1,721,968 research outputs found

    IL MITO DI PROCRUSTE. IL PROBLEMA DELL'INTERPOSIZIONE DELLE NORME GENERATIVE DI OBBLIGHI INTERNAZIONALI NEI GIUDIZI DI LEGITTIMITÀ COSTITUZIONALE

    No full text
    L’indagine è volta a esplorare la complessità della categoria delle norme generative di obblighi internazionali in relazione alle prospettive dell’interposizione nel giudizio di legittimità costituzionale, a quelle già affermatesi e a quelle che potrebbero inverarsi, atteso il potenziale prescrittivo dell’art. 117 I co., con l’obiettivo precipuo di saggiare quali potrebbero essere le ripercussioni nella fisiologia della giustizia costituzionale

    I “terzi poteri” dell'Unione vigilano sull'indipendenza del giudice, principio cardine del costituzionalismo europeo Alcune considerazioni sulle vicende del giudice polacco (a margine di CGUE, Grande Sezione, sentt. 24 giugno 2019, 19 novembre 2019 e 26 marzo 2020)

    No full text
    This comment is mainly focused on the E.U.’s Judges action – the European Court of Justice and the domestic judges - in defending the rule of law in Poland and, specifically, the principle of judges’ independence. With this aim, some peculiar features of three European Court of Justice’s judgments are shown and analyzed. At the end, some perspectives on Poland’s current situation are examined, taking into account the last press release on the order of the Court of Justice in case C-791/19

    Ne riparleremo, dunque, tra qualche tempo»: a proposito dell'introduzione delle opinioni separate (e non meramente dissenzienti) vs. l'attuale forma di «dissenso mascherato»

    Full text link
    This article deals with the problem due to the discrepancies between the rapporteur Judge and the opinion-writer in some judgments by the Italian Constitutional Court. Starting from the recent statements made by the Judge Zanon, the study resumes the debate on the dissent related to the problem of the independence of the Constitutional Judge. In conclusion, it values the introduction of separate (and not merely dissenting) opinions into the constitutional justice system

    Fostering European Constitutionalism through the power of solidarity: the drive for value enforcement by the European Court of Justice in the light of case C-848/19

    No full text
    This research explores the meaning of the principle of solidarity in European constitutionalism, particularly in terms of energy solidarity (Art. 194 TFEU). In view of the many proposals made by the EU institutions of political leadership, the European Court of Justice gave a response that could mark a turning point for the creation of a European energy policy (ECJ, C-848/19, Germany vs. Poland). By studying this case, we can attempt to understand how European constitutionalism is developing in light of the principle of solidarity. In this regard, the Court underlines that it is not only a value characterised by a political meaning, but it is primarily a legally enforceable principle, establishing rights and duties for each Member State. It is also a parameter of legitimacy in the Court’s judicial review. From this perspective, in the sensitive field of energy, since this judgment, the ECJ has performed a peculiar and controversial institutional role

    Le rilevanti peculiarità del Testo Unico in materia di cultura della Regione Piemonte

    No full text
    The paper aims to underline the relevant features of the consolidated text on culture of Region Piedmont («legge regionale» n. 11/2018). Among the Italian Regions that adopted a similar consolidated text, the Piedmontese act distinguishes itself for several aspects. In the framework, culture is conceived as a powerful instrument of social integration, in order to remove obstacles, as the art. 3 of Italian Constitution provides
    corecore