1,721,038 research outputs found

    Fire protection of films, fabrics and foams achieved through surface nano-structuring

    No full text
    Generally speaking, polymer combustion is fuelled by pyrolysis products escaping from its surface due to the heat transferred from the flame to the polymer surface and also radiated from the flame itself. The oxygen required for sustaining the flaming combustion diffuses in and from the surrounding air environment. Solid particles escape from the flame as smoke, which is accompanied by gaseous species, some of which can be toxic1, 2. The most significant polymer degradation reactions usually occur in the condensed phase, as they take place mainly within 1mm of the interphase between the flame and polymer, where the temperature raise is high enough. These reactions involve the polymer and any additives (in particular flame retardants) included in the formulations or applied as surface treatments. Experimental studies of this region have been published by Price and co-workers3 and by Marosi and coworkers4. The volatile species formed during combustion escape into the flame zone, whilst heavier species undergo further reactions and may eventually turn into char: this multi-lamellar carbonaceous structure acting as a thermal insulator protects the surrounded polymer. Therefore, the polymer surface can be considered the critical zone in the polymer combustion scenario because, being the interface between gas and condensed phase, it controls mass and heat transfers which are the processes responsible for flame fuelling. Indeed, the heat reaching the polymer surface is transmitted to the polymer bulk, from which volatile products of thermal degradation diffuse towards the surface and the gas phase, feeding the flame. Thus, the polymer surface plays a key role in polymer ignition and combustion because its chemical and physical characteristics affect the combustible volatiles flux towards the gas phase5. One of the most valuable fire retardant strategy pursued by bulk addition, proved to be the production or accumulation of a thermally stable surface layer able to act as a barrier to mass and/or heat exchange. Such a layer is built during the early stage of combustion as a consequence of polymer surface layer decomposition, in the presence of different kinds of fire retardants, including inorganic nanoparticles. However, the time required for build-up of the surface barrier is straightforwardly connected to the development of the fire in the early stage, consequently adversely affecting the effectiveness of the protective barrier. Results and discussion Here it is shown how the combination of advancements in polymer surface engineering and development of nanotechnologies, supplies an innovative environmentally friendly approach to fire retardance, based on providing polymer material products with a surface barrier, which either reradiates heat and/or slows down heat transmission and volatiles diffusion, without affecting the bulk properties. To this purpose, nanoparticle adsorption6, sol-gel and dual-cure processes7, 8, Layer by Layer assembly8, will be thoroughly described. By building the fire protection onto the original polymer surface, its effectiveness will be larger than in the case of protection created during combustion as usually happens with traditional bulk addition. Numerous examples of the above mentioned approaches applied to films, fabrics and foams will be presented. A glimpse on the use of biomacromolecule-based coatings will be proposed, as well9, 10. Conclusion Engineering the polymer surface is shown to provide a potential promising, environmentally-friendly and effective approach to polymer fire retardance, particularly when combined with nanostructurating technologies. Feasibility is demonstrated for textiles, films and foams while present efforts are directed towards composites with possible future extension to thick polymer materials. A major interest in this approach to surface polymer properties is the possibility to simultaneously confer multifunctional features that, besides fire retardance, may involve gas barrier, hydrophobicity, biocide activity, surface electrical conductivity, etc. Keywords: surface; coatings; Layer by Layer; sol-gel; combustion; Acknowledgments The European COST Action “Sustainable flame retardancy for textiles and related materials based on nanoparticles substituting conventional chemicals“, FLARETEX (MP1105) is gratefully acknowledged. References 1. J. Alongi, F. Carosio, A.R. Horrocks, G. Malucelli G, Update on Flame Retardant textiles: State of the art, Environmental Issues and Innovative Solutions, Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire (UK): Smithers RAPRA Publishing, 2013. 2. T.R. Hull, “Challenges in fire testing: reaction to fire tests and assessment of fire toxicity” in Advances in Fire Retardant Materials, edited by D. Price and A.R. Horrocks, Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing, 2008, pp. 255-290. 3. D. Price, F. Gao, G.J. Milnes, B. Eling, C.I. Lindsay, T.P. McGrail, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 64, 403-410 (1999). 4. G. Marosi, “Use of Organosilicone Composites as Flame Retardant Additives and Coatings for Polypropylene” in Fire Retardancy of Polymers: New Strategies and Mechanisms, edited by T.R. Hull and B.K. Kandola, Cambridge (UK): The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2009, pp. 49-58. 5. G. Malucelli, F. Carosio, J. Alongi, A. Fina, A., Frache, G. Camino, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 84, 1-20(2014). 6. J. Alongi, J. Tata, F. Carosio, G. Rosace, A. Frache, G. Camino, Polymers 7, 47-68(2015). 7. J. Alongi, F. Carosio, G. Malucelli, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 106, 138-149(2014). 8. J. Alongi, G. Malucelli, J. Mater. Chem. A 22, 21805-21809(2012). 9. G. Malucelli, F. Bosco, J. Alongi, F. Carosio, A. Di Blasio, C. Mollea, F. Cuttica, A Casale, RSC Adv. 4, 46024-46039(2014). 10. J. Alongi, F. Bosco, F. Carosio, A. Di Blasio, G. Malucelli, Mater. Today 17, 152-153(2014)

    Innovative Solutions To Enhance The Flame Retardancy Properties Of Natural And Synthetic Fabrics: Sol-Gel, Dual-Cure Processes And Layer By Layer Assembly

    No full text
    Nowadays, nanotechnology has a real and great potential in the textile industry, considering that conventional methods used to give different properties to fabric textiles often do not lead to permanent effects against wearing or laundering; in such scenario, the use of nanotechnology has been proved to give high durability for fabrics, improve the performance of fibres and create unprecedented functions [1]. The idea is to develop a new method based on the introduction of nanoparticles during the finishing step. Multilayered thin films made of nano size layers, with total thickness ranging from submicron to a few millimetres, can be prepared with a new technique called layer-by-layer (LbL). Now, the technique can be tailored to multimaterial assembly of several compounds without special chemical modifications, thus enabling the production of multilayer films. Furthermore, the technique is very easy and applicable to different field applications, such as textile sector. It consists in an alternate immersion or more simply in alternate spraying of the substrate with an oppositely charged polyelectrolyte solutions, thus creating a structure of positively and negatively charged layers piled up on the substrate surface. On the other hand, the nano-sized particles have been synthesized by sol-gel process, which involves inorganic precursors (organo-silicates, -titanates-aluminates, etc.) that undergo several reactions resulting in the formation of a three-dimensional molecular network. The sol-gel process is conducted at a low temperature which also enables the incorporation of organic compounds into the inorganic structure without decomposition. [1] J. Alongi, F. Carosio, R.A. Horrocks, G. Malucelli. Flame Retardant Textiles: State of the Art, Environmental Issues and Innovative Solutions, Rapra, In press

    Flame retardancy of flexible polyurethane foams: traditional approaches versus layer-bylayer assemblies

    No full text
    This chapter provides an overview of the flame retardancy of flexible polyurethane foams. In particular, the different chemical structures of polyurethanes are discussed, underlining the most relevant aspects related to thermal decomposition and combustion. A brief description of the toxicity of the combustion gases is provided. The traditional strategies developed in the past are presented and commented upon, highlighting the main results achieved. Subsequently, layer by layer is discussed as new emerging approach for conferring flame-retardant properties to open-cell polyurethane foam. The principles of this technique and its practical applications in flame retardancy are presented, providing a complete overview of the results achieved so far. Finally, there is a discussion on the future perspectives and unmatched needs, and a comparison between old and new approaches

    Layer by Layer Assembly: A Current Emerging Technique for Conferring Flame Retardancy

    No full text
    Layer by Layer (LbL) assembly consists in a step-by-step film build-up based on electrostatic interactions; it was introduced in 1991 for polyanion/polycation couples in order to obtain the so-called polyelectrolyte multilayers [1], and subsequently extended to inorganic nanoparticles [2] exploiting different interactions (e.g. covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, etc.) beside the electrostatic one. The LbL assembly through electrostatic interactions simply requires the alternate immersion of the substrate into an oppositely charged polyelectrolyte (usually water-based) solution (or dispersion). Thus, an assembly of positively and negatively charged layers piled up on the substrate surface is obtained, exploiting a total surface charge reversal after each immersion step. LbL was first described in 1966 [3] and has been rediscovered and optimized decades later [4, 5]. Very recently, such approach proved to be extremely advantageous when exploited for the flame retardancy of foams [6, 7], thin and thick films [8-10], fibres and fabrics [11-13]. More specifically, different types of architectures have been deposited on fabrics: namely, i) inorganic LbL coatings; ii) hybrid organic-inorganic or intumescent LbL coatings; and iii) char-former/enhancer LbL coatings. The main results collected in the literature will be described in the present work, with particular attention to the possible industrial exploitations. Indeed, although dipping has been widely investigated as deposition technique, surprising results have been obtained employing spray, as well. A deep overview of all these results will be presented. References 1. Decher G, Hong JD. Buildup of ultrathin multilayer films by a self-assembly process, 1 consecutive adsorption of anionic and cationic bipolar amphiphiles on charged surfaces. Makromol Chem, Macromol Symp 1991;46(1):321-327. 2. Tang Z, Kotov NA, Magonov S, Ozturk B. Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nature Mater 2003;2(6):413-418. 3. Decher G. In: Decher G, Schlenoff JB, editors. Multilayer thin films, sequential assembly of nanocomposite materials. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley VCH, 2003. p. 1. 4. Decher G, Schlenoff J, editors. Multilayer thin films, sequential assembly of nanocomposite materials. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley VCH, 2002. 5. Decher G. In: Decher G, Schlenoff JB, editors. Multilayer thin films, sequential assembly of nanocomposite materials. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley VCH, 2003. p. 1. 6. Laufer G, Kirklan C, Cain AA, Grunlan JC. Clay−chitosan nanobrick walls: completely renewable gas barrier and flame-retardant nanocoatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012;4(3):1643-1649. 7. Kim YS, Davis R, Cain AA, Grunlan JC. Development of layer-by-layer assembled carbon nanofiber-filled coatings to reduce polyurethane foam flammability. Polymer 2011;52(13):2847-2855. 8. Apaydin K, Laachachi A, Ball V, Jimenez M, Bourbigot S, Toniazzo, Ruch D. Polyallylamine–montmorillonite as super flame retardant coating assemblies by layer-by layer deposition on polyamide. Polym Degrad Stab 2013;98(2):627-634. 9. Laachachi A, Ball V, Apaydin K, Toniazzo V, Ruch D. Diffusion of polyphosphates into (poly(allylamine)-montmorillonite) multilayer films: flame retardant-intumescent films with improved oxygen barrier. Langmuir 2011;27(22):13879-13887. 10. Carosio F, Di Blasio A, Alongi J, Malucelli G. Layer by Layer nanoarchitectures for the surface protection of polycarbonate. Eur Polym J 2013;49(2):397-404. 11. Carosio F, Alongi J, Frache A, Malucelli G, Camino G. In: Morgan AB, Nelson GL, Wilkie CA, editor. Fire and polymers VI: new advances in flame retardant chemistry and science. Washington DC (USA): ACS Symposium Series 1118, 2012. Chapter 22. 12. Alongi J, Carosio F, Malucelli G. Current emerging techniques to impart flame retardancy to fabrics, Polymer Degradation and Stability, In press. 13. Alongi J, Carosio F, Horrocks AR, Malucelli G, editors. Update on Flame Retardant textiles: State of the art, Environmental Issues and Innovative Solutions. Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire (UK): Smithers RAPRA Publishing, 2013, ISBN: 978-1-90903-017-6

    Influence of layer by layer coatings containing octapropylammonium polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane and ammonium polyphosphate on the thermal stability and flammability of acrylic fabrics

    No full text
    The use of Layer by Layer (LbL) assembly for modifying the thermal stability and flammability of acrylicfabrics is proposed. Many efforts have been devoted to improve the flame retardancy of acrylic materialsthat vigorously burn, releasing dense smoke when exposed to a flame or a heat flux. In spite of this, noone has still attempted LbL as new nanotechnological solution up to now.Here, nanostructured LbL coatings based on ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and octapropyl ammo-nium polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) layer have been deposited on acrylic fabrics exploitingthe LbL assembly. More specifically, the coatings consisting of 4 or 6 bi-layers have been found to homo-geneously cover each fibre, creating an intimate interconnection between those adjacent. By this way, theacrylic fibres turned out to be efficiently protected the exposure to a 20 mm methane flame or 35 kW/m2heat flux. As a result, the melt dripping phenomenon has been completely suppressed and the com-bustion rate significantly reduced. The success of the proposed treatments has been ascribed to (i) thechar-former character of APP, (ii) the ceramic thermal insulating barrier created by POSS and (iii) theintimate contact between these two species, only occurring in a LbL assembly. These three aspects haveproven to be responsible of a significant modification in the thermal degradation mechanism of acrylicfibres that discussed as key role in their combustion

    Materials engineering for surface-confined flame retardancy

    No full text
    Polymer combustion is fuelled by pyrolysis products escaping from its surface due to the heat transferred from the flame to the polymer surface and also radiated from the flame itself. The oxygen required for sustaining the flaming combustion diffuses in and from the surrounding air [1, 2]. The most significant polymer degradation reactions usually occur in the condensed phase, as they take place mainly within 1mm of the interphase between the flame and polymer. These reactions involve the polymer and any additives (in particular flame retardants) included in the formulations or applied as surface treatments. The volatile species formed during combustion escape into the flame zone, whilst heavier species undergo further reactions and may eventually turn into char: this multi-lamellar carbonaceous structure acting as a thermal insulator protects the surrounded polymer. Therefore, the polymer surface can be considered the critical zone in the polymer combustion scenario because, being the interface between gas and condensed phase, it controls mass and heat transfers which are the processes responsible for flame fuelling. Indeed, the heat reaching the polymer surface is transmitted to the polymer bulk, from which volatile products of thermal degradation diffuse towards the surface and the gas phase, feeding the flame. Thus, the polymer surface plays a key role in polymer ignition and combustion [2]. Here, it is shown how the combination of advancements in polymer surface engineering and development of nanotechnologies supply an innovative environmentally friendly approach to fire retardance, based on providing polymer material products with a surface barrier, which either reradiates heat and/or slows down heat transmission and volatiles diffusion, without affecting the bulk properties. To this aim, Layer by Layer assembly has proven to be one of the most effective approaches and here it will be thoroughly described. Numerous examples applied to films, fabrics and foams will be presented and discussed. References 1. Alongi J, Carosio F, Horrocks AR, Malucelli G, Eds. Update on Flame Retardant textiles: State of the art, Environmental Issues and Innovative Solutions. Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire (UK): Smithers RAPRA Publishing, 2013. 2. Malucelli G, Carosio F, Alongi J, Fina A, Frache A, Camino G. Materials engineering for surface-confined flame retardancy. Materials Science & Engineering R Reports, 2014;84(October):1-20

    Few durable layers suppress cotton combustion due to the joint combination of layer by layer assembly and UV-curing

    No full text
    In the last five years, Layer by Layer (LbL) assembly has proven to be one of the most innovative solutions for conferring flame retardancy to fabrics. In spite of this, two main issues for the breakthrough of this approach at an industrial scale are still unsolved: namely, the use of few efficient layers characterized by washing durability. In this context, the present study shows that both these limitations can be overcome by coupling LbL with UV-curing processes in a joint action. In detail, 3 bi-layers (BL) consisting of an anionic UV-curable aliphatic acrylic polyurethane latex doped with a phosphorus-based flame retardant (namely, ammonium polyphosphate, APP) and chitosan have been initially deposited on cotton fabrics by dipping. Subsequently, this assembly has been exposed to UV radiation, thus resulting in a thin coating in which APP is in intimate contact with chitosan within a UV-cured network. This system has proven to be an efficient flame retardant system with exceptional durability features. Indeed, cotton self-extinguishment in horizontal flame spread tests has been achieved, even after washing in water at 65 °C for 1 h. Furthermore, this coating managed to withstand the attack of a 1 M solution of acetic acid or ammonia for 1 h, without losing its original structure. Indeed, no visible signs of coating hydrolysis or slight degradation phenomena have been observed by scanning electron microscopy

    Starch-Based Layer by Layer Assembly: Efficient and Sustainable Approach to Cotton Fire Protection

    No full text
    Starch has been employed via layer by layer assembly for building an efficient and sustainable biobased coatings capable of protecting cotton from fire. In order to obtain a better understanding of the coating to substrate relationship, the coating efficiency has been tested on cotton fabrics having different densities (i.e., 100, 200, and 400 g/m<sup>2</sup>). The adopted deposition conditions allow for the buildup of a homogeneous coating even at a low number of deposition steps. The physical and chemical mechanisms are described and related to the achieved results. The coating can greatly enhance the char forming ability of cellulose, nearly doubling the amount of thermally stable organic residue produced by cotton at high temperatures, as assessed by thermogravimetric analyses. After only 2 bilayers deposited, this biobased system is capable of self-extinguishing a flame during flammability tests with less than 5% in weight deposited on cotton. This high efficiency is kept even when the coating is deposited on cotton with the highest density. By cone calorimetry, all treated cottons showed significant reductions (up to 40%) of the total heat released during combustion, thus demonstrating the high efficiency achieved
    corecore