4,489 research outputs found
Historia Lectionvm Ill. Gymnasii Schlevsingensis : h. e. Recensio Lectionum Publicarum, quae ab ortu Gymnasii, Anno nempe MDLXXVII. vsque ad hoc tempus, in Classibus inprimis tribus superioribus, receptae fuerunt & propositae, ex Matricvla Gymnasii sic instituta, ... possit perspici / ... in apertum prolata a M. Godofredo Lvdovici, Rectore. A. MDCCVI.
No full textVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Schleusingae, exscripsit G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymnasii Typographus
Ad Panegyrin Oratoriam bono cum Deo VI. Id. Quinctil. A. MDCCIV. in Ill. Gymnasio Schlevsingensi apparandam, qua De Ivre Et Ivdicio Eqvestri Silesiaco s. von des Schlesischen Adels Ritter-Recht und Ehren-Gericht Orationem Latinam memoriter recitabit Generosus Iuuenis Christophorvs Heinricvs de Briesen, Eques Silesius, & Versibus Latino-Germanicis Consignationem peculiarem Nobilivm, qui ab A. MDLXXVII. ad annum vsque MDCXXVII. Schleusingae literis sunt operati, exhibiturus est Adolescens industrius Io. Gvstavvs Otto, Frisenhusanus, Studiorum liberalium Maecenates, Patronos Fautores & Amicos demisse & obseruanter inuitat M. Godofredvs Lvdovici, Rect.
No full textVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Schleusingae, publice exscripsit G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymn. Typograph
Adventvm Felicem Reverendissimi Serenissimiqve Principis Ac Domini, Domini Mavritii Gvilielmi Postvlati Administratoris Episcopatvs Nvmbvrgensis
No full textSchleusingen, Hennebergisches Gymnasium, Schulprogramm, 1701Autopsie nach Ex. der ULB Sachsen-AnhaltVorlageform des Kolophon: Excud. G. W. Goebel, Ill. Gymn. Schleusingensis Typographus
Aspects of prokaryotic genome research
No full textGottschalk G, Goebel W, Pühler A. Aspects of prokaryotic genome research. JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 2006;126(1):1-2
Eustra plagiata Schmidt-Goebel 1846
No full text<i>Eustra plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 <p>DIAGNOSE</p> <p>Édéage sensiblement comme celui des espèces précédentes ou à peine plus allongé, le paramère gauche particulièrement long et étroit, à extrémité émoussée ou arrondie (Fig. 6F, G). Genitalia femelles orthotopiques, les gonopodes fusiformes mais étroits et étirés, avec un gonostyle terminal (Fig. 9I): la spermathèque membraneuse, assez courte, un peu annelée (Fig. 11G).</p> <p> <i>Eustra plagiata plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 <i>Eustra plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846: 66. — Chaudoir 1854: 310; 1868: 71.</p> <p> TYPES. — L’espèce <i>E. plagiata</i> Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, étant polytypique, il est souhaitable de désigner le lectotype du taxon nominal pour mieux fixer la nomenclature et éviter toute équivoque.</p> <p> Lectotype (présente désignation): 1, « Lectotype [étiquette rouge] / <i>Birma, Helfer</i> [étiquette blanche] / <i>plagiata Sch. G.</i>, col. Helfer [étiquette blanche] / Mus. Pragense, coll. Helfer [étiquette blanche] / Mus. Nat. Pragae, Inv. <i>26475</i> [étiquette orange] / Typus! teste Dr. J. Obenberger [étiquette rouge] / <i>Eustra plagiata Schm. -G., Lectotype</i>, Th. Deuve dés. 1996 [étiquette blanche] », <i>ex</i> coll. Helfer (MNP).</p> <p> Paralectotype: 1, Birmanie, Tenasserim, <i>ex</i> coll. Helfer (MNP Inv. n°26474).</p> <p> DISTRIBUTION. — <b>Birmanie, Tenasserim.</b></p> <p>DIAGNOSE</p> <p>Pronotum modérément cintré en arrière, les côtés denticulés et assez peu sinués avant les angles basaux, qui sont obtus, peu saillants (lp/Lp = 1,50). Paramère gauche de l’édéage rétréci vers l’apex (Fig. 6G).</p>Published as part of <i>Deuve, Thierry, 2001, Le genre Eustra Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, insectes (Coleoptera, Paussidae, Ozaeninae) à genitalia femelles orthotopiques, pp. 547-578 in Zoosystema 23 (3)</i> on page 574, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5391021">10.5281/zenodo.5391021</a>
Dendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel 1846
No full textDendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 Type species: Dendrocellus discolor Schmidt-Goebel, 1846 (= Desera nepalensis Hope, 1831)= Desera Hope, 1831 (nec Dejean, 1825) Type species: Desera nepalensis Hope, 1831 Bousquet (2002) and Liang et al. (2004) have correctly reconstructed the complex nomenclatorial history of this genus, reaching the conclusion that its valid generic name is Dendrocellus Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, instead of Desera Dejean, 1825, as it was frequently considered previously. We only observe that back in 1949 Jeannel already wrote: “Les Dendrocellus Schm. -Goeb. (type: discolor Schm. -Goeb.,= nepalensis Hope) sont généralement classés à tort sous le nom de Desera. … Malgré leurs ongles tarsaux pectinés, ils sont très voisins des Drypta s. str. ” (Jeannel, 1949). So, it seems the french author had already reached the same conclusions. This genus, recently revised by Liang & Kavanaugh (2007), contains 22 species occuring in Africa, Asia and Australia. Systematically it is extremely close to Drypta, differing only in its tarsal claws pectinate instead of smooth. The genitalic characters of both sexes are the same, the external resemblance among members of the two genera is sometimes puzzling and a few species of Dendrocellus show very slight tarsal pectination, sometimes leaving a doubt on their generic pertinence; only a comparative study of all the characters of the species belonging to the two genera will allow to decide whether they can be really maintained as separate genera. Already in 1968 Darlington observed: “ Desera differs from Drypta only in having pectinate tarsal claws. A modern revision of the species is needed to show whether both genera are really monophyletic and distinct” (Darlington, 1968, p. 218). The unique combination of characters distinguishing this genus from the others of the tribe is: pronotal bead absent or very rudimental (fig. 10); punctuation on head and pronotum dense, regular, the punctures usually well distinct from each other; pronotum very feebly constricted towards base; elytral microsculpture well developed; elytral pubescence dense, usually arranged in two-three more or less regular rows; scutellar pore constantly single; intervals flat or slightly convex; tarsal claws slender, more or less pectinate on inner side; two to five evident setae on outer side of stylomere (fig. 8).Published as part of Sciaky, Riccardo & Anichtchenko, Alexander, 2020, Taxonomic notes on the tribe Dryptini Bonelli, 1810 with description of a new genus and species from China (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Dryptini), pp. 522-530 in Zootaxa 4731 (4) on page 524, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/366198
William Goebel: The Politics of Wrath
No full textThe turbulent career of William Goebel (1856–1900), which culminated in assassination, marked an end-of-the-century struggle for political control of Kentucky. Although populism had become a strong force in the nation, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad and ex-Confederates still dominated the state and its Democratic party. Touting reforms and attaching the railroad monopoly, Goebel challenged this old order.
A Yankee in a state that fancied itself southern, Goebel had to depend on a strong organization to win votes. As “The Kenton King” he created a new style of politics. To some he was a progressive reformer; to others, a tyrannical machine boss. His drive for power and his enemies’ fierce opposition aroused violent political factionalism. Goebel’s fateful duel with a rival, his partisan election law, and his ruthless convention tactics led to the bitterly contested gubernatorial election of 1899 that resulted in his murder. Although the full truth about the murder was never revealed in nearly a decade of trials and the advent of progressive politics was long delayed in Kentucky, Goebel’s death did relieve the state’s political turmoil and induce some legal reforms. Using new sources and fresh perspectives, James C. Klotter portrays Goebel’s tumultuous era and discovers the real man within the obscurity of his conflicting images.
James C. Klotter is professor of history at Georgetown College and the state historian of Kentucky. He is the author or coauthor of several books, including A New History of Kentucky.
A lively account of one of the most bizarre and controversial episodes in Kentucky history. -- Tennessee Historical Quarterlyhttps://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/1000/thumbnail.jp
Organographie der Pflanzen, insbesondere der Archegoniaten und Samenpflanzen. Von K. Goebel.
No full textFIG. 6 in Le genre Eustra Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, insectes (Coleoptera, Paussidae, Ozaeninae) à genitalia femelles orthotopiques
No full textFIG. 6. — Eustra Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, édéages des mâles, face latérale du lobe médian et paramère gauche; A, E. matanga matanga Andrewes, 1919, de Brunei, Bukit Sulang; B, E. matanga darlingtoni n. ssp., paramère gauche de l'holotype; C, E. matanga negrosensis n. ssp., paramère gauche de l'holotype; D, E. csikii csikii Jedlicka, 1968, de Hoa-Binh; E, E. pseudomatanga pseudomatanga n. ssp., de Sulawesi, des environs de Morowali; F, E. plagiata peguensis n. ssp., holotype; G, E. plagiata plagiata Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, paramère gauche du lectotype; H, E. indica n. sp., holotype; I, E. ceylanica n. sp., paramère gauche de l'holotype; J, E. storki n. sp., holotype. Échelle: 0,5 mm.Published as part of Deuve, Thierry, 2001, Le genre Eustra Schmidt-Goebel, 1846, insectes (Coleoptera, Paussidae, Ozaeninae) à genitalia femelles orthotopiques, pp. 547-578 in Zoosystema 23 (3) on page 559, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.539102
- …
