9,358 research outputs found

    Bridge Engineering Section, April 2013

    No full text
    This archived document is maintained by the Oregon State Library as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Title from PDF caption (viewed on April 11, 2014)"Updated April 18, 2013."Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in Englis

    Bridge Engineering Section, April 2011

    No full text
    This archived document is maintained by the Oregon State Library as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Title from PDF caption (viewed on April 11, 2014)"Updated April 28, 2011."Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in Englis

    Bridge Engineering Section, March 2014

    No full text
    This archived document is maintained by the Oregon State Library as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Title from PDF caption (viewed on April 11, 2014)"Updated March 5, 2014."Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in Englis

    Elis Gangl Leonard standing on bridge

    No full text
    Photo of Leo Leonard\u27s 2nd wife Elisabeth Josefine Gangl Leonard standing on a bridge in an unidentified city in winter. Loose photograph originally on a damaged album page from Elisabeth (Elis) Josefine Gangl Photo Album "Krakau 1943" (Leo Leonard Photographs Box 3)

    Bridge Load Testing: State-of-The-Practice

    No full text
    Bridge load testing can answer a variety of questions about bridge behavior that cannot be answered otherwise. The current governing codes and guidelines for bridge load testing in the United States are the 1998 NCHRP Manual for Bridge Rating through Load Testing and Chapter 8 of the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation. Over the last two decades, the practice of load testing has evolved, and its intersections with other fields have expanded. The outcomes of load tests have been used to keep bridges open cost-effectively without unnecessarily restricting legal loads, when theoretical analyses cannot yield insights representative of in-service performance. Load testing data can be further used to develop field-verified finite-element models of tested bridges to understand these structures better. In addition, structural reliability concepts can be used to estimate the probability of failure based on the results of load tests, and noncontact measurement techniques capturing large surfaces of bridges allow for better monitoring of structural responses. Given these developments, a new Transportation Research Board (TRB) Circular, Primer on Bridge Load Testing, has been developed. This document contains new proposals for interpreting the results of diagnostic load tests, loading protocols, and the determination of bridge load ratings based on the results of proof load tests. In addition, included provisions provide an estimation of the resulting reliability index and the remaining service life of a bridge based on load testing results. The benefit of load testing is illustrated based on a cost-benefit analysis. The current state-of-The-practice has demonstrated that load testing is an effective means for answering many important questions regarding bridge behavior that are critical to decisions on bridge maintenance or replacement. Load testing has evolved over its history, and the newly developed TRB Circular reflects this evolution in a practical way. Accepted Author ManuscriptConcrete Structure

    Bridge 47 Target 4.7 Roadmap

    No full text
    Publication typology: Advocacy tool. Responsibility: Bridge 47. Author(s): Bridge 4.7 (with contributions of the participants of the Envision 4.7 Event, Helsinki, 6–7 November 2019). Language: English. Publication date: November 2019. Pages: 4. Acess: https://www.bridge47.org/node/24

    Elis Gangl Leonard standing on bridge

    No full text
    Photo of Leo Leonard\u27s 2nd wife Elisabeth Josefine Gangl Leonard. Loose photograph originally on a damaged album page from Elisabeth (Elis) Josefine Gangl Photo Album "Krakau 1943" (Leo Leonard Photographs Box 3)

    Design and implementation of a HLA inter-federation bridge

    No full text
    In this paper, we discuss the design and implementation of a HLA inter-federation bridge. Our works are mainly motivated by the scalability and security problems, but we also consider the use of bridges for interoperability purposes. We describe several bridge topologies, including linear and cyclic inter-federations. We discuss problems raised by bridge federates and the use of different RTI implementations. We detail several solutions, leading to the design and implementation of a bridge prototype. Then we present our current results, and on-going works concerning performance improvements, interoperability, and security purposes

    Precast Concrete Elements for Accelerated Bridge Construction Final Report, Volume 1-1. Laboratory Testing of Precast Substructure Components: Boone County Bridge: TR-561, January 2009

    No full text
    In July 2006, construction began on an accelerated bridge project in Boone County, Iowa that was composed of precast substructure elements and an innovative, precast deck panel system. The superstructure system consisted of full-depth deck panels that were prestressed in the transverse direction, and after installation on the prestressed concrete girders, post-tensioned in the longitudinal direction. Prior to construction, laboratory tests were completed on the precast abutment and pier cap elements. The substructure testing was to determine the punching shear strength of the elements. Post-tensioning testing and verification of the precast deck system was performed in the field. The forces in the tendons provided by the contractor were verified and losses due to the post-tensioning operation were measured. The stress (strain) distribution in the deck panels due to the post-tensioning was also measured and analyzed. The entire construction process for this bridge system was documented. Representatives from the Boone County Engineers Office, the prime contractor, precast fabricator, and researchers from Iowa State University provided feedback and suggestions for improving the constructability of this design

    Bridge inspection program manual

    No full text
    Title from PDF cover (viewed on January 18, 2023).Covers OCLC #1361810743 and OCLC #1030749370.This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Includes bibliographical references.Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in English
    corecore