1,276 research outputs found
Historia Lectionvm Ill. Gymnasii Schlevsingensis : h. e. Recensio Lectionum Publicarum, quae ab ortu Gymnasii, Anno nempe MDLXXVII. vsque ad hoc tempus, in Classibus inprimis tribus superioribus, receptae fuerunt & propositae, ex Matricvla Gymnasii sic instituta, ... possit perspici / ... in apertum prolata a M. Godofredo Lvdovici, Rectore. A. MDCCVI.
No full textVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Schleusingae, exscripsit G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymnasii Typographus
Paylon Theriomachon Sistit Et Ad Avdiendas Orationes d. 23. Ian. CIƆ IƆCC XXXXI. In Svperiore Avditorio Gymnasii Hennebergici Habendas Schlevsvungam Litteratam Omni Pietate Observantia Et Hvmanitate [Schleusungae d. 22. Jan. 1741.] / Invitat Georgivs Erenstvs Walchivs Gymnasii Rector
No full textAutopsie nach Ex. der ULB Sachsen-AnhaltVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Silvsiae, excudit Ioh. Christoph. Goebel. Gymn. Henneb. Typogr
Ad Panegyrin Oratoriam bono cum Deo VI. Id. Quinctil. A. MDCCIV. in Ill. Gymnasio Schlevsingensi apparandam, qua De Ivre Et Ivdicio Eqvestri Silesiaco s. von des Schlesischen Adels Ritter-Recht und Ehren-Gericht Orationem Latinam memoriter recitabit Generosus Iuuenis Christophorvs Heinricvs de Briesen, Eques Silesius, & Versibus Latino-Germanicis Consignationem peculiarem Nobilivm, qui ab A. MDLXXVII. ad annum vsque MDCXXVII. Schleusingae literis sunt operati, exhibiturus est Adolescens industrius Io. Gvstavvs Otto, Frisenhusanus, Studiorum liberalium Maecenates, Patronos Fautores & Amicos demisse & obseruanter inuitat M. Godofredvs Lvdovici, Rect.
No full textVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Schleusingae, publice exscripsit G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymn. Typograph
De cura magistratus apud veteres circa scholas
No full textNebent. nach handschr. Eintrag im Ex. d. ULB Sachsen-AnhaltVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Silvsiae, excudit Ioh. Christoph Goebel, Illustr. Gymnas. Henneb. Typogr
Adventvm Felicem Reverendissimi Serenissimiqve Principis Ac Domini, Domini Mavritii Gvilielmi Postvlati Administratoris Episcopatvs Nvmbvrgensis
No full textSchleusingen, Hennebergisches Gymnasium, Schulprogramm, 1701Autopsie nach Ex. der ULB Sachsen-AnhaltVorlageform des Kolophon: Excud. G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymn. Schleusingensis Typographus
Dendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel 1846
No full textDendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 Type species: Dendrocellus discolor Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 (= Desera nepalensis Hope, 1831)= Desera Hope, 1831 (nec Dejean, 1825) Type species: Desera nepalensis Hope, 1831 Bousquet (2002) and Liang et al. (2004) have correctly reconstructed the complex nomenclatorial history of this genus, reaching the conclusion that its valid generic name is Dendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, instead of Desera Dejean, 1825, as it was frequently considered previously. We only observe that back in 1949 Jeannel already wrote: “Les Dendrocellus Schm. -Goeb. (type: discolor Schm. -Goeb.,= nepalensis Hope) sont généralement classés à tort sous le nom de Desera. … Malgré leurs ongles tarsaux pectinés, ils sont très voisins des Drypta s. str. ” (Jeannel, 1949). So, it seems the french author had already reached the same conclusions. This genus, recently revised by Liang & Kavanaugh (2007), contains 22 species occuring in Africa, Asia and Australia. Systematically it is extremely close to Drypta, differing only in its tarsal claws pectinate instead of smooth. The genitalic characters of both sexes are the same, the external resemblance among members of the two genera is sometimes puzzling and a few species of Dendrocellus show very slight tarsal pectination, sometimes leaving a doubt on their generic pertinence; only a comparative study of all the characters of the species belonging to the two genera will allow to decide whether they can be really maintained as separate genera. Already in 1968 Darlington observed: “ Desera differs from Drypta only in having pectinate tarsal claws. A modern revision of the species is needed to show whether both genera are really monophyletic and distinct” (Darlington, 1968, p. 218). The unique combination of characters distinguishing this genus from the others of the tribe is: pronotal bead absent or very rudimental (fig. 10); punctuation on head and pronotum dense, regular, the punctures usually well distinct from each other; pronotum very feebly constricted towards base; elytral microsculpture well developed; elytral pubescence dense, usually arranged in two-three more or less regular rows; scutellar pore constantly single; intervals flat or slightly convex; tarsal claws slender, more or less pectinate on inner side; two to five evident setae on outer side of stylomere (fig. 8).Published as part of Sciaky, Riccardo & Anichtchenko, Alexander, 2020, Taxonomic notes on the tribe Dryptini Bonelli, 1810 with description of a new genus and species from China (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Dryptini), pp. 522-530 in Zootaxa 4731 (4) on page 524, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/366198
William Goebel: The Politics of Wrath
No full textThe turbulent career of William Goebel (1856–1900), which culminated in assassination, marked an end-of-the-century struggle for political control of Kentucky. Although populism had become a strong force in the nation, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad and ex-Confederates still dominated the state and its Democratic party. Touting reforms and attaching the railroad monopoly, Goebel challenged this old order.
A Yankee in a state that fancied itself southern, Goebel had to depend on a strong organization to win votes. As “The Kenton King” he created a new style of politics. To some he was a progressive reformer; to others, a tyrannical machine boss. His drive for power and his enemies’ fierce opposition aroused violent political factionalism. Goebel’s fateful duel with a rival, his partisan election law, and his ruthless convention tactics led to the bitterly contested gubernatorial election of 1899 that resulted in his murder. Although the full truth about the murder was never revealed in nearly a decade of trials and the advent of progressive politics was long delayed in Kentucky, Goebel’s death did relieve the state’s political turmoil and induce some legal reforms. Using new sources and fresh perspectives, James C. Klotter portrays Goebel’s tumultuous era and discovers the real man within the obscurity of his conflicting images.
James C. Klotter is professor of history at Georgetown College and the state historian of Kentucky. He is the author or coauthor of several books, including A New History of Kentucky.
A lively account of one of the most bizarre and controversial episodes in Kentucky history. -- Tennessee Historical Quarterlyhttps://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/1000/thumbnail.jp
Joh. Canuti Lenaei De Veritate Et Excellentia Christianae Religionis Brevis Informatio : Ad Exemplar Upsaliae MDCXXXVIII Excusum / [Hrsg.: Ernestus Salomon Cyprianus]
No full textVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: LIPSIAE ET COBVRGI IN OFFICINA PFOTENHAVERIANA ANNO MDCCI. SCHLEVSINGAE, TYPIS G. W. GOEBELII, GYMNAS. TYPOGR
Klinischer und ökonomischer Vergleich zweier standardisiert implantierter Knieendoprothesenmodelle
No full textAim: To evaluate the differences in clinical Outcome and economics of primary total knee replacements, the results with two implant types (cruciate retaining and sacrificing) were analysed. Method: From 1/2000 until 6/2001 twenty-two consecutive patients with primary arthrosis of the knee underwent total knee replacement with the cruciate-retaining CKS-CC knee system (= group 1: 9 men, 13 women, mean age 65.68 years). Between 8/2001 and 3/2002 twenty-two consecutive patients received the cruciate-sacrificing NexGen Full Flex implant (= group 2: 4 men, 18 women, mean age 67.18 years). The operative procedures and rehabilitation regimes were standardised. The modified Insall score, patient satisfaction, as well as implant and rehabilitation costs were evaluated. Statistical analyses were based on two theses. I) There is no difference between the clinical early and five-year results of both groups. II) The more expensive NexGen implant is less economic regarding total costs per patient. Results: The more expensive, cruciate-sacrificing NexGen implant showed significantly better clinical results (p = 0.0005) and higher patient satisfaction while rehabilitation costs were lower (p = 0.003). While the clinical results remained unchanged, the revision rate after 5 years for the NexGen System was lower. Conclusion: Not only minimally invasive surgery, but also choosing the right type of implant may lead to better early as well as mid-term clinical results in primary total knee arthroplasty. This may also reduce total costs per patient in primary total knee arthroplasty
Erwiderung auf den Leserbrief von Georg Supp zur Arbeit D. Goebel und W. Schultz: Ambulante Physiotherapie in Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie: Kann der Erfolg überhaupt beurteilt werden? Z Orthop Unfall 2011; 149: 17–21
No full text- …
