1,721,144 research outputs found

    Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Primary Operation for Morbid Obesity: Experience with 200 Patients

    Full text link
    Introduction. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) represents a valid option for morbid obesity, either as a primary or as a staged procedure. The aim of this paper is to report the experience of a single surgeon with LSG as a standalone operation for morbid obesity. Methods. From April 2006 to April 2011, 200 patients underwent LSG for morbid obesity. Each patient record was registered and prospectively collected. In July 2011, a retrospective analysis was conducted. Results. Patients were 128 females and 72 males with a median age of 40.0 years. Median pre-operative BMI was 49.4 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 27.2 months. Median post-operative BMI was 30.4 kg/m2. Median %excess weight loss (%EWL) was 63.6%. Median post-operative hospital stay was 4.0 days in the first 84 cases and 3.0 days in the last 116 cases. Six major post-operative complications occurred (3%): two gastric stump leaks (1%), three major bleedings (1.5%) and 1 (0.5%) bowel obstruction. One case of mortality was registered (0.5%). To date only 4 patients are still in the range of morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2). Conclusions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a formidable operation in the short-term period. Median %EWL in this series was 63.6% at 27.2 months follow-up

    Hand-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic resection

    No full text
    The extent of reported laparoscopic pancreatic resections vary from enucleation to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Nevertheless, most patients with pancreatic disease who require resection are still treated with a traditional approach. Technological advancements in recent years may play an important role for the future diffusion of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. In hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon inserts a hand into the abdomen through a small laparotomy while pneumoperitoneum is maintained, and uses the hand to assist with dissection, palpation and retraction, control of blood vessels, manipulation of organs, and removal of the specimen. We present a review of our experience and of the world literature on hand-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Based on the first encouraging results, we believe that the hand-assisted technique should allow for substantial advantages to laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in the future

    Laparoscopic pancreatic resection

    No full text
    The extent of reported laparoscopic resections vary from enucleation to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although initial series have been reported with encouraging results, most patients with pancreatic disease requiring resection are still treated with an open approach. We present a review of our experience and of the world literature on laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been attempted in 12 patients with a conversion rate of 33%. Complications occurred in the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic patients have experienced no benefit in the postoperative recovery and convalescence. Early experience with the hand-assisted approach is promising. Sixty-eight laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies and enucleations have been reported to date. They were 42 distal pancreatectomies and 26 enucleations. Thirteen procedures have been converted to open surgery (19.1%). There was no mortality and the main postoperative complication was pancreatic leak (5 patients, 7.3%). Average hospital stay was 9 days. These results compare favorably with the outcomes after open pancreatic resection. While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is not associated with patient benefit and may be accompanied by increased morbidity, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and enucleation are safe, carry low morbidity and have encouraging results in terms of postoperative recovery

    [Primary sarcoidosis of the breast: a clinical case]

    No full text
    Sarcoidosis of the breast is rare and only few cases are reported in the literature. A case of sarcoidosis presenting as a breast mass with no other evidence of disease is herein reported. Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration biopsy were performed, but only excisional biopsy with microscopic examination confirmed the diagnosis. Differential diagnosis with other granulomatous lesions is important to select the proper treatment

    Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases

    No full text
    Background: Lap Group Roma was established in 1999 to promote and control the development of laparoscopic surgery in the area of pome and its province. Complications during the creation of pneumoperitoneum were given a high priority of investigation, and a retrospective enquiry was immediately carried out.Methods: A questionnaire about all laparoscopic surgical practice performed from January 1994 to December 1998 was sent to the supervisors of 28 centers of general surgery in the area of Rome and its province participating to the Lap Group Roma, requesting demographics, type of procedure for the creation of pneumoperitoneum, type and timing of operation, and major vascular, visceral, and minor vascular injuries related to the creation of pneumoperitoneum.Results: The questionnaire was returned by 57% of the centers, for a total of 12,919 laparoscopic procedures. The type of procedure used to create the pneumoperitoneum involved a standard dosed approach (Veress needle + first trocar) in 82% of the cases, an open (Hasson) approach in 9% of the cases, and the use of an optical trocar in 9% of the cases. There were seven major vascular injuries (0.05%), eight visceral lesions (0.06%), and nine minor vascular lesions (0.07%), for an overall morbility of 0.18%. There was no death related to these complications. The rate of complications differed significantly (p < 0.0001) depending on the type of approach used. It was 0.27% with the optical trocar (3 of 1,009 cases), 0.18% with the closed approach (20 of 10,664 cases), and 0.09% with the open approach (1 of 1,135 cases).Conclusions: There is no foolproof technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum, and this inquiry confirms the need of a constant search for prevention and early treatment of complications encountered during this obligatory phase of any laparoscopic approach. A well-conducted and prolonged prospective audit of clinical practice could help in identifying the risk factors that can make an alternative approach (open or video controlled) preferable to the widely used closed approach

    Impact of resected gastric volume on postoperative weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

    No full text
    Among the bariatric surgery community, it has recently emerged the idea of a possible association between resected gastric volume (RGV) and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). If the size of the sleeve depends on the bougie caliber, the resected volume of the stomach remains something which is not possible to standardize. The aim of the study was to investigate a possible relationship between RGV and weight loss after LSG. We developed a mathematical method to calculate the RGV, based on the specimen size removed during LSG. Ninety-one patients (63 females and 28 males) affected by morbid obesity were included in the study. They underwent LSG between 2014 and 2016. Mean preoperative BMI was 45 +/- 6.4. At 1 year after LSG, the mean BMI was 30 +/- 5.3 and the EWL% was 65 +/- 20.2. The statistical analysis of RGV, BMI, and EWL% at 1-year follow-up did not find any correlation between the volume of stomach removed and the weight loss after LSG. Further studies in the future should clarify the potential role of RGV during LSG. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03938025

    Evidence-based medicine: Open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery

    No full text
    Background: The aim of this study was to perform an evidence-based analysis of the literature on open and laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity.Methods: Human studies on surgery for morbid obesity were conducted. Multiple publications of the same studies, abstracts, and case reports were reviewed. Current Contents, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were investigated.Results: Open Roux-en-Y gastric by pass (RYGB) for morbidly obese patients and long-limb RYGB for superobese patients are highly effective procedures. Randomized controlled trials comparing malabsorptive procedures with other bariatric operations are needed. The long-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) still is undetermined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic RYGB is as safe as its open counterpart, although its long-term results are lacking. Laparoscopic ASGB is less invasive than open ASGB. although its efficacy cannot be determined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is becoming unpopular since the decreasing trend of open VBG. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is feasible, but needs further studies.Conclusions: Randomized controlled trials comparing the various laparoscopic operations are strongly needed
    corecore