270,023 research outputs found
E. M. Forster
No full textThis set comprises 40 volumes covering 19th and 20th century European and American authors. These volumes will be available as a complete set, mini boxed sets (by theme) or as individual volumes. This second set compliments the first 68 volume set of Critical Heritage published by Routledge in October 1995.Cover -- E. M. Forster: The Critical Heritage -- Copyright -- General Editor's Preface -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Note on the Text -- Where Angels Fear to Tread (1905) -- 1. Unsigned Notice, the Times Literary Supplement, Sep- Tember 1905 -- 2. Unsigned Review, Bookman (london), October 1905 -- 3. ' V ' Review, Manchester Guardian, October 1905 -- 4. Unsigned Notice, Glasgow Herald, October 1905 -- 5. Unsigned Notice, Pall Mall Gazette, October 1905 -- 6. Unsigned Notice, Birmingham Daily Post, October 1905 -- 7. Unsigned Notice, Manchester Courier, October 1905 -- 8. Unsigned Notice, Guardian, October 1905 -- 9. Unsigned Review, Speaker, October 1905 -- 10. C. F. G. Mas Term An, Review, Daily News, November 1905 -- 11. Unsigned Notice, Yorkshire Post, December 1905 -- 12. Unsigned Review, Spectator, December 1905 -- (american Edition, 1920) -- 13. Unsigned Review, Springfield Sunday Republican, March 1920 -- 14. E. M. Forster's Arrival Discussed in Bookman (london), June 1907 -- The Longest Journey (1907) -- 15. Unsigned Review, Tribune, April 1907 -- 16. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, April 1907 -- 17. Unsigned Review, Nation, April 1907 -- 18. Unsigned Notice, Evening Standard & -- St James's Gazette, April 1907 -- 19. C. F. G. Masterman, 'the Soul in Suburbia', Daily News, May 1907 -- 20. Elizabeth Von Arnim, Letter to E. M. Forster, May 1907 -- 21. Unsigned Review, Morning Post, May 1907 -- 22. St Barbe', Notice, Queen, May 1907 -- 23. Unsigned Notice, Pall Mall Gazette, May 1907 -- 24. 'R.w.l.', Notice, Black and White, May 1907 -- 25. Unsigned Notice, Standard, May 1907 -- 26. ' V ' Review, Manchester Guardian, May 1907 -- 27. Unsigned Notice, Cambridge Review, May 1907 -- 28. Unsigned Review, Athenaeum, May 1907 -- 29. Unsigned Notice, Pforw, May 190730. Unsigned Notice, Liverpool Daily Post, May 1907 -- 31. Unsigned Notice, Birmingham Daily Post, May 1907 -- 32. Unsigned Review, Spectator, July 1907 -- 33. Unsigned Notice, Outlook, July 1907 -- 34. T. De Wyzewa, 'a Newcomer', Revue Des Deux Mondes, December 1907 -- 35. Frieda Lawrence, Letter to E. M. Forster [1915] -- (american Edition, 1922) -- 36. Unsigned Notice, Boston Evening T -- 37. Unsigned Review, Springfield Sunday Republican, Octobcr 1922 -- A Room with a View 1908 -- 38. R. A. Scott-james, 'a Novel of Character1, Daily News, October 1908 -- 39. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, October 1908 -- 40. Unsigned Notice, Morning Leader, October 1908 -- 41. Unsigned Notice, Daily Mail, October 1908 -- 42. F, Review, Manchester Guardian, November 1908 -- 43. Unsigned Notice, Pall Mall Gazette, November 1908 -- 44. 'A Young Woman in a Muddle', Observer, November 1908 -- 45. 'a Clever Novel', Morning Post, November 1908 -- 46. C. F. G. Masterman, Unsigned Review, 'the Half-hidden Life', Nation, November 1908 -- 47. Unsigned Notice, Athenaeum, December 1908 -- 48. Unsigned Notice, Outlook, December 1908 -- 49. Unsigned Notice, Evening Standard & -- St James's Gazette, December 1908 -- 50. Unsigned Review, Spectator, January 1909 -- (american Edition) 1911 -- 51. Unsigned Notice, Inter-ocean (chicago), May 1911 -- 52. 'the Candid, Innocent Seriousness of Father and Son, New York Times, July 1911 -- Howards End (1910) -- 53. A. N. Monkhouse, Initialled Review, Manchester Guardian, October 1910 -- 54. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, October 1910 -- 55. Unsigned Notice, Pall Mall Gazette, October 1910 -- 56. 'the Part and the Whole', Morning Leader, October 1910 -- 57. Unsigned Notice, Standard, October 1910 -- 58. Unsigned Review, Daily Telegraph, November 1910 -- 59.Unsigned Review, Spectator, November 191060. Unsigned Notice, Observer, November 1910 -- 61. R. A. Scott-james, 'the Year's Best Novel', Daily News, November 1910 -- 62. 'Villadom', Nation, November 1910 -- 63. Archibald Marshall, 'the Season's Great Novel', Daily Mail, November 1910 -- 64. 'A Fine Novel', Daily Graphic, November 1910 -- 65. Unsigned Review, Westminster Gazette, November 1910 -- 66. Unsigned Review, Morning Post, November 1910 -- 67. Unsigned Review, Athenaeum, December 1910 -- 68. A. C. Benson, Letter to E. M. Forster, December 1910 -- 69. 'A Story of Remarkably Queer People', Western Mail (cardiff), December 1910 -- 70. Unsigned Review, World, December 1910 -- 71. Jacob Tonson' (arnold Bennett), New Age, January 1911 -- (american Edition) 1911 -- 72. 'A Novel That Suggests the Work of Galsworthy but Lacks the Galsworthian Strength', New York Times, February 1911 -- 73. An American Summing-up, Current Opinion (usa) April 1911 -- 74. D. H. Lawrence, Letter to E. M. Forster, [1915] -- 75. Katherine Mansfield, Journal, May 1917 -- (american Edition, 1921) -- 76. 'R.h.', Review, New Republic, April 1921 -- 77. Unsigned Notice, Dial, October 1921 -- 78. George B. Dutton, Review, Springfield Sunday Republican, January 1922 -- 79. T. Sturge Moore, Letter to W. B. Yeats, April 1911 -- The Celestial Omnibus (1911) -- 80. Unsigned Notice, Daily Telegraph, May 1911 -- 81. 'A Book of Phantasies', Daily Mail, May 1911 -- 82. Dixon Scott, 'the Pipes of Puck', Manchester Guardian, May 1911 -- 83. Unsigned Review, Nation, June 1911 -- 84. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, June 1911 -- 84. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, June 1911 * -- 85. Unsigned Notice, Athenaeum, July 19 N -- 86. Unsigned Notice, Cambridge Review, October 1911 -- (american Edition, 1923) -- 87. Unsigned Notice, New York Evening Post, September 192388. D. H. Lawrence, Letter to Bertrand Russell, February 1915 -- The Story of the Siren (1920) -- 89. Katherine Mansfield, 'throw Them Overboard!', Athenaeum, August 1920 -- 90. Rebecca West, Review, New Statesman, August 1920 -- 91. D. H. Lawrence, Letter to E. M. Forster, September 1922 -- 92. Hamish Miles on E. M. Forster, Dial, May 1924 -- A Passage to India (1924) -- 93. Rose Macaulay, 'women in the East', Daily News, June 1924 -- 94. Unsigned Review, the Times Literary Supplement, June 1924 -- 95. A. C. Benson, Letter to E. M. Forster, June 1924 -- 96. H. C. Harwood, Review, Outlook, June 1924 -- 97. Leonard Woolf, 'arch Beyond Arch', Nation & -- Athenaeum, June 1924 -- 98. H. W. Massingham, 'the Price of India's Friendship', New Leader, June 1924 -- 99. Unsigned Review, Observer, June 1924 -- 100. 'c.m.', Review, Manchester Guardian, June 1924 -- 101. Unsigned Review, Birmingham Post, June 1924 -- 102. Sylvia Lynd, 'a Great Novel at Last', Time and Tide, June 1924 -- 103. Gerald Gould, Review, Saturday Review, June 1924 -- 104. Ralph Wright, Review, New Statesman, June 1924 -- 105. L. P. Hartley, Review, Spectator, June 1924 -- 106. J. B. Priestley, Review, London Mercury, July 1924 -- 107. R. Ellis Roberts, Review, Bookman (london), July 1924 -- 108. Marmaduke Pickthall, Letter to E. M. Forster, July 1924 -- 109. D. H. Lawrence, Letter to Martin Seeker, July 1924 -- 110.John Middleton Murry, 'bo-oum or Ou-boum?', Adelphi, July 1924 -- III. Unsigned Notice, Times of India (bombay), July 1924 -- 112. Laurence Stallings, 'when Rudyards Cease Their Kiplings and Haggards Ride No More', World (new York), August 1924 -- 113. Edward Carpenter, Letter to E. M. Forster, August [1924] -- 114. 'A Striking Novel', Statesman (calcutta), August 1924 -- 115. E. A. Horne, an Anglo-indian View, Letter to the Editor of New Statesman, August 1924116. S. K. Ratcliffe, Another Anglo-indian View, Letter to the Editor of New Statesman, August 1924 -- 117. Rebecca West, 'interpreters of Their Age', Saturday Review of Literature (new York), August 1924 -- 118. Henry W. Nevinson, 'india's Coral Strand', Saturday Review of Literature (new York), August 1924 -- 119. 'D.l.m.', Review, Boston Evening Transcript, September 1924 -- 120. St Nihal Singh, 'indians and Anglo-indians: as Por- Trayed to Britons', Modern Review (calcutta), September 1924 -- 121. 'C.w.g.', Review, Englishman (calcutta), September 1924 -- 122. I. P. Fassett, Review, Criterion, October 1924 -- 123. D. H. Lawrence, Letter to John Middlcton Murry, October 1924 -- 124. Elinor Wylie, 'passage to More Than India', New York Herald Tribune, October 1924 -- 125. Edwin Muir, Review, Nation (new York), October 1924 -- 126. 's. A.', Review, Springfield Sunday Republican, October 1924 -- 127. Robert Bridges, Letter to E. M. Forster, November [1924] -- 128. Clarbncb H. Gaines, Review, North American Review, December 1924 -- 129. Arnold Bennett, Journals, January 1925 -- 130. 'an Indian' ('a.s.b.'), 'hommage a M. Forster', August 1928 -- 131. Bhupal Singh on E. M. Forster's Picture Oflndia, a Survey of Anglo-indian Fiction, 1934 -- 132. Roger Fry on a Passage to India, as Quoted by Virginia Woolf, 1940 -- Four Views of Forster (1927) -- 133. Jacques Heurgon, 'the Novels of E. M. Forster', Revue De Paris, April 1927 -- 134. Edward Shanks, 'e. M. Forster', London Mercury, July 1927 -- 135. T. E. Lawrence on Forster and D. H. Lawrence, August 1927 -- 136. Virginia Woolf, 'the Novels of E. M. Forster', Atlantic Monthly (boston), November 1927 -- Aspects of the Novel (1927) -- 137. E. F. Benson, 'a Literary Mystification', Spectator, October 1927 -- 138. Virginia Woolf, Review, Nation, November 1927139. L. P. Hartley, Review, Saturday Review, December 1927This set comprises 40 volumes covering 19th and 20th century European and American authors. These volumes will be available as a complete set, mini boxed sets (by theme) or as individual volumes. This second set compliments the first 68 volume set of Critical Heritage published by Routledge in October 1995.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
Letter from Clifford Forster, American Civil Liberties Union, to Ernest Besig, Director, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, April 1, 1943
No full textLetter from Clifford Forster to Ernest Besig, regarding the status of "all of the Japanese evacuation cases" being referred to the Supreme Court. Forster writes: "In view of the fact that, as I understand it, certain questions are being certified by the CCA to the Supreme Court, if we are to file a brief amicus in behalf of the Union we shall have to know what the questions were that are being certified. Or is the situation such that the cases in toto are being referred?" Forster suggests Besig to see Endo's attorney James C. Purcell, "and urge upon him the importance of getting Judge Roche to make a decision."The ACLU-Northern California case file records contain legal documents and correspondence pertaining to the case Ex parte Mitsuye Endo (1944), in which the United States Supreme court unanimously ruled that the federal government could not indefinitely detain United States citizens who were loyal to the government. Files include documents related to the Gordon Hirabayashi Supreme Court case Hirabayashi v. United States
Fabeln
No full textThis 112-page book has a list of fabulists and a list of illustrations on its last page. The choice of representatives in this anthology puts stress on ancients, La Fontaine, Bidpai, and Germans. All the selections here are in prose. The style of illustration that Forster employs is simple. There is a short essay at the end: Allgemeines zu Fabel. The print in this essay is so small that it tests one's eyes! There are very good fables among this collection, starting with the very first, Lessing's Der alte Löwe (5). I miss, however, some organization, whether by subject or era or author. Other worthy fables I have noticed here in the first third include Pfeffel's Das Glühwürmchen und die Kröte (6); Meissner's Der schwörende Wolf (27); Langbein's Der Igel und der Hase (32); and Gleim's Der Löwe und der Fuchs (36). This book prints the US military government's permission to publish. Actually, it is a surprise to see a fable book published in Germany in 1946!This is a hardbound book (hard cover)Language note: GermanFirst editionAusgewählt und illustriert von Hanna Forste
Forster and adaptation: across time, media and methodologies
No full textThe online international conference E. M. Forster: Shaping the Space of Culture: 4th conference of the International E.M. Forster Society, was convened to mark the 50th anniversary of Forster’s death. It replaced the in-person Forster 50 conference to have been held at Cambridge University in Apr 2020 (at which I was also an accepted speaker), which had to be cancelled at short notice due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The online conference attracted scholars and a wider audience from six continents, with a highly engaged audience for my paper.This paper seeks to advance conversations around Forster and adaptation – or Forsterian adaptation – by appraising the current state of Forster/ian adaptations scholarship and proposing conceptual and methodological tools for advancing the study of this field. As a cross-disciplinary scholar of film, adaptation, literature, popular and critical reception, and digitally enabled participatory culture, my more specific goal is to heighten and extend transdisciplinary awareness of the materials available to be studied, the available methodologies, and their merits and limitations, while identifying issues and challenges for the development of a Forster/ian Adaptation Studies.
Structurally, the paper proceeds by identifying ten ‘themes’ – or important considerations – for the study of Forster/ian adaptation. The ten themes look substantially beyond ‘page-to-screen’ adaptation studies to demonstrate the
roles and impacts of institutions, institutional practices, personal relations, the successive ‘new’ media of the past century and their advancing technologies and practices, commercial forces, and Forster’s literary estate (as the rights-holders
and royalties beneficiaries for his works). Via this approach I call for a closer, evidence-based, attention to film and media adaptation and production processes and their adaptational consequences; and foreground the importance of the
visual and unscripted – performed, embodied, intangible and even accidental – elements and determinants of audio-visual adaptation.
Temporally, the paper proposes that there have been three phases of Forster/ian adaptation. Phase 1 (1942–1973) comprises those adaptations of Forster’s stories and novels written and produced (broadly) during his lifetime, always for non-cinematic media. Phase 2 comprises the 1984–1992 era of the Forster feature-films cycle, instigated by a (widely
disregarded) institutional shift which brought a step-change in the nature of Forster adaptation: for the first time, the development of new adaptations of Forster’s novels, going back to the source, became the norm. Phase 3 comprises
everything that comes after the 1984–1992 Forster feature films and also certain earlier adaptations which fall outside the ‘classic adaptation’ category. This third (and current) phase is characterised by its heterogeneity: adaptation to a range of
media, across a range of forms and aesthetic approaches, but, I propose, spanning four main areas: Sci-Fi Forster; Queer Forster; The Revisionist or Condescending Forster Adaptation; and twenty-first-century Forsterian Bio-Drama, Bio-Fiction and ‘Literary’ Paratexts
Pseudanapis wilsoni Forster
No full textPseudanapis wilsoni Forster Pseudanapis wilsoni Forster, 1959, p. 316,figs. 111-117, 154 (male holotype from New Guinea, in MCZ, not seen). Diagnosis: Males of P. wilsoni may be recognized by the presence of spines on the first tibia (Forster, 1959, fig. 114),females by the reduction of the pedipalp to the coxa only. Male: Described by Forster (1959). Female: Described by Forster (1959). Material Examined: None; known only from the type series taken in leafmould in a lowland rain forest at the Lower Basu River, Huon Peninsula, New Guinea, by E. O. Wilson in 1955.Published as part of Platnick, N. I & M. U. Shadab, 1979, A review of the spider genera Anapisona and Psudanapis, pp. 1-20 in American Museum Novitates 2672 on page 1
Anapisona kartabo Forster
No full textAnapisona kartabo Forster Figures 38,39 Anapisona kartabo Forster, 1958, p. 11,figs. 9,12, 14,17, 22 (male holotype from Kartabo, Mazaruni-Putaro, Guyana, in AMNH, examined). Diagnosis: Males of A. kartabo may be recognized by the absence of an apophysis on the palpal patella (figs. 38, 39). Male: Described by Forster (1958). Female: Unknown. Material Examined: Only the holotype, taken by sifting in 1924.Published as part of Platnick, N. I & M. U. Shadab, 1979, A review of the spider genera Anapisona and Psudanapis, pp. 1-20 in American Museum Novitates 2672 on page 1
Nanometinae FORSTER & FORSTER 1999
No full textNANOMETINAE FORSTER & FORSTER, 1999 NEW RANK (FIGS 4F, 71–76, 87–91, 96–99) <p> <i>Type genus:</i> <i>Nanometa</i> Simon, 1908. This family name was first proposed by Forster & Forster (1999: 166) at the family rank, but it has never been formally diagnosed.</p> <p> <i>Diagnosis:</i> Nanometines can be differentiated from other tetragnathids by the following combination of characters: female cheliceral denticles present (84-1: Figs 73C, 88D), absence of trichobothria on femur IV (Fig. 73F) and the remaining femora, female genital openings often plugged with amorphous material (132-3: Figs 74A, 98B), male palpal patella without macrosetae (180-0: Figs 73D, 97H), conductor originating on the centre of the tegulum (55-0), solid, uniform degree of sclerotization between tegulum and conductor (59-0); and tubular embolus shape (67-0) (Figs 75E, 76A–C, 90C, 91A). These six characters also represent the morphological synapomorphies supporting this lineage obtained by the total evidence analysis of Dimitrov & Hormiga (2011), in which they are labelled as ‘ Nanometa clade’ (see also Álvarez- Padilla <i>et al</i>., 2009). Additional diagnostic characters of nanometines are the female copulatory ducts longer than the spermathecae length (146-2; Figs 74B, 89D, 98D), shorter in <i>Pinkfloydia</i> Dimitrov & Hormiga, 2011: figs 8G, H, 15F); the presence of a cymbium ectobasal process (26-1); and having the cymbium ectomedian process more than half the cymbial width (30-1: Figs 75A, 90A, C, 99D). The characteristic branched tracheal system of many nanometines (such as <i>Nanometa</i> and ‘ <i>Orsinome</i> ’ <i>sarasini</i>; see Forster & Forster, 1999: 166) is not found in <i>Pinkfloydia</i>, which has its median tracheal trunks confined to the abdomen and not branched (Dimitrov & Hormiga, 2011).</p> <p> <i>Taxonomic and natural history:</i> Forster & Forster (1999) were the first to recognize this group endemic to Australasia as ‘Nanometidae’ and discussed some interesting aspects of nanometine anatomy such as the presence of an stridulatory organ on the booklung covers of males opposite to a row of denticles on the IV coxa (Figs 71A, B, 73E). They also included in their ‘Nanometidae’ the monotypic genus <i>Eryciniolia</i> Strand, 1912 and <i>Orsinome lagenifera</i> (Urquhart, 1888). There are many species to be described in Nanometinae, some which are new (e.g. Dimitrov & Hormiga, 2011) but others are misplaced, such as the case of ‘ <i>Orsinome</i> ’ <i>sarasini</i> (Figs 143A, B, 144), which is not congeneric with the type species of <i>Orsinome</i> and belongs in the Nanometinae. At the present time Nanometinae includes the genera <i>Nanometa</i> and <i>Pinkfloydia</i>. The monophyly of Nanometinae has been tested in recent phylogenetic analyses that also included molecular data and the group is relatively well supported (Álvarez-Padilla <i>et al</i>., 2009; Dimitrov & Hormiga, 2011).</p>Published as part of <i>Álvarez-Padilla, Fernando & Hormiga, Gustavo, 2011, Morphological and phylogenetic atlas of the orb-weaving spider family Tetragnathidae (Araneae: Araneoidea), pp. 713-879 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 162 (4)</i> on pages 802-803, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00692.x, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5440885">http://zenodo.org/record/5440885</a>
Pseudanapis aloha Forster
No full textPseudanapis aloha Forster Pseudanapis aloha Forster, 1959,p. 315, figs. 106-110 (male holotype from Hawaii, in AMNH, examined). Suman, 1967,p. 25, figs. 11-16. Gossiblemma yapensis Roewer, 1963, p. 129, figs. 9e-9i (male and female syntypes from Yap, in Bishop Museum, not seen); first synonymized by Shear, 1978,p. 8. Diagnosis: Males of P. aloha may be recognized by the small proximal apophysis on the palpal patella (Forster, 1959,figs. 108, 109; Palpal patella with distal dorsal apophysis; embolus wide (fig. 50). Female: Total length 0.83. Carapace 0.31 long, 0.32 wide, 0.22 high. Abdomen 0.58 long, 0.54 wide. Thorax and posterior eye row as in male. Pedipalp reduced to coxa and trochanter. Abdomen without dorsal scutum, with numerous small round sclerotizations and four large muscle impressions (figs. 48,49). Suman, 1967,fig. 16),females by the small spermathecae on short stalks (Suman, 1967,fig. 15). Male: Described by Forster (1959). Female: Described by Suman (1967). Material Examined: Hawaii: Oahu (Van Zwaluwenburg, AMNH), lc? (holotype). Yap: Colonia, under rocks in grassy field, May 31, 1973 (J. A. Beatty, J. W. Berry, JAB), IS, 1$.Published as part of Platnick, N. I & M. U. Shadab, 1979, A review of the spider genera Anapisona and Psudanapis, pp. 1-20 in American Museum Novitates 2672 on page 1
"What I Believe" di Edward Morgan Forster tra ironia e disincanto
No full textThe first Italian translation of the essay What I Believe by Edward Morgan Forster is offered here. Under the shadow of Second World War, the author illustrates his ideal of humanity and civilization, by defending liberal values against the threat of totalitarianisms. The target text is preceded by an introduction, which analyses the essay within the context of Forster’s commitment as a public intellectual and discusses the translation strategies adopted.Esta es la primera traducción italiana del ensayo What I Believe enscrito por Edward Morgan Forster con una introducción
crítica.C\u27est la première traduction italienne de What I Believe de Edward Morgan Forster avec une introduction.Il contributo propone la prima traduzione italiana del saggio What I Believe (1939) di Edward Morgan Forster. L’autore, dinanzi alla minaccia della seconda guerra mondiale, sintetizza il proprio ideale di civiltà e umanità, proponendo la difesa dei valori liberali dalle insidie del totalitarismo. La traduzione è accompagnata da una nota introduttiva, in cui si analizza il saggio nel quadro dell’impegno pubblico di Forster come intellettuale e si discutono le strategie traduttive impiegate
Maurice, and complementary entry on E. M. Forster
No full text(i) Chapter on E. M. Forster’s posthumous novel Maurice and the development and production complexities of its 1987 film adaptation by Merchant Ivory Productions (directed by James Ivory) for the first volume in a large multi-volume reference work, and (ii) the accompanying entry on the source author E. M. Forster and the history of adaptations of his works across multiple media (not solely the 1980s–1990s Forster feature films). 5,071 words in total
- …
