937,531 research outputs found
Hedwig Geng Collection 1939-1970s
No full textThis collection consists of the papers of Hedwig Geng née Berg from her time as a forced laborer in Munich (1939-1942), her incarceration in Theresienstadt (1943-1945), and her eventual liberation. The bulk of the collection consists of personal correspondence with relatives living in England and with Luise Geng, Hedwig’s daughter who immigrated to the United States in 1940. Other correspondence includes letters by Hedwig Geng to Margarete Mühsam of the Leo Baeck Institute regarding her experiences.Hedwig Geng née Berg was born in Munich on April 23, 1891 to Moritz Berg and his wife Jeanette née Hirschmann. She married Karl Geng on April 2, 1917, and their daughter Luise was born in 1922. Hedwig Geng was deported to Theresienstadt in 1943. She returned to Munich in 1945 and immigrated to the United States in 1946, where she lived in Albuquerque, New Mexico. She died in May 1981.8 catalogue cards.Photographs removed to Photograph CollectionProcesseddigitizedSpies, Gerty; Levyn, Emmy; Vogl, Rudolf; Denk, Marianne; Kahn family ; Oppenheimer, Ernst ; Herzberg, Karl; Mühsam, Margaret T. ; Berg, Jeanette;
Pestalotiopsis licualacola K. Geng, Y.
No full textPestalotiopsis licualacola K. Geng, Y. Song, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis, sp. nov. (Fig. 2) MycoBank MB 803183 Type: — CHINA. Hainan Province: Xinglong County, Tropical Botanical Garden, living leaves of Licuala grandis, 8 March 2012, HGUP 4057, K. Geng, HGUPd4057, holotype! Differs from related Pestalotiopsis and Pestalosphaeria species mainly by its noticeably narrower, fusiform conidia with mostly a single apical appendage. Colonies on PDA attaining 7 cm diam. after 7 days at 25° C, with edge undulate, whitish, aerial mycelium on surface, fruiting bodies black, concentric; reverse of culture yellow to pale brown. Conidiophores most often indistinct. Conidiogenous cells discrete, hyaline, simple, filiform, 4–10 µm long. Conidia 16–20 × 3–5 µm (x = 17.4 × 3.9 µm), fusiform, straight to slightly curved, 4-septate, smooth, greyish brown; basal cell conical, hyaline, thin-walled, 2–4 µm long (x = 2.4 µm); with three median cells, dark brown, concolorous, septa and periclinal walls darker than the rest of the cell, together 9.5–12 µm long (x = 11 µm); second cell from base 2.7–4.2 µm (x = 3.6 µm); third cell 2.4–4 µm (x = 3.3 µm); fourth cell 2.5–3.8 µm (x = 3.2 µm); apical cell hyaline, conic to subcylindrical, 1.8–3.6 µm (x = 2.4 µm); with 1–3 tubular apical appendages (mostly 1) without knobs, arising from the apex of the apical cell, 4–9.5 µm long (x = 6.6 µm); basal appendage filiform, short. Etymology: —In reference to the host, Licuala grandis, from which this fungus was first isolated.Published as part of Geng, Kun, Zhang, Bin, Song, Yu, Hyde, Kevin D., Kang, Ji-Chuan & Wang, Yong, 2013, A new species of Pestalotiopsis from leaf spots of Licuala grandis from Hainan, China, pp. 49-54 in Phytotaxa 88 (3) on pages 51-52, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.88.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/507190
Gertrude Trudi Geng Cobb
No full textGertrude zTrudiy Geng Cobb quietly passed away June 18, 2015. The child of German immigrants, Trudi was born on Oct. 28, 1927, in Palo Alto where she lived throughout her life. Trudi earned her Associates of Art degree in merchandising from Lux College in San Francisco where she was the class valedictorian. She embraced her college years and the opportunity it brought her to work for the San Francisco department store, The White House. There she became the children's buyer making several trips to New York each year. During that time she met her husband W. Robert Cobb of Palo Alto. She worked for The White House until her first daughter, Joan, was born in 1956, followed in 1958 by her second daughter, Marian. Trudi remained busy in retail as well as volunteering for many organizations throughout the remainder of her life. Her family and friends were most important to her. Her warmth and wit will be missed. She is survived by her daughters, Joan Boodrookas of San Anselmo (husband Nick Boodrookas) and Marian Cobb of Palo Alto (husband Phil Fox) grandchildren, Alex Boodrookas of New York and Diane Boodrookas of San Anselmo sisters, Elizabeth zBettyy Cobb and Margaret zDollyy Kinsey and brother-in-law Harvey Cobb
Encarsia imiza Geng & Li 2017, sp. nov.
No full textEncarsia imiza Li & Geng, sp. nov. Figs 18–23 Type material. Holotype ♀ [on slide, NEFU]: CHINA, Liaoning Province, Anshan City, Qianshan Mountains, Gudaoguan, 19–21.IX.2015, Hui Geng, Xin-Yu Zhang, Ye Chen, YPT. Paratype. 1♀ [on slide, NEFU], CHINA, Liaoning Province, Fushun City, Yuanshuailin, 18.VI.2012, Hui Geng, Xiang-Xiang Jin, Jiang Liu, sweeping. Diagnosis. Female. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.58–0.66 mm. Head (Fig. 18) yellow with some brownish patches. Mesosoma (Fig. 20) mainly yellowish-brown with some pale yellow or brown patches. Metasoma (Fig. 20) pale yellow except petiole brown. Fore wing faintly infuscate behind submarginal and stigmal veins. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 8 or 10 setae; placoid sensilla on scutellum moderately separated (Fig. 20). Fore wing (Fig. 21) 2.38–2.52× as long as wide, marginal fringe 0.23–0.25× as long as wing width. Mid tibial spur 0.57–0.61× as long as corresponding basitarsus. Ovipositor hardly exerted, 0.77–0.79× as long as mid tibia; third valvula 0.34× as long as second valvifer. Description. Female. Holotype. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.58 mm. Head yellow except clypeus, malar sulcus, a spot on each side of occipital foramen, and postocellar bars brown. Antenna (Fig. 19) pale yellow. Mesosoma yellowish-brown except side lobe pale yellow; pronotum, anterior margin of mid lobe, a patch on expanded part of each side lobe, inner sides of axillae, and propodeum brown. Wings (Figs 21, 22) hyaline, fore wing with a faint infuscation behind submarginal and stigmal veins, veins pale brown. Legs yellow (Fig. 23). Metasoma pale yellow except petiole brown. Head (Fig. 18) wider than mesosoma. Stemmaticum with transversely rugose sculpture. Mandible with two teeth and a truncation. Radicle (R), scape (S), pedicel (P) and 6 flagellomeres with the following ratios of length to width: R: 2.62, S: 4, P: 1.5, F1: 1.83, F2: 2.09, F3: 2.23, F4: 2.04, F5: 1.85 and F6: 1.92; relative lengths of R–F6 to length of F1: R: 1.03, S: 2.79, P: 1.03, F1: 1.00, F2: 1.33, F3: 1.42, F4: 1.48, F5: 1.45, and F6: 1.39; flagellomeres with the following numbers of longitudinal sensilla: F1: 0, F2: 1, F3: 2, F4: 3, F5: 3, F6: 3. Mesosoma 0.79× as long as metasoma (Fig. 20). Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 8 setae, each side lobe of mesoscutum with 3 setae. Distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum 4.89× maximum width of a sensillum. Distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae equal to distance between posterior pair. Fore wing (Fig. 21) 2.52× as long as wide, costal cell with 7 short setae, basal cell with 10 setae, marginal vein with 6 setae along anterior margin; marginal fringe 0.25× as long as wing width. Mid tibial spur 0.57× as long as corresponding basitarsus, and the latter 0.37× as long as mid tibia. Hind tibia 0.96× as long as mid tibia. Metasoma (Fig. 20) with petiole distinctly sculptured. T2–T7 with 1+1, 1+1, 1+1, 6, 1+4+1 (4 between cercal plates) and 4 setae, respectively. Ovipositor slightly exerted, apparently originating from base of T4, 0.79× as long as mid tibia, and 0.58× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined. Third valvula 0.34× as long as second valvifer. Male. Unknown. Host. Unknown. Variation. Sole paratype more infuscate on metasoma: T1 anteriorly, T5 completely, and T6 anteriorly brown; mid lobe of mesoscutum with 10 setae. Etymology. The specific name is an anagram of azimi, a similar species in this genus. Comments. Encarsia imiza resembles E. azimi Hayat in having similar body colour and the presence of internal sculpture in the cells forming the reticulation on the thoracic dorsum, but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: occiput largely yellow except for a brownish patch on each side of foramen (vs occiput completely brownish); mesosoma largely brownish-yellow (vs brown); all legs yellowish (vs fore and hind coxae brown basally); ovipositor 0.56–0.58× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined (vs 0.76×); gaster pale yellow (vs pale yellow with T1 across base dark brown).Published as part of Geng, Hui & Li, Cheng-De, 2017, Three new species of the Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) species group from China with a key to Chinese species, pp. 208-222 in Zootaxa 4306 (2) on page 215, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4306.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/84373
Encarsia dongbeiana Geng & Li 2017, sp. nov.
No full textEncarsia dongbeiana Li & Geng, sp. nov. Figs 2–17 Type material. Holotype. ♀ [on slide, NEFU]: CHINA, Liaoning Province, Anshan City, Qianshan Mountains, Xianrentai, 20.IX.2015, Hui Geng, Xin-Yu Zhang, Ye Chen, sweeping. Paratypes. 1♀, 1♂ [on slides, NEFU], same data as holotype; 4♀, 4♂ [on slides, NEFU], CHINA, Heilongjiang Province, Mudanjiang City, Heixiazigou, 26.VIII.2015, Hui Geng, Yan Gao, Zhi-Guang Wu, sweeping; 1♀, 2♂ [on slides, NEFU], CHINA, Jilin Province, Wangqing County, Daxingou Town, Longshui Village, 24.VIII.2015, Hui Geng, Yan Gao, Zhi-Guang Wu, sweeping. Diagnosis. Female. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.57–0.71 mm. Head mainly yellow with postocellar bars dark brown and two short oblique bands above occipital foramen brown (Figs 2, 3). Mesosoma and metasoma entirely dark yellow with only pronotum pale brown. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 8 or 9 setae; placoid sensilla on scutellum moderately separated (Fig. 7). Fore wing (Fig. 5) 2.52–2.74× as long as wide, marginal fringe 0.26–0.3× as long as wing width. Mid tibial spur 0.54–0.62× as long as corresponding basitarsus (Fig. 8). Ovipositor slightly exerted, about as long as mid tibia; third valvula 0.40–0.46× as long as second valvifer (Fig. 9). Male. Mostly brown with some paler parts. Antenna with last two flagellomeres partly fused (Fig. 12). Genitalia 0.75–0.84× as long as mid tibia. Description. Female. Holotype. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.61 mm. Head yellow except postocellar bars dark brown and two short oblique bands above occipital foramen brown. Antenna (Fig. 4) dark yellow with radicle and scape pale yellow and distal flagellomere brown. Mesosoma and metasoma entirely dark yellow with only pronotum pale brown. Wings (Figs 5, 6) including venation hyaline. Legs completely yellow. Head (cf. Fig. 2), as wide as mesosoma in dorsal view. Ocelli forming about an obtuse triangle, POL<OOL. Stemmaticum (cf. Fig. 3) with transversely rugose sculpture. Mandible with two teeth and a truncation (cf. Fig. 2). Radicle (R), scape (S), pedicel (P), and 6 flagellomeres with the following ratios of length to width: R: 2.91, S: 3.59, P: 1.55, F1: 1.78, F2: 2.1, F3: 2.2, F4: 1.96, F5: 1.74 and F6: 1.83; relative lengths of R–F6 to length of F1: R: 1.00, S: 2.63, P: 0.88, F1: 1.00, F2: 1.25, F3: 1.38, F4: 1.38, F5: 1.25, and F6: 1.31; flagellomeres with the following numbers of longitudinal sensilla: F1: 1, F2: 2, F3: 2, F4: 3, F5: 3, F6: 3. Mesosoma 0.68× as long as metasoma. Mid lobe of mesoscutum (Fig. 7) with 9 setae, each side lobe of mesoscutum with 3 setae. Distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum approximately 4.4× maximum width of a sensillum. Distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae 1.64× distance between posterior pair. Fore wing (Fig. 5) 2.59× as long as wide, costal cell with 10 short setae, basal cell with 6 setae, marginal vein with 6 setae along anterior margin; marginal fringe 0.27 × as long as wing width. Mid tibial spur 0.58× as long as corresponding basitarsus, the latter 0.38× as long as mid tibia. Hind tibia 1.04× as long as mid tibia (Fig.8). Metasoma (Fig. 9) with petiole (Fig. 10) sculptured. T2–T7 with 1+1, 1+1, 1+1, 2+2, 1+4+1 (4 between cercal plates) and 4 setae, respectively. Ovipositor (Fig. 9) slightly exerted, apparently originating from base of T3, 1.03× as long as mid tibia, and 0.75× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined. Third valvula 0.46× as long as second valvifer. Male. Essentially similar to female, differing mainly in colour, antennal structure and genitalia. Head (Fig. 11) yellow except malar sulcus infuscate, a stripe at level of occipital foramen brown, and postocellar bars dark brown. Mesosoma (Fig. 13) largely yellow with pronotum, mid lobe of mesoscutum anteriorly and mediolongitudinally, axillae and propodeum brown. Metasoma brown to dark brown with T6 posteriorly and T7 yellow. Antenna (Fig. 12) dark brown with abundant longitudinal sensilla on all flagellomeres, last two flagellomeres partly fused. Genitalia (Fig. 17) 0.75–0.84× as long as mid tibia. Host. Unknown. Variation. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.57–0.71 mm. Antenna dark yellow to yellowish-brown. Mesosoma and metasoma entirely dark yellow with pronotum, cercal plates and ovipositor stylet apically brown or pale brown. F1 0.94–1.14× as long as pedicel, without or with 1 longitudinal sensillum. Fore wing 2.52– 2.74× as long as wide, marginal fringe 0.26–0.3× as long as wing width. Basal cell with 6–10 setae. Marginal vein usually with 6 or 7 (rarely 5 or 8) long setae along anterior margin. Ovipositor 0.99–1.09× as long as mid tibia, and 0.72–0.79× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined. Third valvula 0.4–0.46× as long as second valvifer. Etymology. dongbei = the Chinese word for northeast; and refers to the distribution of the species in the northeastern part of China. Comments. E. dongbeiana is similar to E. aferi Schmidt & Polaszek in having the head and body mostly yellowish, but differs from the latter in: mesosoma and metasoma with only pronotum brownish (vs with some brownish patches on mesosoma, petiole and faint transverse band on T1); marginal fringe of fore wing 0.26– 0.3× as long as wing width (vs 0.2–0.21×); distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae 1.4–1.64× distance between posterior pair (vs 1×); ovipositor 0.99–1.09× as long as mid tibia (vs 0.85–0.91×); third valvula 0.4– 0.46× as long as second valvifer (vs 0.3–0.33). Encarsia dongbeiana also resembles those E. melanostoma Polaszek & Hernández with a completely yellow metasoma (colouration variable in melanostoma as noted in original description), but differs from the latter in different antennal formula, 1,1,4,2 (vs 1,1,3,3), presence of internal sculpture in the cells forming reticulation on mesoscutum (vs absent), pale clypeus and malar sulcus (vs dark) and more distantly placed anterior pair of scutellar setae than that between posterior pair, 1.4–1.64× (vs 0.8–1.1×).Published as part of Geng, Hui & Li, Cheng-De, 2017, Three new species of the Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) species group from China with a key to Chinese species, pp. 208-222 in Zootaxa 4306 (2) on pages 210-211, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4306.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/84373
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Encarsia hayati Li & Geng, sp. nov.
No full textEncarsia hayati Li & Geng, sp. nov. Figs 9–16 Type material. Holotype. ♀ [on slide], (NEFU), CHINA, Jiangxi Province, Shangrao City, Wuyishan Protection Station, 780m, 2.VII. 2013, Chao Zhang, sweeping. Paratype. 1♀ [on slide], CHINA, Hubei Province, Suizhou City, Santan, 14. VIII. 2015, Hui Geng, Yan Gao, Zhi-Guang Wu, sweeping. (NEFU). Diagnosis. Female. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.49–0.51 mm. Body pale yellow except clypeus, malar sulcus and postocellar bars brown. Antennal formula 1:1:3:3. F1 and F2 without longitudinal sensilla. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 4 setae; each side lobe and axilla with 1 seta; placoid sensilla on scutellum narrowly separated; distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae distinctly less than that between posterior pair. Fore wing 3.35–3.49× as long as wide, sparsely setose, with a large asetose area around stigmal vein; marginal fringe 0.88–0.89× as long as wing width. Tarsal formula 5:4:5. Mid tibial spur 0.70–0.76× as long as corresponding basitarsus. Petiole with sculpture laterally. Ovipositor slightly exerted, 1.15–1.19× as long as mid tibia; third valvula 0.35–0.36× as long as second valvifer. Description. Female. Holotype. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.51 mm. Head and body including ovipositor and legs pale yellow except clypeus, malar sulcus and postocellar bars brown. Antennae yellow except last two segments slightly brown. Wings hyaline, venation pale brown. Head (Fig. 9), in frontal view, 1.77× as wide as high, and about as wide as mesosoma. Ocelli forming about an obtuse triangle, POL distinctly less than OOL. Maxillary and labial palpi 1-segmented. Mandibles with two teeth and a truncation. Eyes with fine and transparent setae. Frontovertex with short setae. Antennal formula, 1:1:3:3 (Fig. 10); radicle (R), scape (S), pedicel (P), 3 funicle segments (F1–F3) and 3 club segments (F4–F6) with the following ratios of length to width: R: 2.00, S: 4.05, P: 1.47, F1: 1.40, F2: 2.00, F3: 1.89, F4: 1.65, F5: 1.70 and F6: 2.33; relative lengths of segments R–F6 to length of F1: R: 1.15, S: 3.68, P: 1.61, F1: 1.00, F2: 1.61, F3: 1.95, F4: 1.90, F5: 1.95 and F6: 2.41; flagellum with the following numbers of longitudinal sensilla: F1: 0, F2: 0, F3: 2, F4: 3, F5: 3, F6: 3. Mesosoma (Fig. 11) 0.61× as long as metasoma. Mid lobe of mesoscutum and axillae weakly reticulate. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 4 setae, each side lobe of mesoscutum with 1 seta. Axilla with 1 short seta. Scutellum 1.94× as wide as long, and 0.75× as long as mid lobe of mesoscutum. Distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum about own maximum width. Anterior pair of scutellar setae clearly shorter than posterior pair, and distance between anterior pair 0.7× that between posterior pair. Endophragma long and rounded at apex, extending to posterior margin of T1. Fore wing (Fig. 12) 3.49× as long as wide, sparsely setose, with a large asetose area around stigmal vein; costal cell with 4 short setae in basal half; basal cell with 2 setae, with proximal one distinctly shorter; submarginal vein with 2 setae; marginal vein 1.38× as long as submarginal vein, with 5 setae along anterior margin; marginal fringe 0.89× as long as wing width. Hind wing 8× as long as wide, marginal fringe 1.84× as long as wing width. Tarsal formula 5:4:5, mid leg with last two tarsal segments fused but indicated by a transverse suture (Fig. 13). Mid tibial spur 0.7× as long as corresponding basitarsus (Fig. 13), and the latter 0.34× as long as mid tibia. Hind tibia 0.99× as long as mid tibia. Metasoma with petiole (Fig. 15) sculptured laterally. T1–T5 with scale-like reticulation laterally. T2–T7 with 1+1, 1+1, 1+1, 2+2, 1+2+1 and 4 setae, respectively. T7 1.56× as wide as long. Ovipositor (Fig. 16) not exerted, apparently originating from middle of T3, 1.19× as long as mid tibia, and 0.89× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined. Third valvula 0.36× as long as second valvifer. Male. Unknown. Host. Unknown. Variation. Sole paratype with antennal F2 1.41× as long as wide, F3 1.63× as long as wide and with 2 longitudinal sensilla; fore wing with 4 setae along anterior margin; hind tibia 1.04× as long as mid tibia. Other characters the same as holotype. Etymology. This species is named in honor of Prof. Mohammad Hayat (Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh, India) for his contributions to the study of Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea. Comments. Mid tarsal structure of E. hayati is similar to that of the foregoing new species (see also comments under E. dianensis). Placement to species-group of this new species is uncertain. Among the species with a 5:4:5 tarsal formula and fore wing with a clear asetose area around the stigmal vein (meghalayana - and cubensis -group), E. hayati is unique by having a completely yellow body, and narrowly separated placoid sensilla on the scutellum. This species is closely related to E. dianensis based on similar structures of the mid tarsi, body color, and shape and characters of the fore wing, but can be separated from the latter by the differences given in the key and the comments under E. dianensis.Published as part of Geng, Hui & Li, Cheng-De, 2016, Five new species of genus Encarsia Förster from China (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), pp. 535-549 in Zootaxa 4162 (3) on pages 540-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4162.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/25468
Encarsia yunnana Li & Geng, sp. nov.
No full textEncarsia yunnana Li & Geng, sp. nov. Figs 31–38 Type material. Holotype. ♀ [on slide], (NEFU), CHINA, Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, Tengchong County, Yinghe Village, 1820m, 17–19. VII. 2012, Xiang-Xiang Jin, Hui Geng, Chao Zhang, YPT. Paratypes. 3♀ [on slides], same data as holotype. (NEFU). Diagnosis. Female. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.5–0.66 mm. Ocelli forming a right to slightly obtuse triangle. POL distinctly less than OOL. Mandible with two teeth and a truncation. Maxillary and labial palpi 1- segmented. Antennal formula 1:1:4:2. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 2 setae; each side lobe with 2 setae; axilla with 1 seta; distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum approximately 2–4× maximum width of a sensillum; distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae about equal to that between posterior pair. Fore wing 3.21–3.36× as long as wide, with an asetose area around stigmal vein; marginal fringe 0.67–0.8× as long as wing width. Tarsal formula 5:5:5. Mid tibial spur 0.88–0.97× as long as corresponding basitarsus. Petiole with sculpture laterally. T7 2.52–2.6× as wide as long. Ovipositor not or hardly exerted, 0.93–1.1× as long as mid tibia; third valvula 0.36– 0.4× as long as second valvifer. Description. Female. Holotype. Length, mesosoma plus metasoma, 0.66 mm. Head and body pale yellow except pronotum brown, petiole, T1 and T4–6 with very faint brownish bands. Ovipositor yellow. Antennae pale yellow. Fore wing hyaline, venation pale except stigmal vein mostly and base of submarginal vein slightly infuscate. Hind wing hyaline. Legs pale yellow. Head (Fig. 31) a little broader than mesosoma. Frontovertex 0.67× as broad as head width. Eyes with fine and transparent setae. Ocelli forming about a right triangle, POL distinctly less than OOL. Stemmaticum with reticulate sculpture. Mandible (Fig. 31) weakly dentate, with two teeth and a truncation. Maxillary and labial palpi 1- segmented. Antennae inserted at level of lower margin of eyes. Antennal formula, 1:1:4:2 (Fig. 32); radicle (R), scape (S), pedicel (P), 4 funicle segments (F1–F4) and 2 club segments (F5–F6) with the following ratios of length to width: R: 2.20, S: 4.13, P:1.44, F1: 1.83, F2: 2.42, F3: 1.88, F4: 1.75, F5: 1.73 and F6: 1.86; relative lengths of segments R–F6 to length of F1: R: 1.00, S: 3.00, P: 1.24, F1: 1.00, F2: 1.32, F3: 1.36, F4: 1.59, F5: 1.64 and F6: 1.90; flagellum with the following numbers of longitudinal sensilla: F1: 0, F2: 1, F3: 1, F4: 3, F5: 3, F6: 3. Mesosoma (cf. Fig. 33) 0.75× as long as metasoma. Mid lobe of mesoscutum and axillae indistinctly reticulate. Mid lobe of mesoscutum with 2 setae near posterior margin, each side lobe with 2 setae. Axilla with 1 seta. Scutellum 2.08× as wide as long, and 0.62× as long as mid lobe. Distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum approximately 4× maximum width of a sensillum. Anterior pair of scutellar setae distinctly shorter and thinner than posterior pair, and distance between anterior pair 0.92× that between posterior pair. Endophragma rounded at apex, extending to anterior margin of T2. Fore wing (Fig. 34) 3.3× as long as wide, with a small asetose area around stigmal vein; costal cell with 4 short setae in basal half; basal cell with 2 setae; submarginal vein with 2 setae; marginal vein 1.26× as long as submarginal vein, with 4 setae along anterior margin; marginal fringe 0.67× as long as wing width. Hind wing (Fig. 35) 7.69× as long as wide, marginal fringe 1.54× as long as wing width. Tarsal formula 5:5:5. Mid tibial spur 0.92× as long as corresponding basitarsus (Fig. 36), and the latter 0.28× as long as mid tibia. Hind tibia as long as mid tibia. Metasoma (Fig. 37) with petiole (Fig. 38) sculptured laterally. T1–T4 with scale-like reticulation laterally. T2– T7 with 1+1, 1+1, 1+1, 2+2, 1+2+1 and 4 setae, respectively. T7 2.59× as wide as long. Ovipositor not or hardly exerted, apparently originating from anterior margin of T4, 1.05× as long as mid tibia, and 0.83× as long as mid tibia and basitarsus combined. Third valvula 0.37× as long as second valvifer. Male. Unknown. Host. Unknown. Variation. Antennal segment F3 with 1–2 longitudinal sensilla. Distance between placoid sensilla on scutellum approximately 2–4× maximum width of a sensillum. Axillae completely yellow (slightly brownish at apex in one paratype). Marginal vein of fore wing with 4 or 5 (in one paratype with 6–8) setae along anterior margin. In one paratype, 1 seta present at apex of stigmal vein of fore wing. Etymology. The specific name is derived from the collection locality name. Comments. This new species is placed in the E. parvella- group as defined by Polaszek & Gill (2011), except for the host being unknown, in having all tarsi 5-segmented, fore wing with an asetose area around the stigmal vein, marginal fringe of the fore wing not longer than the wing width, and each side lobe of the mesoscutum with 2 setae. However, it is easily separated from all the species of the group by the following combination of characters: only 2 setae on the mid lobe of the mesoscutum, relatively densely setose fore wing disc, laterally sculptured petiole, and relatively short third valvula (less than 0.5× second valvifer). Encarsia yunnana resembles E. gerlingi Viggiani (1989) in similar body color, antennal structure, similar shape, setation, pigmentation on venation of the fore wing, and relatively short third valvulae, but is distinguished from the latter by: mid lobe of mesoscutum with 2 setae (vs 8 setae), marginal fringe of fore wing relatively long, 0.67–0.80× as long as wing width (vs shorter than half of wing width), and distance between anterior pair of scutellar setae about equal to that between posterior pair (vs distinctly shorter).Published as part of Geng, Hui & Li, Cheng-De, 2016, Five new species of genus Encarsia Förster from China (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), pp. 535-549 in Zootaxa 4162 (3) on pages 546-548, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4162.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/25468
Pegohylemyia flavibellula Deng, Geng & Liu
No full textflavibellula Deng, Geng & Liu in Deng et al., 1995b: 58 (Pegohylemyia). Paratype male with labels: (1) handwritten on white label: “Xicen / 93.7.18”; (2) printed on yellow label: “ PARATYPE ”; (3) printed with handwritten inscriptions on white label: “ Pegohylemyia / flavibellula / Identifier: Anxiao Deng ”; (4) printed with handwritten inscriptions on red label: “ PARATYPE / Botanophila / flavibellula / (Deng, Geng et Liu) ”. Preservation: pinned. Missing parts: right mid leg. Paratype male with labels: (1) handwritten on white label: “Hongshibao / 93.7.18”; (2) printed on yellow label: “ PARATYPE ”; (3) printed with handwritten inscriptions on white label: “ Pegohylemyia / flavibellula / Identifier: Anxiao Deng ”; (4) printed with handwritten inscriptions on red label: “ PARATYPE / Botanophila / flavibellula / (Deng, Geng et Liu) ”. Preservation: pinned; right fore leg mounted on the first label. Additional notes: Paratype collected by Anxiao Deng, Lin Gen and Ling Li. Current name: Botanophila flavibellula (Deng, Geng & Liu, 1995).Published as part of ZHANG, XUFENG & ZHU, WEIBING, 2014, The types of Anthomyiidae (Diptera) in the Shanghai Entomological Museum, Chinese Academy of Science, China, pp. 1-67 in Zootaxa 3756 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3756.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/503313
- …
