1,721,276 research outputs found
Vitessa formosa C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer 1875
No full text505. Vitessa formosa C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875: pl. 137 fig. 1 Type locality: India orientalis Distribution. Indian records: India Orientalis (C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875). Global records: unknown.Published as part of Singh, Navneet, Ranjan, Rahul, Talukdar, Avishek, Joshi, Rahul, Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Chandra, Kailash & Mally, Richard, 2022, A catalogue of Indian Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 1-423 in Zootaxa 5197 (1) on page 141, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5197.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/725229
Tetraphlebia C. Felder & R. Felder 1867
No full textTetraphlebia C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 Type species: T. germainii C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 = Faunula C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 syn. nov. Type species: F. leucoglene C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 Diagnosis. Tetraphlebia has a well-developed M 1 -M 3 ocellus on the ventral side of the forewing with variable pupillation. In T. leucoglene, males have heavy androconia, but these scales are sparse in T. germainii and absent in T. eleates. The hindwing is rectangular with a postmedian band on the ventral side that is without ocelli. Though specimens were unavailable for dissection, T. patagonica (Mabille, 1855) (Erebia), lately a species of Faunula (cf. Pyrcz 2012), is very similar to T. leucoglene in that it bears an identical M 1 -M 3 VFW ocellus with a large, white pupil, but T. patagonica also bears two ocelli on the VHW, making it the only Tetraphlebia with hindwing ocelli. Antennae are round in T. eleates and T. leucoglene, spatulate in T. germainii. Eyes are naked and terminal palp segment is short and conical or oval. Foreleg tarsi are segmented with males having 2–3 tarsal segments and females 3–5 segments, those of T. leucoglene females also bearing spines. Male genitalia with the proximal end of the valvae triangular, a wide pedunculus, an aedeagus that is truncate at the proximal end, a saccus longer than it is wide, and an uncus that is widest where it meets the tegumen, narrowing gradually toward the distal end. Remarks. Felder & Felder described Faunula as a new genus immediately following the description of Tetraphlebia, noting similarities in wing venation between the two genera. These genera are here combined based on morphological and genetic similarity.Published as part of Matz, Jess & Brower, Andrew V. Z., 2016, The South Temperate Pronophilina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a phylogenetic hypothesis, redescriptions and revisionary notes, pp. 1-108 in Zootaxa 4125 (1) on page 69, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4125.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/27170
L'apprendimento cooperativo: un metodo per migliorare la preparazione e l'acquisizione di abilità cognitive negli studenti
No full text
Description of a new genus for Euptychia hilara (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)
No full textNakahara, Shinichi, Janzen, Daniel H., Hallwachs, Winnie, Espeland, Marianne (2015): Description of a new genus for Euptychia hilara (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Zootaxa 4012 (3): 525-541, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4012.3.
thliptophana subsp. thliptophana thliptophana (C. Felder & R. Felder 1874
No full textDirphia thliptophana thliptophana (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1874) . (Fig. 12) Ormiscodes thliptophana C. Felder & R. Felder in Felder et al., 1874: pl. 90, fig. 7. Dirphia thliptophana – Bouvier 1929b: 284. Dirphia thliptophana thliptophana – Lemaire 1981: 89. DÉTERMINATION. — Morphologique.Moléculaire (BOLD: AAI 9774). LOCALITÉ TYPE. — Rio Amazonas (Felder et al. 1874). RÉPARTITION GÉOGRAPHIQUE. — Guyano-amazonienne (Lemaire 2002). DISTRIBUTION EN GUYANE. — Connu des trois zones biogéographiques. HABITAT EN GUYANE. — Forêt primaire. MATÉRIEL DU MITARAKA EXAMINÉ. — Guyane • 2♂; Maripasoula, Mitaraka, Crique Alama (DZ); alt. 310 m; 2°14’1.9”N, 54°27’38.1”W; La Planète revisitée, MNHN / PNI Guyane; APA-973-1; 23.II-26.III.2015; E. Poirier leg.; MNHN • 1♂; mêmes données que précédent; Coll. FB • 1 ♂; Maripasoula, Mitaraka, Crique Alama (DZ); alt. 310 m; 2°14’1.9”N, 54°27’38.1”W; La Planète revisitée, MNHN / PNI Guyane; autorisation APA-973-2; 11-21.VIII.2015; FB leg.; MNHN • 2 ♂; mêmes données que précédent; Coll. FB.Published as part of Bénéluz, Frédéric, 2021, Liste commentée des Saturniidae (Lepidoptera, Bombycoidea) de Guyane, avec la liste des taxons récoltés au Mitaraka (extrême sud-ouest guyanais), pp. 759-809 in Zoosystema 43 (31) on page 795, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2021v43a31, http://zenodo.org/record/579681
Arctioblepsis rubida C. Felder & R. Felder 1862
No full text352. Arctioblepsis rubida C. Felder & R. Felder, 1862: 33 Type locality: Tse-kiang [China, Zhejiang], Níngbô Shì [Ning-po] Distribution. Indian records: Sikkim, Khasis (Hampson 1896b), Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh (Singh & Ranjan 2015), Assam, Manipur (Sondhi et al. 2021). Global records: China (Hampson 1896b), Nepal (Yamanaka 1995), Borneo (Sutton et al. 2015). Genus Arippara Walker, [1863c] 1864: 74 Type species: Arippara indicator Walker, [1863c] 1864, by monotypy = Paleca Butler, 1879c: 354 Type species: Paleca rufescens Butler, 1879c, by original designation = Paredra Snellen, 1880b: 60 Type species: Paredra eogenalis Snellen, 1880b, by monotypyPublished as part of Singh, Navneet, Ranjan, Rahul, Talukdar, Avishek, Joshi, Rahul, Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Chandra, Kailash & Mally, Richard, 2022, A catalogue of Indian Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 1-423 in Zootaxa 5197 (1) on page 116, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5197.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/725229
Ancylolomia indica C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer 1875
No full text83. Ancylolomia indica C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875: pl. 137 fig. 19 Type locality: India, Kolkata Distribution. Indian records: Throughout India, Kolkata, Kashmir, Nilgiris, Pune, Bihar (Mughal sarai), Kutch, Assam, Madras (Bleszynski 1970b), India (reaching about 1250 m in India) (Robinson et al. 1994). Global records: Arabian Peninsula, Afganistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, China (Hainan), Burma, Thailand, W. Malaysia, Lowland (Robinson et al. 1994), Nepal (Yamanaka 1998).Published as part of Singh, Navneet, Ranjan, Rahul, Talukdar, Avishek, Joshi, Rahul, Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Chandra, Kailash & Mally, Richard, 2022, A catalogue of Indian Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 1-423 in Zootaxa 5197 (1) on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5197.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/725229
Cosmosatyrus C. Felder & R. Felder 1867
No full textCosmosatyrus C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 Type species: Cosmosatyrus leptoneuroides C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 = Chillanella Herrera, 1966 syn. nov. Type species: Faunula stelligera Butler, 1881 Diagnosis. Male genitalia exhibit a long and slender uncus with the aedeagus more even in width at the distal end. Cosmosatyrus bears an M 1 -M 3 ocellus on the ventral side of the forewing that may appear as a single bipupillate ocellus or two unipupillate ocelli fused at M 2. The distal end of the discal cell is deeply sinuous. Cosmosatyrus leptoneuroides males bear androconia on the forewing, but C. stelligera and C. dubii do not. The hindwing is oval and may be slightly crenate to entire with an ocellus appearing in each cell between Rs and CuA 2. Antennae terminate in spatulate clubs in C. leptoneuroides and C. stelligera, while those of C. dubii are round. Terminal palp segment is cylindrical in C. leptoneuroides and C. stelligera and conical in C. dubii. Eyes are naked. Tarsal segmentation in the foreleg is variable, with C. leptoneuroides unsegmented in both sexes, C. stelligera with three segments in both males and females, and C. dubii males with three segments and females with four segments. Remarks. Herrera (1966) erected the monotypic genus Chillanella, for C. stelligera, on the basis of the positions of the forewing radial veins, which he noted are similar to those of Neosatyrus but with sufficient difference in genitalic characters (in his view) to separate it as a new genus. However, the position of the forewing radial veins is inconsistent in the Neosatyriti, even among individuals of the same species collected from the same locality, and is therefore unreliable as a character upon which to base the formation of a separate genus. Cosmosatyrus was considered monotypic in Lamas & Viloria (2004), but our phylogenetic analysis places Chillanella stelligera (Butler, 1881) in close relationship with C. leptoneuroides. Additionally, the male genitalia of C. stelligera differ from Neosatyrus and are more closely aligned with Cosmosatyrus. We also include in Cosmosatyrus the species recently described as Faunula dubii by Pyrcz (2012).Published as part of Matz, Jess & Brower, Andrew V. Z., 2016, The South Temperate Pronophilina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a phylogenetic hypothesis, redescriptions and revisionary notes, pp. 1-108 in Zootaxa 4125 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4125.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/27170
- …
