91 research outputs found
Role and interpretation of antifungal susceptibility testing for the management of invasive fungal infections
No full textInvasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and timely ap-propriate antifungal therapy is essential for good outcomes. Emerging antifungal resistance among Candida and Aspergillus spp., the major causes of IFI, is concerning and has led to the increasing incorporation of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) to guide clinical decisions. However, the interpretation of AST results and their contribution to management of IFIs remains a matter of debate. Specifically, the utility of AST is limited by the delay in obtaining results and the lack of pharmacodynamic correlation between minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and clinical outcome, particularly for molds. Clinical breakpoints for Candida spp. have been substantially revised over time and appear to be reliable for the detection of azole and echinocandin resistance and for outcome prediction, especially for non-neutropenic patients with candidemia. However, data are lacking for neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis and some non-albicans Candida spp. (notably emerging Candida auris). For Aspergillus spp., AST is not routinely performed, but may be indicated according to the epidemiological context in the setting of emerging azole resistance among A. fumigatus. For non-Aspergillus molds (e.g., Mucorales, Fusarium or Scedosporium spp.), AST is not routinely recommended as interpretive criteria are lacking and many confounders, mainly host factors, seem to play a predominant role in responses to antifungal therapy. This review provides an overview of the pre-clinical and clinical pharmacodynamic data, which constitute the rationale for the use and interpretation of AST testing of yeasts and molds in clinical practice
Analysis of antimicrobial drug penetration in human body fluids and tissues
No full textLes régimes des agents antimicrobiens sont établis sur des études pharmacocinétiques basées sur
des modèles animaux ou des humains en bonne santé. Toutefois, il peut être observé une grande
variabilité intra- et interindividuelle de la biodisponibilité du médicament, en particulier chez des
patients en état critique. Cette étude vise à mesurer la concentration des agents antimicrobiens dans
les tissus ou liquides infectés des patients, tout en la comparant à la concentration sérique, afin
d’évaluer la biodisponibilité du médicament au site de l’infection. De plus, elle évalue la corrélation
entre ces mesures et la réponse clinique.
L’étude a inclut des patients recevant un antibiotique bêta-lactamine ou un antifongique depuis au
moins 48 heures pour traiter une infection documentée sur le plan microbiologique ou clinique, et
devant subir une intervention au site de l’infection. Un échantillon de tissu ou de liquide infecté était
ainsi prélevé pour mesurer la concentration des antimicrobiens au site d’infection. Simultanément,
un échantillon de sérum était également prélevé afin de déterminer la concentration sérique. Le
succès pharmacodynamique a été défini par une concentration dans le liquide ou le tissu infecté
supérieure aux seuils de sensibilité des principaux pathogènes attendus, et la réponse clinique a été
évaluée à la sortie de l’hôpital.
Les résultats ont globalement montré une bonne pénétration des antimicrobiens dans les tissus,
malgré une importante variabilité interindividuelle et quelques exceptions. Ces dernières ont
d’ailleurs été associées à une évolution clinique défavorable.
Ces observations apportent des informations uniques sur la pénétration des antimicrobiens dans les
liquides et tissus infectés de l’être humain en conditions cliniques réelles. Les différences entre les
différents agents antimicrobiens pourraient influencer le choix des traitements à venir
Upc2-mediated mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida auris
No full textCandida auris is an emerging yeast pathogen of major concern because of its ability to cause hospital outbreaks of invasive candidiasis and to develop resistance to antifungal drugs. A majority of C. auris isolates are resistant to fluconazole, an azole drug used for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Mechanisms of azole resistance are multiple, including mutations in the target gene ERG11 and activation of the transcription factors Tac1b and Mrr1, which control the drug transporters Cdr1 and Mdr1, respectively. We investigated the role of the transcription factor Upc2, which is known to regulate the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway and azole resistance in other Candida spp. Genetic deletion and hyperactivation of Upc2 by epitope tagging in C. auris resulted in drastic increases and decreases in susceptibility to azoles, respectively. This effect was conserved in strains with genetic hyperactivation of Tac1b or Mrr1. Reverse transcription PCR analyses showed that Upc2 regulates ERG11 expression and also activates the Mrr1/Mdr1 pathway. We showed that upregulation of MDR1 by Upc2 could occur independently from Mrr1. The impact of UPC2 deletion on MDR1 expression and azole susceptibility in a hyperactive Mrr1 background was stronger than that of MRR1 deletion in a hyperactive Upc2 background. While Upc2 hyperactivation resulted in a significant increase in the expression of TAC1b, CDR1 expression remained unchanged. Taken together, our results showed that Upc2 is crucial for azole resistance in C. auris, via regulation of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway and activation of the Mrr1/Mdr1 pathway. Notably, Upc2 is a very potent and direct activator of Mdr1.IMPORTANCECandida auris is a yeast of major medical importance causing nosocomial outbreaks of invasive candidiasis. Its ability to develop resistance to antifungal drugs, in particular to azoles (e.g., fluconazole), is concerning. Understanding the mechanisms of azole resistance in C. auris is important and may help in identifying novel antifungal targets. This study shows the key role of the transcription factor Upc2 in azole resistance of C. auris and shows that this effect is mediated via different pathways, including the regulation of ergosterol biosynthesis and also the direct upregulation of the drug transporter Mdr1
Navigating the Uncertainties of COVID-19–Associated Aspergillosis: A Comparison With Influenza-Associated Aspergillosis
No full textInvasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is increasingly recognized as a life-threatening superinfection of severe respiratory viral infections, such as influenza. The pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to emerging SARS-CoV-2 rose concern about the eventuality of IPA complicating COVID-19 in intensive care unit patients. A variable incidence of such complication has been reported, which can be partly attributed to differences in diagnostic strategy and IPA definitions, and possibly local environmental/epidemiological factors. In this article, we discuss the similarities and differences between influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Compared to IAPA, the majority of CAPA cases have been classified as putative rather than proven/probable IPA. Distinct physiopathology of influenza and COVID-19 may explain these discrepancies. Whether CAPA represents a distinct entity is still debatable and many questions remain unanswered, such as its actual incidence, the predisposing role of corticosteroids or immunomodulatory drugs, and the indications for antifungal therapy
Aspergillus fumigatus-Related Species in Clinical Practice
No full textAspergillus fumigatus is the main etiologic agent of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Other Aspergillus species belonging to the section Fumigati (A. fumigatus complex) may occasionally be the cause of IA. These strains are often misidentified, as they cannot be distinguished from A. fumigatus by conventional morphological analysis and sequencing methods. This lack of recognition may have important consequences as these A. fumigatus-related species often display some level of intrinsic resistance to azoles and other antifungal drugs. A. lentulus, A. udagawae, A. viridinutans and A. thermomutatus (Neosartorya pseudofischeri) have been associated with refractory cases of IA. Microbiologists should be able to suspect the presence of these cryptic species behind a putative A. fumigatus isolate on the basis of some simple characteristics, such as defect in sporulation and/or unusual antifungal susceptibility profile. However, definitive species identification requires specific sequencing analyses of the beta-tubulin or calmodulin genes, which are not available in most laboratories. Multiplex PCR assays or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization – time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) gave promising results for rapid and accurate distinction between A. fumigatus and other Aspergillus spp. of the section Fumigati in clinical practice. Improved diagnostic procedures and antifungal susceptibility testing may be helpful for the early detection and management of these particular IA cases
Amoebal pathogens as emerging causal agents of pneumonia.
No full textDespite using modern microbiological diagnostic approaches, the aetiological agents of pneumonia remain unidentified in about 50% of cases. Some bacteria that grow poorly or not at all in axenic media used in routine clinical bacteriology laboratory but which can develop inside amoebae may be the agents of these lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) of unexplained aetiology. Such amoebae-resisting bacteria, which coevolved with amoebae to resist their microbicidal machinery, may have developed virulence traits that help them survive within human macrophages, i.e. the first line of innate immune defence in the lung. We review here the current evidence for the emerging pathogenic role of various amoebae-resisting microorganisms as agents of RTIs in humans. Specifically, we discuss the emerging pathogenic roles of Legionella-like amoebal pathogens, novel Chlamydiae (Parachlamydia acanthamoebae, Simkania negevensis), waterborne mycobacteria and Bradyrhizobiaceae (Bosea and Afipia spp.)
Pulmonary aspergillosis: diagnosis and treatment
No full textAspergillus species are the most frequent cause of fungal infections of the lungs with a broad spectrum of clinical presentations including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). IPA affects immunocompromised populations, which are increasing in number and diversity with the advent of novel anti-cancer therapies. Moreover, IPA has emerged as a complication of severe influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 in apparently immunocompetent hosts. CPA mainly affects patients with pre-existing lung lesions and is recognised increasingly frequently among patients with long-term survival following cure of tuberculosis or lung cancer. The diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis is complex as it relies on the presence of clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria, which differ according to the type of pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA or CPA) and the type of patient population. The management of pulmonary aspergillosis is complicated by the limited number of treatment options, drug interactions, adverse events and the emergence of antifungal resistance
Clinically relevant bidirectional drug-drug interaction between midostaurin and voriconazole.
No full textMidostaurin is often prescribed with azole antifungals in patients with leukemia, either for aspergillosis prophylaxis or treatment. Midostaurin is extensively metabolized by cytochrome (CYP) 3A4. In addition it inhibits and induces various CYPs at therapeutic concentrations. Thus midostaurin is associated with a high potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs), both as a substrate (victim) and as a perpetrator. However, data on midostaurin as a perpetrator of DDIs are scarce, as most pharmacokinetic studies have focused on midostaurin as a victim drug. We report a clinically relevant bidirectional DDI between midostaurin and voriconazole during induction treatment. A 49-year-old woman with acute myeloid leukemia developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis after induction chemotherapy. She was treated with voriconazole at standard dosage. Six days after starting midostaurin, she developed visual hallucinations with a concurrent sharp increase in voriconazole blood concentration (Ctrough 10.3 mg L-1 , target Ctrough 1-5 mg L-1 ). Neurotoxicity was considered to be related to voriconazole overexposure. The concentration of midostaurin was concomitantly six-fold above the average expected level, however without safety issues. Midostaurin was stopped and the dosage of voriconazole was adjusted with therapeutic drug monitoring. The evolution was favorable with quick resolution and no recurrence of visual hallucinations. To our knowledge, this is the first case suggesting that midostaurin and voriconazole reciprocally inhibit each other's metabolism leading to increased exposure of both. This case highlights the knowledge gap regarding drug-drug interactions between midostaurin and azole antifungals. Close clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring is advised in such cases
- …
