1,721,094 research outputs found
Le conseguenze sul contratto di appalto dei vizi della procedura di gara nell'esperienza britannica, tra tutela della buona fede e attuazione della direttiva ricorsi
No full text
La full jurisdiction sulle sanzioni amministrative : continuità della funzione sanzionatoria v. separazione dei poteri
No full textThe essay aims at showing that the concept of full jurisdiction as an
instrument of ex post compensation of the shortcomings of the administrative
phase has found in the criminal field (i.e., in relation to administrative sanctions)
its most coherent expression. In particular, in this field, no administrative
merit is conceivable. By contrast, a full continuity between the powers exercised
respectively by the Administration and the Court needs to be recognized, with
the result that the Court should be vested with the power of an ex novo and
integro examination of all the grounds of the sanction. In other terms, between
separation of powers and the kelsenian idea of the logic identity among the
public functions of application of the law in the concrete cases, the latter should
prevail
La giurisdizione sulla selezione dei contraenti negli appalti sotto soglia di società-organismi di diritto pubblico
No full text
Un'analisi critica delle tutele precedimentali e giurisdizionali attraverso la potestà sanzionatoria delle Pubblica Amministrazione, alla luce dei principi dell'art. 6 della Convenzione Europea dei diritti dell'uomo. Il caso delle sanzioni per pratiche commerciali scorrette
No full textRINNOVAMENTO DEI COMITATI ETICI QUALI RIMEDI AI RITARDI DELLA PUBBLICA AMMINISTRAZIONE
No full textANALISI DEI RIMEDI AVVERSO L'INERZIA DELLA PA RISPETTO AL PROCESSO DI RINNOVAMENTO DEI COMITATI ETIC
Verso una nuova nozione di sanzione amministrativa in senso stretto: il contributo della Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo
No full textThe article examines the concept of sanction as elaborated by the European Court of human rights in order to investigate whether and how this diverges from the traditional national one. In particular, since 1971 (so called Engel criteria) not only the Court of Strasbourg has looked at the very nature of the offence, as opposed to its legal classification under national law, but also has clarified that the aims of prevention and reparation are consistent with a punitive purpose and that, in any case, any sanction with a significant degree of severity is due to be classified as criminal, even if with an exclusive preventive purpose and in absence of a punitive nature. As a result, as already noted by the Constitutional Court in 2010 and 2014, an evolution seems necessary for the sake of consistency with ECHR obligations: any administrative sanction, regardless its legal classification and primary purpose, for the only reason of being serious, in principle triggers the application of all the guarantees set forth by the ECHR in the field of criminal sanctions. This conclusion calls for a substantial reinforcement of the protection of the citizens in relation to various forms of administrative reactions to infringements of law
- …
