379 research outputs found

    Smart Governance and COVID-19 Control in Wuhan, China

    No full text
    In dealing with the global COVID-19 pandemic, China has achieved reasonable success in governing COVID-19 within two months with the help of technologies. This study specifically focuses on how these massive technologies have been implemented to facilitate the smart governance of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. By discursively analyzing existing data from multiple sources, the results obtained in this chapter show that the real ‘smartness’ of the smart governance of COVID-19 in Wuhan is the innovative use of technologies to develop different types of governance approaches to control COVID-19 in an effective and targeted way. As the pandemic continues to evolve worldwide, lessons learned from Wuhan, China can be beneficial to other countries in different institutional contexts to build their own, context-specific governance for controlling the pandemic

    Morton M. Smith important dates prepared November 1, 2002, Stan Smith (703) 289-1230

    No full text
    Chronology of Morton M. Smith's professional career, prepared by Stan Smith, from various sources. Also includes a list of the people Smith worked with, as well as a collection of anecdotes about Smith, as told by the people who knew him.Morton M. Smith Important Dates Prepared November 1, 2002 Stan Smith (703) 289-1230 1949 – Made a member of Louisiana Nu Chapter of Xi Sigma Pi (National Forestry/Natural Resource Honor Society) 1949 – Made a member of Louisiana Chapter of Alpha Zeta (Professional Fraternity of Agriculture) 1950 – B.S. (Forestry) from Louisiana State University 1951 – M.S. (Game Management) from Louisiana State University 1951 (July) to 1953 (July) – Assistant Waterfowl Study Leader, Louisiana Fisheries & Wildlife Commission. Supervisor was Richard Yancey. Based in Ferriday, LA. Served as assistant to Yancey on Waterfowl Research Project 17-R and 29-R under Pittman Robertson Section. Work consisted of research and surveys of Louisiana waterfowl populations. Duties required 200 hours flight time per year as an observer. Work conducted statewide. 1953 (April 23) – Notification of Assignment Upon Entry into Active Military Service (“Having accepted a commission as a second lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve through the Air Force Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program, you are being ordered into active military service and assigned to 1912th Airways and Air Communication Service Squadron, Olmstead Air Force Base, Pennsylvania.” /s/ Samuel E. Barger, Major, USAF, Acting Air Adj Gen.). 1953 (July 3) – Entered Active Duty. Served as a personnel officer, primarily at Scott Field, Illinois. Served as Squadron Personnel Officer and Adjutant for two years. Responsible for all administrative phases of squadron operation, including records, personnel assignments and squadron maintenance. 1954 (March 4) – Promoted to first lieutenant. 1955 (July) – Honorable discharge from USAF. 1955 (July) to 1957 (July) – Biologist II, Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Commission. Supervisor was John Newsom. Based in Alexandria, LA. Responsible for wildlife management and development practices carried on in the Commission’s District III under various Pittman Robertson projects. Also was responsible for fish and game work in District III. 1957 (July) to 1962 (December) – Biologist II, Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Commission. Supervisor was Robert Murray (Research Supervisor). Returned to research as a Waterfowl Study Leader. Responsible for all research under Pittman Robertson Project W29R. Duties required travel statewide. One phase of work required 250 hours of flight time/year as an observer. Late 1950’s – Conducted aerial surveys (along with fellow Louisiana biologist Clark Hoffpauir) in the aftermath of Hurricane Audrey indicating a sudden population jump in certain species wintering in Louisiana. (Source: Flyways: Pioneering Waterfowl Management in North America, Arthur S. Hawkins, et al., Editors, U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1984, page 448.) Late 1950’s to Early 1960’s – Participated in annual workshops of technical committees of the flyway councils to discuss agency contributions to waterfowl management programs of the flyway. (Source: Flyways, at page 382, pictured attending meeting of Mississippi Flyway waterfowl technicians held at Louisiana’s Rockefeller Refuge.) Early 1960’s – Flew aerial transect surveys over inland and coastal marshes with other state waterfowl biologists. (Source: Flyways, at page 446.) 1962 (January 4) – Career-Conditional Appointment as Wildlife Biologist (Management/Airplane Pilot) for Bureau’s Division of Wildlife, Branch of Management and Enforcement, Atlanta, Georgia (Pos. No. 4-3213-1). 1964 – Contributor, U.S. Department of the Interior’s Waterfowl Tomorrow (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1964); “Ducks in Dixie” with John L. Sincock, and John J. Lynch (at page 99-106). 1967 – Attended meeting of management biologists at Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. (Source: Flyways, at picture at page 260, caption at page 261.) ~1968 (January) – Appointed Assistant Branch Chief, Division of Management and Enforcement’s Branch of Management, and reassigned from Atlanta to Washington, D.C. 1968 (February) to 1969 (September) – Citation for Outstanding Performance for, among other things, “field administration and supervision of summer waterfowl surveys and banding program in the United States and Canada.” 1970 (April 13) – Special Achievement Award “for Superior Service” to the Bureau’s Division of Management and Enforcement. 1971 (February) – Cited for a Quality Performance Award for “continuing high level performance” with the Bureau’s Division of Management and Enforcement. ~mid-1970’s-1980’s – At Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, supervising Branch of Surveys. (Source: Letter, dated March 9, 1990 from Thomas J. Dwyer, Chief, Office of Migratory Bird Management, on the occasion of retirement.)1 1 I have not yet located Dad’s personnel files for the year ~1972-1990. They would probably provide more details about specific work assignments than I have been able to provide here. 1990 (May 1) – Retirement. Retired as Assistant Director – [Refuges] & Wildlife, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. (Branch Chief, Surveys and Operations) Logged 7,000+ hours as a pilot for FWS. (Source: Interview with Mark Madison, FWS Historian, conducted March 29, 1999.) Worked with (among others): Vern Stotts Don Frickie William Vogel Patricia Holt Keith A. Morehouse Ken Gamble Jim Bartonek Jerry Serie Skip Ladd David E. Sharp Harvey K. Nelson David L. Hall Gene Wood Henry Reeves John P. Rogers George Brakhage Dick Pospahala Bob Blohm Brad Bortner Sean Kelly Arthur Brazda Dick Bauer Jerome Stoudt Arthur S. Hawkins Jerry Pospichal Douglas S. Benning Bill Larned Robert L. Jessen K. Duane Norman Fred Roetker Vic Hamer H. W. Heusmann Matthew C. Perry Leon Kirkland Fairfax H. Settle Bob Trost John Tautin Bruce Conant Frank Bowers Judy Bladen Jim Bredy Sam Carney Liz Cummings Dave Dolton Mike Elkins Greg Essinger Fred Fiehrer Ken Gamble Paul Geissler Jim Goldsberry Mary Lou Hill Larry Jahn Kathy Klimkiewicz Phil Koscheka Fant Martin Harvey Miller Barbara Moore Jim Nichols Al Novara Pete Poulous Jim Price Ron Reynolds Bunny Siran Bob Smith Rollie Sparrowe Tom Taylor Roy Tomlinson Dave Trauger Jim Voelzer Ken Williams Dr. Fred Glover Kahler Martinson Ross Hanson Dick Yancey Jake Chamberlain C. Lostetter W. Crissey J. Smith G. Jensen D. Purinton D. Combs K. Baer Harry Hansen A Weinrich R. Mackay K. Vermeer K. Norman E. Wellein R. Buller R. Slattery P. Smith R. Martinson Don Smith Maury Lundy David Anderson Anecdotes (Source: Morton M. Smith Retirement File, 1990) • [Author not named]: “I really believe Mort’s favorite air-machine was the DeHavilland ‘Speedster’ or Beaver. Seriously, when it came to multiple use or being capable of handling many tasks, it was by far the best bush craft I ever flew. It had one unredeeming feature however – it was slower than the second coming of the ‘Big Man’ – in fact, it was the only aircraft I knew of that a tailwind wouldn’t help. I had several affectionate adjectives for the machine and I used to relate to Mort about the ‘Speedster’s’ inability to develop much forward motion. I believe he took this bitching with a grain of salt – until he drove it himself for awhile. Finally, after a long summer, he called and said I was probably right; ‘it probably wouldn’t go much over 100 miles per hour coming straight down.’” • Vern Stotts: Some of his greatest thoughts and lessons for me were: a. “I could hit these seaducks more often if they tasted better,” meant that with practice one can rationalize anything. b. When he said, “We can get this 206 off the water in less than 1 minute when everyone is down to their high school weight,” it translated into don’t stuff rocks in your personal kit to take home as souvenirs. c. After a clapper rail hunting trip to the Eastern Short of Virginia, he remarked, “We should shoot these critters only with a singleshot, 4-10 pistol fired with the left hand after a cross-draw”, meaning that modern equipment can take away the thrill of a full bag. d. And, finally, after a perfect 2-point landing, he stressed that, “We can be happy that we didn’t do it the other way around and land with our wheels down on the water”, teaching me the hows, whys, whens, and beauty of a personal checklist. • Bob Blohm: Of course, Mort, your red station wagon was legendary at the [Patuxent Wildlife Research] center and how many Monday lunchtime discussions focused on your weekend activities with your son to prepare the vehicle for the next week’s drive. And, your love of doughnuts (particularly stale ones, at least 3-4 weeks old) and old hunting clothes (the more holes and dangling threads, the better) is known far and wide. • Art Hawkins: After you joined the FWS Airforce it was fun getting together with you, Don Smith, Maury Lundy and others to compare notes. You were unique among most of the pilots listed above in that you were completely interchangeable between ground and air duty. In fact, on days when you couldn’t fly, for one reason or another, you joined the guys in the trenches, of your own free will. … One thing for sure, I never worked with anyone I’ve enjoyed working with more, whether in the Louisiana marshes or on the Canadian Prairies, whether at wing bees or Tech meetings. Your cheerful attitude and dedication to duty made the job easier. • John Tautin: I still recall my first months with FWS in 1974 and being assigned to a duck banding station in Alberta. My first flight in FWS aircraft was when you flew me from Saskatoon to Brooks to meet up with the banding crew. We (you) had to make a tough landing in a crosswind on sod. It went well, and I still recall being impressed and thinking that this pilot has the right stuff. I went on to learn that the other pilots, our flyway biologists, were also fine biologists and good, safe pilots. You deserve a lot of credit for that, having been in charge of that operation. Being in charge as Branch Chief, Surveys and Operations, is how I most often think of you. You have been one of the best managers I have seen, fair and honest with people, managing to get the job done well with limited resources, and firm and decisive when need be on issues and problems. I learned a lot from you that helps me now that I am in charge of [the Bird Banding Laboratory]

    Introduction

    No full text
    This book is a selection of the best papers presented at the CUPUM conference at Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland in June 2021. CUPUM stands for Computational Urban Planning and Urban Management and is a once every two years conference, held somewhere in the world. This chapter is the introductory chapter to this book. It introduces the title and central theme of the book: ‘Urban Informatics and Future Cities’. Therein, three cross cutting themes can be identified: big data, disasters and resiliance, and walkability and tourism. Besides, the chapter provides an overview of the content of the volume by presenting briefly each of its consituting chapters, their titles and authors and their main content. In total 30 chapters have been included in this volume

    Author Correction: Ultra-thin enzymatic liquid membrane for CO2 separation and capture

    No full text
    The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Stanley S. Chou, which was incorrectly given as Stan Chou. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.</jats:p

    Less is More? Evaluating Technical Aspects and User Experiences of Smart Flood Risk Assessment Tools

    No full text
    In light of several recent large-scale flooding events worldwide, the urgency of involving residents in the flood risk management debate is growing. However, this has so far proven to be problematic, mainly because of lacking or ineffective communication between stakeholders. One way to better involve residents in the flood risk management debate is by developing smart applications, dedicated to facilitate and increase the insights of residents into the flood risk and vulnerability of their private properties. However, what is lacking thus far is a systematic evaluation of the technical aspects and the user experiences of such tools. The goal of this article is to explore and evaluate the technical, analytical, and communicative qualities of smart flood risk assessment tools. To this end, a new smart application named FLOODLABEL is used, aiming to inform residents of flood-prone areas about potential flood risks and associated protection measures of their dwellings. Based on this, the article concludes that a smart application like FLOODLABEL can be beneficial for informing residents about flood risks and potential protection measures. However, it also shows that a one-size-fits-all approach is not suitable for informing residents on flood risks, inter alia because how residents perceive risks is not homogeneous. This research is therefore just the first step towards a more systematic evaluation method of smart applications

    AMS with light nuclei at small accelerators

    No full text

    The dX(t)=Xb(X)dt+Xσ(X)dWdX(t)=Xb(X)dt+X\sigma(X)dW equation and financial mathematics. I

    No full text
    summary:The existence of a weak solution and the uniqueness in law are assumed for the equation, the coefficients bb and σ\sigma being generally C(R+)C({\mathbb{R}}^+)-progressive processes. Any weak solution XX is called a (b,σ)(b,\sigma )-stock price and Girsanov Theorem jointly with the DDS Theorem on time changed martingales are applied to establish the probability distribution μσ\mu _\sigma of XX in C(R+)C({\mathbb{R}}^+) in the special case of a diffusion volatility σ(X,t)=σ~(X(t)).\sigma (X,t)=\tilde{\sigma }(X(t)). A martingale option pricing method is presented

    Smart Urban Governance for Climate Change Adaptation

    No full text
    Climate change will affect the way cities work substantially. Flooding and urban heating are among the most tangible consequences in cities around the globe. Extreme hydro-meteorological events will likely increase in the future due to climate change. Making cities climate-resilient is therefore an urgent challenge to sustain urban living. To adapt cities to the consequences of climate change, new ideas and concepts need to be adopted. This oftentimes requires action from different stakeholder groups and citizens. In other words, climate adaptation of cities needs governance. Facilitating such urban governance for climate adaptation is thus a big and increasing challenge of urban planning. Smart tools and its embedding in smart urban governance is promising to help in this respect. To what extent can the use of digital knowledge technologies in a collaborative planning setting be instrumental in facilitating climate adaptation? This question entails visualising effects of climate adaptation interventions and facilitating dialogue between governments, businesses such as engineering companies, and citizens. The aim of this thematic issue is to explore how the application of technologies in urban planning, embedded in smart urban governance, can contribute to provide climate change adaptation. We understand smart urban governance in this context both in terms of disclosing technical expert information to the wider public, and in terms of supporting with the help of technologies the wider governance debates between the stakeholders involved. The contributions reflect this dual focus on socio-technical innovations and planning support, and therefore include various dimensions, from modelling and interacting to new modes of urban governance and political dimensions of using technologies in climate change adaptation in urban areas
    corecore