160 research outputs found
Comfort During Non-invasive Ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in avoiding intubation and improving survival in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) when compared to conventional oxygen therapy. However, NIV is associated with high failure rates due, in most cases, to patient discomfort. Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to all those interventions aimed at enhancing patient's tolerance to NIV. Several practical aspects have been considered to improve patient adaptation. In particular, the choice of the interface and the ventilatory setting adopted for NIV play a key role in the success of respiratory assistance. Among the different NIV interfaces, tolerance is poorest for the nasal and oronasal masks, while helmet appears to be better tolerated, resulting in longer use and lower NIV failure rates. The choice of fixing system also significantly affects patient comfort due to pain and possible pressure ulcers related to the device. The ventilatory setting adopted for NIV is associated with varying degrees of patient comfort: patients are more comfortable with pressure-support ventilation (PSV) than controlled ventilation. Furthermore, the use of electrical activity of the diaphragm (EADi)-driven ventilation has been demonstrated to improve patient comfort when compared to PSV, while reducing neural drive and effort. If non-pharmacological remedies fail, sedation can be employed to improve patient's tolerance to NIV. Sedation facilitates ventilation, reduces anxiety, promotes sleep, and modulates physiological responses to stress. Judicious use of sedation may be an option to increase the chances of success in some patients at risk for intubation because of NIV intolerance consequent to pain, discomfort, claustrophobia, or agitation. During the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, NIV has been extensively employed to face off the massive request for ventilatory assistance. Prone positioning in non-intubated awake COVID-19 patients may improve oxygenation, reduce work of breathing, and, possibly, prevent intubation. Despite these advantages, maintaining prone position can be particularly challenging because poor comfort has been described as the main cause of prone position discontinuation. In conclusion, comfort is one of the major determinants of NIV success. All the strategies aimed to increase comfort during NIV should be pursued
Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes
Purpose of review The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems. Recent findings Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research. Summary Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey
Unexpected intensive care unit admission after surgery: impact on clinical outcome
Purpose of review This review is focused on providing insights into unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery, including its causes, effects on clinical outcome, and potential strategies to mitigate the strain on healthcare systems. Recent findings Postoperative unplanned ICU admission results from a combination of several factors including patient’s clinical status, the type of surgical procedure, the level of supportive care and clinical monitoring outside the ICU, and the unexpected occurrence of major perioperative and postoperative complications. The actual impact of unplanned admission to ICU after surgery on clinical outcome remains uncertain, given the conflicting results from several observational studies and recent randomized clinical trials. Nonetheless, unplanned ICU admission after surgery results a significant strain on hospital resources. Consequently, this issue should be addressed in hospital policy with the aim of implementing preoperative risk assessment and patient evaluation, effective communication, vigilant supervision, and the promotion of cooperative healthcare. Summary Unplanned ICU admission after surgery is a multifactorial phenomenon that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems without a clear impact on clinical outcome. Thus, the early identification of patient necessitating ICU interventions is imperative
PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: take the right time!
What’s new on the management of obstetric patients who tested positive for COVID-19?
To date, there is still partial data on the effects of COVID-19 on pregnant women. The constant collection of information results in a continuous updating of the knowledge about the best management of pregnant patients affected by COVID-19. This work aimed to summarize the state of the art on prevention and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in obstetric patients. This was enabled by a comprehensive literature search for the most recent and relevant publications on the subject, including guidelines and recommendations. Management of these women by a multidisciplinary team is of crucial importance, given the extreme clinical complexity of this condition. Every health worker involved must put in place all possible procedures to protect themselves from contagion. Neuraxial anesthesia should be favored in the management of labor and caesarean section over other modalities, unless there are contraindications based on the patient’s status. There is still no standardized drug treatment in pregnant women with COVID-19 due to their exclusion from studies conducted to evaluate pharmacological therapies. Nevertheless, various drugs have been used to treat this disease in pregnancy, although the data at our disposal are still few. As regards mRNA vaccines, it seems that their immunogenicity, safety and tolerability in pregnant women are comparable to those of non-pregnant women of the same age. More studies are certainly needed in infected pregnant women to establish treatment and prevention protocols for this special category of patients
Reverse Triggered Breath during Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist at Increasing Propofol Infusion
Background: Reverse triggered breath (RTB) has been extensively described during assisted-controlled modes of ventilation. We aimed to assess whether RTB occurs during Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) at varying depths of propofol sedation. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective crossover randomized controlled trial conducted in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Fourteen intubated patients for acute respiratory failure received six trials of 25 minutes randomly applying PSV and NAVA at three different propofol infusions: awake, light, and deep sedation. We assessed the occurrence of RTBs at each protocol step. The incidence level of RTBs was determined through the RTB index, which was calculated by dividing RTBs by the total number of breaths triggered and not triggered. Results: RTBs occurred during both PSV and NAVA. The RTB index was greater during PSV than during NAVA at mild (1.5 [0.0; 5.3]% vs. 0.6 [0.0; 1.1]%) and deep (5.9 [0.7; 9.0]% vs. 1.7 [0.9; 3.5]%) sedation. Conclusions: RTB occurs in patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation. The level of propofol sedation and the mode of ventilation may influence the incidence of RTBs
Forced Complete Femoral Approach for Urgent Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair Using an Inner Branched Endograft
Background: A successful case of urgent type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair with an inner branched endograft conducted entirely through femoral accesses without the bailout possibility to achieve an upper extremity approach for bridging stents delivery is described. Case report: A 70-year-old male patient underwent hybrid treatment for a thoracic aortic aneurysm on complicated type B dissection in 2 steps. First, arch debranching with carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass and then ascending aortic replacement with reimplantation of the anonymous trunk plus TEVAR were performed. The scheduled 1-month control computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed a rapid increase of the false lumen thoracoabdominal aneurysm, with axial diameter measuring more than 10 cm. The repair procedure was based on the use, as off-the-shelf graft, of a prosthesis customized for another patient with inner branches for visceral vessels that well suited the characteristics of the case. A steerable guiding sheath was essential to stabilize the system in the selective and sequential cannulation of 2 of the 4 inner branches (for celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery) and to complete the bridging stents deployment. Procedure was carried out without complications. Conclusions: In an urgent setting, total endovascular correction of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm exclusively through femoral accesses appears to be feasible when the appropriate tools are available
The Fate of Patients Treated in Emergency for True-Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms After 30 Days and 6 Months: Is There a Benefit from Endovascular Repair?
Background. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been claimed to decrease periprocedural mortality for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with suspected rupture (rAAA). However the benefit of EVAR in true clinical emergencies (plain ruptured AAA) is still uncertain. This study aimed to analyze immediate and mid term outcomes of true rAAA treated in emergency.
Methods. All patients treated for rAAA from 2006 to 2010 were reviewed. Our policy is to perform an immediate computed tomography (CT) in emergency room (ER) for all patients with suspected rAAA. Only patients with evident aneurysm rupture on imaging were selected for this study. EVAR feasibility was left to the discretion of the operative specialized team available 24hours/day. Stability of EVAR repair was assessed with pre-discharge CT-scan.
Results. A total of 66 patients with plain rAAA were treated in emergency: 23 underwent EVAR and 43 open surgery. At baseline there was an equal distribution of physiologic characteristics and comorbidities with the exception of age, older in the EVAR group. Intraoperative mortality was 0% in EVAR and 9.3% (4/43) in the open group (p=0.29) while 30-day mortality rates were 21.7%(5/23) vs 34.8%(15/43), respectively (p=0.39). Life table estimates at 6 and 15 months showed survival rates of 54% and 50% after open surgery and of 65% and 58% after EVAR (p=0.19). Endoleak presence was detected on CT in 6 EVAR patients who survived until discharge (none of these required immediate treatment due to small size).
Conclusions. Despite the use of EVAR can decrease intraoperative mortality in emergencies for plain rAAA, mortality can involve more than one fifth of these patients at 30-day and one third at six months. The frequent detection of endoleak (more than one fourth of rAAA) at discharge can raise the question whether EVAR might be used as an effective bridge solution for hemodynamic stabilization to be re-evaluated in a later stage.
Author Disclosures: P. De Rango: None. M. Lenti: None. E. Cieri: None. F. Verzini: None. G. Simonte: None. P. Bonanno: None. A. Casalino: None. P. Cao: None.
Key Words: Abdominal aortic aneurysm • Stent • Emergency care • Vascular surgery • Tea
Rotational Mechanical Thrombectomy to Treat Iliac Limb Occlusion after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: The Rotational Mechanical Thrombectomy Italian Study
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a rotational mechanical atherothrombectomy device in patients with symptomatic iliac limb occlusion after abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent rotational mechanical thrombectomy using the Rotarex S device for symptomatic acute, subacute, or chronic graft limb thrombosis at 5 vascular centers between 2017 and 2021. This study comprised 23 male patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (SD ± 7.2) at the time of the procedure. The clinical presentation of the patients varied, with 1 patient experiencing acute limb ischemia and 11 patients (47.8%) experiencing disabling intermittent claudication. The remaining patients developed chronic limb-threatening ischemia after iliac limb occlusion. Early outcomes included technical success, postprocedural complications, and periprocedural mortality. Follow-up evaluations encompassed primary patency, patient survival, freedom from reintervention, and the need for surgical conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no occurrences of distal embolization during or after the procedure, and no periprocedural deaths were reported. Endograft relining was performed in 82.6% of patients to establish a new, nonthrombogenic surface within the graft. Over a median follow-up period of 8 months (interquartile range, 3-16 months), 2 patients experienced iliac limb reocclusion. No deaths or other reinterventions occurred during the observational follow-up period. Conclusions: Rotational mechanical thrombectomy for iliac limb occlusion after EVAR appears to be both safe and effective. This technique may uncover intraluminal defects contributing to graft occlusion and enable their resolution within the same procedure
Branched Endograft Partial Deployment to Save Space for Vessel Cannulation When Treating Aneurysms with Narrow Aortic Lumen
Purpose: To describe a novel technique developed for the treatment of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms having narrow aortic lumens using branched endografts. Technique: When treating patients with a narrow aortic inner diameter with branched endografts, we propose a partial graft deployment leaving the distal portion of the device inside the delivery system with the aim of spare space and facilitate target vessel cannulation. Conclusions: Partial endograft deployment could be considered in the case of expected difficulty associated with encumbrance deriving from the distal straight graft portion. This technique could be useful to avoid target vessel loss and therein save procedural and fluoroscopy time
- …
