9,729 research outputs found
Replication Data for: Does Deference Depend on Distinction? Issue Salience and Judicial Decision Making in Administrative Law Cases
No full textReplication data and code for Fix (2014)
Replication Data for: Does Deference Depend on Distinction? Issue Salience and Judicial Decision Making in Administrative Law Cases
No full textReplication data and code for Fix (2014)
Replication Data for: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Polarization and Presidential Success in Congress
No full textReplication data and code for Franklin and Fix 201
Replication Data for: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Polarization and Presidential Success in Congress
No full textReplication data and code for Franklin and Fix 201
Replication Data for: The Complexities of State Court Compliance with U.S. Supreme Court Precedent
No full textReplication Data for Fix, Kingsland, and Montgomery 2017, and file of state-specific vitality scores for Miller v. California for all states
Replication Data for: The Complexities of State Court Compliance with U.S. Supreme Court Precedent
No full textReplication Data for Fix, Kingsland, and Montgomery 2017, and file of state-specific vitality scores for Miller v. California for all states
Replication Data for: Examining the Interconnectedness of State High Court Twitter
No full textJudges are not the first political officials that come to mind when one considers the role of social media in modern politics. Following in the wake of some prominent judicial personalities adopting Twitter, however, a growing number of state high court judges have adopted and established more public personas on the platform. Judges use Twitter in substantively different ways than traditional elected officials (Curry and Fix 2019), however little is understood about how the use of such social media platforms affects broader judicial networks. Recognizing that judges, like typical social media users, may aspire to expand their networks to build and appeal to broader audiences, we contend that active participation in judicial Twitterverse could yield personal and professional advantages. Here, we address a currently unexplored question: To what extent have judges formed a distinctive “judicial network,” on Twitter, and what discernible patterns present in these networks? Leveraging the unique structure of social media, we collect comprehensive network data on judging using Twitter and analyze what institutional and social factors impact greater power within the judicial network. We find that early adoption, electoral concerns, and connective links between judges all impact the strength of the judicial network, highlighting the complex motivations driving judicial Twitter engagement, and the significance of network building in judges' social media strategies and its potential impact on career advancement
Replication Data for: Examining the Policy Learning Dynamics of Atypical Policies with an Application to State Preemption of Local Dog Laws
No full textReplication Data and Cod
Replication Data for: Examining the Policy Learning Dynamics of Atypical Policies with an Application to State Preemption of Local Dog Laws
No full textReplication Data and Cod
Replication Data for: Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand-Your-Ground Laws
No full textCode and Replication Data for Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand-Your-Ground Law
- …
