1,720,971 research outputs found

    Replication Data for: Racial Attitudes through A Partisan Lens

    No full text
    The conventional wisdom is that racial attitudes, by forming through early socialization processes, are causally prior to most things political, including whites’ party identifications. Yet, a broad literature demonstrates that partisanship can shape mass attitudes. I argue that this influence extends even to presumptively fundamental predispositions like racial attitudes. Applying cross-lagged models to panel data from the 1990s and 2000s, I demonstrate that whites align their racial attitudes with their party loyalties. Partisanship’s influence is more pronounced in the latter time period, results consistent with a view that changes in the political context can make partisanship a more likely causal force on other attitudes. Racial concerns not only provide a foundation for political conflict, but my results reveal that political processes can actually increase or decrease racial animus

    Taubman Center June 2020 Poll

    No full text
    Public release data for Brown University's Taubman Center for American Politics and Policy's June 2020 National Poll

    Replication Data for: Racial Attitudes through A Partisan Lens

    No full text
    The conventional wisdom is that racial attitudes, by forming through early socialization processes, are causally prior to most things political, including whites’ party identifications. Yet, a broad literature demonstrates that partisanship can shape mass attitudes. I argue that this influence extends even to presumptively fundamental predispositions like racial attitudes. Applying cross-lagged models to panel data from the 1990s and 2000s, I demonstrate that whites align their racial attitudes with their party loyalties. Partisanship’s influence is more pronounced in the latter time period, results consistent with a view that changes in the political context can make partisanship a more likely causal force on other attitudes. Racial concerns not only provide a foundation for political conflict, but my results reveal that political processes can actually increase or decrease racial animus

    Replication Data for: Generational Persistence in the Nature of White Racial Attitudes

    No full text
    The included data and code contain the materials necessary to replicate the results reported in Engelhardt "Generational Persistence in the Nature of White Racial Attitudes" article published in Public Opinion Quarterly

    Replication Data for: Grand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings

    No full text
    The included STATA do file and data sets replicate the analyses in Engelhardt and Utych "Grand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings

    Replication Data for: A Drop in the Ocean: How Priors Anchor Attitudes Toward the American Carceral State

    No full text
    That Black and White Americans disagree about the carceral state is well established; why this is the case is much less clear. Drawing on group hierarchy theory and the state’s role in perpetuating group subordination/domination, we theorize that differences in socialization and contact during emergent adulthood produce divergent priors for racial groups and gender subgroups within race. These different starting points shape how people integrate new information from recent contact into their belief systems. Using a survey of over 11,000 respondents, we find that instead of all groups integrating information the same way, recent direct contact contributes most to negative attitudes among groups whose contact with government agents is least negatively valanced. While interactions with the American carceral state divide opinions considerably among White Americans and women, adulthood contact for Black Americans, especially Black men, appears but “a drop in the ocean” of political life

    Replication Data for: Grand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings

    No full text
    The included STATA do file and data sets replicate the analyses in Engelhardt and Utych "Grand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings

    Taubman Center Fall 2019 Poll

    No full text
    Public release data for Brown University's Taubman Center for American Politics and Policy's Fall 2019 National Poll. https://watson.brown.edu/taubman/poll

    Replication Data for: Observational Equivalence in Explaining Attitude Change: Have White Racial Attitudes Genuinely Changed?

    No full text
    Understanding when and why White racial attitudes change is important for understanding their politics. Critically, surveys reveal Whites’ views of Black Americans are changing recently, an important result given conventional wisdom that these are stable orientations. I test four possible explanations for these shifting views: genuine attitude change, social desirability, partisan expressive responding, and changing racial attitude measure performance. Importantly, these explanations produce observationally equivalent survey toplines. To adjudicate between them I use the measurement equivalence framework and examine how Whites answer the racial resentment measure. Evidence from multi-group confirmatory factor analysis models supports genuine attitude change. Substantively, this suggests these changes may have important political implications. Methodologically, it suggests partisan expressive responding may have limits, indicates social desirability pressures have not changed how Whites answer at least one racial attitude measure, and offers additional validity evidence for the racial resentment measure

    Replication Data for: Knock out Blows or the Status Quo? Momentum in the 2016 Primaries

    No full text
    The included files and data replication the primary and supplementary analyses in Clinton, Engelhardt, and Trussler, "Knock out Blows or the Status Quo? Momentum in the 2016 Primaries
    corecore