37,774 research outputs found
Letter dated 5 June 1930 from Shih Fu Tang to American friends
Letter dated 5 June 1930 from Shih Fu Tang, Superintendent of Evangelistic Work at Lintsing, China, to American friends; this letter was sent in an envelope addressed to Edith (Tallmon) Park at Morgan Hill, Californi
Letter dated 5 June 1930 from Shih Fu T\u27ang, Superintendent of Evangelistic Work, Lintsing
Letter dated 5 June 1930 from Shih Fu T\u27ang, Superintendent of Evangelistic Work, Lintsing, to American friends, translated by Mr. Wickes, relating ongoing challenges of the Lintsing Church; envelope addressed to Mrs. H. B. (Edith Tallmon) Park, Morgan Hill, California; includes a map showing location of Lintsin
Letter dated 2 September 1914 from Shih Fu Tang to Mrs Wagner, translated by an American missionary
Letter dated 2 September 1914 from Shih Fu Tang, a Chinese girl at Lintsing, to Mrs Wagner (perhaps Mrs. Vincent E. Wagner), translated by an American missionary, perhaps Dr Susan B. Tallmo
Tu Fu and Kao Shih
Kao Shih (d. 765) was one of the oldest and closest of Tu Fu's friends. Their association began when Tu Fu was in his twenties, and Kao Shih was over thirty, and lasted for the next twenty years or so. But although Tu Fu greatly admired the poetic ability of Kao Shih, there were marked differences in the ways of thinking of the two men. These differences are evident in the poems composed when Kao Shih, Tu Fu, and their friends visited the Tz'u-en 慈恩 Temple in Ch'ang-an and climbed the pagoda there. But they are perhaps most clearly shown in the contrast between Kao Shih's poem "Li Yun-nan cheng man shih", written in 752 in celebration of Li Mi's conquest of Cochin China, and Tu Fu's "Ping-ch'e-hsing" 兵車行 written in the same year. While Tu Fu describes the hardships inflicted upon the people by such military expeditions, Kao Shih merely praises the achievements of his friend, the official Li Mi, and shows no sympathy for the plight of the soldiers. Moreover, if the histories of the period are to be believed, Li's "victory" was actually a defeat which he disguised to appear as its opposite. Kao Shih's poems are often described as patriotic, but it would appear that, like Ts'en Ts'an 岑参, he journeyed to the border regions on his own initiative merely in search of fame, and had little concern for the welfare of the people as a whole. Thus when Tu Fu praised Kao Shih, it was for his beauty of diction and fame. It was praise of a different kind from that which he gave to the poetic works of men like Yüan Chieh or Li Po
Sphingius deelemanae Feng & Fu 2010, sp. n.
<i>Sphingius deelemanae</i> sp. n. <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 31749410-B22D-4A45-BC39-A977D3A01D87</p> <p>Figs. 1–7</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype male, CHINA: Hainan Province, Mt. Jianfengling [N 18.62°, E 108.98°], May 28, 2009, G. X. Han leg. (MHBU), paratype 1 <i>3</i>, same data as holotype (MHBU).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> In the Chinese <i>Sphingius</i> species, such as <i>S</i>. <i>hainan</i> Zhang, Fu & Zhu, 2009, <i>S. pingtung</i> Tso et al., 2005, <i>S. sinensis</i> (Schenkel, 1963) and <i>S. zhangi</i> Zhang, Fu & Zhu, 2009, the new species can be easily distinguished from <i>S</i>. <i>hainan</i> by its broader embolus (Fig. 5), while in <i>S. hainan</i> the embolus is shorter and thinner (Zhang et al. 2009: fig. 6); by the chelicerae without a distal anterior tubercle (Fig. 4), while <i>S. hainan</i> (Zhang et al. 2009: fig. 3) has such a distal anterior tubercle on the chelicerae. Specifically compared to <i>S. pingtung</i>, the new species is also distinguished the embolus broader and shorter (Fig.5), while in <i>S. pingtung</i> the embolus thinner and longer (Zhang et al. 2009: fig. 10); by the tibial apophysis shorter (Fig. 5), while in <i>S. pingtung</i> the tibial apophysis very long (Zhang et al. 2009: fig. 12). The new species can be distinguished from <i>S. zhangi</i> by having a longer and broader embolus and with the embolus tip very near to the distal end of the cymbium (Fig. 6), while in <i>S. zhangi</i> the embolus thinner, shorter and far from the distal end of the cymbium (Zhang et al. 2009: figs. 29, 31).</p> <p>Comparing the new species with the seven species with known males found in nearby south east Asian countries, we find the new species can be distinguished from <i>S. scrobiculatus</i> (Myanmar), <i>S. songi</i> (Thailand) and <i>S. gothicus</i> (Thailand) by having a longer and broader embolus and the embolus tip very near to the distal end of the cymbium (Fig. 6), while in <i>S. scrobiculatus</i>, <i>S. songi</i> and <i>S. gothicus</i> the embolus thinner, shorter and far from the distal end of the cymbium (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: figs. 840, 854, 844). The new species can be distinguished from <i>S. penicillus</i> (Thailand), <i>S. gracilis</i> (Myanmar) and <i>S. octomaculatus</i> (Myanmar) by the tibial apophysis shorter (Fig. 5), while in <i>S. penicillus</i>, <i>S. gracilis</i> and <i>S. octomaculatus</i> the tibial apophysis very long (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: figs. 849, 839, 858). The new species can be distinguished from <i>S. punctatus</i> (Thailand, Indonesia) by the lump-shaped median apophysis (Fig. 5), while in <i>S. punctatus</i> the median apophysis ribbon-shaped (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: fig. 864).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific name is a patronym in honor of Dr. Christa L. Deeleman- Reinhold, arachnologist.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Male (holotype). Total length 2.25: carapace 1.12 long, 0.85 wide; abdomen 1.13 long, 0.77 wide. Carapace ovoid in dorsal view (Fig. 1), with wedgeshaped posterior margin; reddish brown, surface covered with many seta-bearing granules, each sunk in a large round pit, lateral and posterior margins with triangular thorns, with a long seta arising from the side. Eyes in two transverse rows; AER slightly recurved and PER straight in dorsal view (Fig. 1). Eye diameters: AME 0.13, ALE 0.12, PME 0.14, PLE 0.13. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.17, AME–ALE 0.12,</p> <p>26 <i>Feng Zhang & Jian-Ying Fu / ZooKeys 49: 23–31 (2010)</i> <b>Figures Ι–7.</b> <i>Sphingius deelemanae</i> sp. n. <b>Ι</b> Male body, dorsal view <b>2</b> Male abdomen, ventral view <b>3</b> Endites, labium and sternum of male, ventral view <b>4</b> Male right chelicera, anterior view <b>5</b> Male left palp, ventral view <b>6</b> Same, prolateral view <b>7</b> Same, retrolateral view <b>c</b> conductor <b>e</b> embolus <b>es</b> epigastric scutum <b>is</b> intercoxal sclerites <b>ma</b> median apophysis <b>pt</b> precoxal triangles <b>sd</b> sperm duct <b>st</b> subtegulum <b>t</b> tegulum <b>ta</b> tibial apophysis <b>vs</b> ventral scutum. Scale bars: 1 mm (1–3); 0.4 mm (4–7).</p> <p>is pt 3 4 c e ma st sd t ta Ι 5 es c e ma st sd t vs 2 ta 6 7</p> <p>PME–PME 0.16, PME–PLE 0.14; MOA 0.28 long, front width 0.26, back width 0.25. Thoracic groove obsolete. Chelicerae reddish brown (Fig. 4), with three promarginal and three retromarginal teeth, anterior surface somewhat swollen. Endites, labium and sternum dark brown (Fig. 3). Sternum shield-shaped, lateral margin with precoxal triangles and intercoxal sclerites. Space above the coxae and below the carapace with longitudinal, sclerotized pleural bars. Leg spination: femora I-IV with one small dorsal spine, tibia III v1-1-0, p0-0-1, metatarsus III v0-2-0; tibia IV v2-2-1, r0- 0-1, metatarsus IV p0-1-0, v0-1-0, r0-1-0.Leg formula: 4123 (Table 1).</p> <p>Abdomen (Fig. 1) dark brown dorsally, with nearly entire dorsal scutum, epigastric and postgenital scutum fused to some extent, postgenital scutum relatively large, about two thirds of abdomen length; venter smooth, without longitudinal lines.</p> <p>Male palp as illustrated (Figs. 5–7). Tibia with short retrolateral apophysis. Bulb ovoid in ventral view (Fig. 5), tegulum straight at base; sperm duct distinctive Ushaped, originating from upper part of tegulum; subtegulum relatively large (Fig. 6); embolus bent, long and thick, originating from prolateral-apical tegulum, extending beyond tegulum (Fig. 5); conductor apical, corn-flake shaped; median apophysis nearly rectangular from retrolateral view, on distal-retrolateral sector of tegulum.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Presently known only from the type locality, Mt. Jianfengling, Hainan, China.</p>Published as part of <i>Feng, Zhang & Fu, Jianying, 2010, A new species of the genus Sphingius (Araneae, Liocranidae) from China, and first description of the female: Sphingius hainan Zhang, Fu & Zhu, 2009, pp. 23-31 in ZooKeys 49 (49)</i> on pages 25-27, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.49.391, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/576675">http://zenodo.org/record/576675</a>
Heteralepas Canci, A Replacement Name For Heteralepas Cantelli Chan, Tsang & Shih, 2009 (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Thoracica), Preoccupied By Heteralepas Cantelli Buhl-Mortensen & Newman, 2004
Chan, Benny K. K., Tsang, Ling Ming, Shih, Fu-lung (2012): Heteralepas Canci, A Replacement Name For Heteralepas Cantelli Chan, Tsang & Shih, 2009 (Crustacea: Cirripedia: Thoracica), Preoccupied By Heteralepas Cantelli Buhl-Mortensen & Newman, 2004. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 60 (1), No. 1: 3
Changshou er Feng xian sheng ji /
Imprint date from postscript.[1-2] Moan xian sheng ji 10 juan fu lu feng shu zhu -- [3-6] Dun yin xian sheng ji: Feng shi xiao ji 3 juan Dun yin ji 3 juan bie ji Yu ji you xian ji 2 juan ji wai shi yu fu wen gao za lu 10 juan feng ban shu jiao kan ji.Mode of access: Internet
Yuan Shikai, approximately 1900
Caption on image: Fu Sheng, Photographer, City north east Wall Street, Tientsin
On verso of image: Yuan Shih Kai, Viceroy of Chihli Province, afterwards first President of the Chinese Republic.
PH Coll 214.6
Otacilia bawangling Fu, Zhang & Zhu 2010
Otacilia bawangling Fu, Zhang & Zhu, 2010 (Figs 59–65) Otacilia bawangling Fu, Zhang & Zhu, 2010: 645, f. 3A–F. Material examined. Holotype ♂, China, Hainan Province, Changjiang County, Mt. Bawangling (19.3°N, 109.1°E), 7 November 2008, Ming-Sheng Zhu leg. Paratypes: 1♂, 4♀, same data as holotype, Guang-Xin Han, Sheng-Tao Guo and Jian-Yu Guo leg. © Zoological Systematics, 40(4): 436–450 © Zoological Systematics, 40(4): 436–450 Description. See Fu, Zhang & Zhu (2010). Male (holotype) habitus shown in Fig. 59, male palp in Figs 61–63; female (paratype) habitus in Fig. 60, epigyne and vulva in Figs 64–65. Distribution. China (Hainan). Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31093430, 31372154), and in part by the Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (2012 FY110803) to Prof. Feng Zhang. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Dr. Bao-Shi Zhang and Chi Jin for collecting the valuable specimens. We are particularly grateful to Dr. Xin-Ping Wang for reading and improving the manuscript.Published as part of Fu, Li-Na, He, Jing-Chao & Zhang, Feng, 2015, Species of the genus Otacilia from Hainan Island, China (Araneae: Phrurolithidae), pp. 436-450 in Zoological Systematics 40 (4) on pages 448-450, DOI: 10.11865/zs.20150402, http://zenodo.org/record/461752
- …
