4 research outputs found
Efficacy and safety of topiramate in refractory epilepsy of childhood: long-term follow-up study
No full textThis study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of topiramate in treating children with drug-resistant epilepsy. A multicentric, retrospective, open-label, add-on study was undertaken of 277 children (mean age 8.4 years; range 12 months to 16 years) affected by drug-resistant epilepsy. The efficacy was rated according to the seizure types and epilepsy syndrome. After a mean period of 27.5 months of treatment (range 24-61 months), 11 patients (4%) were seizure free and 56 (20%) had more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency. The efficacy of topiramate treatment was noted in localization-related epilepsy and in generalized epilepsy. In addition, in a group of 114 patients, we compared the initial efficacy (evaluated after a mean of 9 months of follow-up) and the retention at a mean of 30 months of topiramate with regard to loss of efficacy (defined as the return to the baseline seizure frequency). Fifty-five (48%) of 114 patients were initial responders. The retention at a mean of 30 months was 23 of 114 patients (20%), 4 of whom (3.5%) were still seizure free. A loss of efficacy occurred in 32 of the 55 initial responders (58%). It was prominent in patients with generalized epilepsy, such as symptomatic infantile spasms and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, as well as in those with Dravet syndrome. By contrast, a well-sustained topiramate efficacy was noted among patients with localization-related epilepsy. Globally, adverse events were observed in 161 patients (58%) and were mainly represented by weight loss, hyperthermia, sedation, and nervousness, which, in most cases, disappeared after slowing titration or reducing the dosage of the drug. In conclusion, the present long-term study confirms that topiramate represents a useful drug effective in a wide range of seizures and epilepsy syndromes. Moreover, preliminary data seem to suggest that the efficacy of topiramate, when evaluated in the long-term perspective, is more sustained in localization-related epilepsy than in generalized epilepsy
Open prospective study on oxcarbazepine in epilepsy in children: A preliminary report
No full textSummaryPurposeTo evaluate the long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC) in children with epilepsy.MethodsWe enrolled 36 patients (median age 7.75) with new diagnosis of partial epilepsy in an open prospective study. All type of epilepsy were included: 25 patients were affected by idiopathic epilepsy, eight by symptomatic epilepsy and three by cryptogenic epilepsy. Patients were then scheduled to come back for controls at 3 months (T1), 12 months (T2) and 24 months (T3) after the beginning of OXC-monotherapy (T0). At each control we evaluated patients through their seizure diary, a questionnaire on side effects, their level of 10-monohydroxy (MHD) metabolite and laboratory analysis.ResultsAt T1, 21/36 patients (58.3%) were seizure-free, 3/36 patients (8.3%) showed an improvement higher than 50%, 3/36 (8.3%) lower than 50%, while 2/36 worsened (5.6%). In 7/36 (19.5%) patients, no improvement was reported. At T2 13/18 patients (72.2%) were seizure-free, 1/18 showed a response to therapy higher than 50% while 2/18 worsened (11%). In two patients no improvement was reported. A correspondence between MHD plasmatic levels and clinical response (r=0.49; p<0.05) was only registered at T1.An EEG normalization was observed in 25% of cases. Side effects were reported in 25% of cases, but symptoms progressively disappeared at follow-up.ConclusionsWe can therefore conclude that OXC can be considered, for its efficacy and safety, as a first line drug in children with epilepsy
VNS in drug resistant epilepsy: preliminary report on a small group of patients
Get PDFAbstract Background In 1997 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy in people aged 12 years and older who are ineligible for resective epilepsy surgery. Although the exact mechanisms of action are unknown, the use of VNS with children has increased, including those younger than 12 years of age, or those with generalized epilepsy. Methods We describe the outcome for the first group of nine patients, aged 8-28 years, who had pharmaco-resistant epilepsy and were treated with VNS. During the follow up, we gradually and slowly increased the parameters of the stimulation in order to assess the efficacy of VNS even at parameters which would usually be considered "non-therapeutic", along with possible side effects and changes in quality of life. Results At the last follow, up 1 patient was "seizures free", 3 were "very good responders", 3 were "good responders" and 2 were "non responders". We obtained an initial seizure reduction with low stimulation parameters, the highest current reached being 2.00 mA. This observation supports the possibility that, for younger patients, lower stimulation intensities than those commonly used in clinical practice for adults can be therapeutic. We also wanted to underline the reduction in seizure frequency (~91,7%) and the reduction in seizure duration (> 50%) in the patients affected by drug-resistant absence epilepsy. Adverse effects were mild, tolerable and, in most of cases, easily resolved by adjusting the stimulation parameters. Hoarseness of voice was the most frequent side effect. The improvements in the quality of life are relevant and seem to be independent of the VNS effect in controlling seizures. Conclusions Our small experience seems to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS in drug resistant partial and generalized epilepsy in developing age groups.</p
First Attack and Clinical Presentation of Hemiplegic Migraine in Pediatric Age: A Multicenter Retrospective Study and Literature Review
Get PDFBackground: Data on clinical presentation of Hemiplegic Migraine (HM) are quite limited in the literature, particularly in the pediatric age. The aim of the present study is to describe in detail the phenotypic features at onset and during the first years of disease of sporadic (SHM) and familial (FHM) pediatric hemiplegic migraine and to review the pertinent literature.
Results: Retrospective study of a cohort of children and adolescents diagnosed with hemiplegic migraine, recruited from 11 Italian specialized Juvenile Headache Centers. Forty-six cases (24 females) were collected and divided in two subgroups: 32 SHM (16 females), 14 FHM (8 females). Mean age at onset was 10.5 ± 3.8 y (range: 2–16 y). Mean duration of motor aura was 3.5 h (range: 5 min−48 h). SHM cases experienced more prolonged attacks than FHM cases, with significantly longer duration of both motor aura and of total HM attack. Sensory (65%) and basilar-type auras (63%) were frequently associated to the motor aura, without significant differences between SHM and FHM. At follow-up (mean duration 4.4 years) the mean frequency of attacks was 2.2 per year in the first year after disease onset, higher in FHM than in SHM cases (3.9 vs. 1.5 per year, respectively). A literature review retrieved seven studies, all but one were based on mixed adults and children cohorts.
Conclusions: This study represents the first Italian pediatric series of HM ever reported, including both FHM and SHM patients. Our cohort highlights that in the pediatric HM has an heterogeneous clinical onset. Children present fewer non-motor auras as compared to adults and in some cases the first attack is preceded by transient neurological signs and symptoms in early childhood. In SHM cases, attacks were less frequent but more severe and prolonged, while FHM patients had less intense but more frequent attacks and a longer phase of active disease. Differently from previous studies, the majority of our cases, even with early onset and severe attacks, had a favorable clinical evolution
