum Gratiani cum glossa? AUTHOR: 2. Petrus Ilerdensis; Bernardus Bottonius (Parmensis) also suggested (MPO). DATE: Saec. xiv also suggested (MPO). FROM: 1301 TO: 1400 OTHER NOTES: Also known as: MPO Fr 31055 (CCM Jur AA 190), Fr 29183 (CCM Jur Coll 237). From same codex: CCM Jur Coll 237 (Stockholm, Riksarkivet: Fr 29184 Skeppsgårdshandlingar 32:10 1576 Västervik Peder Jonssons löning; 1 fr., 2 fol.). Also known as: "A", "3"
Seneca tragico fra Medioevo e Umanesimo
Get PDFThe reception of Seneca’s Tragedies had a crucial moment during the 14th and early 15th centuries. In this period, after their recent rediscovery but before the extraordinary circulation across Europe in the Renaissance, Seneca’s plays attracted the attention of scholars and poets, and also of some exegetes who taught in Italian universities and schools. These cultural places represented a formidable medium for the dissemination of the Tragedies and the exegetical materials produced around them. In particular, an important role was played by Petrarch and Boccaccio, who read Tragedies and evoked them in their works, but also by some exegetes-professors such as Giovanni del Virgilio, Pietro da Moglio, Domenico Bandini, Bartolomeo del Regno and Petrus Parmensis, who focused their commentaries and lectures on Seneca’s plays.
So, at first, this volume recalls the narrow spread of Seneca’s Tragedies up to Early Middle Ages, and examines their rediscovery, that was realized by Nicolaus Trevet and Paduan prehuminists Lovato de’ Lovati and Albertino Mussato, but which took place also in Tuscany and Bologna. Then, the book analyses the philological and interpretative reception of the Tragedies by Petrarch and Boccaccio, and the allusions to Seneca’s plays in the Expositio on Ovid’s Metamorphoses by Bolognese professor Giovanni del Virgilio, who may have influenced Petrarch. Furthermore, great attention is paid to the exegetic activity of Pietro da Moglio, professor in Bologna and Padua and author of poetic summaries of the Tragedies that were very popular. In detail, the volume contains a new edition of these text, which updates Giuseppe Billanovich’s edition on the basis of many recently rediscovered manuscripts. Then, the book explores the interest in Tragedies shown by Domenico Bandini, teacher in Bologna and Tuscany and close friend of Coluccio Salutati. A pupil of the latter, Lorenzo Ridolfi, in his youth wrote – almost certainly on Salutati’s advice – a proem and some original summaries of the Tragedies, an edition of which is offered in this volume for the first time. New investigations are also focused on the exegetical activity of Bartolomeo del Regno, student of Pietro da Moglio and professor in Bologna, and on an important manuscript of the Tragedies linked to him. Good attention is also given to the original glosses on the Tragedies written by Petrus Parmensis in a manuscript adorned with elegant miniatures, that show special features compared to the illustrations in other codices and textual commentaries composed by Trevet and Mussato.
This continuous exegesis, multifaceted and also open to dialogue with the art of illumination, represented an indispensable point of reference for the pupils of such professors, including Coluccio Salutati, Francesco da Fiano and Francesco Piendibeni da Montepulciano, who were students of Pietro da Moglio before becoming humanists. After all, the book underlines that Francesco da Fiano and Francesco Piendibeni knew Seneca’s dramas, but also analyses the manuscript of Tragedies copied and annotated by Coluccio Salutati and lists all quotations from this plays in his Epistolary and De laboribus Herculis. Therefore, the ways followed by exegesis and fortune of Tragedies in the 14th century and at dawn of 15th, analyzed in this volume, offer an example of the multiple routes of the text’s tradition, but also an eloquent paradigm of the fact that Middle Ages and Humanism, far from being conceived as historical categories, in this era could productively dialogue on the level of hermeneutics and dissemination of knowledge
F.m.VIb.6 (Casus longi cum Apparatu (et Constitutiones Innocenti IV Papae))
No full textCasus longi cum Apparatu (et Constitutiones Innocenti IV Papae)LegalCONTENT: Casus longi cum apparatu AUTHOR: Bernardus Bottonius (Parmensis) DATE: Saec. xiv also suggested (MPO). FROM: 1301 TO: 1400 OTHER NOTES: Also known as: MPO Fr 20534. From same codex: CCM Jur AA 7 = MPO Codex 1351 (Stockholm, Riksarkivet: Fr 20513 KB A 103 s 52 Hans Anderssons räk f lilla arkliet Stockholm 1565 (114); Fr 20520 KB A 103 s 60 Småland 1565:7 Sven Perssons räk f Torforsens fiske; Fr 20521 KB A 103 s 61 Småland 1564:13 Simon Jonssons räk f Torforsens fiske; Fr 20522 KB A 103 s 94 Småland 1564:13 Måns Olofssons räk f Simpevarps fiske; Fr 20523 KB A 103 s 112 Hans Anderssons m fl räk för lilla arkliet 1565 (119); Fr 20524 KB A 103 s 111 Hans Anderssons räk för lilla arkliet 1565 (115); Fr 20525 KB A 103 s 113 Harald Töressons längd på svarta ryttare 1565; --, --: Kammararkivet Fr 8548 Kaperiräkenskaper 3:11 1562-1564; Fr 9467 Strödda kamerala handlingar 22:4 1565; Fr 9469 Strödda kamerala handlingar 22:6 1565; Fr 20514 Kaperiräkenskaper 3 Frälsebytesgods i Kalmar 1566; Fr 20515 Provianträkenskaper 27:6 Stockholm 1565-1567 Tideman Erikssons kvittenser 1565; Fr 20516 Provianträkenskaper 3:6 Fälttåg 1565 Sven Huffwedssons räkenskap ; Fr 20517 Provianträkenskaper 3:6 Sjötåg 1565-1566 Lasse Håkanssons räkenskap 1565; Fr 20518 Smålands handlingar 1565:4:1 Räkenskap; Fr 20519 Västergötlands handlingar 1565:4 A:6 Kinne m fl hd Prästernas taxa (avt); Fr 20526 Hälsinglands handlingar 1565:4:1 Räkenskap; Fr 20527 Smålands handlingar 1564:18:4 Knektarnas friheter; Fr 20528 Medelpads handlingar 1565:3:1 Räkenskap; Fr 20529 Provianträkenskaper Vadstena 1561-1565 Borgarnas räkenskap; Fr 20530 Fogdarnas restantieräkenskaper 1:16 F 1-28 Uppland Olof Anderssons rest för Norunda hd 1565; Fr 20533 Västergötlands handlingar 1577:16:1 Räkenskap A; --, --: Krigsarkivet Fr 20531 Militieräkenskaper 1565:54 Anders Erssons räk för västgötaknektar 1565; Fr 20532 Militieräkenskaper 1565:61:2 Tomas Olssons räkenskap 1565; 24 fr., 50 fol.). Previous shelfmarks: "ah"
Regole del canto fermo, e di sonare sopra la parte l'organo
No full textTitle from p. 1, added after much of the ms. was copiedPaper ms. with full vellum binding from a fragment of a [16th or 17th century?] chant book; the Tenebrae responsory "Astiterunt reges" appears on the front coverModern pagination in pencil in lower outer corners. Earlier incomplete and discontinuous foliation in ink on upper corners of some recto pagesPages 70 and 71 are glued together, as are p. 74 and 75Pages 9-118 ruled up in faint brown ink (apparently by the original scribe, though the lines are more widely spaced on p. 95-118) ; p. 6-7 have 4 line staves in the same red ink used for the diagram on p. 5. Pages 2-4, 8, 56-57, 73, 76, 92-94 and 102-106 left blankItems 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 all appear to be in the same (late 15th century?) hand ; items 5, 8 and probably 9a all appear to be in another (16th century?) hand, as does the title on p. 1 ; item 7 is in a unique (16th or 17th century?) hand ; item 9b is in a unique (16th century?) hand. The first initial of the text of no. 6 is the most elaborately illuminated in the ms. and this may have originally been the first itemItem 2 is apparently a unique copy of an otherwise unknown work ; Item 3 occurs in full or in part in several other mss. ; item 4 consists of excerpts from Burtius' Musices opusculum printed in 1487The author of item 2 can be identified with the Nicolaus de Aversa cited in the "Ars cantus mensurabilis mensurata per per modos iuris" (ed. C. Matthew Balansuela, Lincoln [Nebraska], 1994. Cf. p. 63 "a composer known only through this treatise")Items noted by Herlin. 1. (p. 5) Prime namque dicuntur graves [with Guidonian hand] -- 2. (p. 9-21) Incipit ars plane musice s[ecundu]m fratr[e]m Nicolaum de Aversa -- 3. (p. 21-55) Ad laudem s[an]ctissi[m]e Trinitatis et gloriose Virginis Marie dulcissi[m]e matris sue aetatis curie c[el]estis triu[m]phatis. Incipit co[m]pendium muscicales multis doctoribus et philosophis editum et co[m]positum p[er] p[res]b[yter]um d[omi]n[u]m Nicolaum de Capua ordinatum su[um] an[n]o d[omi]ni m.cccc.xv -- 4. (p. 58-60) Nicolai Burtii Parmensis De signo ♭ molle et [b] quadri. Quanquam in secundo tractatu hujismo[d]i -- 5. (p. 61-64 ; 67-72) P[rim]o tuono festivo -- 6. (p. 65-67) Prouemium. Cum n[ost]re aetatis gaudea[n]t brevitate moderni -- 7. (p. 77-79) [Italian text concerning feast days] -- 8. (p. 80-90) Modo di sonare sop[r]a la parte con facilità -- 9. (p. 95-101) Avvertimento PrimoItems not noted by Herlin. [1a]. (p.6) Benedicam[us] Domino -- [1b]. (p.6-7) Primus punctus -- [9a]. (p. 107-114) La terza maggiore -- [9b]. (p. 115-118) Per concordare el contraponteThis copy from the Collection of Louise Hanson-Dye
THREE INCUNABULA FROM SENJ IN THE LIBRARY OF THE FRANCISCAN MONASTERY OF TRSAT (contribution to the history of Franciscans in Senj)
Get PDFFranjevci dolaze u Senj sredinom XIII. stoljeća, gdje već 1272. godine imaju svoju crkvu izvan gradskih zidina. U toj se crkvi u idućim stoljećima pokapaju knezovi krčki (kasnije Frankopani) i članovi njihovih obitelji. Početkom XVI. stoljeća pred naletom
turske sile grad se utvrđuje, ruše se svi objekti izvan gradskih zidina, a na brežuljku iznad grada gradi se utvrda za obranu grada i cijeloga Primorja i Istre od Turaka. Ruši se i franjevački samostan, a na zamolbu Frankopana gradačko Ratno vijeće gradi franjevcima u središtu grada novi samostan i crkvu sv. Franje. Taj samostan i crkvu franjevci koriste sve do kraja XVIII. stoljeća kada privremeno napuštaju samostan zbog smještaja vojske koja ratuje na granici s Otomanskim carstvom. Zbog nastojanja senjskoga i modruškoga
biskupa Ivana Krstitelja Ježića da u samostanu osnuje i smjesti biskupijsku visoku bogoslovnu školu i bogoslovni zavod te zbog niza drugih okolnosti, više se nikada ne vraćaju. Poznato je da prema odluci Općeg franjevačkog generalnog kapitula iz 1593. godine svaki samostan treba nabavljati knjige za potrebe samostanske zajednice, odnosno mora imati svoju knjižnicu. Tako je i senjski samostan imao svoju knjižnicu koju su franjevci napustivši Senj zajedno s arhivom prenijeli u trsatski samostan. Hrvatska franjevačka provincija sv. Ćirila i Metoda od 2011. godine sustavno obrađuje građu svojih bogatih knjižnica primjenom suvremenih informatičkih i komunikacijskih tehnologija i metoda. Time čini tu građu dostupnom javnosti. U knjižnici trsatskoga samostana najprije su obrađene zbirke s najstarijom građom: inkunabule i strane knjige XVI. stoljeća. Među tim knjigama nalaze se i tri inkunabule koje su, kako se vidi po bilješkama u njima, nekada pripadale franjevačkome samostanu u
Senju ili su došle iz Senja. U ovome radu opisuju se te knjige i donose relevantni podatci povezani s tom građom, koje su ostatci knjižnice senjskoga franjevačkoga samostana i dragocijeni dokumenti društvenoga, vjerskoga i kulturnoga života franjevaca i grada Senja.The Franciscans who were welcomed in Senj in the mid-13th century abandoned it in 1807 because their monastery in the centre of the city was intended for the diocese seminary by the Hungarian government and which in 1806 was opened by the Senj-Modruš bishop Ivan Krstitelj Ježić. With it was taken the monastery’s archive and library which is today an integral part of the library of the Franciscan monastery of Trsat. The Croatian Franciscan Province of St. Cyril and Methodius from 2011 has been systematically processing the material of its rich library with the application of modern information and communication technologies and methods. Thus in the library of the Trsat monastery the oldest material of the collection is being dealt with first: the incunabula and foreign books of the 16th century. Amongst the incunabula are also located three incunabula which, as can be seen from their markings, once belonged to the Franciscan monastery in Senj and which came from Senj. The first incunabulum which was owned by Senj’s Franciscans is: Confessionale: Defecerunt scrutantes scrutinio. Add: Titulos de restitutionibus or Incipit
Summula confessionis utilissima ..... It was a handbook for confessors, as well as for penitent women, which was written by Antoninus Florentinus, a Dominican and archbishop of Florence.
Printed in 1473 in Venice in the print workshop of Bartholomeusa Cremonensis. In that incunabulum is written by hand ex libris: Conventus Segnensis. In the second incunabulum is Summa angelica de casibus conscientiae (cum add. Hieronymi Tornieli), a work written by Angelum de Clauasio (Angelum de Clauasio), and an epistle – a letter in the preface of Girolamo Tornielli. It was printed in 1486 in the village of Chiavasso in the print workshop of Jacobinusa de Suigo de sancto Germano. For this book, which also deals with the problem of confession, sin and examination of the conscience, it cannot be said that it belonged to the Senj Franciscan monastery, but from the notes from 1659 it is known that it was in Senj and that it was owned by
Stjepan Pribinović, who had handed it to a friar L.V. The third incunabulum is one from an edition of a collection of papal decretals: Noua decretalium compilatio Gregorii IX. ... feliciter explicit or under the general title Decretales cum glossa, which was composed by an order of Pope Gregory 9th, by his chaplain and legal expert Raymond of Peñaforte (Pennafort), and the author of the comments of this publication Bernard from Botone or Parmensis, professor of the
University of Bologna. The book was printed by Thomas de Blavis in Venice in 1489. This book has marks in two places which show its affiliation with the Franciscan monastery and the year 1804. These books are a part of the great literary wealth of Croatian cultural heritage but they also testify to the centuries of theological, ecclesiastical, cultural and legal traditions of the Franciscan community, the Franciscan monastery in Senj and in Trsat. They are precious monuments to the faith, culture and scientific traditions of the town of Senj and Croatia, the country’s rich European, Christian culture and civilisation
