577 research outputs found

    Fluorpyromorphite, Pb5(PO4)3F, a new apatite-group mineral from Sukhovyaz Mountain, Southern Urals, and Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka

    No full text
    Fluorpyromorphite, ideally Pb5(PO4)3F, a new apatite-group member, an F-dominant analog of pyromorphite and hydrox-ylpyromorphite. It is a supergene mineral found at two localities: Sukhovyaz Mountain, Ufaley District, Southern Urals (holotype) and Mountain 1004, Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka (co-type), both in Russia. At Sukhovyaz, fluorpyromorphite forms anhedral grains up to 0.2 mm across (usually much smaller), filling cavities in quartz and sometimes partially replacing fluorapatite. Associated supergene minerals include pyromorphite, hydroxylpyromorphite, fluorphosphohedy-phane, mimetite, and nickeltsumcorite. At Tolbachik, fluorpyromorphite occurs in the oxidation zone of paleo-fumarolic deposits in close association with pyromorphite, fluorphosphohedyphane, wulfenite, cerussite, munakataite, vanadinite, chrysocolla, and opal. It forms crude long-prismatic to acicular crystals up to 0.1 mm long and up to 5 mu m thick com-bined in bunches and spherulites up to 0.2 mm. Fluorpyromorphite is colorless (Sukhovyaz) or yellow (Tolbachik), translucent to transparent and has a vitreous luster. It is brittle, with an uneven fracture and poor cleavage on (001). The calculated density values are 7.382 (holotype) and 6.831 (cotype) g/cm3. Fluorpyromorphite is optically uniaxial (-). In reflected light, it is light-grey, weakly anisotropic. The reflectance values (Rmin/Rmax, %) are: 15.8/16.6 (470 nm), 16.2/17.2 (546 nm), 15.9/16.9 (589 nm), 15.4/16.2 (650 nm). The chemical composition is (electron microprobe, wt. %; holotype/co-type): CaO 0.10/3.16, SrO 0.17/0.00, PbO 83.51/77.39, P2O516.13/16.35, CrO3 0.00/0.49, SeO3 0.00/0.98, F 1.00/1.35, Cl 0.29/0.40, H2Ocalc 0.13/0.00, -O=(F,Cl) -0.49/-0.66, total 100.84/99.46. The empirical formulae based on 13 anions (O +F + Cl+OH)pfu are Pb4.95Ca0.02Sr0.02P3.00O12F0.70(OH)0.19Cl0.11 (holotype) and Pb4.26Ca0.69P2.83Se6+0.09Cr6+0.06 O11.99F0.87Cl0.14 (co-type). Fluorpyromorphite is hexagonal, space group P63/m, unit-cell parameters (from powder X-ray diffraction data; holotype / co-type) are: a = 9.779(5) / 9.732(1), c = 7.241(9) / 7.242(1) angstrom, V = 599.6(7) / 594.0(2) angstrom 3, and Z = 2. The crystal structure was refined using the Rietveld method to Rp= 0.1764 (holotype). Fluorpyromorphite is isostructural with other members of the apatite group, a subdivision of the apatite supergroup

    Tolstykhite, Au3S4Te6, a new mineral from Maletoyvayam deposit, Kamchatka peninsula, Russia

    No full text
    Tolstykhite, ideally Au3S4Te6, is a new mineral from the Gaching ore occurrence of the Maletoyvayam deposit, Kamchatka peninsula, Russia. It occurs as individual anhedral grains up to 0.05 mm or as intergrowths with native Se, native Te and tripuhyite. Other associated minerals include calaverite, fischesserite, Cu-Te-rich 'fahlores' [stibiogoldfieldite, 'arsenogoldfieldite', tennantite-(Cu), tetrahedrite-(Zn)], galena, gold, maletoyvayamite, minerals of famatinite-luzonite series, pyrite, baryte, ilmenite, magnetite, quartz and V-bearing rutile. Tolstykhite is bluish-grey, opaque with metallic lustre and grey streak. It is brittle and has an uneven fracture. Cleavage is good on {010} and {001}. D-calc = 7.347 g/cm(3). In reflected light, tolstykhite is grey with a bluish shade. No bireflectance, pleochroism and internal reflections are observed. In crossed polars, it is weakly anisotropic with bluish to brownish rotation tints. The reflectance values for wavelengths recommended by the Commission on Ore Mineralogy of the International Mineralogical Association are (R-min/R-max, %): 32.6/34.3 (470 nm), 32.4/34.1 (546 nm), 32.6/34.5 (589 nm) and 33.0/35.0 (650 nm). The Raman spectrum of tolstykhite contains the main bands at 297, 203, 181, 151 and 127 cm(-1). The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 13 atoms per formula unit is (Au2.98Ag0.01)(sigma 2.99)(S3.59Se0.41)(sigma 4.00)Te-6.01. Tolstykhite is triclinic, space group P(sic)1, a = 8.977(5), b = 9.023(2), c = 9.342(6) angstrom, alpha = 94.03(3), beta = 110.03(3), gamma = 104.27(4)& DEG;, V = 679.0(3) angstrom(3) and Z = 2. The strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern [d, angstrom (I, %) (hkl)] are: 8.59 (18) (010); 2.90 (100) ; 1.89 (21) (13(sic)4). Tolstykhite is the S-analogue of maletoyvayamite, Au3Se4Te6. The structural identity between them is confirmed by powder XRD and Raman spectroscopy. The mineral honours Russian mineralogist Dr. Nadezhda Dmitrievna Tolstykh for her contributions to the mineralogy of gold and platinum-group elements and the study of ore deposits

    Maletoyvayamite, Au3Se4Te6, a new mineral from Maletoyvayam deposit, Kamchatka peninsula, Russia

    No full text
    Maletoyvayamite, Au3Se4Te6, is a new mineral discovered in a heavy-mineral concentrate from the Gaching occurrence of the Maletoyvayam deposit, Kamchatka, Russia (60°19′51.87′′N, 164°46′25.65′′E). It forms anhedral grains (10 to 50 μm in size) and is found in intergrowths with native gold (Au-Ag), Au tellurides (calaverite), unnamed phases (AuSe, Au2TeSe and Au oxide), native tellurium, sulfosalts (tennantite, tetrahedrite, goldfieldite and watanabeite) and supergene tripuhyite. Maletoyvayamite has a good cleavage on {010} and {001}. In plane-polarised light, maletoyvayamite is grey, has strong bireflectance (grey to bluish grey), and strong anisotropy; it exhibits no internal reflections. Reflectance values for maletoyvayamite in air (Rmin,Rmax in %) are: 38.9, 39.1 at 470 nm; 39.3, 39.5 at 546 nm; 39.3, 39.6 at 589 nm; and 39.4, 39.7 at 650 nm. Sixteen electron-microprobe analyses of maletoyvayamite gave an average composition: Au 34.46, Se 16.76, Te 47.23 and S 0.84, total 99.29 wt.%, corresponding to the formula Au2.90(Se3.52S0.44)Σ3.96Te6.14 based on 13 atoms; the average of eleven analyses on synthetic analogue is: Au 34.20, Se 19.68 and Te 45.42, total 99.30 wt.%, corresponding to Au2.90Se4.16Te5.94. The calculated density is 7.98 g/cm3. The mineral is triclinic, space group P1, with a = 8.901(2), b = 9.0451(14), c = 9.265(4) Å, α = 97.66(3), β = 106.70(2), γ = 101.399(14)°, V = 685.9(4) Å3 and Z = 2. The crystal structure of maletoyvayamite represents a unique structure type resembling a molecular structure. There are cube-like [Au6Se8Te12] clusters linked via van der Waals interactions. The structural identity of maletoyvayamite with the synthetic Au3Se4Te6 was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy

    High energy nuclear collisions

    No full text
    This presentation covers three broad topics: a brief introduction to the field of nucleus-nucleus collisions at relativistic energies; a discussion of several topics illustrating what`s been learned after more than a decade of fixed target experiments; and an indication of what the future may bring at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) under construction at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) planned at CERN

    Sharing the Architectural Knowledge of Quantitative Analysis

    No full text
    Sharing the architectural knowledge of architectural analysis among stakeholders proves to be troublesome. This causes problems in and with architectural analysis, which can have serious consequences for the quality of a system being developed, as this quality might be incompletely or wrongly assessed. This paper presents a domain model, which can be used as a common ground among analysts and architects to capture and explicitly share such knowledge. This enables a way to overcome some of the obstacles imposed by the multi-disciplinary context in which architectural analysis takes place. To apply the domain model in practice, we have created a tool implementing (part of) this domain model for capturing and using explicit architectural knowledge during analysis. We validate the tool and domain model in the context of an industrial case study.</p

    Sharing the Architectural Knowledge of Quantitative Analysis

    No full text
    Sharing the architectural knowledge of architectural analysis among stakeholders proves to be troublesome. This causes problems in and with architectural analysis, which can have serious consequences for the quality of a system being developed, as this quality might be incompletely or wrongly assessed. This paper presents a domain model, which can be used as a common ground among analysts and architects to capture and explicitly share such knowledge. This enables a way to overcome some of the obstacles imposed by the multi-disciplinary context in which architectural analysis takes place. To apply the domain model in practice, we have created a tool implementing (part of) this domain model for capturing and using explicit architectural knowledge during analysis. We validate the tool and domain model in the context of an industrial case study.
    corecore