1,720,986 research outputs found
Figure 12 in New species of Lucicutia and taxonomic status of L. grandis (Copepoda, Calanoida, Lucicutiidae)
Figure 12. Lucicutia hulsemannae. Male, paratype. (A, B) P5 of different specimens. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.Published as part of Markhaseva, E. L. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2005, New species of Lucicutia and taxonomic status of L. grandis (Copepoda, Calanoida, Lucicutiidae), pp. 1077-1100 in Journal of Natural History 39 (15) on page 1097, DOI: 10.1080/00222930400005740, http://zenodo.org/record/521430
Figure 6 in New species of Lucicutia and taxonomic status of L. grandis (Copepoda, Calanoida, Lucicutiidae)
Figure 6. Lucicutia bradyana. Male. (A, B) P5, specimen identified by Hulsemann (1966) as Lucicutia rara, Indian Ocean, Anton Bruun cruise 6, station 355C: (A) right, (B) left legs; (C, D) P5, holotype of Lucicutia rara, NMNH 113545. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.Published as part of Markhaseva, E. L. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2005, New species of Lucicutia and taxonomic status of L. grandis (Copepoda, Calanoida, Lucicutiidae), pp. 1077-1100 in Journal of Natural History 39 (15) on page 1088, DOI: 10.1080/00222930400005740, http://zenodo.org/record/521430
Figure 2 in Comparative morphology among trunk limbs of Caenestheriella gifuensis and Leptestheria kawachiensis (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata)
Figure 2. Caenestheriella gifuensis adult female (8.7 mm ¥ 5.4 mm). A, trunk limb 13, anterior. B, trunk limb 2, enditic lobe 5 and endopod, anterior. Adult male (7.6 mm ¥ 4.9 mm). C, trunk limb 15, endopod and enditic lobes 4–5, anterior, with small palp bearing 2 setae. D, ventral face of enditic lobes 4–5 of trunk limb 15 showing position of palp, anterior setae (closed circles), and posterior setae (open circles). Scale bars: 0.1 mm. For A–C, ventral left, proximal up; in A, broken line indicates area of attachment to the body; enditic lobes 1–5 are numbered; EN, endopod; EX, exopod; P, palp; xt, exite.Published as part of Ferrari, Frank D. & Grygier, Mark J., 2003, Comparative morphology among trunk limbs of Caenestheriella gifuensis and Leptestheria kawachiensis (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata), pp. 547-564 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 139 (4) on page 551, DOI: 10.1046/j.0024-4082.2003.00083.x, http://zenodo.org/record/543279
Moina weberi Richard 1891
18. Moina weberi Richard, 1891 Moina weberi Richard 1891a, p. 120 –123, Pl. 10: figs 1–3. Type locality. "lacs de Singkarah et de Maninjau (Sumatra)" (Richard 1891a), Indonesia. Richard's specimens. A few well-preserved females in sample DGF 702, " Lac Singkarah (Sumatra) Pêche pelagique, surface, Max Weber, 3.V.1888 "; many females in poor condition in sample DGF 703 from the same locality. Comments. This is a junior synonym of M. micrura Kurz, 1874 according to Goulden (1968) and Smirnov (1976), but specimens reported as M. micrura from different areas may belong to a group of species (see Petrusek et al. 2004).Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on <em>Cladocera</em> (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, USA
FIGURE 6. Pleuroxus letourneuxi (Richard, 1888), appendages of parthenogenetic female from Bir el Nebech, Tunisia, tube DGF 962: (A) Paragnath and maxilla I. (B) Limb I. (C–D) Limb II and distal portion of its gnathobase. (E–F) Limb III and its inner portion. (G–H) Limb IV and its inner portion. (I) Limb V. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U.S.A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 59, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
Moinodaphnia mocquerysi Richard 1892
20. Moinodaphnia mocquerysi Richard, 1892 Moinodaphnia Mocquerysi Richard 1892b, p. 222 –226, figs 7–8. Type locality. No specific locality reported. All samples of Richard (1892b) were taken "sur le territoire de Mayoumba (Congo français)", now Gabon. Richard's specimens. Females from samples DGF 851 and DGF 854 from “Fr. Eq. Africa” (no further information). Samples DGF 708 and DGF 883 from “Mayoumba. Congo, Fr. Eq. Africa” are not present in DGF; these samples contained Moinodaphnia sp. according to identifications on this Frey’s card. Comments. Goulden (1968) regarded M. mocquerysi as a junior synonym of M. macleayi (King, 1853) described from Australia. If specimens of M. macleayi cannot be reconciled with those of M. mocquerysi, the latter name should restricted to populations from Gabon.Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
Moina wierzejskii Richard 1895
19. Moina wierzejskii Richard, 1895 Moina brachiata (Jurine) in Wierzejski 1893, p. 234 –235, Pl. 5: figs 2–7. Moina Wierzejskii Richard 1895e, p. 195 –199, figs 9–13; Goulden 1968, p. 42 –48, figs 17–19; Smirnov 1976, p. 206 – 208, figs 182, 187–188. Moina platensis Birabén 1917, p. 264 –266, figs 4–7; Birabén 1918, p. 118 –123, figs 38–44. Type locality. "Environs de Port-au Prince" (Richard 1895e), Haiti. Richard's specimens. Many females and males from samples DGF 719, “Moulin de Drouillon”; DGF 751, “Mare Coucher Blain. Port au Prince”; DGF 800, “Mare T. Vienp. et Briqueterie. Port au Prince”; DGF 806, “Florian Armond-Rouge. Port au Prince”; DGF 836, “Carrefour. Port-au-Prince”. This species is absent from other samples taken in the vicinity of Port-au Prince (DGF 721, 727, 752, 805, 989), although Moina cf. micrura is present in the some of the samples. Comments. Valid species, widely distributed in North, Central and South America (Goulden 1968; Smirnov 1976).Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
Guernella raphaelis Richard 1892
24. Guernella raphaelis Richard, 1892 Guernella Raphaelis Richard 1892b, p. 218 –221, figs 4–5; Rey and Saint-Jean 1968, p. 97, fig. 14; Fryer 1974, p. 227 – 230, figs 110–112; Smirnov 1976,p. 156, figs 140–141; Ko ř ínek 1984,p. 50–51, fig. 27; Smirnov 1992, p. 114, figs 485–490. Type locality. "Mayoumba et à l'endroit nommé " Caca Muerca ""(Richard 1892b), Gabon. Richard's specimens. A few females from samples DGF 851 and DGF 854 from “Fr. Eq. Africa” (no further information). Samples DGF 855 and DGF 865 from “Caca Muerca. Fr. Eq. Africa” do not contain this taxon. Sample DGF 883 from “Mayoumba. Congo, Fr. Eq. Africa”, which also contained Guernella raphaelis according to David Frey’s card, is no longer present in the collection. Comments. A valid species (Smirnov 1992), reported circumtropically but rare; non-African populations should be reconciled with specimens from type locality. Only African records were presented in the synonymy.Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
Grimaldina brazzai Richard 1892
23. Grimaldina brazzai Richard, 1892 Grimaldina Brazzai Richard 1892b: 214–218, figs 1–3; Daday 1910, p. 130 –139, Pl. 7: fig. 26; Rey and Saint-Jean 1968, p. 97, fig. 13; Fryer 1974, p. 236 –238, figs 128–129; Smirnov 1976, p. 155 –156, figs 137–139; Ko ř ínek 1984, p. 50, fig. 26; Smirnov 1992, p. 107 –109, figs 461–468; Silva-Briano 1998, p. 149 –151, figs 1–10. Type locality. "Mayoumba et Caca Muerca (Congo Français)" (Richard 1892b), now in Gabon. Richard's specimens. Lectotype (selected here) USNM 1134577: Parthenogenetic female on slide with Richard number 207 labelled “ Grimaldina brazzai Richard, ♀, Congo, Caca Muerca, 10 juin 1890 ”. Females from sample DGF 851 from “Fr. Eq. Africa” (no further information). Samples DGF 855 and DGF 865 from “Caca Muerca. Fr. Eq. Africa” do not contain this species. Sample DGF 708 from “Mayoumba. Congo, Fr. Eq. Africa”, contained Grimaldina brazzai according to Frey’s card, but is no longer present in the collection. Comments. A valid species (Smirnov 1992), reported circumtropically but rare; non-African populations should be reconciled with specimens from type locality. Only African records are presented in the synonymy.Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
Macrothrix chevreuxi Guerne et Richard 1892
25. Macrothrix chevreuxi Guerne et Richard, 1892 Macrothrix Chevreuxi Guerne and Richard 1892c, p. 530 –533, figs 3–6. Type locality. " Rio Fresco, près Rufisque " and "un lieu dit "Caca Muerca", près Majumba", (Richard 1892c). The former now is in Senegal; the latter now is in Gabon. Richard's specimens. A few females from samples DGF 854 from “Fr. Eq. Africa” (no further information). Samples DGF 855 and DGF 865 from “Caca Muerca. Fr. Eq. Africa” do not contain this taxon. Samples DGF 708 and DGF 883 from “Mayoumba. Congo, Fr. Eq. Africa” are no longer in the collection but did not contain Macrothrix sp. according to David Frey’s card. There are no Macrothrix in any of the samples from Senegal. Comments. A junior synonym of M. triserialis according to Smirnov (1992). However, Dumont et al. (2002) and Kotov et al. (2004) believe that specimens reported as " M. triserialis " constitute a large assemblage of sibling species. The status of different African populations of M. cf. triserialis should be reconciled with specimens from type locality.Published as part of Kotov, Alexey A. & Ferrari, Frank D., 2010, The taxonomic research of Jules Richard on Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) and his collection at the National Museum of Natural History, U. S. A., pp. 37-64 in Zootaxa 2551 (1) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2551.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/530471
- …
